Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

DF Commission Report

1252628303137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Well, we are in the final days of the government, the Daíl is rushing through the bills the government wants passed (anyone rate the chances of the WTD getting done in the next few days? Yeah right), and after that we are into the election and horse trading as to what is the new government.

    Can’t really see any of those areas getting progressed until the new year at this point at best, or at worst very long fingered depending on the make up of the next government.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    It seems to me that a fair bit of that list is all dependent upon #2. Not much point in recruiting reservists or reviewing property if there is a lack of guidance as to what it's all supposed to be supporting, in case they end up recruiting the wrong type or selling the wrong property.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,449 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The problem there is you have the war between the 3 branches of the defence forces and than you have the war within the army itself of whos corps will be top dog and who gets to be over the army espcially with a lot of the older leadership getting ready to cash in there pensions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,272 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The Minister for Defence in the next government must absolutely stamp on that sort of nonsense carry on.

    The people elects the government. The government designs the defence forces. Its that simple.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭sparky42


    And every military that has more than one branch has the same internal feuding and fighting, whether it’s the U.K. forces every time there are “reviews” or the “revolt of the admirals” in the US post WW2, or even the internal battles that have been fought here over the years.


    im not sure how you would go about stopping it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,272 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I've always been a fan of the Ruairí Quinn approach myself.

    In the aftermath of Veronica Guerin's assassination, he and Nora Owen convened a meeting of the senior brass of the Departments of Finance of Justice, of which they were respectively in charge.

    They outlined to the attendant mandarins the concept of the Criminal Assets Bureau and how the government wanted suitable draft legislation and operational plans to bring before the Oireachtas and create the Bureau within the shortest possible timescale....

    Myself and Nora sat down with this group of about 14 different officials from different government departments, including members of the gardaí and a senior official in the Department of Justice.

    “Nora said a few words and then I said a few words. The assistant secretary said, ‘Well, thank you very much, minster. We are now going to start our deliberations, and if we come to the conclusion that new measures are necessary and we have to do other things...’

    And at that stage I just f**king exploded.

    “I said, ‘You haven’t heard what we said. We are going to f**king do this and you are going to make it happen. And, incidentally, if you can’t make it happen yourself, we’ll get someone who will because this is not going to happen again.’”

    And so it is my belief that the new government should, in short order, legislate for the CHoD and the force re-org, then sit down every general staff officer, flag, brigadier and GOC, and the Sec Gen, and tell them, "this is f**king well happening; its happening now, and if we hear of any blow back or dragging of feet emanating from YOUR command, your f**king future in contention for the expanded command structure of these Defence Forces will be in serious f**king jeopardy".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,449 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    3 weeks untill the end of this current government no major annoucments on purchases or plans has been inacted as put forward by the commission!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 324 ✭✭mupper2


    We'll be in WWIII and they'll dub it "The Incovenience"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,272 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Why would there be, when they'll be on the battle buses to Cobh or Galway or Athlone or Newbridge or wherever, to make an easy promise thats already funded?

    Come on man, don't be that naive about how election campaigns work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I’m not sure that really works if the promise goes “yes we have had 3 GE since we suggested we would buy a new ship, but honestly this time if we are elected we honestly will!”

    I mean now that we are finally into the campaign effectively it will be interesting to see what if anything is said about defence, but I’m firmly in the “pull the other one” about the idea that there is a glut of order announcements/promises just waiting for the campaign.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,272 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yes, but, you are deeply knowledgeable about the topic.

    Most of the voters, as we've bemoaned on here often, don't have a notion about defence issues, including investment. It would be easy enough to repackage stuff thats already in the public domain and announce it as new investment/opportunities for whatever local constituency.

