Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1833834836838839943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I’m not making that argument now. I’m making that argument back in 2013.

    There simply was no demand for houses at a price that those building them required. There were too many empty houses everywhere. Financing was also an issue no doubt, but if demand was there, capital would have found its way to produce the product. Hindsight is easy to apply here but if you said to someone in Ireland in 2011 that your great business plan was to start building houses, you’d have been sectioned.

    House building only became viable again from 2016/17 onwards in many parts of the country. The government often takes a beating for that ‘house prices need to rise a bit further’ quote - but it was an inconvenient truth. It’s not sustainable for houses to be as cheap as they were. We are now suffering the consequences of houses being too cheap for too long.


    You undoubtedly have a point now in some of the more expensive parts of the country. However I’d imagine there are still plenty of parts of the country where house building may not be viable even if the land is free. That is a difficult problem to solve.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Complaining about posters trying to shift the narrative here is a bit of a stretch.

    My input on this point in quoting the journal was highlighting a particularly egregious example of how media deliberately ignore or spin facts and data in order to perpetuate the narrative that the housing problems are way worse than they actually are.

    Whether it is 35k units or 40k units a year, two facts are undeniable - that is a significant improvement on five or six years ago, and puts us at the top or near the top in Europe on a per capita basis.

    To dispute that is simply disingenuous spin.

    It is no different to enthusiastically lapping up and presenting as gospel up the Housing Commission's estimate of a 250k deficit without asking who the 500k+ currently displaced people are.

    Or totally ignoring the Census findings of a vacancy rate of almost 8% and peddling the myth that we have a low vacancy rate.

    It's all the same as far as I'm concerned - deliberately ignoring or manipulating data that doesn't support the popular narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    Could you elaborate a bit more on the luas or possible share the map?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    Total recklessness. We've gone through that once and we know who's gonna take the hit /Hint: not people taking those high risk mortgages/.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,042 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Since when is a 3x LTI a high risk mortgage?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The taxpayer is much more likely to take a hit from giving an extra €150k to people earning €70k so they can borrow 6 or 7 times income to buy an "affordable" house for the guts of €500k than from people on €240k borrowing 3 times income to buy a house for €1m.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    Cos it's ~4K to pay monthly… It's very risky specially these days. Cheap foreign labor + AI will change the job market layout beyond recognition (never mind black swans), not understanding this is a risk on its own. Effectively those risks are shifted from the borrowers to a much wider community of "taxpayers".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    One doesn't bother another. I concur your point though. I bough my first house without any help. An I think it'd fair to compensation those "help to buy" payments to people who didn't avail of them at the time when they bought. Just to be fair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    I think the whole system is based on a rather risky assumption. The higher the mortgage the more stress tests it should go through. This hopefully represents a niche case, but many industries in Ireland saw massive drops in salaries, such as IT (anything between X2-X3), banking/finance. More to come. People getting high wages should be additionally assessed for the period of time within which they got that money - Shorter than 3 years income should be taken at 60% as there's a great chance they aren't sustainable. A new cohort of rich people is forming and the equity "shift" will hit poorest borrowers the most.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,819 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I think anyone on middle incomes with a couple of kids want to see house pricing fall to levels that will allow their kids manage to purchase a house in a decent location in the future.

    At the time of the Noonan comments the Irish state and as such it's citizens were invested heavily via NAMA and the bank stakes it held in the Irish property market. I appreciate that the Irish state and it's citizens are invested in many ways in property but the above caused the links to strengthen even moreso.

    As such there was a time when property prices needed to increase to cover some of the states exposure to it.

    All of that said. It was and still is a farce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    It’s an interesting point, there’s so much going on underneath and a fairly simplistic ‘4x gross salary’ is applied to all. I think I’d agree that higher income earners have much more potential volatility, and certainly most high income earners I know have a bit of ‘pay down debt while times are good’ mindset.

    Even using gross salary is somewhat silly given how progressive our tax system is. It also takes no allowance of the fact that two €50k earners bring home a lot more than one €100k earner…but more sophistication must be balanced against consumer understanding

    The bank also applies their own stress tests to supplement the simple rules. They don’t have to lend 4x

    However, there are some counter points as to why high income mortgages are safer

    • In good times high income earners are more likely to get significant pay increases.
    • Higher base income usually means higher variable pay. Banks lend pretty conservatively on variable pay, particularly deferred stock.
    • There is a baseline level of living that doesn’t really vary. If you make €3k a month, and have 33% mortgage (€1k). Even a fairly small change in circumstances can derail you. If you’re making €10k a month and have a 33% mortgage (€3k)…you already have a significant buffer in place even though the proportions are the same.
    • Other external shocks like energy inflation, food inflation etc. have far less impact on higher earners.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I'm not speaking in support of the Journal article. It's just plain weird and spin as you describe it.

    I do however think it's I'mportant to recognise spin on both sides of the argument. In the first 6 months of 2024 our housing output is significantly down on 2023. These are based on results not distorted forecasts. In that time raw materials and energy have significantly reduced in price

    Is comparing ireland to the EU in terms of housing output a fair comparator.

