Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1382383385387388394

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Yes, it's not just that Connolly is 700 metres from the Spire and right beside the IFSC, docklands and Busarus that is best about the current routing, but also direct access to two third level educational institutions in Maynooth, and en-route direct access to the future Metro, direct access to the Luas at Broombridge, and direct access to the major inner suburb of Drumcondra, near the Mater hospital and St. Patricks DCU campus.

    Getting to Heuston 20 minutes faster would not be an improvement, to say the least.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,399 ✭✭✭Consonata


    You have essentially restated what I said, twice. What is the benefit of "greater connectivity of through running Southern Main Line trains to much of the city centre" if not because Heuston is not a place which most travellers are alighting from as their final destination! Dart Underground, already a pretty poor value add in 2024, exists primarily to facilitate travellers actually getting to where they want to be (GCD, IFSC, where the vast majority of work is in town)



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    If this change to Sligo trains is made, we could have a stop at one of the dart stations along the way to Heuston so the passengers can get a Dart via Glasnevin and ending in the city centre. The Sligo trains will still stop at Maynooth so they can alight there for the university. No easy way to get to the Green Luas though.

    Or thinking outside the box here, but what if the Sligo train diverted to Adamstown then into the Phoenix Park tunnel and still terminated at Connolly? This would keep the line west of Glasnevin to Maynooth free of Sligo trains. It would set a new precedent that intercity trains could use the Phoenix Park tunnel though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,201 ✭✭✭Economics101


    If the point of siverting Sligo trains into Heuston is to make journey times more competitive and avoid crawling between DART+ trains, then there should be just one stop: Maynooth for onward connections every few minutes. Having Sligo trains use a hugely expensive new connecting line, only to crawl back up through the PPT to a congested line into Connolly would be pure madness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    DU is about more than just connectivity, what economics101 didn't mention and what will likely be the biggest improvement DU will bring, capacity. DU will be a high capacity line adding a direct connection between the 2 highest capacity lines. DU should easily be capable of 12tph, likely even higher. But yes it will also allow a better connection to busy areas, the SSG and Pearse stops will likely be some of the busiest on the network after DU is complete, and Pearse might become the busiest as it currently isn't that far behind Connolly.

    One of the most immediate effects from DU will likley be the reduced congestion from Heuston, Connolly, and Spencer Dock terminating services. While I don't believe sending IC services through the tunnel is a good use of track capacity, allowing otherwise terminating DART or outer commuter services to become DU services will help free space for improved IC services at Heuston and Connolly

    Where DU is really going to shine however is with the four-tracked northern line. While the northern line is desperately in need of four tracking, when it eventually is four-tracked, there unfortunately wont be the capacity on the rest of the network to maximise the use of the upgraded northern line. While four-tracking will massively imporve the existing and planned DART services, it really wont allow for much more than there already is planned to be (9 DARTs, 2 Dundalk, and an Enterprise an hour). They can potentially run half hourly Enterprise services during peak times, maybe a 3rd Dundalk services, or possibly one or two express express commuters an hour, however there won't be the station or track capacity south of Connolly or at SD. DU will fix that and I think will be what will allow 12 DARTs an hour, as well as an expansions of Enterprise, Dundalk, and Express services.

    I think we already are seeing this somewhat with D+SW where it is only planned to have 11tph on the slow line, and I think that is because there isn't really anywhere a 12th service could be sent. However where the Kildare line is making use of most of the track capacity it is gaining, I don't the northern line will be able to add more than a few services without improvements elsewhere in the system like DU.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    With resignalling and removal of slower-accelerating diesel trains, it may be possible to reduce the length (in seconds) of a track slot, allowing more trains per hour.

    As an example: Munich's trunk S-Bahn tunnel operates at 20 tph, has stops every 900 metres on average, all using signalling from the 1980s. There's little reason why the Kildare "slow" line couldn't match that capacity once there's places for those trains to go. Putting inter-city and regional trains on their own tracks unlocks huge improvements in capacity. DART Underground is key to this.

    DART+ is, hopefully, only the first track expansion programme. Glasnevin-Connolly is effectively 4-tracked already, so north of Connolly needs doing next.

    The AISRR suggested a separate routing between Clongriffin and Drogheda for IC/regional trains as part of this plan. That would fix the congestion, and knock significant time off the Dublin-Belfast run.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I mean, do all services have to be cut? Surely you could retain some different direct connectivity whilst also adding some services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,377 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    I would also have to leave 70 minutes to get to Heuston.

