Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

1316317319321322

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭mulbot


    Cracking nuclear codes, jesus fkn christ, now that's embarrassing



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,835 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Mod: don't post cryptic one liners as otherwise it will appear as trolling!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,407 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Simple answer is because Ukraine was turning west rather than east and putins sphere of corruption was being lessened which might mean harder decisions to make at home without a boogeyman to fight.

    I'd be interested if you can give your reasons and avoid the security logical fallacy that is Finland where russia moved military away after they joined NATO…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭mulbot


    Some parts, the west, the Eastern areas didn't, they wanted autonomy, pure and simple, that's where it started. This has all been covered before. Simple, Finland doesn't have the historical significance that Ukraine has, nor does it have the population of Ethnic Russians that the whole of Eastern Ukraine has.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The Ukrainians have shown exceptional bravery and resilience in defending themselves against a much bigger foe. However it's only natural that under such brutal conditions, and for so long, that some people flee the invasion or avoid being called up. They know they are going to trench warfare on the front-line. It's a tough war, their bravery isn't infinite.

    Keep in mind they have never had the option of peace. Only of defending themselves or occupation. Even after years and weariness of the war, public support for that defense remains high.

    People in Donbas expressed interest in some federal freedom from Kyiv, but only a minority ever expressed interest in being controlled from Moscow. They never had a choice. Fake elections were held and they were occupied by Putin's forces.

    Many of us were shocked at the annexation of Crimea and the proxy war in Eastern Ukraine, but people were scared of triggering Putin more, even Obama at the time stated he didn't want to further provoke Russia. With hindsight we can see what that appeasement achieved.

    Putin could end all this in second. He doesn't, this is his invasion, he's there to subjugate and conquer whatever he can grab of Ukraine. His propaganda is designed to shift blame away from him. As we can see from posts like yours, it works.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭mulbot


    You talking about propaganda is ironic, you just believe what you want. Ukraine had the option of peace, that's well documented at this stage. And you're statement about Crimea, completely wrong, Crimeans voted under their own constitution,it wasn't just "some interest",.. You'll find that even up to 2016, BBC news night had many documentaries focused on all this, focused on the Azov and extremely right wing groups and what they were doin g to the people of the Donbass,. Are you saying the BBC were spinning Russian propaganda too?.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,500 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Can you show what countries in the world has recognized the 2014 vote as having been done correctly and legitimately? It should be easy for you since we're all fallen for propaganda so you should easily be able to quote recognized international sources. As a counter point here's the UN resolution 68/262 on the same topic which ended up with:

    One hundred countries voted in favor of the resolution, with 11 against and 58 abstaining.

    The 11 that opposed the resolution were Armenia, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, North Korea, Nicaragua, Russia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe.

    No whataboutery on it; show your sources please that the vote was legit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,179 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Funny, isn't it, how "autonomy" for unionists in Northern Ireland is awful, but "autonomy" in eastern Ukraine is just great.

    Odd to say the least.

    BTW, just because one is ethnic Russian does not mean one wants to live under Putin's impoverished, criminal regime.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭jmreire




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Aside from the code cracking, they have passed no comment on the rest of my post?

    And here's a link from a former resident of Donbass, maybe you know him?

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1657421382794313731

    Also you might want to read Igor Girkin's account of how he started the war in Donbass on Putin's orders with his little green men, Russian who brought war to Donbas admits it has turned into “a dump”worse than Ukraine or Russia. He shelled both ethnic Russians and Ukrainians to start the so called "rebellion", which Putin used as an excuse to send the Russian military in to "rescue" ethnic Russians.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,407 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Fine, so historical significance is now more important than a long NATO border...

    Eastern Ukraine was not looking to join russia or have itself destroyed by russia, or have russians shoot down civilian planes over their territory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,100 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    What a tremendous idea, that'll really show them who the big dogs are…

    The Irish government should have no gripes with the US over anything that's happening in Ukraine as it's none of our business. Ireland's economy is very reliant on US multinationals so boycotting the US administration would be an extremely short sighted and dangerous thing to do for our country.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,344 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Of course it is our business if a prospective EU member state is undermined and invaded for engaging with the EU, sending huge numbers of refugees into the EU.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,058 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Amazing that ?? The same Trump who sided with Netanyahu now sides with Putin. Both aggressors who invade and kill many innocents and the Irish should say nothing? Good God !!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭mulbot


    Soviet Union, seriously,? Not Russia, what's your point?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭mulbot


    My wife's family are from the Don bass, living in Estonia, I think I'll take their accounts of things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The point is that the referendum was held after break up of the USSR, and those results are still valid. Anyone who didnt like the result has always been free to move to Russia. Putin deliberately stirred up trouble, by starting his so-called Separatist movement, after 14 years of Russians and Ukrainians living together.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Ukraine hasn't had the option of genuine peace. Previous to this Jan, Putin has never once offered a ceasefire or made an overture - it was all an act