    The main economies of the EU have been drifting in and out of recession over the last 12months, while our government were bragging about a sovereign wealth fund on disputed taxes to the world (not very smart) .

    Last year I identified this as an opportunity to substantially increase our output as we could take advantage of reduced demand for labour and raw materials elsewhere. A reduction of 8% in housing output in the first 6 month of 2024 over what was poor output in the first 6 months of 2023 is not what I was expecting, it is yet another missed opportunity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,713 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Good article in the Sunday times yesterday from Cormac lucey- basically Irelands economy is as reliant on multinationals as Irish people were on the potato for food before the famine! Hope it ends better!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    That is my point. Unfortunately as we know banks aren't going to take the hit, there's much higher chance of us paying USC2 etc. A few recent posts in that topic touch on "responsible" selling (i.e. not selling to investors) why not applying the same pattern to borrowing? We all saw those taxi drivers owning 2-3 properties pre-crush time while you lost 10 on renting purely over their greed… Many times people realize the risk but they say "now or never", this risk is covered by other taxpayers. Two snr. managers getting 300K combined today may earn 0 this time next year, that is already happening. There's a simple way to mitigate it - just take higher incomes (> 100K p/p) as 30, 40, 50, 75%, 100% for each of the years it's been earned, how can it go wrong? Otherwise it's just borrowing at other people's expense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    I agree that higher earners are generally a safer bet, however there are a number of cases of high earners willingly defaulting on mortgages as a tactic for wealth acquisition.

    When you owe the bank 100k it's your problem, 1m and it's the banks problem. Non payment of large mortgages and subsequently getting large payment write downs and keeping the home is a disgusting but effective tactic - but one only available to higher earners.

    Still I'm sure it's less than 5% of cases but given the sums involved is still significant risk for bank balance sheet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,042 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    cheap foreign labour is going to affect the earning potential of the top 0.5%?

    as for your predictions on AI i cant see how a bank can be expected to apply that logic in any coherent way.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I don't think defaulting and keeping the house is something that's only available to higher earners, as far as I can see it's available to all.

    It just seems more disgusting when it is a jumbo mortgage on a trophy home, rather than low earners in cheaper houses.

    But if as a society we wish see huge forbearance for low income mortgage defaulters, we kind of have to accept it for all mortgage defaulters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    It already is sadly. I don't think 240K is within top 0.5, but I'll leave it to you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    If I'd be a risk manager I'd pay particular attention to people taking on the highest LTVs available while having high salaries only for a year or two. The practical impossibility to repossess acts as a decision factor for some people rest assured.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I understand your points but as long as the economy continues to grow and wages continue to increase, house prices in economic centres will also increase, unless there is a considerable uplift in housing output.

    Thr number of households in the state earning 6 figure salaries has doubled in the last 6 years. If 1 in 4 Dublin households is earning 100k+, its difficult to see a situation where a family home costs less than 400k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Add to this the fact that 100k plus NET immigration seems to be establishing itself as the norm, and there is little to no hope of a reversal in house prices here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 306 ✭✭scrabtom


    We're probably 3 or 4 years away from 50k homes a year at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Maybe I’ll eat my words, but I’d be inclined to trust the banks this time around. It’s just such a completely different lending environment to 2007.

    Having gone through two mortgage drawdowns in 3 years I was shocked at just how stringent they are with their checking of information, their reluctance to factor in variable pay and how conservative they are with their lending amounts.

    They regularly choose not to lend the full amount permitted (which is reasonably conservative by global standards) due to their own internal affordability restrictions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,341 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Just viewed a 4 bed in Galway city. The estate agent said that their current stock of houses for sale in the city is the lowest it's ever been. Really hits home what the market is like, pardon the pun. The market in Galway city has been incredibly dry since April/May time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    I generally agree with one caveat - I'd use the word cumbersome instead of stringent. As it happens in many other areas tightening the rules in one area inevitably leads to their relaxation in another one. Until banks start repossessing, there will always be an opportunity to sell your risk to a larger group of less smart/more responsible taxpayers. This is a corner stone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    Government buying up properties for the new Irish leaving Paddy with fcuk all is adding to it aswell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭chalky_ie


    Cheap foreign labour and AI are going to impact high earners before low earners, and make them a bigger risk than lower earners in terms of mortgage viability, you'll have to explain that one to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭GalwayBmw


    I don't, but I will 😀 Cheap (or more correctly cheaper) foreign labor is used in relative terms here. IT job market for instance is practically dead in Ireland I'd love to use "at present", but I think it's not needed. Agencies sourcing IT personnel started to work in other low margin market segments such as accounting etc. People from SEA/India took over a lot of IT jobs across all sectors (75K-200K p/a from what I can observe at my level), resulting in a lot of people who considered their work situation safe are sitting on the bench now with more to join them. To get a job now you have to first compete with a remote team and then if ye're lucky with local experts. AI of course has a long way to go until it starts affecting job market, but the first step in that direction is done, there'll be highs and lows but it will take its toll. I think the same will happen to finance, the likes of Revolut and blockchain in more remote future will kill canonical banking along with the jobs created by it. Have a look at BOI shares. It's a great market for people having truly unique/rare skills, I hope you're one of them 😎.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt




Advertisement
Advertisement