Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Amazon WFH Policy

1235715

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,954 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    We’ve definitely seen the best days of WFH fulltime behind us now- 2-3 days mandatory in office will be standard fare. I know of a few Irish large Irish companies struggling to get people into the office even a few times a month - but I predict even they will turn up the heat - it’s always better to be seen in the office voluntary a couple of days a week rather than waiting on a 4-5 day mandatory order - that should be the thinking of all good manages right now - get your entire team into the office at least once a week - it may keep senior management “happy” - if you don’t , then expect a non negotiable demand for many more days in the office. Companies follow each other like sheep - WFH good yesterday - bad today



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 287 ✭✭sekond


    School holidays - camps, days chilling at home with older sibling, days out with Granny and strategic use of annual leave for both parents. And strategic use of WFH days (e.g. my husband and I would make sure that our WFO days weren't the same, so that one of us would be home each day and we didn't need to rope Granny in too often). But as I said, that was when they were older primary age. When they were still a bit young for that - we did the all day afterschool camp. Paid through the nose for it too.

    I do agree about younger children - if they aren't self-sufficient you can't be minding them when working (unless an emergency - I have no problem with one of my team minding a sick child at home every now and then, and logging on when they can).

    I'm very lucky now that they are both in secondary school, they pretty much manage themselves and even occasionally cook the dinner for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,023 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    digital signatures are useful but there are loads of scenarios where they dont work.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Bollocks.

    We've been using them exclusively for five years now. Large government department. My bank uses them. My credit union uses them. Amongst others.

    Some people will look for any minor excuse to be anti-WFH.

    Also, as I added above, if an employee needs to print / sign / scan a document while WFH, then it is the employer who should be providing them with the equipment to do so.



  • Posts: 9,954 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Zurich did that. The had leased laptops for WFH. When the following Christmas (2nd?) lockdown came around loads of staff got Covid and all the laptops had gone back. Their customer service was FUBARed for months, during their busiest time of the year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Thats not the companies problem.

    As more companies require in-office work, commuters will need to figure out how they get to the office. The number of companies offering 5 day WFH is likley to continue to reduce, to the point where most employees wont have a choice but to work in the office, at least 2 or 3 days a week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60 ✭✭vival20062


    What large irish companies are you talking about?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 644 ✭✭✭Arsenium


    Just quickly skimmed this article - as I finished work from home on one of my 2 days WFH.

    One poster said working for US companies gives you the best of both worlds - US benefits and higher salaries but protected by Irish laws that US workers arent protected by. 100% agree.

    I've had WFH for at least 22 years now. Always had to apply for the benefit and give a good reason. Always had 2 days. It started off with idiot managers messaging me every hour asking what I was doing. Eventually more and more people did it and it became normal. You applied for the benefit and it needed to be approved. It wasnt a company wide entitlement.

    18 or so years later, Covid made me realise 5 days WFH was a terrible terrible extreme. Sure I had no commute but by that same reason I had no switch off. Walking past the laptop, checking emails, sending messages at 11:00 PM. Up in the morning at the same time as your commute starts, but instead of that time you are immediately in work.

    Hybrid work is an excellent compromise. 3 days in, 2 days out is an excellent model. Another poster mentioned they went in for 1 day in 6 months and hated it….man you need to leave your job !!

    Before Covid 5 days in the office was the norm. Bringing it to 3 had people complaining. HArd to understand.

    Another poster mentioned about Amazon staff (desk) finding it difficult to get another role due to the high salaries Amazon pay. Nail on the head. FAANG companies are nearly an island at this stage. LEave on principle due to WFH requirements and watch your salary drop.

    US companies (Amazon in this case) will all follow suit here. It's not to build culture. It's to encourage staff to leave. Quiet Quitting. No bad publicity, no redundancy payouts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 387 ✭✭Jambonjunior


    What happens if people don't comply? Would the company be able to let them go?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,690 ✭✭✭Sono


    I can only speak for the place I work for but the company is performing better than they ever have pre Covid, incredible results in fact. It will be a very hard sell to try and force staff back in given the company’s performance. Staff are extremely productive overall at home as most want to prove that it works. There’s always going to be some people who take the piss but they do that at home or in the office so I don’t see the difference at all in that regard.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,065 ✭✭✭caviardreams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,323 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    AWOL would be if they weren't working or just vanished. It would more be "you aren't meeting the requirements for the role".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60 ✭✭vival20062


    Yeah. But what Amazon are hoping for is the easier option of people just moving to somewhere with hybrid hours. Cuts down on staff, of which many tech companies scaled up too much and saves them money. Rather than properly paying to get rid of them.

    A great bunch of lads is our Amazon.



  • Posts: 4,229 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yes to digital signatures. Employees should not be printing confidential documents at home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,570 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    The reason we are inching to 5 days back in the office is because companies are coming to the realization that hybrid is bollix.

    It was always bollix, companies trying to show that they were progressive and employees pretending that they were happy that post lockdown they had a bit of flexibility.

    But it just upsets routines and work flows.

    You start out Monday at home, then you have to up sticks on Tuesday, back home Wednesday, gone again Thursday and home Friday, or whatever.

    Every location change takes a little bit of adjustment, not much, almost a micro adjustment, but enough to make you less productive than if you were in the same location.

    100% WFH or 100% in office were always better than hybrid.