    70 minutes on the road would take me to Junction 18 on the M7 (the one beyond Portlaoise).

    The train might still win for Tralee, but not for Limerick



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,713 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    What's bad for you may be good for others. You can't just argue that it won't work because it doesn't suit your circumstances.

    Dublin is a large city and once the new N2, S2 and O bus routes are fully implemented, Heuston will be far more connected than it has been before, including a direct connection to the Mater Hospital.

    Heuston is far better located for anyone going to points west of O'Connell Bridge, to the Zoo and to the new National Children's Hospital. It has a direct express bus link to/from the Airport.

    People are looking at this in the here and now, and not considering what the Maynooth Line will be like once DART+ is implemented in terms of frequency, which will see far more intense use with slow stopping DART services. A same platform connection at Maynooth will still deliver all the locations that the Sligo trains do at present, while the Sligo train could then continue to Heuston.

    The new line ideally would have to diverge east of Maynooth - it's far too great a traffic generator for points west along the Sligo line, and links into the new W6 bus route to Tallaght there too.

    The object has got to be to maximise separating DART and Intercity services as much as possible, as frankly that delivers far better use of the infrastructure and facilitates standard timetable patterns with improved Intercity journey times.

    Any connecting line hasn't even started planning yet, so it's a good way down the road post DART+ implementation.

    Also, sending Intercity trains trundling around via the PPT would be a waste of resources and won't avoid the congestion between Glasnevin and City Centre - it would also mean that you'd need more physical trains and more staff to deliver the same overall frequency of Intercity service due to the longer journey times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,377 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    I was making a point about long journey times in Dublin.

    I am not at all arguing against Dart+ expansion, although it is not very relevant to me. In particular, DART underground makes a lot of sense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I comletely agree, Connolly(through platforms)-GCD is supposed to support 15tph, 9 northern line, 3 Maynooth, and 3 HH DARTs. So I am hoping that will be able to show what the network is really capable of supporting in the future.

    However I think 12tph will support dublin for a while to come, and will allow IE to focus on other projects, both in and out of Dublin. Especially electrification for exactly the reasons you mention, I am hoping that it will shorten the length of various IC service and might allow higher frequency on key lines. Its also just something IE should be working on.

    I am really hoping that the new alignment, along side fournorth, and an EMU 200km/h capable fleet could make a 90min Enterprise possible. I might have misunderstood, but I believe the switch to MUs from locos alone saves 10-15 minutes and makes a sub 2h time possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The trip generators on the Maynooth line will be the local DART commuters, it won't be people from Sligo. The interconnecting line for Sligo trains to terminate at Heuston may not pass a value for money test because not enough people travel by train from Sligo. Terminating Sligo trains at Maynooth or Kilcock to allow for extra DARTs may be the alternative solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,201 ✭✭✭Economics101


    @Platform 9:"I am really hoping that the new alignment, along side fournorth, and an EMU 200km/h capable fleet could make a 90min Enterprise possible. I might have misunderstood, but I believe the switch to MUs from locos alone saves 10-15 minutes and makes a sub 2h time possible"

    You can 4-track to Malahide (which is the current aspiration), but fast Enterproses and much slower and frequent DART+ services do not mix, and anything remotely like 200kph would not kick in until clear of Drogheda. The "new" DD Enterprise used to be timed Dublin-Drogheda in about 28 minutes, now it's10 minutes slower. And north of Dundalk there are many stretches with curvature that limits things to well under 160 kph



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Yes but 200km/h sets would still be a good investment. Being stuck behind slower units south of Drogheda is far from ideal, but Drogheda-Dublin is less than a third of the total distance. Increasing the speed of the line from 145km/h(the current limit of the line and the DD stock) to 200km/h could still easily save 10 minutes between Belfast and Drogheda. With proper infrastructure upgrades NIR think it can save even more time bringing jounry times to closer to 90 minutes.

    The new DART units could also improve times for enterprise services even with the increase frequency, as the 29Ks are now limited to 110km/h while the 80K/90Ks will be capable of 145km/h. The additional platform at Clongriffin should also give them a better chance to pass DARTs. The increased frequency between Connolly and Drogheda might prevent Enterprise services from being any faster than they are now, but at the very least they shouldn't be any slower.

