Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1386387389391392394

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,583 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    also of note - after 5+ years of planning, the upgrade plan for Bray to Pearse is basically "who knows"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It's easy to blame successive governments, NIMBY residents, ABP, whoever.

    The only constant is Iarnrod Eireann. They are utterly incompetent and I would suggest the only way forward for any of these projects is to take infrastructure delivery out of their hands and keep them focused on service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭specialbyte


    They are not the only constant. The NTA and the Department of Transport exist. The existing structure has too many cooks in the kitchen right now. The NTA can be awful nitpicky about things but Irish Rail is also spending the NTAs money, that was given to it by the Department of Transport, which got it's money from the Department of Finance. Lots of checks all along the way to make sure "we're not wasting money" that honestly might all add up to slow down progress so much that it costs us more money in construction inflation and opportunity cost.

    Irish Rail can't even go to consultation without NTA approval



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yes, a general disinterest in public transport projects by the political class is more to blame here than any other organisation. The only reason it's different this time around is that the political class has now signed up to binding reductions in emissions, which basically necessitate large scale public transport projects.

    If that pressure didn't exist, then all we'd be hearing about is how building another road will definitely solve our commuter crisis….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Actually the constant here is the NTA and Dept of Transport. Irishbrail have tried to close those crossings multiple times and have been denied permission to do so multiple times from the higher ups.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,200 ✭✭✭Economics101


    That is totally unfair to I.E. They may have their faults, but there have been many cases where they delivered projects on time and within budget. More recently with the huge number of bodies involved (DoF, FPE, NTA, DoT, ABP) its a wonder anything ever get done.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I think this is a pretty illogical take. I believe both Irish Rail and the NTA/DoT are very much on the same page here.

    I’ve no doubt IR has no interest in ending up in court battles for years either. That is why they took the smart move of breaking up DART+ into multiple separate projects, so that if one gets blocked, it doesn’t impact the entire project. And now they are taking it a step further wisely breaking the South Coastal line into even more sub projects.

    This is all about de-risking. We have already been there with trying to close level crossings on this line, we know it is going to be a massive battle. Better to focus on the rest of the DART+ project first. Get that built and delivered and then you can start that long fight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭gjim


    Yes, a general disinterest in public transport projects by the political class is more to blame here than any other organisation.

    The "political class" isn't some distinct thing - politicians align their positions with those of the general public.

    Blaming "politicians" without recognizing that they are representatives of the public at large is an easy way to divert blame.

    And clearly the public hate politicians who attempt to provide "leadership" - look at what happened the Greens. The vilification of E Ryan and the bile he has and continues to be subject to - despite being the first member of cabinet since the formation of the state to prioritize transport spending on PT and active travel over spending on roads - is clear proof of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60 ✭✭Taisteal Éireann


    If anything, Greystones would/should have been the most powerful place politically in the country during the last government term, with the Taoiseach and a Minister based in the town. Yet, no progress was made on the railway line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,583 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    well they (Irish Rail) were working on a plan, and 5 years later they're still working on a plan.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    The 20 minute service would only be practically possible (and is only planned) with a list of upgrades that IE have been trying to finalise for years now. It includes twin-tracking and relocating points south of Bray Station, as well as twin-tracking from south of the last Bray Head tunnel to (I think?) the first bridge in Greystones. From memory, it is supposed to add about 1-2km of twin-track between the two stations. The speed improvements from closing the unattended LC, might help a bit as well though I think in comparison will be marginal, I think the safety improvement is the main benifit. But I don't think it is was ever even considered an option to introduce 3tph to Greystones without some upgrades. All the upgrades will allow the 20 minute frequency to operate while allowing for reasonable delays.

    I know IE has talked about turning Greystones-Rosslare into a shuttle service, but I personally believe that plan has been put on hold for now. Especially being that the D+ South Stage 1 plans don't include a third platform at Greystones Station, which would be required for the shuttle service. I think it will happen eventually to allow for extra DART capacity, but I personally don't see it happening before the Waterford-Rosslare line is reopened and Rosslare/Wexford town services are redirected along the line to Heuston. IE is going to have to do everything they can to make the a shuttle service seem as inticing as possible, and even then they are still going to have to fight to get the changes implemented.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Has there been any update on the third D+ fleet order? There was talk about it being placed before the end of 2024, but it seems that never happened. I believe these are supposed to be the units that will replace the 8100s? If that is still the case I would hope the order is placed soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 orb123


    The preferred plan is to have the Rosslare passengers interchange to the hourly dart service at Wicklow when it is introduced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    its a wonder anything ever get done.

    Nothing ever gets done, that’s my point.

    Case in point, the Dart West. Planning was granted by ABP in July, finance is in place, the NTA is on board. Everyone except IE has done their part, but here we are six months later and nothing has happened. And by “nothing”, I mean quite literally zero.

    It was mentioned in the Dail a couple of weeks ago that because of the rejection of the depot at Maynooth and the judicial review of Ashtown, IE are examining the issues “before a decision on the next steps is made.” IE have no idea what to do and they’re delighted to have an excuse not to do anything.

    We are still at least ten years from electric trains in Dublin West despite all the necessary supports being in place.

