Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1843844846848849943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Most of this is related to the pension time bomb. Only a small minority is adequately prepared for retirement, but the intent, at least in the past, was that everyone would own their home by the time they retired. The asset's value was used to pay for care like the Fair Deal scheme here and equity release schemes in the UK. Worth reminding people that housing appreciation was reported positively in past decades.

    Now people are completely f*cked. Can't buy a house because they're too expensive. Can't pay a pension because the rent is too high.

    I was on the r/Cork Reddit forum and the consensus is that house prices have risen 20k this year alone, and 50k since 2022. That's utter madness. I'm sure Dublin is worse!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Hmm, is it truly 500k people living with their parents?

    Regardless, I think that a sizable chunk of the population is happy enough with how things are. You are correct that rising prices are of little use if you live in your house, but they're also of no concern if you don't want to move. If one owns their house, has a decent job and a stable personal life, things are pretty good here. The chaos of the housing crisis isn't a problem if it doesn't affect you.

    That said, I think that above cohort is shrinking. This is because eventually, reality will reach us all no matter how removed we may wish to be. Probably the most salient symptom of the problem is adult children who are unable to move on in life though no real fault of their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    Well there’s an election coming up, if people think X is an issue no time like next few weeks to make themselves heard and then Vote accordingly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    The whole idea of retirement is a modern concoction. When pensions were introduced in Prussia in the 19th century, they were only given to people over 70, at a time when few people lived that long. Today, the idea that one can retire in their 60s and potentially live for another 20-30 years (or more) has taken root. It's unsustainable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭Rooks


    Young people are renowned for their voter turnout statistics.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭Rooks


    Which is why the retirement age is slowly creeping up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    It's sustainable with proper planning. Unfortunately very few people can make a plan and stick to it. I'm happy the state pension age is rising. If you want to retire early then plan for it and start saving!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Yes, but not slowly enough.

    I don't want to retire at all! The idea of having a day with nothing to fill is is horrifying ot me :(



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭Rooks




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    It is difficult to put away enough for a pension if you have high housing costs, which renters do. Renting is far more expensive than mortgage in this country on average.

    Also putting a chunk of money away towards pension when you don't own a house is a bit stupid too - a house is the best investment you can get. If it's at all possible to save for a house then do so, home ownership is far better for your financial future than pension contributions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Yep, as I said in a previous comment, the housing crisis is really exacerbating the pension time bomb



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    A simple solution. Extend the rent a room scheme to landlords who rent their properties out. Tenant saves the difference between current rent and rent a room rent. They are then saving for a deposit for a house/pension etc. Tenant is no worse off landlord is no worse off and tenant eventually has deposit to purchase house/invest in pension.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The housing crisis negatively impacts even those who own their own home though. Thats why even most home owners are against price rises in Ireland now.

    I live in South Dublin and I'm a home owner and I know local schools, hospitals and garda stations and local businesses are understaffed because they can't get junior staff, because of the housing crisis - thats a direct impact on my quality of life.

    I work for a tech MNC and our number one issue as a company is hiring, and retaining, staff in Dublin now because of the housing crisis - thats a direct impact on my career.

    I have friends and younger family members who can't buy because of the housing crisis - thats a direct impact on my social life, because I'd love them to be able to buy/live in the area we all grew up in, and because I care about them being happy/secure.

    And the general "best for Ireland" aspect applies too too - I'd really prefer it if we had 0, or as close to 0 as possible homeless Irish people. That would make me happier than knowing the number is constantly going up, and seeing the poor people on the streets.

    A 20% drop in my home price tomorrow would have absolutely zero negative impact on my day to life. But would have tangible positive impacts in all of the above areas.

    And on top of that a lot of older homeowners have the very real prospect of their kids in their 20s and 30s living at home with them indefinitely, which is a huge direct impact. As of 2022 it was 440,000 young Irish living with their parents (41% of people aged 18-34), up 13% since 2016, so heading into 2025 its likely at approx 500,000 yes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    That side of the housing crisis is fascinating (in a morbid way) but doesn't get anywhere near the attention it deserves, yet. Theres a whole generation (or multiple generations soon) of people where very sizable %s of the cohort are never going to own their own house now.

    Theres absolutely no way to pay rent while on a pension (and lots of people under 45 don't even have a private pension these days, and never will), so once they start retiring in 20 odd years whats going to happen?