    The Crimea referendum was a fake or sham referendum. It was held in weeks, under Russian occupation, with no proper oversight. Russian leaks showed that only 30% to 50% of people actually voted and the vote was relatively close. The options on the ballot paper were twisted. The "official results" showed nearly 97% of people in favour. Ukrainian channels were shut down, only Russian state media operated with spread a pro-Russian message

    Putin has also held similar "referendums" in occupied territory in Ukraine, all similar sham referendums used to "legitimise" the invasion for a domestic audience

    "Ukrainian Nazi's" - The Azov brigade had some far right links which were exposed and well known about in the media. The Kremlin seized on and exaggerated that to project the "Ukrainian Nazi" propaganda.

    (Also pretty rich considering e.g. Wagner whose captain, a skinhead, was literally covered in SS tattoo's, and also ignoring the Russian troops (and their commanders) who have been pictured with neo-Nazi tattoos and insignias)

    It's grim that these classic Putin talking points are still doing the rounds with some people at this stage. They are so well known there's a Boards bingo card for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I've lived in that part of the world for several years and been in Donbass too. I lost good friend in Donbass ,,went outside the shelter for a minute, and a sniper got him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 132 ✭✭Lucien_Sarti


    The point is that the referendum was held after break up of the USSR,

    Incorrect, it was held while the USSR still existed, on 1 Dec 1991.

    For context:

    In March 1991 a referendum was held in 9 of the 15 Soviet republics on whether or not to preserve the USSR; in Ukraine 71.5% voted to preserve the Union (as did 78% across all USSR voting republics). This referendum was subsequently ignored by the different groups of wreckers determined to terminate the USSR. We all know their names & motivations.

    The referendum you are referring to was held 9 months later in Dec 1991.

    Edit: got date wrong



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Indeed and the question asked in the March referendum was this:

    "Do you consider it necessary to preserve the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics as a renewed federation of equal sovereign republics, in which the rights and freedoms of individuals of any nationality will be fully guaranteed?"

    Ukrainians voted on this as they saw it as a step-stone to greater independence. 9 months later there was the full referendum on independence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,407 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Assuming this isn't made up, why are they no longer in the Donbas? (I'd expect a bit of detail about the reason for moving from or detail of who is remaining in the Donbas if you're going to use this to press a point, I can see if it matches my experience from people who lived there).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,990 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Why aren't they living in Russia if it's so effing great then?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭mulbot




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭mulbot


    They left when they could-and this was before McCain and Victoria Nuland made their appearances there, remember that, going around handing g out bread rolls from a bag to the people who produced the world's largest amount of grain. You see, it didn't start in 2014 either with the coup, that was just the real turning point,.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,100 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    So Russia invaded because Ukraine engaged with the EU?

    As for them being a prospective EU member, they were a long ways from ever achieving that in all fairness. Pre invasion there was very little appetite to bring them into the EU.

    Our governments job is first and foremost to look out for the interests of Irish citizens. Starting a pissing contest with the US is most certainly not in our interests right now.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,344 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Russian violations of the Budapest agreement started when Ukraine was considering signing a treaty with the EU. Nothing to do with NATO. That led to the Maidan revolution, the deposing of what had become a Russian stooge as Ukraine's leader. Russia could clearly see Ukraine moving out of its orbit… which led to the Russia invasions of Crimea, fomenting an insurgency in Ukraine border regions with its little green men.

    Amply documented previously on this thread.

    Further Russia has openly expressed revanchist claims on EU member states such as the Baltic states, and 2 member states threatened by Russia abandoned their previous neutral position.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,100 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Every US administration sides with Israel, this isn't a Trump thing. It's one of the more bizarre foreign policies they seem to follow regardless of whether it's a Republican or Democrat sitting in the White House.

    I just don't understand our governments insistence on going all in on Ukraine. We have nothing to gain and quite a lot to lose by starting a row with the US over it.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,058 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,100 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I'm well aware of the Maidan revolution and the 10 years that led up to it. With one side being extremely pro Russian and the other having deep links to US political figures. For me, the trade agreement was merely a pretext for Russia to go in and take Crimea and was the culmination of over a decade of brewing conflict between the 2 countries.

    Unfortunately for the everyday Ukrainian, the political figures on both sides don't really have their best interests at heart.

    With all that said, I still don't agree with getting on the wrong side of the US over it. It's global politics that has been going on in that region since Ukraine gained freedom from the old USSR. We gain nothing by it.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



Advertisement