Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1379380382384385394

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,180 ✭✭✭1huge1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,714 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Just to correct a point here - the DART drivers did not get a pay rise for driving longer trains.

    There was a claim at the time, but it was rejected.

    This nonsense keeps getting repeated like an old wives' tale every so often.

    There are multi-year pay agreements in place nowadays across the CIÉ Group of companies which, to the best of my knowledge, incorporate the use of new technology.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    They're looking at 4 sites in total. Including the original proposal at maynooth. However the NTA are indicating that they prefer a site to the west of Kilcock at the moment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭tnegun


    There's plenty amount of land west of Kilcock along with motorway access for construction and then the potential for a park-and-ride type station like Dunboyne in future.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    That’d be great - I presume if so then DART services and double-tracking would go to Kilcock also.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    That would have to be the case if that option is chosen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,129 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    You're suggesting that they would build a Dart Depot beyond Kilcock station and not include dualling/electrification through Kilcock Station to reach it as part of that plan? Though it is true that a proposal to do basically exactly that (sans depot) is apparently already in the works, perhaps they will tag the depot into that design work and try and get it fast tracked.

    Fingers crossed that the backlog is clearing and we won't see it languishing for several extra years and severely delaying Dart+



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    Does the government have the power to jump the planning for the new depot/dual tracking to kilcock up the queue in ABP?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,129 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Kilkock hasn't gone to ABP yet, still in internal design AFAIK, I'm more speculating that Depot design and placement might be rolled into that work if a site beyond Kilcock is selected, whether that's actually the best move time wise I don't know.

    I don't know if there is a specific mechanism that the government has to ask ABP to prioritise a project, but whatever fast tracking needs to happen for the Depot should happen. Depending on the existing JRs for West it could end up being ready when the rest of West is, but it delays all the other routes as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭PlatformNine


    How many DART sets would be needed for the full capacity network? I am wondering how the timeline might look for increasing the fleet size with the depot delayed.

    It is easy enough to get a number for just 1 hour of peak capacity. 11 from HH, 11 from Bray/Greystones, 10 from Maynooth/M3, 9 from the Northern line, and I think the Howth shuttle would need 3 trains for 6tph. So that would be 44 trains and assuming during peak times the plan is for every train to be full length, that would be 88 sets for 1 hour of peak service. But if 88 would be needed for just 1 hour of service, how many would be needed to both maintain that during peak hours and have enough spare sets to cover sets in maintenance? Maybe 120 or 130 sets? I can't imagine it would need all 150 sets of the framework would it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Where do you get the figure of 10 from Maynooth/M3?

    At the moment it takes 44 minutes for a train to travel from Maynooth to Connolly. Assume four minutes to turn around, it will therefore take 96 minutes to return to Maynooth to be ready to start again (with another four minute turn around). Assuming 10 tph from Maynooth, that means it will take 16 sets travelling continuously to maintain a 10 tph from Maynooth.

    Am I missing something?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    750 carriages is 150 sets plus the 17 Japanese sets so 167 total

    Bray Malahide is 75 minutes, 10 minute layover, 85 minutes end to end to sustain service at 11tph would need 35 sets in motion, thats 70 total…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,714 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    4 mins turnaround is far too tight. I think that would be asking for trouble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭Crakepottle?




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It was for calculation purposes, if it is longer, you need 17 sets to run on the Maynooth line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭PlatformNine


    From the TSS diagrams IE has given, they are in various report, but I can't seem to find the best one from either the D+ website or my computer. I did find one in the technical report from PDF page 28(doc page 13) Volume 2 in the link below. It does make sense though, if the capacity is for 12tph, 1 has to be the sligo service and 1 has to be the longford service, the other 10 would be DARTs.

    https://www.dartplus.ie/en-ie/projects/dart-south-west/public-consultation-round-2/dart-south-west-useful-material-and-downloads

    However I do agree that a 4 minute turn around is too quick, it is probably closer to 10 minutes, eitherway somewhere around 16 trains/32 sets does sound right at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Ah okay so it adds up very quickly then. I would think that would be the majority of the sets given the length of the Malahide-Bray as well as the frequency, but I assume there would still be a good few sets needed for the other lines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    What about CACR?

    It seems based on the fact they intend to start it as a battery service that it will surely need a fair few sets.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    There's a question about how the Cork area will be electrified, first. The national network is likely to be 25 kV AC, with only the Dublin area at 1500 V DC because of DART.