    If you think IE are anything other than incompetent, then you don’t get the train very often.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,095 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Why would they be delighted to not do anything?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Fear of change, fear of failure?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    You do understand that IÉ cannot legally do any works until the JR is resolved right? And they're not doing nothing about the Depot, they've launched a separate depot project which is at site selection stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 297 ✭✭Thunder87


    I've never worked with IE so can't comment directly on them but at least based off the state of our railways I'd say there's a similar culture to many of our other public bodies, where the mentality when confronted with a new proposal is usually to dig in and come up with reasons why it can't be done, why it needs to be watered down or to be over-complicated and drawn out. Ambition and pragmatism just aren't in their dictionary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,411 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    If the characterisation in the last few posts was true, IÉ would not be the single largest customer for BEMU trains in Europe. BEMUs are not yet a tried and trusted technology for commuter rail, so an organisation that was in “fear of failure” would have scaled back its ambitions to avoid using them. And yet, those very same BEMUs are starting to arrive, and are being tested for deployment.

    DART+ is a single €2.2 billion programme of works. The planning was split for very good reasons, but the best value for the State will be realised if the total works are put out for tender as one package. That means tendering waits until it’s clear what can be built. Also, on a project this size, you have to give the potential tenderers notice as well; here’s the project notification for that: eTenders

    Note that this notice is only for the line and station works. It excludes DART+ Fleet, which is already in progress.

    It’s frustrating that things are slow, but this is the largest rail works project in the country’s history - expecting it to happen in a few months is unrealistic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,095 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    I’m certainly not a fan of Irish Rail, but we have game changing plans for the Greater Dublin Area.

    Take the proposal to close level crossings to decrease travel time for commuters. Who’s blocking those plans? Is it Irish Rail? Are politicians rowing in behind IR for the greater good?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Because they aren’t capable.

    Once all the external obstacles are gone, they have no more excuses left. That’s the last thing they want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    You do understand that IÉ cannot legally do any works until the JR is resolved right?

    I don’t understand that because it’s not true.

    Unless there’s a High Court order to stop the work (which I certainly haven’t heard about), there is absolutely no legal impediment to proceeding. It’s literally written in the legislation as such.

    Is there such an order? Because if not, it is only the sloth of IE that is holding things up.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I’m under the impression that they could proceed with tenders while the JR is in progress but it’s risky as the outcome of the JR could have serious effects on the project’s makeup.
    A private sector operator would weigh it up and go ahead, but IR are highly risk averse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,095 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    They’re not capable of doing what specifically?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Delivering large scale infrastructure projects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,200 ✭✭✭Economics101


    If Irish Rail are not capable of delivering large infrastructure projects, it's because they have not been given the funding and the permission go go ahead with such projects for many years. Its not like the case of the HSE whare the lack of capability is self-evident.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,411 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The last “large scale infrastructure project” of any kind that IÉ did was the Kildare Route project in 2011. That was “only” €22 million, but it was done on time, on budget.

    From then until 2019, not one cent was allocated to railway works by government. Nothing was delivered, but not from any lack of competence. (It’s a wonder that services on the network actually increased in that time)

    Before the KRP, the entire rail network was re-laid with the old jointed tracks replaced with modern, continuously-welded track through mid-1990s. You didn’t even notice it happening.

    Before that, you have to go back to DART, which also met its budget and schedule. At this point, though, we’re back over 40 years, so there’s no comparison that can be drawn with IÉ today.

    DART+ Fleet isn’t an infrastructure project per se, but from current progress, the first group will be ready to go into service as soon as Alstom delivers the final units.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Fair enough - but that explains why they can't do it, it doesn't change the reality on the ground that this is beyond them.

    I work in a job that involves long-term planning of complex projects too. If we hit a setback on one part of the project, we bust our asses to get everything else moving so that when the setback is resolved, it just slots into place and overall delay is minimised. IE are doing the exact opposite.

    You thanked a post above which says that IE cannot legally do anything until the judicial review is resolved. That is factually wrong. If people don't even know the basics of the legislation, perhaps they should refrain from commenting.

    If the High Court throws out the judicial review and the RO is unchanged, we'll have lost a year of the project. Even if the High Court sides with the objector, the project is still going ahead in a modified form. IE should be putting the boot down and tearing into every single piece of work that is not related to Ashtown or the flood plains of Maynooth.

    If IE down tools completely at every single snag, the thing will never get built. Unfortunately, that seems to be what is happening. Meanwhile the consultants' bills will keep piling up and the train service remains in the Victorian era.

    It is four and a half years since the first public consultation. If we see electric rail in Dublin West by 2035 I'll be (pleasantly) surprised.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Irish Rail have plenty of problems, but a lack of delivery isn't really one of them. They've been quietly working away on projects that have been very successful in terms of future proofing, but lack the kind of PR that something like the Luas has generated.

    They've been working on upgrading the signalling across the entire network, they've built and are currently commissioning the new national train control centre, they've dinner several other smaller projects that haven't become bogged down in litigation or a political quagmire.

    The fact is that they have been working away on projects that they've been allowed to work on. Up until recently, governments were basically only focused on roads, which had now mercifully changed.

    On dart+ progress, I'm pretty sure that they're continuing with tendering, despite the depot set back. This takes time, and while it prefer it to be done now, that's not realistic.

    As I said, Irish Rail definitely have problems, but I think some people are confusing Irish Rails issues with our legal and planning system issues.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Also, one of the quickest, most surefire ways of losing a judicial review is to continue to announce progress on that project.

    Until the judge makes a decision on the bridge at Ashtown, there'll be nothing announced in this, regardless of the work being done in the background.



Advertisement