Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Civil servants told to spend more time in the office - Irish Times - Mod warning #526

  • 31-01-2025 11:14AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭


    What do people think of this?

    I work in a public service organisation where we are obliged to spend 50% of our time in the office - and it is rigidly monitored.

    There have been threats recently from our senior leadership that they will increase this obligation to 60%, unless 100% of staff are adhering to the 50% all the time.

    I do hope that Forsa continue with their strong stance. I mean, one day in the office a week is kind of ridiculous and they should never have started off with that. But they've made their bed now. And I am a strong advocate for hybrid working, with the balance being in favour of WFH as opposed to office time. Less commuting, less environmental effects, more opportunities for people to get on the housing ladder outside of Dublin, regeneration of rural areas, more diverse backgrounds of people working in large government departments etc etc.

    I hope the government see sense, but if they don't, I hope Forsa's members feel strongly enough about this to take this all the way to strike action.

    #526 Mod:

    I'm seeing a lot of low level trolling with generic comments and sweeping statements portrayed as facts; this is the only warning I'll give to up the quality of the discussion and use of actual linked to facts or cards will be handed out.

    Current thread banned users:

    itsacoolday

    Post edited by Nody on


«13456722

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,594 ✭✭✭Xander10


    Covid is gone.

    Time for civil servants to be back in office at least 4 days a week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭LastApacheInjun


    Covid isn't the issue. Nobody is staying we should stay at home to avoid catching covid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,251 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    They spend most of the day yapping to each other,catching up the day they come into the office they may as well be wfh full time but I would say some share spend the day scratching themselves full time.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,861 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    There have been threats recently from our senior leadership that they will increase this obligation to 60%, unless 100% of staff are adhering to the 50% all the time.

    that's clever - punish the staff who are compliant for the behaviour of the non-compliant? and if the non-compliant are not attending 50% of the time, what's that going to do to make them attend 60% of the time?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭LastApacheInjun


    I work with a lad who comes into the office full time, and does absolutely f*ck all during the day. Making people come in to the office doesn't at all mean that underperformers suddenly start doing their job. That's a very common misconception.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭LastApacheInjun


    I think it was more of an excuse to extend office hours, because specific people in our senior leadership don't believe in WFH at all. In fairness they're of a generation where they still think people should have clock cards to clock in and out and people should ask permission to leave the building during office hours. It's difficult to shift that mindset.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 929 ✭✭✭crinkley


    The least productive person on my team is the lad who goes to the office 5 days a week



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭doc22


    But in the office everyone has to put in their time in. No picking up children, shopping etc while on the clock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 JobTalkBoards


    I agree that this is a myth.

    I take long walks while in the office. I make sure to take multiple tea breaks. I chat with everyone. I make sure to use the bathroom for as long as possible.

    It's well established at this stage that remote work increases productivity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 JobTalkBoards


    Delighted to see Forsa fighting this. We need a standardised approach to WFH across the Civil Service. 2 days a week in the office is enough.

    It's also time to fully roll out Flexi time building from home. I've heard the Officer of the Comptroller and Auditor General even allows this and they are meant to be the goody two shoes of the Civil Service. If they think it's acceptable, it should be acceptable everywhere.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 929 ✭✭✭crinkley


    Odd that they don't appear to be doing anything about it happening in NSSO - this after replacing all completely fine laptops with desktops for people to work at home - another complete waste of public money



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭LastApacheInjun


    You can easily spend your time reading Boards.ie, chatting or making tea while in the office. Being in the office usually means there are way more opportunities to slack off.

    If your team member is not hitting their targets for the week, you need to have that difficult conversation with them, whether they are in the office or not. If your team member is consistently unavailable at their desk when you need them, you need to have that difficult conversation with them, whether they are in the office or not. If you think someone is taking advantage of a WFH protocol, and that they would get more work done in an office setting, then bring them in for more days during the week. Like, as a manager, basically do your job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 JobTalkBoards


    Were they informed of this happening in NSSO? They can only fight when they get told of an issue.

    This response from them has been quick and clear. I think they were working on it for a while and waiting for the moment to start the fight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭LastApacheInjun


    For our lower grades, you can build flexi time when you're working from home. So if its available to us, it should be available across the public/civil sector.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,049 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    WFH isn't covid dependant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,875 ✭✭✭brokenbad


    As a team leader myself, i have seen first hand a small minority of WFH people who abuse the system for their own benefits and this in turn creates mistrust in the system and disillusionment from those who do turn up to the office. From being non contactable for lengthy periods, these so called WFH individuals give the term a bad name and they have milked the system for almost 5 years now. Had numerous difficult conversations with a handful of direct reports about this. Being asked to go into "work" at least 50% of the time is not unreasonable - Pre Covid, WFH was a rare exception rather than the rule and that's the way it should be….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 929 ✭✭✭crinkley


    The union are aware of it, its not being implemented until September, you'd imagine there would be some level of coordination but considering they appear to roll over on whatever management want to introduce in NSSO I'm not suprised



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 571 ✭✭✭DayInTheBog


    You see that's the problem. Managers won't do their job and manage. People who don't do a thing , won't be any different at home or work if not managed correctly.

    I'm in the office full time and it doesn't bother me. Worked at home for 2 years full time and loved it. I'm as productive at home as in work



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭LastApacheInjun


    In our place, you are told that if you abuse the system, there'll be one conversation with you in order to give you the chance to amend your hand, and the next step is to require you to attend the office full time. Our union is aware of this and approves of it. It's happened on a handful of occasions (in light of the fact we have close to 2000 employees). Why don't you do that? It increases trust in the system for everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 JobTalkBoards


    Being asked to go into "work" at least 50% of the time is not unreasonable

    I disagree. As do most Civil Servants.

    Pre Covid, WFH was a rare exception rather than the rule and that's the way it should be….

    Before 1993 being gay was illegal. We don't stifle progress because of the way things used to be.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,214 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    Flexitime prior to Covid was widely abused.

    I spent years visiting 100's of PS building and the abuse was frightening.

    example of one is a customer facing role: staring at 930 to 16:30.

    Drop the kids off at school and get to office at 8:30.

    Clock-in and out for a smoke.

    Then wait in office until kids are ready from creche: 18:00

    Accumulated the FTHs and took 5 weeks FTHs leave, at start of summer.

    came back for a week

    took 4 weeks annual leave.

    I gather now with WFH, you can clock in on the app from the phone, from bed perhaps.

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,875 ✭✭✭brokenbad


    My own brother in law (and a Class A prick to boot!) is a principal officer in the civil service and is WFH 4 days a week - he is always boasting about how he gets his daily jog in, goes in and out of town to run errands during the day and does the school drops/ collections when he is WFH - it's guys like him that have created mistrust in the system 🤬



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,876 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    Because you will quickly find yourself up against a false complaint of bullying and all sorts of other lies to discredit you, cause you endless stress, and HR depts (espec public service) run a mile from disciplinary warnings - don't want to know

    A certain cohort of poor performers never take responsibility for their performance, and the system allows them get away with it - one manager taking a fair but hardline on performance (for the benefit of those who do work hard) will get destroyed if the HR system doesn't back it up. This ruins it for the decent, honest, trustworthy cohort unfortunately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,049 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    People who doss will do so at home and at the office.

    Presenteeism is not the same as productivity. I went into the office 2 days in Q4, and those were probably my least productive days. I spent half of the day in meetings (at my desk, on zoom), and the other half having people talk at me at my desk or at coffee or at lunch. Got almost nothing done. And a 4 hour round trip to boot.

    I was remote before covid and I'll remain the same. I simply will not take a non full remote job unless there are massive other benefits.

    Can't see why sending civil servants into office more does anything except justify the existence of too many middle managers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,191 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Why do you do this?

    Are you just lazy and don’t want to work?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 506 ✭✭✭NattyO


    I'm VERY dubious about claims that WFH increases productivity. We discourage it for most staff, mainly because most of the work we do is collaborative, and we find that we just don't get the same quality of work when staff are not in the same place. We have overseas teams, but the key word is teams - they work in the same place as each other, just not the same place as us.

    In terms of quantity of work, as opposed to quality, I find that the people who are diligent and hard working in the office, are diligent and hard working when working from home, and the reverse also applies - the people who are workshy, who miss days, and who rarely meet deadlines don't suddenly improve because they are at home - in fact, the good ones seem to stay good, but the bad ones get worse. I've no problem with people picking up kids from school, going for a walk, etc. when WFH, as long as they do these things at times that suits their work commitments. I've met employees in shops and cafes who are WFH during the work day, and have no issue at all as long as I know they're not missing a Teams call or whatever.

    On the civil service thing, I suspect, perhaps because I'm a filthy capitalist, that there is a far higher amount of work-dodging going on there than in the private sector. I know a few civil servants that WFH, and what I hear and see from them makes me think that WFH is treated more as a holiday by many than it is work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭LastApacheInjun


    Surely that is the case with every unproductive employee, whether they are at home or in the office? I agree that disciplining underperformers in the public service is an absolute pain in the a*se, but that was the same before covid. Our HR department are quite supportive of managers trying to fix underperforming employees.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭doc22


    If they do this in the office you can only imagine him WFH



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 JobTalkBoards


    Obviously I don't want to work, what sort of question is that? I work because they pay me.

    But the reason I do this is because I can be 5x more efficient at home. What's the point in me trying hard in the office for minimal returns and then being wrecked when I get home and not being able to enjoy life?

    When I work hard at home I get a lot done and can do what I want the second I clock out. By the time I get into the office I'm already annoyed, probably cold or wet, tired. My output is limited and I have to make my way home afterwards. It's crap.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 JobTalkBoards


    Him?

    I find it very easy to get stuff done at home. It's proven that WFH is more productive.



Advertisement