    It's highly unlikely IÉ would do the same split system for cities outside Dublin, so DART stock will not be transferable to Cork.

    (That doesn't stop them buying 25 kV trainsets under the existing Alstom framework agreement .. the Xtrapolis product is also available as 25kV AC)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    Don't they intend on running it on battery only first before overhead lines are out in though?

    You'd have to assume their planning on using the new Alstom stock down there in the interim if that's the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,412 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Operating in Cork would mean running the BEMUs entirely on battery, which is not how they’re going to be deployed in Dublin. In Dublin, they spend over half of their time running on overhead lines, drawing power from overhead, but charging the battery when energy is recovered during braking (the regular EMUs feed this recovered energy back into the overhead lines). In effect, and indirectly, the battery gets charged up from the overhead supply at the southern end, and so only needs direct recharging at the northern terminus. In Cork, recharging would be needed at both ends, which affects turnaround times.

    That situation is probably fine, but the point I was making is that these BEMUs would probably have to be new sets, as it’s unlikely that Cork will be electrified as anything other than 25 kV AC - the "EMU" bit of the Dublin BEMUs wouldn’t be compatible, and would need conversion. It’s not a big deal on a new order to specify AC, but if you’re using cascaded stock from Dublin, it’ll mean a rework before they can be used with OHLE.

    What I think is most likely is that the existing BEMUs will stay in and around Dublin, and most will be converted back to EMU after 5 years once the network is electrified. Alternatively, some may be kept to operate outer extension services (Kildare, Wicklow, Enfield) at peak times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I don't think there are any concrete plans for electrification at the moment, however I think early in the planning process they considered only using BEMUs rather than traditional electrification. However I imagine that plan has been scrapped given the target frequency for the network. When it comes to the final CACR network I don't think we will see any new units in cork before the depot, so whether they even consider a BEMU as an interim solution might depend on whether the electrification takes significantly longer than the depot. Hopefully if they are still planning to submit the RO next year, we should see more concrete plans and timelines soon.

    I don't think so, both because of the reasons I already mentioned, but also I think the GDA is going to need all of the units they recieve. Additionally temporarily sending a handful of units all the way to cork would likely be a logistical nightmare. What we could see is as the 29Ks are freed from the GDA, some could be sent to cork however that assumes they can be cascaded before the depot and electrification is complete or well progressed. I do think they might order the same units for the CACR network, it would likely make commissioning the units much easier, but I just can't see them sending DART units to Cork.

    Also to answer your the question from your other post, the original CMATS plan for the CACR fleet was for 22x 41m 2-car sets. To meet the frequency required on the network, it does sound like they would be mostly if not only operating as single-set trains. So even though more recent statements from IE make it sound as though they are planning to order up to 30x 82m 5-car units (they referanced the depot as supporting 150 cars), I still think they will be ordering at least 22 sets. Though I think its possible they will order all 30 the depot can support to better support the network.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Just rethinking what I said about Kilcock if the depot was moved to west of there, this would also have implications for the proposed Sligo line to Hazelhatch new line which would send Sligo trains to Heuston.
    It would have to start west of Kilcock which is a much further distance than west of Maynooth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,906 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Not really, it could still branch out at the origional location.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭PlatformNine


    I think it depends on if they want to completely bypass DART services or they want to allow for a change at the last stop. I agree that it would be a problem if they want to completely bypass DART services, I think it could make the options a good bit more expensive. However if they want to allow for a DART interchange they would still call at the last DART stop (which if the depot is built west of Kilcock would hopefully be Kilcock). In which case they could start the link shortly before Maynooth, which if the plan to route it along the M4 would be perfect because of how close the line is to the M4 at that point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    If there was some forward planning a third track at Kilcock could provide interchange with DART and not impact DART frequency



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭Thunder87


    For anyone that follows RMTransit, I just noticed this pop up on my youtube feed! Only a short video but well researched to be fair



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Assuming the bonkers Sligo trains to Heuston plan goes ahead, there would absolutely be a need to keep the interchange at Maynooth as it is a major destination in its own right with two higher education institutions (St. Pats college and NUI Maynooth) being within walking distance of Maynooth train station. By contrast, Kilcock is more of an origin point and very rarely a destination AFAIK.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



Advertisement