Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

1314315317319320322

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,643 ✭✭✭yagan


    Trumps rehabilitation of Putin's stature is just more about Trump's desperate need to inflate his own importance.

    Is Trump going to threaten Ukraine if it doesn't surrender to Putin?

    Ukraine remaining in Kursk until a better offer arrives is going to really make Trump look irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,259 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Some commentators have picked up on the suggestion that for Putin this is mainly about normalising relations with the Trump regime and getting the sanctions lifted - the supposed 'peace process' for Ukraine is much more of a sideshow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    I can't help but think this Saudi "peace summit" is less like Munich 1938, and more like Moscow 1939.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Could well be that. Russia is facing economic collapse and the lifting of sanctions would be a high priority for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Until Putin is stopped dead in his tracks, he will continue making wars, thats a given. War for him is a peronal survival issue. He keeps his power because of his story that Russian is threatened by outside forces that only he can protect them from.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Where did you find the US is down 600 billion?? Since the beginning in Feb 2022, to the present, $175 Billion has been earmarked / approved for Ukraine. $65 billion has actually been drawn down, and 95% of that has gone directly to US munitions manufacturers, to replace the older stock sent to Ukraine with newer updated weapons to the US military stocks. Are you using the Trump version of economics?? You know, the version where he's demanding repayment of $500 billion for the $65 billion the US has spent on helping Ukraine against Russia?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭jmreire


    A view from a Russian who was actively engaged in all of Russi'a war's…

    https://x.com/i/status/1890156417992086001



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,643 ✭✭✭yagan


    Both Putin and Trump have legacy ambitions, which is why they chime with eachother.

    Vance knows now that Trump will want one of his own kids to be his successor. Will he flip again and go full anti trump?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,358 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    So Trump now believes Ukraine was responsible for Putin's invasion. He also believes that it would not have happened under his presidency.

    This is absolute nonsense.

    In 2014, Russia invaded the Crimea, and began a war in the Donbass which persisted under his presidency - so that bit is untrue. Until the actual invasion of Ukraine in Feb 2025, Russia denied its intention to invade, and fully expected to take Kiev in 3 days, and the invading army had its parade uniforms ready for the victory parade. There was no possibility for Ukraine to agree any peace agreement under those circumstances.

    There is no basis for a just peace for this way if USA is not prepared to support Ukraine 'come what may' which is the guaranty given to Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The problem is that with Trump spreading these lies, lots of Americans will believe him. And increase anti Ukraine sentiment in the US and the world. Not to mention what the Russian will do with it, propaganda wise.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Unbelieveable. Well almost, it's a gift to Putin's propaganda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,990 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    As the EU and our EEA and British allies prepare a package of support for Ukraine and finally start seriously talking about our own defence cababilities, independent of an unreliable partner in the US, what is Ireland's role in the future? Ireland prospers in a peaceful Europe. Is it fair that we spend 0.2% of our GDP on defence while more or less expecting our neighbours to pay 10 times that and more? I think "strict" Irish neutrality has run its course. I think we need to be a part of Europe's defence in a meaningful way like several other small European nations are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    We could make a start by defending ourselves at least. We no air capability and very inadequate naval and army units. These need to be brought up to a level where taking the country in a few hours wouldn't be easy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,990 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    That would be a solid start and as we have seen, the Russians and their Chinese accomplicies are no strangers to attacking undersea infrastructure. We are of course heavily dependent on such infrastructure so I hope we won't be hearing any "sure we're an island, they can't do anything to us" nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Sadly you will. Some wouldn't believe we could be invaded until they were marching down Irish streets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 365 ✭✭poop emoji


    All Trumps nonsense has done is increase popularity of Zelensky

    A comedian is now more popular than a clown

    Zelensky can call Trumps nonsense out by holding a snap election and either himself or Zalushny or Budanov would win by a landslide

    Putin of course would try to run his puppets but they can mysteriously fall out of a window or have a heart attack in a true Russian politician fashion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,990 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The Ukrainian constitution appears to prohibit elections in time of martial law. How would polling even take place in the occupied territories or safely along the frontline in the non-occupied territories? No. Ukraine has a robust democracy. Its parliament sits and the president does not rule by decree. It's much closer to a parliamentary democracy than the US system in fact. The president needs the support of parliament to govern. Ukraine, even in its current state of emergency is of course more free than Russia, where dissent of any kind is swiftly quashed, so the Ukrainians need take no cues from Moscow on freedom and democracy. The "there should be elections" is a Kremlin talking point that Trump is repeating, for as yet unknown reasons. It is not Trump's idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 365 ✭✭poop emoji


    Actually that a chunk of population are in occupied territories or Russia proper presents a very interesting opportunity

    If anyone with a passport who happens to not be in free Ukraine would have to travel to Kiev to vote with the passport stamped when entering country via designated port of entry and again when voting

    If they are male well they can’t leave again because war

    If they are female and want to leave the country well they have to relinquish their passport and citizenship if they want to go back to Russia or just prevent them from leaving since it show on passport they voted and now want to leave hence committing fraud

    The constitutional question could be held in a referendum at same time as the election

    That puts Putin in a bind, does he permit the Ukrainians who are in occupied territories or Russia itself to travel or not

    It starkly then forces those who might harbour Russian sympathies to chose a side