    The best hybrid offering would have been a week in three weeks at home, thus the disruption is less, but this idea of certain days in , certain days home was just arbitrary.

    So now companies are realizing this and because it's easier to bring everyone back than to allow or deny WFH on a individual basis they are getting everyone back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60 ✭✭vival20062


    Have you any sources for this or have you made up these claims?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭mcburns07


    Completely disagree with this. Have been on a hybrid model for a few years now, 3 days per week in the office the same for everyone. Zero adjustment required to WFH on the same days you WFH every single week. I don't like the office environment, open plan offices are too noisy, distracting, and frankly pretty overwhelming at times. I think a lot of people who have never worked for a large company would be shocked at the working environment, a lot of the time it's akin to working in the middle of a shopping mall. At the same time I appreciate that there are some benefits from being around your colleagues face to face each week, its better for relationship building and when highly collaborative work needs to be done.

    I organise my week so that tasks that require deeper focus are done on WFH days where possible so that I can get in the zone and get through them efficiently.

    A hybrid model where you can choose when you go makes no sense to me though, better to have everyone on the same routine so that you can plan accordingly for best days to have team meetings etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,570 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Totally my own opinion.

    I've always argued that hybrid was never a sustainable model on the other WFH thread in the COVID forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,570 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I organise my week so that tasks that require deeper focus are done on WFH days where possible so that I can get in the zone and get through them efficiently.

    But the only reason you have to organize the week and do these this deeper focus tasks as you call them on certain days is because your company has arbitrarily decided that you have to go into a office environment you don't like on certain days.

    Why not let you stay WFH all the time and you could do those tasks any day of the week.

    Equally anyone who preforms better in the office can go to the office every day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭mcburns07


    I suppose they consider it beneficial for the company for people to be in there a few days a week for the reasons I mentioned in my post. Like anything there needs to be a balance between doing whats best for the company and the employee. Both sides need to make concessions really.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,535 ✭✭✭RedXIV


    I realise this may not apply to most folks who WFH but one of the main arguments I have against going into the office now as well is the lack of facilities in it. I've 5 monitors including an ultrawide screen so I'm very capable of solving multiple problems at once and I can tackle issues far more effectively than I can with my tiny laptop screen and inevitably only half the monitors in the office are working. Ironically as well, when in the office and I need to join a call, I found myself unable to find an available room in the office to join said call. I have a dedicated office at home so that's never a problem there.

    Stipends were given to set up remote offices and like some, I invested more of my own money as well to make myself more effective. The result is a far superior set up at home to anything I'm going to have in an office



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    No employer will want to make exceptions, it would be seen as favouritism. The fella who wants to WFH but is useless would claim they're being treated unfairly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭MattressRick


    Im curious if many people in tech jobs in Dublin around COVID times ended up buying houses in the west of Ireland?

    It was a thing during COVID, was in the newspapers as a trend that estate agents were seeing. People seemed to think that 5 days WFH were here forever. Even 2 or 3 days of commuting from west Clare to Dublin would be a huge drag.

    Also a poster mentioned that when they go into the office 1 day a week or month, they spend the day chatting to people. I've seen that in my own workplace, because people haven't seen that person in ages and end up approaching them most of the day for a chat. Doesn't happen when you turn up most days, you're left alone to do your work.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not tech, but in Dublin. We lost quite a few staff at various grades when the return to the office was fixed at 2 days a week. One person I worked with had begun the process of buying a house in the West, another I know of had bought in Cork. Office in Dublin. WFH worked so well for us, that both had expected the most they would be asked to come into the office would be one day a week or even just one or two days a month, and they were prepared to do that much, but not more. They bought knowing they were prepared to leave, if it would be more than that. All have found alternative employment, with either full WFH or hybrid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    As long as the company replaces those roles with someone more Dublin based, they probably arent too concerned.

    The situation probably worked out well for everyone.

    Those that made the leap early were probably more likley to get a fully remote job than people trying to do the same thing now, as the RTO movement gathers pace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think this is an unspoken reason for companies wanting staff in the office.

    Managers will say they are not sure what Jimmy is doing and they are online/offline all day. Kids arent in creche anymore....hmmm.

    You cant have one rule for Jimmy because he has little kids and another for everyone else, sure just bring them all back into the office and problem solved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Where were all these staff based up until 2019 or even early 2020?

    Companies do have a responsibility to support the well being of their employees, of course. But that doesnt mean they have to accommodate requests to work from home, when such an arrangement is not stipulated in the contract that the employee signed.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They actually haven't filled all those roles yet. Can't get staff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,023 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    firstly tone down your language ,

    Secondly just because whatever outpost of the civil service you work in has adopted them doesn’t mean they work in all scenarios, we do business in a lot of southern European countries and they require wet ink , notarised and apostilled documents for certain things , try doing that from home.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The poster listed some of the positives of office work, better collaboration on projects, team bonding and so on.

    If they were fully WFH they would miss out on those benefits and so would the employer.

    Company loyalty is a big factor in RTO. If someone is hired and is WFH full time from the start, they don't meet colleagues and may not really feel part of the team. Equally, the rest of the team may not bond with them either, because they have never met them.

    That employee is probably more likley to move jobs than someone that felt a connection to their team and had built personal relationships with colleagues.

    Employee churn is a big cost to business, so having a whole team of folks that aren't invested in the company is a major risk.

    It's easy to become a mercenary if you are fully WFH and that's a risk to the employer.



Advertisement