Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

13653663683703711316

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,941 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Need to sign a lwb and a central midfielder in January imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,941 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    And if they did it would be entirely their fault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭Caustic


    Arsenal managed to rebuild going down the youth root, manager forcing out the overpaid unmotivated players, took them a few years to stabilize and then pushed on signing complete players.

    Casmaerio also seems to be out of the managers favour about now too you'd think hed be the one coming on for ugarte but seems to be getting used a bit less and less



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,923 ✭✭✭Nigzcurran


    Why do we always need to keep replacing players? Teams like Bournemouth are full of average players but seem to always outperform us. It looks like it's always been an attitude problem that is what needs to be replaced.Concentration is constantly an issue, last year it was the cut back on the edge of the box that kept costing us goals, this year it's set pieces. Different coaches but the same results. Bottom half at Christmas and a negative goal difference with the squad we have is shocking regardless of formation/management. Maybe we need a decent psychologist in there to sort their heads out.

    Time is contagious, everybody's getting old.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,598 ✭✭✭Ninthlife


    Yeah I get all that, but put the starting 11 on paper and not just todays but over the past few years and the ability/talent available vs the results is very poor. Once they cross the chalk line and the whistle blows its on the players and time and time again theyve let themselves, fans and club down with their performances



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,331 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    salah 20 mins in against spurs already has 5 shots. rasmus would kill for 5 shots in a full game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,759 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Taking off Ugarte and not Bruno was the turning point for me. Yeah he was booked but so what. Casemiro should have come on to shore up the midfield for Bruno, who was truly awful today.

    We are playing better stuff than under ETH but RA needs to get to grips with this team sharpish before results take things in a wrong direction for him. If he can't see that Bruno in a midfield 2 isn't the answer to any question in the PL then he may really struggle.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,605 ✭✭✭SteM


    What a ridiculous comparison.

    Was he getting 5 shots on goal 20 minutes into games 11 years ago when he was Højlunds age? Had he even joined Chelsea at that stage?



  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Salah doesn't play in the same position as Højlund. The closest would be Amad.

    Diaz playing Højlund's position interplaying with Salah and playing him through linking the play together up front. Also got on the end of a cross.

    That said Højlund played a nice ball through to Garnacho today. Few and far between generally whereas these lads interact multiple times a game. Individual vs team play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭Caustic


    As far as I'm aware Bruno only started one game as a cm he has been moved back a few times but I think that's a by product of us chasing the games and going more attacking. I don't think we will see it anyways long term. Within the system we are quite limited in what we can do to get more attacking players on the pitch maybe he could have put amad back as a wing back and left Bruno as as ten and brought on casmaerio.

    But if we aren't seeing a lot of cas you wonder how he is going in training, one would think this setup would suit him better especially as a bench player.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,331 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    its not a comparison, just a fact. was done to highlight how bad we are at creating chances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,605 ✭✭✭SteM


    Well when you make a 'fact' using a direct comparison they should at least be in the same ball park.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,215 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I am still struggling to see just how United are playing better stuff.

    Even apart from the mistakes, every game is marked by multiple crap performances from different players.

    I know the players are crap but the manager is there to improve performances, he is supposed to be a hotshot young coach so at some point soon we are going to have to start seeing some improvements.

    Picking a settled side would be a good start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,759 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    He's played quite a bit in that position since RA took over and he hasn't performed there yet in any game really. He's also one of the few players to be rotated, which is probably a testament to his fitness levels and the lack of options in the team, especially with Rashford bailing on the team and Mount just being a crock.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,166 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    I agree, however there has been no cohesion in how squads have been assembled, hence we have a group of players unable to perform at the most basic expected level every week.

    The players are culpable, but they wouldn't be there without the Glazers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,689 ✭✭✭✭FourFourRED




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    I don't buy this free season stuff for one minute. He should be given time to hopefully show progress and incremental improvement of course. But when you're leaking goals at the alarming rate we are, it has to be addressed urgently.

    In 4 months Tuchel turned Chelsea from mid table mediocrity into Champions of Europe and Top 4. Top managers are in the hot seat and paid huge salaries to produce results and while I'm really not expecting Top 4, it should be a lot better than this.

