Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dispute with mod

15556575961

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,605 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Wasn't there calls for Mrs Brown's Boys to be cancelled the other week? (not for any controversy, just in general like...)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,223 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I reported in the boards tech issues thread or whatever it’s called earlier about the top menu bar being mainly inaccessible - notifications bell and messages or indeed user icon top right inaccessible - happens in both safari and chrome - I updated IOS yesterday so might be the cause - anyway just posting here in case others experiencing similar - I’ve only seen one other post on the helpdesk thread about it- surprised not more posters experiencing this - all above on mobile btw not laptop



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    You have personal responsibility to keep your property safe.

    You have personal responsibility to keep yourself as safe as possible.

    There are bad people out there. It is common sense to take precautions and to protect yourself as best you can against their action.

    Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to take a long hard look at themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    And you think that personal responsibility means never opening e window? Or never going to a party? A victim is never to blame, for the actions of others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    Thats not even remotely what I said.

    Opening a window is very different than leaving a window open unattended for a long strech of time. I would do one but not the other. That is personal responsibility

    Going to a party is very different to going on a three day bender, taking copious amounts of drugs and alcohol and actively seeking to spend time, alone in the company of a man, who was also intoxicated and was locally known to be violent towards women. I would encourage my daughter to do one, not the other.

    The world isn't always a nice place. You should do whatever you find reasonable to avoid being a victim. The fault and blame always lies with the person committing the crime, but to ignore people putting themselves in harms way is infantalising.

    Mentioning it is not victim blaming.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,817 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    That’s a lot of “hoops” you’re jumping through, there. You say you’re not blaming the victim but then in the same breath you’re attributing blame to the victim.

    EmmetSpiceland: Oft imitated but never bettered.

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    The person who commits the crime is ultimately to blame for the crime.

    Every person has a duty of care to themselves and that is to put themselves in situations where there is the least possible danger of risk or harm. In this particular case, the woman actively put herself in danger by her actions. Does it mean she "deserved" it? Absolutely not. Does it mean that her actions and behaviour increased the liklihood of her coming to harm? Absolutely.

    Mentioning this is not victim blaming. It's pointing out the obvious.

    No hoops Emmet. Just common sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,648 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    This site really needs to bring back down voting. 👎️

    For those posts when someone posts something completely ridiculous / stupid / baiting / troll like - and you just can't be arsed getting into a row with them over it, but also want to express your opinion.

    If Vanilla has the capacity to allow thanks, it should have the capacity to allow this too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,810 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think this would lead to even more bad blood in the CA threads. I'd imagine any pro immigration posts would be downvoted to hell in the refugee thread or anything supporting Trump would downvoted mightily in the Trump thread. It wont be a good indicator of the quality of the post, just that the post is not popular in that particular thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    She put herself in danger by going to a party? Are all parties dangerous places in your world?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,648 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    I could see your point if usernames of downvotes were visible, like they currently are with thanks.

    In fact, maybe some thought should also be given to the visibility of the usernames of those who thank posts, also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    Now you don't believe that's what I said. Please don't frame it in such a way that I was even hinting at this.

    I was very specific and made very specific reference to decisions she took which put her in danger.

    Parties with 4 people which involve lying to your partner, no sleep, copious amounts of cocaine, copious amounts of alcohol, and the extreme liklihood of being alone in a penthouse with a violent celebrity who was locally rumoured to be violent towards women is quite a step from a party in my world. But yes, I would say willingly going to a party like this would be putting yourself in some danger?

    Would you suggest that the woman did not increase the risk of something bad happening to her?

    To suggest that even pointing that out is in ANY way similar to victim blaming is nonsense.

    I have stated multiple times that the person commiting the crime is ultimately at fault for the crime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Ah so just parties that you believe don't meet your moral code on parties?

    Parties with 4 people which involve lying to your partner, no sleep, copious amounts of cocaine, copious amounts of alcohol, and the extreme liklihood of being alone in a penthouse with a violent celebrity who was locally rumoured to be violent towards women is quite a step from a party in my world.

    Anyway, there is a thread for this topic, so I won't be replying here anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    There was no mention of a moral code?! My moral code? lol. Brilliant.

    There was an undoubtedly higher chance of something untowards happening to her by going to a party which had a few of those things I mentioned, never mind all of them combined.

    The reason I am discussing it here is because I am trying to see if acknowledging the fact that she put herself in a situation where she increased the likelihood of someone else may do something terrible to her, while also acknowledging the fact that she didn't deserve it and the fault lies with the agressor would still be classed as "victim blaming" by some on here. I'm of the view that it doesn't fall into that category

    I don't want to fall foul of a ban. Some people are very trigger happy on the report button and don't want to pick up a warning unintentionally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,648 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Well, for what my opinion is worth, I would put that in the category of victim blaming.

    But I'm not a mod, so you're good to go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    And therein is the problem. Despite EXPLICITLY saying that the person at fault was the person who commited the crime, acknowledgement that her behaviour didn't mean she deserved any of what happened, any criticism of the victim's behaviour or lack of care for her own safety is victim blaming to you and people who think like you.

    It's a very good way of silencing discussion.

