Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Transport Aircraft

1454648505160

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    if it won votes, then a century of not investing would have cost votes, it hasn’t. The DF and it’s wider support base is dwarfed by any of the other interest groups, hell I could easily see the same presser being used by the usual suspects including the President to complain about how we shouldn’t be “militarising so much” and 300 million for a ship would solve all other problems in the state (just don’t ask how)….

    I’m firmly in the no expectations, no disappointment position, nothing the parties have done since the Russian invasion suggests they have any concern about how dangerous the world is getting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Yeah. I can't see defense procurement featuring at all in the election campaign apart from saying there will be no big changes in funding and capability. We've already seen Micheal Martin saying there'll be no deterrence measures to stop overflights by Israeli suppliers. And the auld fella up in the park is a total pacifist. LOA2 /3 are laughable. Barely keeping up with inflation and most of the spend is on meagre wages and pensions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭zone 1


    why bother building MRV when most ships are parked up in both dockyards pointless at the moment until numbers rise in NS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Firstly as even if it does finally get ordered you are talking about a likely 3-5 years before she is in service, secondly because she is meant for a completely different capability than our OPVs and lastly even just the investment in her order might help recruitment and retention.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,007 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    The only thing that would attract potential sailors to join the NS as a result of buying an MRV, is that they will have somewhere to sleep.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    apart from the fact that there’s work going on right now on the base to increase that capacity and more planned long before the MRV might arrive?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,554 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    I love that this discussion is taking place in the "Transport Aircraft" thread. 😆



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You don't fix the roof when its raining.

    You put the orders in NOW, for delivery in 3,4, 5 years time.

    In parallel, you strengthen pay and conditions, accommodation, opportunities, training etc.

    What you're suggesting betrays a total lack of strategic thinking and an old way of thinking in the development of the forces and of state capital and infrastructure in general.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Pretty much , no matter what the circumstances of navy recruitment, you'd need to be planning now ,for a ship coming on stream in 5 or so years ( at the best of times the naval service is relatively small ,and a large extra vessel ,with new capabilities,and demands is a challenge/

    , and in a scenario where the naval service is so understaffed , they probably should be putting a lot a lot of thought into why , and how they can get over that issue , and start acting very soon ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,007 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Slightly off topic, but new uniforms for the defence forces. Yeah, that will definitely improve morale.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,788 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    “The record Budget funding will facilitate significant progress on important defence projects, including military radar, subsea awareness, force protection equipment and Defence Forces infrastructure. Budget 2025 will also allow the Air Corps to take delivery of the new Airbus C295W aircraft. This level of investment is critical in the current geopolitical situation.”

    The above is taken from the DOD website. The poor Transport Casa is going to have a lot to live up to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    We knew that already. New ITPM based on the US version



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,007 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,767 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    €9 million for mobile phone pouches????

    $7.4M would buy a second hand A320 or $11.1M would buy a 737

    (according to the aircraft values thread on the blue site!)

    Yes, I am being very glib when I say all this, at least its a post that has something to do with this thread! 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,096 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The increase is a paltry €100m for 2025. We're just not serious about it.

    Micheál Martin, our part-time minister for defence, getting ratty again a couple a days a go around the question of freeloading.

    Other countries need to be leaning on Ireland to at least do the basics within it's own airspace and territorial waters. It doesn't have to be mad or expensive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Totally agree…and that's supposed to cover recruitment, training and wages for an extra 400? Doesn't leave much left over for beefing up the hardware.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    This is a misguided take.

    The DF is so shorn of expertise and operational personnel that even if you went from €1.3 Bn to 2 Bn, they simply do not have the capacity to absorb that kind of funding and convert it into delivered projects.

    The Commission implementation plan shows where the budget will end up eventually, but this is a marathon, not a sprint.

    And as I've pointed out many times, when it comes to beefing up hardware, aka capital expenditure, that's already covered in various capital allocations and Project 2040. New ships, planes, APCs and Radar do not come out of current expenditure, which Budget 2025 is for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    is it a misguided take? We are still below inflation adjusted figures to meet the target of even LoA2 by 2028, at this point it won’t even meet the original 2030 date, and no sense of urgency within the Department or Minister in regards to just how bad the global environment is and how it’s likely to get worse. None of our planned capital expenditure involves anything radical or unique so why the massive delay? Nothing we want to order is going to get cheaper by holding off and all it means is delivery will be even further pushed out as we end up back of the line.

    When you compare the vast difference in ambition to what Justice got for all levels from frontline to capital to what Defence got, it’s fairly telling that government focus isn’t on the issue.

    And yeah, don’t think the minor increase at a time of massive surpluses hasn’t been noticed international



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,096 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Two dozen Irish citizens left Lebanon on Friday as fighting continued between the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) and the Lebanese militant group Hizbullah.

    Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Micheál Martin said 24 Irish citizens had been assisted by the Netherlands and Canada in departing the country.

    “The citizens departed on flights operated by Ireland’s international partners and they are expected to arrive in Ireland over the weekend,” he said in a statement. “This is an excellent example of the importance of international cooperation.”

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2024/10/04/more-than-70-irish-troops-unable-to-return-to-their-unit-in-lebanon-due-to-ongoing-hostilities/

    Indeed. An excellent example of freeloading



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Its not a linear scale of increase, not with the capacity deficit I explained. For that and other reasons, the funding increase will have to be backloaded.

    Increase capacity>increase budget>more capacity>enable greater rate of increase



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Anyway, we don't really need to buy anything, our 24 citizen evacuees from Lebanon bummed lifts today from our "international partners" in the Royal Dutch and Royal Canadian Air Forces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    To get to the 2 billion in only 3 years, that means the budget has to effectively increase 200 million a year for the remaining three years (assuming that the next government is made up of parties that will agree to that), moreover unless you are going to fall back to throwing in Capital buys like the MRV or Radar in that period the changes of hitting 2 billion in that period are even slimmer when you figure in the continue Retention issues.

    Nothing we are planning to buy or invest in is anything "new" or ground breaking for anyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,096 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    This has happened many times in the last 10 years. They must be embarrassed in the DFA when thumbing these lifts. All we need is 2 medium - heavy lift aircraft. Only non-microstate in Europe that does this as a first and only resort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Yep, great to see them out of course, hopefully the ones that haven't left aren't going to regret it, good thing evacuations aren't a regular thing so we can leave it to others to handle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I agree, its nothing unique, but we are in a situation where the whole World wants to buy everything, everywhere, all at once.

    And those items do need significant, specialist project teams, which not every officer is qualified to manage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    At least at the rate we are going everyone else will have their orders well progressed long before we have an order in. However iff the argument is that we can't increase the budget till we have more people to manage the projects, while we are still losing people because of lack of investment then we are still stuck in a downward spiral.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,788 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Maybe they have put orders in and just not annouced it as with the AGS H145s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 899 ✭✭✭vswr


    I find it a bit odd that the H145's weren't announced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭mupper2


    Take it with a bucket of salt and pepper but there seems to be recurring strong RUMINT that the favored proposal for the Mowag replacement is a French offer of a G2G deal for VBCIs/Griffons and Jaguars. Saves having to run a tender, competitive trials etc straight buy with good financing terms.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Not the worst idea, both in the G2G and going French, and good “optics” to buy from them, but as you say, assume nothing and wait and see if something actually gets ordered and in sufficient numbers.



Advertisement
Advertisement