Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1843844846848849915

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,623 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    My issue is with the targets. Each target is half what is should be, so each year the govt is falling further behind the actual number that should be delivered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    There are 14000 in emergency accommodation.

    And 440,000 young adults still living at home with parents.

    Not to mention the number who emigrate due to the housing crisis - just because we don't have 500k rough sleepers does not mean the demand or need for 200k+ houses/apartments does not exist.

    https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2024/0620/1446576-ireland-young-adults-living-at-home-parents-cso-statistics-housing/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭DataDude


    That’s just hindsight bias combined with an insane lack of realism.

    When the targets were set in year 2021 the annual net migration was 21k. Irelands population had grown by an average of 57k per year over the previous decade. 30k houses at 2.3 household size was a very sensible target, would have met new demand and slowly/sensible cleared any latent demand…however…6 months after the target was set Russia invaded Ukraine (how could they not foresee it!!) and we’ve had back to back year of 100k population growth (you can have a seperate argument over whether this was managed rightly or wrongly, not one I’m interested in getting involved in). Either way it was pretty much unprecedented and pretty unlikely to be sustained.

    Secondly context at the time matters. Ireland had come from a base building about 5,000 houses a year from 2009-2015. It was at about 20k by 2017. Aiming for over 65% uplift to 33k by 2024 was incredibly ambitious when you consider how long illiquid the supply of housing can be.

    Thirdly the number being built are literally some of the highest in the world. Doubling them again would just be stratospherically high targets.

    If someone in a position of responsibility for delivery published a report in 2021 saying we should aim for 60k home completions per year over the next 3 years like you’ve suggested, they should have been immediately fired. It would have been nonsensical at the time.

    Post edited by DataDude on


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,686 ✭✭✭hometruths


    From your RTE link:

    Census 2022 told us that over 440,000 young adults were living with their parents, up 13% from Census 2016. This accounts for 41% of people aged between 18 and 34 in Census 2022. In Census 2016, 37% of this cohort lived at home and it was 32% in Census 2011.

    I said the excess of adults living with their parents. There has always been a number of adults who have lived with parents for various reasons and always will be.

    In measuring any deficit or pent up demand the "maths of real world housing need" would only deal with the excess over the long term average.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The idea that doubling our current housing out to building 60k housing units a year in Ireland is a "stratospherically high target" is absolutely insane, and has no basis in reality.

    Number one, most importantly, because its very clearly needed given the housing crisis and our now consistent yearly population population growth.

    But number two also simply because we have a history of building per capita far, far more than 30k a year. Its eminently achievable.

    In 2023 that goal of 29k housing units for a population of 5.1mn compares to our actually completed historically:

    88k housing units completed in 2005 when we had a population of 4.1mn, or the per capita equivalent of approx 110k units in 2023

    27k housing units completed in 1975, when we had a population of 3.2mn, or the per capita equivalent of 45k housing units in 2023

    In 1975, when we were one of the poorest, most backward countries in Europe, riddled with planning corruption, with negative population growth due to sky high immigration, we could build the per capita equivalent of 150% of the houses we're building now at a time of incredible wealth, so much tax revenue the government can't spend it, and runaway population growth. Thats a complete and utter failure of governmental housing policy.

    And the housing crisis didn't just begin in 2023 - its been ongoing for a decade now. Nobody would have gotten fired for suggesting a target of 60k housing units a year in 2021, they would have been applauded for actually being realistic and trying to resolve the crisis.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,623 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    All of that is true, but cost of housing was increasing rapidly and supply was restricted all the way back to 2015. People were protesting rising homelessness when I moved to Dublin in 2016 and it was tough to find decent accommodation.

    ESRI reported that over 60 thousand people were on the housing list in 2021. This has been a problem for a decade, so the person setting targets in 2021 was already at least 5 years behind the curve, and that's only gotten worse since.

    You're right that it's not realistic to expect 60k completions, but an acknowledgement from the government that their housing targets are completely meaningless and they have completely failed to contain the issue for over a decade would be a start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    They didn't fail as such. Rather, they didn't try to contain the problem. Everything that the state has done for the last decade has exacerbated the housing crisis. From lockdowns, money printing, immigration and letting in investment funds, prices have gone up and up year on year. It would be credulous to believe that anyone is this incompetent.

    However let's not fool ourselves that this is just because of the actions of civil servants and politicians. I would say that a majority or people here want their house to be worth more, and I doubt that they care too much about the consequences.