    Another miserable Xmas for United fans!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,941 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,375 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    IMG-20241222-WA0023.jpg

    😑😑😑😑



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,759 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Agree completely on the settled side part. It's hard for players to learn a new system and constantly chopping and changing the lineup from game to game. We are definitely seeing an improvement on ball possession and structure. We aren't conceding from chaos ball but individual errors and a truly awful set piece defense.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    Uhm. I think 4 years prior they won the league? And a lot can happen in 4 years. They were a mess when Tuchel arrived.

    Again, I’m not demanding a similar turnaround from RA. But let’s give the “free hit” theory a rest. There’s no way we can afford to spend 6 or 7 months tinkering and implementing a system.
    We’ll soon be looking over our shoulder at the bottom 3 with this kind of defending



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,993 ✭✭✭Bleating Lamb


    One thing that worries me about Amorim is the fact that virtually none of the top sides in Europe are playing with a back 3.

    This leaves it more difficult to identify top players that can be signed who are used to that system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,598 ✭✭✭Ninthlife


    Ok yes they are culpable for not putting structures in place that would enable smooth transitions when changing coaching staff.

    Sometimes people try over complicate football and we see that lately with false GKs or inverted No9s or whatever the latest fad is but 11 pro players who are considered to be elite enough to play for a club like United regardless of what coach wanted them for whatever system should be able to adapt. We see with United players some look like theyve never played a pro game before



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Eleusis




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,784 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    Screenshot_2024-12-22-19-18-05-138.jpg

    If you were to look at these stats not knowing the score you would think we won 3-0, very frustrating right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭The Big Easy


    They were in the Champions League and qualified from the group stages, almost impossible to win it otherwise and does suggest a baseline of ability.

    RA is in charge a little over a month ffs

    It takes a bit of time to implement improvement beyond the usual new manager "quick better run around look interested" bounce we tend to see.

    Nothing is a free hit in elite sport, but in all honesty results won't be fully scrutinized until the start of next season and then they rightly will be.

    Now of course in the new year if we are still getting pasted at home to mid table clubs people will be asking questions, it's just far too early for any of that nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,759 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Clear signs of an improved team structure and performances. It's fairly obvious from the eye test as well. We have a handful of duds at the moment who are really hurting the team one way or another, Shaw, Mount, Malacia, Rashford, Dalot. Unfortunately for RA, all those players are on the left side of the team, which is leaving the team extremely unbalanced. They seriously need to invest in a LWB/LB option this January or the season will writing off the season. I would say an extra midfielder is required as well.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,784 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,591 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    The worrying thing is that for some reason the expectation is that:

    Any team coming to old trafford could turn over this crew in their current guise.

    That the players themselves all need to be sold (in some quarters) which isn't at all feasible given the precarious situation years of underperformance and asset stripping by the Glazers has left the club in.

    How many rebuilds need to happen in the club?

    Some of the transfers and new contracts handed out in the past decade have been extremely poorly thought out and have led to this.

    The club have been cost cutting all over the shop, it's not a good sign. A big spending window isn't gonna happen. Amorim is gonna have to work with all of these players and make them earn their wages.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,227 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Re the cost cutting...

    I don't particularly like it, but I don't see it as a sign that we're not going to buy players either.

    When the Ratcliffe review ended, it was shown that we had something like 1100 staff, the next highest Premier league team was Arsenal with 600ish.

    That clearly demonstrates that there were far more employees than required. Whilst I don't like to see people made redundant, I can still be objective and recognise the reality that it probably should have been done long ago.

    The recent stories about cutting Christmas bonuses etc are a bit harder to stomach, but do we have anything to compare it with? Can anyone tell me what Liverpool, City, Chelsea, Arsenal etc pay their staff as a Christmas bonus?

    I didn't like to see it as it seemed like a pittance compared to the monumental playing staff salary bill but it's foolish to think that the club saving £70k a year on staff bonuses has anything to do with whether or not they're going to spend hundreds of millions a year on players.



Advertisement