    Can I ask, would a post which talked about the bad decisions she made be one you would report?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,648 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    In my view, criticising the victim's behaviour is tantamount to assigning blame to them for what happened. They should be free to go to any party they like without having to pause and consider the odds of being sexually assaulted or raped, first.

    As for reporting - in my case highly unlikely purely because I've learned to avoid getting involved in those discussions (on Boards) for the sake of my blood pressure.

    I was giving my view on whether or not the example you gave was victim blaming or not, and in my view, it was, despite how hard you tried to qualify it.

    As far as I'm concerned, victim blaming is trying to silence the victim. It's why so many crimes of this nature go unreported.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,694 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Indeed.

    There's certain posters already whining that posts they don't like are getting too many "Thanks". The victimhood complex would only increase if their own replies were downvoted to hell and back as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    In an ideal world. We don't live in an ideal world. There are bad people out there and they don't care about your "right" to live carefree.

    Not pausing to consider that your actions may be putting you at heightened risk of danger is immature.

    Nobody is excusing the actions of the criminal, but you owe it to yourself to mitigate the chances of harm as best you can.

    Saying a woman should be free to go to ANY party and not even pause to consider that they might be in danger is terrible advice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭uptherebels


    That's the literal definition of victim blaming.

    I'm surprised that you haven't asked what type of underwear she was wearing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    It's actually the complete opposite.

    I have literally said that the fault lies with the person commiting the crime and that they woman's behaviour did not mean she deservered anything bad to happen to her, but it increased the chances of something bad happening.

    It's bizarre that we can't even mention that she made some bad choices which increased the likelihood of her coming to harm. It's almost as if taking as much precautions to mitigate any harm which could come your way is a bad thing. It's really a terrible message to send to people.

    People should lie to their partners about their whereabouts, take illegal drugs, drink to excess, mingle with and invite the company of known violent sexual predators, go to a place where they will likely be alone with that predator and not expect that the chances of a bad person will abuse them increases significantly?

    I just don't see how any of what I said is in any way victim blaming. But predictably enough, a certain few have gone out of their way to choose to see it as such, so I will err on the side of caution and avoid another ban and leave you to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    People should lie to their partners about their whereabouts, take illegal drugs, drink to excess, mingle with and invite the company of known violent sexual predators, go to a place where they will likely be alone with that predator and not expect that the chances of a bad person will abuse them increases significantly?

    You don't see how this is victim blaming? 🤔



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 6,896 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    Though I understand the point you try to make, in my opinion, the 2 middle paragraphs can be perceived as victim blaming. The second last paragraph especially fit the widely accepted definition of victim blaming quite well.

    I reckon there is another way you can phrase your point of view?

    2025 gigs: Selofan, Alison Moyet, Wardruna, Gavin Friday, Orla Gartland, The Courettes, Nine Inch Nails, Rhiannon Giddens, New Purple Celebration, Nova Twins



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    No. I think that is a good example of how the chances of something bad happening to her were increased by the situation she was in.

    That in no way excuses what happened to her. The fault still lies with the person who assaulted her.

    How can I phrase my point of view any differently when any mention of her behaviour that is less than complimentary or even slightly negative is viewed as "victim blaming"?

    No person deserves to be assaulted. Every person has to accept that some choices they make, may increase the likelihood that something bad may happen to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,418 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    I agree that the criminal is 100% responsible for their actions. The problem is there is no convincing people that taking steps to reduce the chances of being a victim is anything other than victim blaming.

    You are essentially tagged with some sort of “ism” to say it’s not smart to do ABC while on XYZ. Same folks are the ones say that unless something is written into law, then it’s fiction.

    For example; in Ireland in 1989, it was impossible for a man to rape a woman if he was married to her at the time. So he could forcibly have sex with her and do so without her consent and it wasn’t rape. But in 1990, it became possible for a married man to rape his wife only because the law changed the definition. Same exact actions. Same people. One is rape and the other is not rape 🤔.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭uptherebels


    It's the opposite if you don't know what victim blaming is.

    What you are doing is literally victim blaming. People don't choose to see it that way. That's what it literally is.

    What do you think victim blaming is?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,144 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    "How can I phrase my point of view any differently when any mention of her behaviour that is less than complimentary or even slightly negative is viewed as "victim blaming"?"

    I'm not trying to shut you down by arguing here, as I don't think you are posting in bad faith, but I think you could phrase your point of view differently: as a more generalised question as to what extent do people bear personal responsibility, if any, if something happens to them.

    As the way you've expressed your point of view in that post - particularly in the second last paragraph - above isn't just less than complimentary or slightly negative - it reads as highly negative and personalised towards the person, who, at the end of the day, we all acknowledge to being the victim. I'm not saying that's your intention, I'm just saying that's how, to me, it reads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    Please don't import this echo chamber creating function from Reddit.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,648 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    THIS ^^^ is a perfect example of why I don't bother getting involved in these type of threads. 🙄

    You asked a question, I answered it, but instead of accepting my answer in the context it was given, now you're trying to engage in a debate about it with me - and if I may say so, being quite uncivil in your tone - because you didn't like my answer.

    For the record, I never mentioned anything about my "right to live carefree" or women going to parties - because men can be victims of sexual assault too.

    I'll leave it there. I suggest you do to, as this is not the thread for it.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement