Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

1373374376378379574

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,849 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    I'll say he shouldn't have said that. I'm looking for some balance in this election. You won't find it from the Irish media though. I have barely commented on this election, unlike so many others here. I did say before that they are both bad candidates. You can see why Trump as a former president is running again. Harris, is so bad though, a hugely unpopular vice president. She's acting like she wasn't part of the current administration, and had no part in any of its missteps.

    Did she not notice the decline in Biden's cognitive abilities? Or did she stay stum, until it was too late, knowing that she could be the only viable Democratic candidate, as the pledged donations could only be used by her or Biden?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's not the question I asked though.

    You've been going blue in the face about how Biden said this unforgivable thing.

    But If Trump says it, the most you could muster is "he shouldn't have said it?"

    And that's balance?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,849 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    "Blue in the face".

    Lay off the hyperbole please. Plus, I never said it was "unforgivable".

    Myself. I will criticise Americans in general. Their gun laws are an absolute disgrace. And we all know which side supports the Second Amendment more.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Still not answering the question though and still trying to deflect of on different topics because you don't want to just admit that it would be bad if Trump said that dem voters were scum.

    You "Centrists" keep doing these gymnastics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,849 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    "Still not answering the question though."

    Says you. I'm still waiting on that link of Trump calling Democrat voters garbage please? What question do you want answered?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lol. You're demanding people provide you proof of something yet you won't bother you look back 3 posts to find the question you avoided.

    On top of that you're avoiding the question to give your self room for the mental gymnastics to defend Trump.

    What would be the point of providing you with proof when you're just going to flip flop and go back on all your concern about the comments the second you have to hold Trump to the same standards.

    So again for clarity:

    If Trump called Democrat voters scum and garbage, would this be bad? Yes or no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I'll say he shouldn't have said that. I'm looking for some balance in this election. You won't find it from the Irish media though.

    This is as frequent a trope as the one conflated MAGA with 50% of the electorate.

    There is a clear difference between 'balance' and using the same scale to judge two things fairly

    image.png

    A certain cohort who adopt this argument are the type who for instance, thing you need to pit 1 climate scientist against 1 climate denier, and that's 'balance' even when science overwhelmingly demonstrates the reality of climate change. The western media does not give 'equal consideration' to the Russians, Iranians etc. either in conflicts, and the logic applied is no different than when concluding a fascist would make a horrible choice for a world leader in western democratic hegemony.

    Here in this election you have one candidate, who is by comparison to other, completely bereft of scandals, yet held to a double standard, and expected to be flawless or else she is considered an abject and total failure. The other is a documented womanizer, a convicted felon awaiting sentencing, a twice impeached seditionist, etc etc. who is held to no standard, and allowed to be lawless.

    The 'both sides' campaign, thinks that these two things are 'the same' — they are not. It is not 'imbalanced' or unobjective to note that the negatives of one of these candidates overwhelmingly outweighs the other. Ergo, the idea that the media is being 'unfair' by bringing up more of Trump's negatives, more often, because there are so many more of them, is not indicative of a lack or balance or objectivity. To suggest otherwise is as logically incongruent and fallacious as the scales shown in the above image. I don't know why anyone would expect journalism in particular, a profession that utterly values the freedom of speech and of the press, to show partiality, or impartiality for that matter, to a fascist whose policies rail against the very fabric of democracy, and the free press, and so much more. Suggesting the media is imbalanced because it disavows fascism and knows what it is when it sees it, is having a laugh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    It was already shared tonight… "garbage" and "scum" and called the US a "garbage can" which includes Puerto Rico.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,849 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    This is just sad. I'm not "demanding" anything. Your words.

    Tell me what the question is please? I think you've confused yourself, you don't even know what it is.

    "Mental gymnastics" indeed, on your part. I've criticised both presidential candidates.

    I've already said that if Trump called Democrat voters garbage, although you've used the word "scum" here, that, yes, it would be bad. Please show me where he did that please?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,849 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    You know full well he's not calling the US electorate garbage and scum with those remarks. And when he calls the US a garbage can, he's referring to those within who shouldn't be there. Try again.

    I'm going to sleep now so. 🥱😴💤



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 230 ✭✭Maxface


    That video of Trump attempting to get in the bin lorry seems to be everywhere. Not a great look for him at this late stage. Clearly there is a hidden health issue at play along with being very old. How will he manage the job if he is flailing now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    "We're like a garbage can"

    Those are his words.

    Yes, he was calling voters scum and garbage.

    Unless you're saying the people he was talking about cannot vote?

    He's also called people who disagree with him, "the enemy within."

    No one will care if you go to sleep, or whatever, the facts will remain the exact same, the continuity of the thread continues 24/7/365. It's a weird defensive tactic one employs when they want to avoid challenges to their posts — eg., you haven't acknowledged in your posts your repeated false claim that Puerto Rico is a separate country from the United States. If you're so certain of that, yet wrong, how certain are you of your deflections abut him calling half of America TM, "scum," "garbage," and "the enemy within?" Notable that when Biden calls people garbage you're very sweeping inferring it attacks 50% of Americans but when Trump calls people Scum, Garbage and the Enemy Within, you are very discriminating and defensive about how many people are inferred by it, yet claim you want 'balance' and criticize "both bad candidates" TM.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    OK finally. Only took 3 times to get you to answer a yes or no question.

    Here You go:

    https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-comments-garbage-kamala-harris-1977791

    Remember that excuses about him not being in context or referring to other people or any of the others that are not allowed to be applied to Biden's words are also not allowed to be applied to Trumps. Cause you care about balance, right?

    There is Trump calling half of the country garbage and scum if we are to apply the same inferences you do to Biden.

    Also here's him using some other choice phrases:

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-democrats-enemies-within-rcna175628

    You agree that is bad.

    Given that you've only one instance of Biden saying it, and multiple instances of Trump saying it, and worse (and many other things besides), who is worse?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Brings to mind the Dara Ó Briain bit about balance.

    "Here is an astrophysicist and in the name of balance we've brought on Billy who believes the sky is a big blanket pulled over the Earth by God."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Churlish projection by Trump thrown at Mark Cuban tonight:

    [H]e’s a very insecure guy, and a MAJOR LOSER, always has been and always will be! Nobody likes him, nobody respects him, and he’s unattractive both inside and out! 

    https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-calls-mark-cuban-unattractive-and-a-major-loser-in-wild-rant-a-very-insecure-guy/

    Why? Why because Cuban called out the fact that Trump is never seen associated around "strong, intelligent women:"

    Let’s clarify something. This is what I said during a conversation about why Nikki Haley was not active in his campaign “Donald Trump, you never see him around strong, intelligent women. Ever. It’s just that simple. They’re intimidating to him. He doesn’t like to be challenged by them and, you know, Nikki Haley will call him on his nonsense with reproductive rights and how he sees and treats and talks about women. I mean, he just can’t have her around. It wouldn’t work.

    I’m happy to clarify that

    1. I know many strong, intelligent women voting for Trump. Including in my extended family. I’m certainly not saying female voters are not smart , strong and intelligent.

    2. I know he has worked with strong intelligent women, like Elaine Chao, Kelly Anne, Ivanka and many others

    I stand by my opinion that he does not like being challenged publicly.

    Trump went on a tear with the 'I'm not weird, you're weird' approach to Cuban's criticisms, point for point. It comes as Trump has gotten in trouble for putting off women in droves with his machismo/bro-culture MSG rally with Hulk Hogan ripping up his shirt (eventually..), Tucker Carlson talking about what can best be described as a cuckolding fantasy where he sees Trump as a daddy he wants to 'come home' and spank 'bad girls,' and Trump's off-key comments about promising to be a "protector of women," which has elicited extremely negative reactions from women in particular, especially given his history with women, his ex wives, women formerly associated with him, the hollywood access tape, etc. etc.; he stepped into it further by doubling down today, in the worst possible way that called up all of his past lewd and morally and otherwise questionable behavior around women when he said, "Well, I'm going to do it, whether the women like it or not." Which, to a tee, sums up Donald Trump and his relationship with women, and explains why, well, he's not ever seen in the orbit of strong-willed and intelligent women, least of all ones he sees as equals and peers never mind of all as superiors. The attacks on Cuban really highlight this, and in projection it reeks of multiple insecurities of his including that he's 'unattractive, inside and out.'

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-protecting-women-whether-they-like-it-or-not-wisconsin/

    It also underscores his attacks on just about every woman he's come across, from ex acquaintances, to Rosie O'Donnell, former staff and campaign members, Cassidy Hutchinson, Taylor Swift, Marie Yovanovitch, and so many others, and lest we forget the attack on women's body autonomy that is also core to the entire modus operandi.

    This all only serves to hurt Trump, and it's abundantly clear he's lost the majority of women support. And MAGA is freaking out about it: in the swing states women make up 55% of the early votes compared to 45% of men, and the polls demonstrate Harris does unquestioningly better with Women than Trump does. USA Today shows them diametrically opposed in gender support: Harris wins over women 53% to 37% and Trump wins over men 53% to 36%. But, with women having a 10% lead in voting participation over men, and women turnout historically being higher than men as a norm, the algebra is not good for him. And neither are the campaign ads from the likes of eg. Julia Roberts which is why they're all in a panic about it and you have the likes of Newt Gingrinch etc. on Fox News tonight flipping out calling the ad "sick!" etc.; Gingrich is a 'win at all costs' kind of Republican who would lie and steal from his own mother if it meant Republicans control Congress, so him calling the ad sick and all is full of ironies.

    Couple this with MAGA voters violent and misogynistic attacks and assaults on women at the polls, which we've seen throughout early voting, and it becomes abundantly clear that they know they have lost their vote and they are utterly panicked that they've lost this election already.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,889 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    For the record, it's legal to wear partisan clothing while casting your vote, including a Trump hat, in most States.

    States which restrict wearing partisan clothing are Arkansas, California, Delaware, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Vermont. However, there are fine details, such as in Maine you may wear a pin or badge or whatever as long as it is not more than 3 inches wide.

    Only ten of the States (California, Delaware, Kansas, Montana, New Jersey, New York, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Vermont) have a total ban on wearing partisan things while voting.

    The other 29 States, and D.C., you can wear as many Tump hats or Harris pins as you like without restriction.

    However, yes, reactions like that in the 21 States are not on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    That's the neat part: they haven't been that secretive that JD Vance would handle the day to day and be the 'prime minister' so to speak while Trump yucks it up on the golf course and gets to feel self important as the royal figurehead.

    I think even if they do get in (which I think going by the polling, turnout, and predictions by Lichtman, would almost certainly have to be a coup via Congress or the Courts) you would see a major chaos unfold between warring factions because Vance is a little power hungry himself and he actually thinks Trump is too much of America's Hitler for his tastes, so for example, filling up the government won't just be as simple as 'loyalty to Trump' but also, 'are you loyal to JD Vance' I think you'd see factional infighting and as terrible as they'd all be on the things they agreed upon, it would be very hard to predict what will actually all happen with them all at each others necks, like what we saw in the first administration: while he was able to do a ton of damage, like packing the courts with Aileen Cannons et al., the child family separations, getting servicemembers killed, giving Russia a pass in the Kerch Strait, Abandoning the Kurds- I'll stop myself, it's a long list, aside from all the damage he's done, still a lot of things he could have done, but didn't/couldn't because of in-fighting within the party (seen in Congress) or in the administration itself, with top cabinet members many of whom have endorsed Harris this cycle, and frustrated some of Trump's worst impulses while in office, and a ton of people in his administration leaked to the press also.

    I think the short of it is, he won't manage the job, he barely managed the job the last time he was in, and now he's just older and less put together and even the people who support him say he needs two weeks at a time to rest up etc.; while he's in the Odinsleep for weeks at a time, the mice will have the cookies. I do hope more voters take notice of his worsening condition though, such as that shown by the garbage truck incident (not to mention the entire obsession of his with garbage rhetoric, etc.) and see to it that his defeat is by landslide. But I do think you'll still see a lot of Republican support even if he straight faceplants himself by Tuesday because, they want the R and they won't care if it's JD Vance and his faction that gets voted in, so long as they thing their policies are good for them. So ultimately his health may only swing a few mere percentage points of the electorate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I apologize, I was very wrong in that statement assuming it was not allowed in all states. Thanks for sharing that info. In general I've been typically impressed by how 'fair' South Carolina's election/voting system has always seemed to me, despite being a red state, especially when the neighbors have done at times, somewhat questionable carry on (you won't find wild 'only open the 5th tuesday of every month' shenanians for DMVs to get IDs etc either). It just made so much sense to me that I assumed all of the states banned campaign apparel at the polls. I've edited the post to reflect that.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,889 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Not really. If they're able to enshrine a right to abortion into the Constitution, then the Republicans they elect can't do much about it. In other words, the concern is taken off the table, and they can vote on the basis of whatever other policy is important to them. We've seen this in a few other conservative states as well. I think Kentucky was the most recent?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,032 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    I'd like to know if the trump supporters here are of the view that Victor Orban is a good guy?

    He's just endorsed Trump...

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,032 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Everyone remember last week when MTG and Kirk said a story would break which would make certain claims but it would be fake?

    People speculated about another assault claim.

    Well, the daily beast has a story....

    "Jeffrey Epstein showed off photos of Donald Trump with “topless young women” sitting in his lap, author Michael Wolff says.

    The pedophile financier had about half a dozen pictures which showed Trump by the pool with multiple young women, Wolff claimed on his podcast, Fire & Fury, Thursday. They were taken in the “late 90s” at Epstein’s Palm Beach home, where he victimized dozens of underage girls along with his procurer, Ghislaine Maxwell, Wolff said.

    Wolff alleged that they were in Epstein’s safe, which the FBI seized when they raided his homes in New York and Palm Beach in July 2019. The massive haul of evidence taken by the feds has never been made public–and while prosecutors disclosed after the raid that they had “hundreds of photos of girls and young women,” they have never offered any more details of them.

    Wolff said of the photos, “They were with Trump at Epstein’s Palm Beach house sitting around the pool with these young girls, and the young girls are topless.

