[RESOLVED] Disputing warning received in Banking & Insurance & Pensions

Hello @28064212,

Sorry for the long delay but I really needed Jim's input as I needed the reason behind it was not a clear cut decision for me to rule it either way. As noted due to the holidays Jim has not been available which has made this take longer than normal. Jim has now come back to me and given me the context I was lacking previously to help clarify the reason behind it. Before I give my ruling allow me to expand on this context because I think it's important to clarify. The banking forum is a more serious tone forum because people will (even if it's clearly flagged as not being professional advise forum) make financial decisions that can have serious impact on their economy and future lives. This is why the standards of post expectations are higher than in let's say AH or other forums. This is not intended to be your local pub talk and the focus is to give relevant and accurate advise and hence have a higher standard of posting requirements accordingly.

Now; with that out there let's return to your post and the zero point warning you got for it. Your last sentence was perfectly fine; the problem lies with your first part; this is does not rise to the standard expected but it's not a personal attack, racist, etc. but simply not useful. Hence; zero point warning stating this is not the level we expect here but it's not at the level of being offensive; it's a warning in the same way a mod posts on thread stating to up the standard of posting and was given to another user on the same thread for the same reason.

Hence; with this context in mind I'm upholding it.

@Spear Admin review requested.