    Post edited by RichardAnd on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭Blut2


    You're wrong about a majority of people in Ireland wanting continuous house price increases. 69% of the population would support a significant drop in the price of houses, including even 63% of home owners. Only 20% would oppose a drop in prices[1] .

    Most people in this country are either renters, or only own the property they live in. In either scenario they don't really benefit from the rapid increase in home prices.

    But they do experience the negative side effects - either directly in being priced out of the market to buy / having to get a larger mortgage, indirectly in the local community through a lack of teachers or gardai, professionally themselves when their company can't hire staff because of the housing market, or socially through their friends, relatives or children not being able to buy/rent.

    On top of that most Irish people are also fundamentally good people still, they don't like seeing 15,000 homeless people, 5000 homeless kids, 500,000 young people forced to live in their parents houses in their 30s etc - they want everyone to have the opportunity to buy their own home for a reasonable price if they work hard.

    Our current government though yes absolutely - they say otherwise in interviews, but the policies over the last decade now have all been very clearly aimed to do one thing - to increase house prices.

    There are too many instantly effective policies (like raising stamp duty significantly for foreign buyers as discussed here recently) they could implement overnight, which they haven't/won't, for no explainable reason.

    Its gone well beyond incompetence at this stage, its now very obvious deliberate.

    [1]https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/poll-sinn-feins-300000-house-price-gamble-pays-off/a382993578.html



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,686 ✭✭✭hometruths


    500,000 young people forced to live in their parents houses in their 30s etc

    This is total and absolute nonsense. Absurd stuff.

    See post above about your "maths of real world housing need".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,623 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Most of this is related to the pension time bomb. Only a small minority is adequately prepared for retirement, but the intent, at least in the past, was that everyone would own their home by the time they retired. The asset's value was used to pay for care like the Fair Deal scheme here and equity release schemes in the UK. Worth reminding people that housing appreciation was reported positively in past decades.

    Now people are completely f*cked. Can't buy a house because they're too expensive. Can't pay a pension because the rent is too high.

    I was on the r/Cork Reddit forum and the consensus is that house prices have risen 20k this year alone, and 50k since 2022. That's utter madness. I'm sure Dublin is worse!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Hmm, is it truly 500k people living with their parents?

    Regardless, I think that a sizable chunk of the population is happy enough with how things are. You are correct that rising prices are of little use if you live in your house, but they're also of no concern if you don't want to move. If one owns their house, has a decent job and a stable personal life, things are pretty good here. The chaos of the housing crisis isn't a problem if it doesn't affect you.

    That said, I think that above cohort is shrinking. This is because eventually, reality will reach us all no matter how removed we may wish to be. Probably the most salient symptom of the problem is adult children who are unable to move on in life though no real fault of their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭j62


    Well there’s an election coming up, if people think X is an issue no time like next few weeks to make themselves heard and then Vote accordingly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    The whole idea of retirement is a modern concoction. When pensions were introduced in Prussia in the 19th century, they were only given to people over 70, at a time when few people lived that long. Today, the idea that one can retire in their 60s and potentially live for another 20-30 years (or more) has taken root. It's unsustainable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    Young people are renowned for their voter turnout statistics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    Which is why the retirement age is slowly creeping up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,623 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    It's sustainable with proper planning. Unfortunately very few people can make a plan and stick to it. I'm happy the state pension age is rising. If you want to retire early then plan for it and start saving!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Yes, but not slowly enough.

    I don't want to retire at all! The idea of having a day with nothing to fill is is horrifying ot me :(



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    It is difficult to put away enough for a pension if you have high housing costs, which renters do. Renting is far more expensive than mortgage in this country on average.

    Also putting a chunk of money away towards pension when you don't own a house is a bit stupid too - a house is the best investment you can get. If it's at all possible to save for a house then do so, home ownership is far better for your financial future than pension contributions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,623 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Yep, as I said in a previous comment, the housing crisis is really exacerbating the pension time bomb



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,337 ✭✭✭The Student


    A simple solution. Extend the rent a room scheme to landlords who rent their properties out. Tenant saves the difference between current rent and rent a room rent. They are then saving for a deposit for a house/pension etc. Tenant is no worse off landlord is no worse off and tenant eventually has deposit to purchase house/invest in pension.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The housing crisis negatively impacts even those who own their own home though. Thats why even most home owners are against price rises in Ireland now.

