Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1548549551553554726

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,780 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    It reminds me of this. This would be what he could look like without makeup and a hair piece.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1gf5nd1/trump_without_orange_spray_and_his_hairpiece/

    He's really old, it's just harder to see because of the cosmetics he uses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,868 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    How many countries have a head of state who has declared economic war on most of the countries it has cultural, familial, diplomatic, economic, trade and military pact ties with? How many countries have a head of state who has threatened to use his country's military in trans-border operations against its two neighbours, despite having trade deal pacts he arranged and signed his country up to as fair and equitable deals? How many heads of state have threatened to unlawfully use his nations military against the territory of a Trans-Atlantic country with whom his country has a decades old military pact from early in the last century? How many countries have a head of state who has brought into use a piece of legislation dated from 1798 called the Aliens War act, designed for use in a time of military war, against civilians during a time of peace in his country? How many countries have a head of state who has declared time and again his intent to ignore the constitution of his country after twice swearing an oath of loyalty to that constitution? How many counties have a head of state with an obligingly "did I say that" forgetful memory?.

    Folks, I give you the non-doddery right honourable Donald J Trump, current holder of the office of the US president.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,328 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Indeed, but keep in mind half the American population voted for Trump knowing that his manifesto was barking mad and hateful towards all minorities and non-Americans. They are clearly in a bad place at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,503 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Trump is not the problem and not to blame. America is the problem and the blame!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,348 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    But if boards.ie rules are to be applied consistently across the board, then we can’t possibly allege that there’s anything wrong with his mind 🤪



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,348 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Wouldn’t it be lovely all the same if this could be a Trump headline:


    NEWSMarine Le Pen is sentenced to four years in JAIL and BANNED from entering presidential elections as she is found guilty of embezzlement and accused of 'undermining democracy'

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14554463/marine-le-pen-banned-presidential-elections-guilty-embezzlement.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,801 ✭✭✭JJayoo


    So in next election could Vance run as president with Donald as vice president? With the cult understanding it's a loophole to keep Donald in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I don't know why this is the latest thought process.... He would be prevented to run as VP because he's ineligible to run as president. Under the 12 amendment: "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    No. 12th amendment to the constitution states:

    "But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States".

    So, he's had his two terms, therefore ineligible to be president, therefore…

    One of the conspiracy theory loons who seem to have his ear might have told him there's a way but there isn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,824 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    You're absolutely right, but we also have someone in office who would be willing to just ignore it. And if nobody is willing to enforce the rules (due to Trump's installation of loyalists), he might just get away with it. That's my concern.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,758 ✭✭✭weisses


    Incorrect ... about 20% of the population voted for him



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,032 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Don't think it's as simple as that.

    Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller, Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, all have possibly influenced MAGA as much as Trump has in real policy terms.

    They'll be looking for a continuance possibly via Don Jr or more likely in my view Ivanka/Jared.

    There's no Trump counterpoint by which ti remotely even challenge the ideology at this point. And it won't emerge unless they lose powerful in a significant way for at least a full Presidential term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭amandstu


    He would also have to actually win the election.

    If after 4 more years of this ©circus this actually seems likely, then that would be a conundrum in itself(unless there is real civil unrest in the meantime which would change a lot)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,810 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Meh, the thin work-around being mooted is that the 12th only refers to eligibility as defined by earlier amendments, the 12th cannot by definition have been intended to include eligibility as later re-defined by the 22nd amendment. And the 22nd only deals with being elected as president, absolutely no reference to VP.

    It's Lionel Hutz level nonsense, and should be laughed at by any US Supreme Court. But the current supreme court, who knows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Proposal: Rename thread on April 1st to

    Donald Trump the Magathread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Hodger


    In years to come when we all look back at the timeline of Biden years 2021 to 2025: we may very well come to remember those years as the years before Trump came along and caused the great economic crash. Let's face it all the various countries Trump is putting tariffs on. We dont know whether it will cause an economic crash on same level as 2008. But if it does the Biden years will be remembered as the good years .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    IMHO is not the tarrifs that has the markets spooked but

    1. The casual disregard for law and judges
    2. The targeting of FTC and Fed
    3. The talk about defaulting on US bonds
    4. The lack of certainty and knowing whom, what, how etc get targeted by tarrifs (and whether they will or not be revoked next day) which is paralysing companies and killing confidence


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,725 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    April 1st is going to be confusing in a time where everything looks like a story from The Onion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Yeah but he's making stocks cheaper for people to buy. Under Biden they were unaffordable or something like that. We'll be into the fourth year of the trumpslump and he'll be still blaming Biden or woke or DEI etc…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,472 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson


    Lads, being America, he's likely to be shot again, so he may not make it to 2028.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭Field east


    Law ,when considered by judges re interpreting it ,is what did the architects of the law mean at the time of their making. If it was - in this case- that an American citizen can only hold the position for two terms ONLY then the case is closed.
    but of course this can be turned on its head if the SC majority Have MAGA eyes only!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭Field east


    Do

    weisses, does that mean that the remaining 80 % were made up of - x

    -Those under the voting age

    -/those who voted Democrat

    -those eligible and registered to vote but chose not to

    -Those of voting age but were not registered



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    77,302,580 out of 346,811,000 is 22.2% of US population

    That’s totally coincidentally the same percentage I have zero sympathies for anymore



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,774 ✭✭✭threeball


    There's a hell of a lot of people in the 346m not eligible to vote, don't forget that. Most of these magazines heads have kids u18 who are as indoctrinated as they are. The 70m figure is just false optimism. There's at least another 20 or 30m who can't vote who would swing their direction too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,933 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,425 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Trump is a self-avowed white-supremacist supporting serial sexual predator convicted of sexual assault and multiple accounts of fraud.

    I will agree though that vance is less charismatic than a self-avowed white-supremacist supporting serial sexual predator convicted of sexual assault and multiple accounts of fraud.

    But, they voted FOR a self-avowed white-supremacist supporting serial sexual predator convicted of sexual assault and multiple accounts of fraud so one cannot assume anything about their moral compass… such as it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,392 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    It may not be politically correct to say this but out of those 70 odd million there is a percentage that voted for Trump rather than see a woman president.

    America is not that progressive a country. If the democrats had put forward a strong male candidate like Obama I believe they would have won over a lot of the undecideds who eventually went with Trump.

    Harris, like Hilary Clinton, had no charisma. She was not strong delivering the democratic message and appeared to have fallen in to a presidential race only because they made Biden step down.

    A conversation should have been had with Biden a lot earlier by the democratic party leadership thanking him for his service but step aside a younger, energetic candidate for the next election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,824 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I said this to my wife as soon as I heard that Harris was selected. I said "well Trump has it in the bag then, because America won't vote for a woman".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,317 ✭✭✭blackcard


    On reciprocal tariffs. The EU puts 10% on US cars, the US puts 2.5% on EU cars. Does reciprocal tariffs mean the US is going to put 10% on EU cars?

    What tariffs does the EU have on US pharmaceutical products? 25% as that is what Trump is threatening?



Advertisement