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,990 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    A Ukrainian election would be subject to the most massive Russian disimformation campaign yet. They would be in their absolute element. It's how they started dismantling our own European Union through Brexit, how they installed apuppet in the White House. It's how they are trying to destablise Europe's largest democracy this coming Sunday (an election I will vote in) through their massive online campaign in favour of the AfD, a party that is openly sympathetic to Moscow and which if elected to government, would probably see the entire EU collapse. This is what the Russians do. An election in the midst of a war, right next door to the enemy would be a huge error. The forces of democracy would quickly lose control of the narrative. Russian drones would be dropping leaflets not bombs. There would be immense pressure put on the Ukrainian electrorate by Moscow. It would not be a fair election. It would only be a free election and in practice there is no way the Ukrainians in the occupied territories can vote fairly or freely. They can't all travel and the ones that can't would be excluded from the democratic process. Russia won't let them travel anyway. That's a pipe dream really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 365 ✭✭poop emoji


    Yes it would

    But three years of war would have convinced even the most pro Russians in Ukraine just what a terrible idea the Russian way is

    Especially since it’s the Russian “speakers” in east who suffered the most and in my scenario would have to be permitted to travel to Kiev to vote

    BTW neither Trump nor Putin cares about “free and fair” elections, if Trump wants to hold free and fair elections well he can then send more equipment to liberate and defend Ukrainian voters

    He can also provide air defence and a squad of us marines to defend each polling station, to show how America is committed to freedom and democracy/s

    These guys don’t care about rules, so **** the rules and screw then over in their own game by making up rules

    Post edited by poop emoji on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,193 ✭✭✭lukin


    Some people are blaming Zelensky for the war because he didn't "make a deal" with Putin before the invasion. Trump seems to be one of those people.

    But what kind of deal would have convinced Putin to change his mind about the invasion? If Zelensky called him up three years ago and said "OK Vlad, I'll give you Donbas; will you leave us alone if I do?"

    Not that that would ever have happened of course. But even if it did happen, I don't think that would have been enough to placate Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Indeed.

    Each evening state TV shows in Russia talk of little else but invading more of Europe and dropping nuclear bombs.

    Putin is consumed with the past, and he sees Russian imperialism as the only way forward. Even if a peace deal is reached now, the number one stipulation from Russia is no NATO membership for Ukraine, this is so that Putin, at some future date, can re-invade the country.

    It's not just Ukraine. I would place a large amount of money on Putin absorbing Belarus in 5 years regardless of whatever outcome with Ukraine at the present.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,344 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Any 'deal' would have just been a sham to make it even easier for Russia to roll in down the line and take the entire country.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,500 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    I don't disagree on the principle but I'm not sure on the practicality of that idea. The problem is a simple one; vehicles & manpower. Russia has gone through their reserves outposts of vehicles, dregs (50s era equipment) and are currently scraping the bottle of the barrel (WW2 era equipment) and have reverted to donkeys for their supply lines due to lack of vehicles. For them to do a second push they would need to replenish decades worth of vehicles and equipment from factories that are today producing less than 10% of the current churn if lucky (and not like for like either; many of the vehicles now being produced have short cuts such cut protection for chemical warfare etc.) and have been proven to not be suitable for modern warfare.

    The second part to this is manpower; not only has Russia lost close to a million men in the war but on top of that another million in men fleeing to not be drafted. When your army is 1.5 million men that's quite a toll on potential manpower and replenishment but they have had a negative population growth for decades as well. Add to this their population is not exactly exploding with young once to grow up and replenish the army as they already emptied the outer regions for recruitment for this war (how many Moscowites do you think would sign up as that's we're they would need to find the replenishment)…

    Russia_Population_Pyramid.svg.png

    And the third is the economy; Russia is on a war economy with huge inflation to the point they have to lock up butter in the stores because it's being stolen. We're talking an economy that pumps 30%+ of their BNP into the military forces. The problem with that is simply that the population will not take that for another decade or two without the war going on (and that's assuming the economy somehow would survive it and could revert back to normalcy in some form).

    In short while I'm sure Putin would love to restart the war with Ukraine after a peace deal I'm not sure there would be enough vehicles, manpower or an economy to allow him with the time he's got left to live (he's already 72 after all).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,344 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    @Nody I was referring back to 2022 though, any deal then that Russia would have agreed to would have been one to put Ukraine at a disadvantage for the next round. And in that 'next round' Ukraine would not have been able to respond as effectively to Russian aggression - at one point Russia were demanding things like no Western weapons for Ukraine, limits on number of tanks and military forces etc

    I believe the same for the current 'negotiations' albeit Russia are in a poorer state to take advantage.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,500 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    And Russia can demand Zelensky's head on a plate and that EU pays them back for their losses as well; Ukraine is not going to stop getting aid to bulk up their forces from the EU side even if USA leaves them behind for 4 years(and that's not taking into account the local production already started or in the works). The point being; Russia wanting to restart the war in let's say 2030 after 5 years of "peace" would struggle with all three areas highlighted simply because their own production, manpower and economy can't suddenly 10x production because the war stopped and due to their losses to date AND their failure in hardware (both function & production) would mean they would not be in a place to restart things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    The big question now is will Trump stop US military items already paid for, to Ukraine? Will he stop new supplies even if they are willing to pay for them or the EU are?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,990 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    We can't discount the possibility that China will decide it is in its interest to support Russian rearmament. Europe needs to be armed to a point that Russia simply never tries to attack us, Ukraine included, ever again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭rock22


    I don't understand the logic of Zelenskiy's signing a minerals deal with the Trump while at the same time Trump is telling him that it is up to Europe to provide security guarantees. I have seen, I think on Channel 4 news, some front line soldiers criticising this deal, feeling that this is not what they fought for.

    So what is Zelenskiy and Ukraine getting from this deal with Trump? Am I missing something here?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,358 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    There are no details in the agreement. So no-one knows what the deal will entail.

    Some of the minerals that Trump wants access to are behind Russian lines, so what will that mean? No-one knows.



Advertisement