    I live in South Dublin and I'm a home owner and I know local schools, hospitals and garda stations and local businesses are understaffed because they can't get junior staff, because of the housing crisis - thats a direct impact on my quality of life.

    I work for a tech MNC and our number one issue as a company is hiring, and retaining, staff in Dublin now because of the housing crisis - thats a direct impact on my career.

    I have friends and younger family members who can't buy because of the housing crisis - thats a direct impact on my social life, because I'd love them to be able to buy/live in the area we all grew up in, and because I care about them being happy/secure.

    And the general "best for Ireland" aspect applies too too - I'd really prefer it if we had 0, or as close to 0 as possible homeless Irish people. That would make me happier than knowing the number is constantly going up, and seeing the poor people on the streets.

    A 20% drop in my home price tomorrow would have absolutely zero negative impact on my day to life. But would have tangible positive impacts in all of the above areas.

    And on top of that a lot of older homeowners have the very real prospect of their kids in their 20s and 30s living at home with them indefinitely, which is a huge direct impact. As of 2022 it was 440,000 young Irish living with their parents (41% of people aged 18-34), up 13% since 2016, so heading into 2025 its likely at approx 500,000 yes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭Blut2


    That side of the housing crisis is fascinating (in a morbid way) but doesn't get anywhere near the attention it deserves, yet. Theres a whole generation (or multiple generations soon) of people where very sizable %s of the cohort are never going to own their own house now.

    Theres absolutely no way to pay rent while on a pension (and lots of people under 45 don't even have a private pension these days, and never will), so once they start retiring in 20 odd years whats going to happen?

    The only thing I can see happening is the state building very large numbers of public housing retirement communities, at an insane cost, to solve the problem. No government is going to let 20-40% of OAPs become homeless.

    So all this pumping up of house prices today is going to have even more costs for tax payers long term…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,359 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    We had that 25+ years ago you paid cash to he LL. The rent a room scheme only came into being when government decided that it would really bring LL into the tax system and home ownerwhowere renting a room would be caught. The first renter credit in the noughties started to catch all LL for tax. The RaR was in from the early noughties.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,359 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Renting is always more expensive than a mortgage. Most houses need revamps. Property tax is not allowed against tax. Electrical certificate needs to be carried out every five years. If there is a boiler it has to be serviced every year. I have a Stanley oil range in my kitchenI did a bit of maintenance last year the last time before that was 10+ years before. Every time Tenants move out a partial or complete repaint is necessary even on a modest house this is 2k.

    A mortgage is the small part of housing costs

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,686 ✭✭✭hometruths


     As of 2022 it was 440,000 young Irish living with their parents (41% of people aged 18-34), up 13% since 2016, so heading into 2025 its likely at approx 500,000 yes.

    It may well be 500k in total, but the excess over the norm is only about 10% of that figure.

    So that's more like 50k.

    A problem no doubt, but nothing like as bad as the picture you're painting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Villa05


    We might be getting external help in cooling our house prices



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,325 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The exact number of those young adults who would be living away from home in a normal housing market is somewhat debateable at the upper end of the range, but we know its absolutely not 50k.

    The headline figure "accounts for 41% of people aged between 18 and 34 in Census 2022. In Census 2016, 37% of this cohort lived at home and it was 32% in Census 2011. Bearing in mind that was during the depths of the recession when a lot of young people were unemployed. This would suggest at least 150k of those adults would not be living at home given the choice.

    Alternatively, as of August 2023: "68 per cent of people aged between 25-29 in Ireland still live at home. This figure is nearly 26 per cent higher than the EU average of 42.1." Bearing in mind that includes plenty of European countries with their own housing crises right now. That figure would also suggest at least 150k, and likely a lot higher, of those adults would not be living at home given the choice.

    And rather more damning is the rate in comparable wealthy, Northern European countries but that have functional housing markets for young adults. Young adults living at home in that demographic is 2% in Denmark and 5% in Sweden or Finland. If we had similar housing markets it would likely be broadly similar here. Very very few normal adults over the age of 22 want to live with their parents, given the choice.

    That would mean about 20k, maybe 50k if we're being very generous, of that 500k are living at home by choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,359 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    What are the percentage's in Southern Europe or elsewhere

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Rooks


    What are the percentages of youth unemployment in southern Europe?



Advertisement