    Also for context, the 10-15 minute saving I was refering to I believe was just from MUs being able to accelerate faster than loco hauled units. And also keep in mind, whatever rolling stock is purchased now will be ours for the next 30-40 years, and I believe the AISRR is encouraging IE to plan for that. Even if on day one the new Enterprise units aren't capable of going 200km/h, it at least means IE can start clearing track for 200km/h and allow for gradual improvements during the fleets lifetime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,287 ✭✭✭mackerski


    I for one can handle (heh!) the idea that small parts of our national infrastructure can be in a colour other than green. But wait until somebody spots that the name "DART" isn't even in Irish…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,201 ✭✭✭Economics101


    In one way I'm glad that the handrails are yellow, whihc appears to be standard practice. However it shows how their lordships in the NTA control everything. Irish Rail are just an operating company and effectively the lapdogs of the NTA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭gjim


    Sounds harsh but if this was a private company and the deputy CEO was spending time getting personally involved in arguing for particular colours for handrails, it would be grounds for firing. I can't imagine any board of a private company putting up with someone at C-level in an organization with a multi-billion annual budget, micromanaging like this. There are FAR more important things for the 2nd most powerful person in the NTA to be doing, I would have thought?

    But then I see that not only Creegan but also the CEO, Anne Graham, are both on the board?

    This is surprising to me - is this structure common for such bodies in Ireland? There are very good reasons for having a board which is independent and separate to the executives running the organization. It's mandatory for listed companies worldwide and is supposed to provide oversight and provide strategic direction. How can a board provide meaningful oversight of the executives, if the executives are also members of the board?

    I checked TfL, for example, and as you'd expect they've an independent board.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,713 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    They are both retiring, so I wouldn’t worry too much about them.

    Creegan is well known for having very deep rooted views on various matters, and it tends to require ministerial intervention to force him to change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I have been reading through some of the ABP submissions for D+ North, and it seems most of them are objections about loosing direct Howth-CC services during peak times. Does anyone think this will actually lead to anything? Only being granted with conditions? maybe a JR? Or is this probably something that will be ignored for the greater good of the DART network?

    I'm genuinely curious to see what will happen, because I could see ABP siding with Howth residents. But at the same time if it doesn't happen as a part of D+, surely it would happen as a part of four-tracking.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    I think ABP will ignore any complaints, but I'd say it'll get JR'ed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    teanglann.ie says "dart" is a variant spelling of dairt, meaning "heifer", so there you go :)

    (okay, also "dart", but the bovine meaning is listed first, so I'm going to consider it definitive)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The quad-tracking will be far more disruptive and attract more opposition than D+N. If D+N runs into planning issues you can pretty much forget about quad-tracking, it certainly won't be a vehicle for pushing through elements of D+N which couldn't get approved in an otherwise uncontroversial RO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    It wouldn't surprise me. I am hoping that if it does, because its not infrastructure related they will at least let IE go ahead with construction. Any JR from Howth residents should only be about shuttle services and LCs, neither of which should delay construction for the rest of D+ North.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Its not as much that I am thinking it would be the next opportunity to push the shuttle service, but that with the increased frequency from D+ North it is already going to be difficult to maintain the direct services to Howth during peak times, And I think four-tracking would make it practically impossible. So even if it is contested and can't happen now, if four-tracking is approved it would have to happen then or else it would be impossible to have any decent frequency on the Northern line.

    However I don't disagree, if D+ North is already having trouble I am worried about what will happen with FourNorth. Especially between Raheny and Clongriffin as it looks like it will be the most difficult seciton. We should hopefully be finding out if/how IE will approach four-tracking in the next few months however.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    If there's issues getting the Howth shuttle getting through with Dart Plus they should put it through again as a separate project rather than putting it in with Four North.

    I'd be confident enough they would do that given they had the foresight to split Dart Plus up in to four projects, which is something Irish Rail should get a lot of credit for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,713 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I’m not sure that timetabling and potential service patterns falls part of a railway order that can be challenged in the courts?

    It only applies to the infrastructure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,201 ✭✭✭Economics101


    That would be a bit like putting a cap on passenger numbers. Planning over-reach gone mad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,294 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    I have done some campaigning for the Nenagh rail line in the past. I am curious as to where the most appropriate stop would be on the Cork Dublin mainline to access DART services once DART SW has been delivered. As others have pointed out Heuston is not the most useful place in Dublin for all passengers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭gjim


    Yeah, changes to scheduling and service patterns have nothing to do with any planning bodies - local or ABP. They happen all the time, minor and major. I can't appeal to ABP or start a JR if IE decide to replace the 8:50 direct Limerick to Dublin service with one that involves a change in Limerick Junction (makey uppy example). The RO will NOT be tied to any commitment to any service pattern, I would have thought.



Advertisement