    The only thing I can see happening is the state building very large numbers of public housing retirement communities, at an insane cost, to solve the problem. No government is going to let 20-40% of OAPs become homeless.

    So all this pumping up of house prices today is going to have even more costs for tax payers long term…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,926 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    We had that 25+ years ago you paid cash to he LL. The rent a room scheme only came into being when government decided that it would really bring LL into the tax system and home ownerwhowere renting a room would be caught. The first renter credit in the noughties started to catch all LL for tax. The RaR was in from the early noughties.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,926 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Renting is always more expensive than a mortgage. Most houses need revamps. Property tax is not allowed against tax. Electrical certificate needs to be carried out every five years. If there is a boiler it has to be serviced every year. I have a Stanley oil range in my kitchenI did a bit of maintenance last year the last time before that was 10+ years before. Every time Tenants move out a partial or complete repaint is necessary even on a modest house this is 2k.

    A mortgage is the small part of housing costs

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


     As of 2022 it was 440,000 young Irish living with their parents (41% of people aged 18-34), up 13% since 2016, so heading into 2025 its likely at approx 500,000 yes.

    It may well be 500k in total, but the excess over the norm is only about 10% of that figure.

    So that's more like 50k.

    A problem no doubt, but nothing like as bad as the picture you're painting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    We might be getting external help in cooling our house prices



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The exact number of those young adults who would be living away from home in a normal housing market is somewhat debateable at the upper end of the range, but we know its absolutely not 50k.

    The headline figure "accounts for 41% of people aged between 18 and 34 in Census 2022. In Census 2016, 37% of this cohort lived at home and it was 32% in Census 2011. Bearing in mind that was during the depths of the recession when a lot of young people were unemployed. This would suggest at least 150k of those adults would not be living at home given the choice.

    Alternatively, as of August 2023: "68 per cent of people aged between 25-29 in Ireland still live at home. This figure is nearly 26 per cent higher than the EU average of 42.1." Bearing in mind that includes plenty of European countries with their own housing crises right now. That figure would also suggest at least 150k, and likely a lot higher, of those adults would not be living at home given the choice.

    And rather more damning is the rate in comparable wealthy, Northern European countries but that have functional housing markets for young adults. Young adults living at home in that demographic is 2% in Denmark and 5% in Sweden or Finland. If we had similar housing markets it would likely be broadly similar here. Very very few normal adults over the age of 22 want to live with their parents, given the choice.

    That would mean about 20k, maybe 50k if we're being very generous, of that 500k are living at home by choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,926 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    What are the percentage's in Southern Europe or elsewhere

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭Rooks


    What are the percentages of youth unemployment in southern Europe?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    So If 20k are in this situation by choice, by your logic 480k people are currently forced to live with their parents due to a housing shortage.

    In 2006 the economy was booming, houses were plentiful, credit even more so, and rents were cheap. And the population was about 20% smaller.

    Do you think the number of adults living with parents was closer to 500k or 20k in 2006?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,806 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Tariffs will do little to ease the cost of constructing new builds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    I am suggesting by extending the Rent a Room scheme it allows renters save for a property of their own. Out of the three parties involved in renting a property who makes the most out of it?

    The State! They collect tax, people are housed and the landlord takes the risks be it fall in property prices, non payment of rent, maintenance costs etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭Rooks


    I didn't buy a house to continue living with strangers. 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    ?

    A landlord rents out his full property and the rent is paid the same fashion as the rent a room scheme. Keep rent below a certain fig you pay no tax. Charge above this fig you pay tax on all of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Renting is always more expensive than home ownership, mortgage included.

    You are always financially better off owning a home, not only in that you build equity but also you will have better cashflow such is the massive difference in cost of ownership Vs renting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,926 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,926 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Its a too technical solution, it creates as many issues as it solves. How do you mange, 2/3/4 bedroom houses one in bally go backwards and the other in D4, if a LL has 2 or 3 or multiple properties, actually a completely tax free market best. It's not going to happen it would be a world of small LL's.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,926 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You will always do better owning your own home. The problem is nobody will hand it to you on a plate. It takes effort and scarfice and you cannot spend 10 years acting the ballox. You cannot get to 30-35, and decide with your GF/partner well we need a home without an arse in your jeans. You could get away with that from 1995-2005 and from 2010-2015, but other than then you have to pay the piper

    Slava Ukrainii



Advertisement
Advertisement