    “And in some of the pictures, they’re sitting in his lap. I mean, and, and then there’s one I especially remember where there’s a stain, a telltale stain and on the front of Trump’s pants, and the girls are pointing at him and laughing.” Trump separated from his second wife Marla Maples in 1997 and began dating his third wife, Melania, in 1998."

    Link here...

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,032 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    MAGA pushing hard on trying to tell wives that they should vote the same way as their husband otherwise it's a disgrace.

    Here's *checks notes* Newt Gingrich telling Hannity that *checks notes again* that lying to one's spouse is wrong .Hang on - didn't he cheat on his wife while she was dying of cancer?

    The hypocrisy is... Stunning

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The hypocrisy is stunning

    These are 2 days apart.

    image.png

    We all dunk on politicians, but there's a certain breed that can just shapeshift so seamlessly that it beggars belief. Some of them, not saying JD Vance is one, you'd nearly admire the brazenness at which they can change and speak with conviction on two diametrically opposed views. Michael Gove in the UK is one, Ted Cruz in the US is another. If you listen to them in isolation on either view, you'd nearly respect them, when you put them together, you realize what you're dealing with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,032 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    And this is the problem for this election more than any.

    False equivalence.

    If the Dems say something slightly contradictory or vague, people "both sides" it with MAGA direct contradictions, when they aren't the same.

    My own view is that the press have been awful on the run up to this year's election. One could be forgiven in thinking, as I do, that this is about making the race as close as possible, as that generates revenue for them, but perhaps it is just a failing on their part.

    You can state one party's position while stating the other. I mean, that's the bare minimum imho. It isn't necessarily practical over here, where there are a number of parties, but when it's a binary choice I think it's required.

    So, back to the point you were making, the second headline could mention that Vance slams Biden for comment, having previously said people are too sensitive.

    To report it as your pictures show, really is a failing on the part of the press.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,032 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Would the MAGA crowd here, who were clutching their pearls yesterday about Biden's comment about people around Trump being garbage, care to defend this from Trump, because to me it sounds like he's fantasising about pointing a gun in Liz Cheney's face…

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The first piece was from Forbes, the second was from NY Post….

    I don't put much weight in 'The Media'. Well, what I mean is, I feel comfortable enough that I know the platform on which I'm viewing something and judge accordingly. I see Forbes as reporting the facts to the readers, the NY Post as trying to influence the view of the readers. And that aside, the reality is Vance himself said what he said in the second instance knowing what he had said in the first.

    And that is something I can subconciously determine because spending a lot of time in current affairs spaces, you get to be able to determine the context of all parties involved. I never needed CNN to tell me what I thought of Trump, I could see what Trump was saying and doing myself and form my own opinion.

    I don't disagree that you could blame the media, but, you don't need to take your instruction from the media, now more than ever there's no shortage of methods to see exactly what and how and why someone says something. You can obviously see leading narratives on the media, but I don't blame the media, I kind of ignore them. I know the context in which all of the individual players operate, so I don't form my opinion based on what any one of them is saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    My immediate thought when looking at that is that Tucker is just waiting for him to stop for a second so he can start talking about spanking his daughters. Weird, all round.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,032 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    I think you're giving far too much credit to a large segment of society, assuming that they use critical thinking when seeing stories in papers. A lot of people are happy in their specific media bubble, and you'll not get them to think differently on a topic, but the mainstream media (not said in a pejorative way), to me anyway, could absolutely do better service to those folk who are open to context.

    I think in ignoring the media, it opens the door to alternative news sources, who have been less scruples than the ones that are currently at the forefront.

    Journalistic standards are failing the vast majority of Americans right now.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 315 ✭✭Hank the DJ


    The protector of Women.

    An absolute garbage human.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I think the media may have already done too much damage to their own reputation for it to be salavaged now. CNN made a conscious effort to move towards the center (what they said) after the last election but it was seen by many as them actually moving towards the right. Chris Licht, their new CEO was fired after pushback from within over giving Donald Trump a townhall broadcast amongst other things that he was said to be doing to appease Disney who owns CNN.

    Last week, Jeff Bezos said that the WaPo was not endorsing a candidate because newsrooms had become too political. A fair point you might say, but saying it the week before an election smacked as a somewhat political move, why not say it 12 months ago when your objectivity could not be questioned.

    The younger generation are not watching TV or buying newspapers, they're streaming shows and watching Tik Toks. The legacy media may be on its downward trend unless it finds a way to either present to those viewers or attract them to where their shows are. Tucker, Don Lemon, Mehdi Hassan and a few more have realized this as they were outed from legacy firms and have sought to create their own 'platform' so to speak instead of moving to a new station.

    I think a big part of landscape the media is in is because of the removal of the fairness doctrine. That removed for any need to appear to be impartial, and we now see the consequence of it.



Advertisement