    I mean look at the sports capital grants at the beginning of the week. These things are an entirely cynical exercise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,449 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The poor cllr must of missed the part about ATCP and the defence forces in the report.

    https://www.oceanfm.ie/2024/11/20/calls-for-more-resources-to-be-pumped-into-irish-defence-forces/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,449 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Should an an of year update be due from the DoD on what been done so far on the report and were they are?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,272 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Lol, you poor naive soul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,449 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    According to the mirror this morning the order for the mowag and the outrider replacements will be going in shortlty. Another direct order i presume like the H145. If this order is going in shortly that may suggest the redeisgn of the army is close.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Good to see if true, but not going to mean much if the personnel issues aren't fixed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,272 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You're right of course Sparky, but in a now crisis situation, it all must be addressed in parallel. The lead times for all this machinery gives a window for increased recruitment to take place in the meantime.

    And not just recruitment, but advancement into specialist roles from within the 3-star cohort, to begin filling all the shortages in technical positions that have filled the headlines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭sparky42


    hey I’m all for getting orders signed off on (wondering/hoping if the NS a might get some love since the AC and Army have/will), and certainly the lead times have to be taken into account. But the specialist roles have to be addressed with a hell of a lot more attention than we’ve seen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,449 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    In the Article it said the runners for the new cars are the Pirrana V, Boxer and the Griffon.

    @Manic Moran had mentioned he had spoken with a cav officer and they said they felt the likes of boxer was to big for here. So you could easily see the Griffon ticking the boxes with its size and protection level and it also has a sister in the jaguar which i am sure the cav would love.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭sparky42


    as I said elsewhere, buying a bulk order from the French would certainly be something to be considered, I mean hell we know they would give us good terms and it couldn’t hurt given some of the current views on our position.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,272 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The talk is about the armour contract being signed in about 2 months, for about half a billion over 4 years.

    I feel the Scorpion trio are too complex and unproven solution for our needs, and yes Boxer is one enormous SOB serving NATO frontline units.

    I think the order will most likely be to GDELCS, for 80 Piranha V's and 20 Eagle V's in 4x4 initially.

    There is already a deep working relationship with Mowag/GD and these types would mean a much smoother transition to the next gens. Also Eagle is available in 6×6 and has a SoF mothership variant coming, to further consolidate from platforms like ACMAT, the Fords etc.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    If I had to put a tenner down, it's on VBMR Griffon and Jaguar. Kindof the same way the Belgians have gone, for much the same reasons, trying to get a good NATO-compatible combat capability for reasonable money in an organisation which has no tracked vehicles. Of course, watch as cheap Bradleys come available and the DF snatch them up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,449 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Have you seen the Griffon and Jaguar in person yet?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭sparky42


    OH come on, you know we’d manage to screw up buying American if we tried…



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I have not, so I don't have much of an opinion on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    what you are saying makes sense. However, are the numbers you mention enough, are they replacement over a number of years rather than additional vehicles ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 324 ✭✭mupper2


    The solid RUMINT (take it as you will) is that the 400/100 figures are on the conservative low end of what's planned..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,088 ✭✭✭blindsider


    image.png

    Shephard Media - paywall,but 1 article p.m. is free if you register.

    Paragraph 3….I didn't see this published elsewhere…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Both FG and FF had that line or similar in their manifestos, but Shepard are really jumping the gun in what they posted. “As soon as possible” means nothing given we haven’t even touched the major issues and uplifts of LoA2, it’s empty words as they know they aren’t going to have to fund LoA3 in the lifetime of this government.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    IMHO to move to LOA3 is some way off. It seems to me there is evidence investment is now being well considered and is for capable equipment. Even if there was a quantum expenditure jump at this point there are capacity issues. The structural issue remains manpower. Navy, buy more vessels - crew. Aer Corps more aircraft technical support. Army, we have pulled out of missions etc. until conditions and retention are improved we are spending on hardware that may not have the personnel to operate or maintain them.

    so what we are left with is trying to increase spending in a steady manner while the staffing is being addressed. Is this even fixable?

    LOA 3 with jet aircraft is a quantum jump we are not even remotely ready for. A huge technical and physical infrastructure will be needed before we even land one jet. If LOA 2 is achieved in 5 years it will be the height of it. If we are lucky it might see us to LOA 2.5.



Advertisement