Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Couples on 107K can’t afford a home

1810121314

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭thereiver


    Housing issues have been getting worse for the last 10 years. Rents going up. Inflation rise in cost of materials shortage of builders. Increase in population. It pointless waiting for the government fix this problem maybe they can stop it getting worse . A low cost house is now 250!k



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You are completely wrong on that.

    My parents moved into a newly built housing estate in Killiney in the 1960s. It was built on open countryside.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killiney

    "South Killiney consisted of farmland, uncultivated hillside and woodland, a few large country houses (Ballinclea House, in particular, owned by the Talbot de Malahide family destroyed by fire in the early 1970s, and Rochestown House, near to the contemporary Killiney Shopping Centre), the convent of the Sisters of St. Joseph of Cluny, and Killiney Golf Club, a nine-hole course founded in 1903."

    Those country houses with farmland were sold off for development in the 1960s and housing estates were built on that farmland e.g. Ballinclea Heights, Avondale Road etc. When I moved to Blanchardstown in the early 1990s, it was actually more built up with more services than when my parents moved to Killiney.

    I never grew up with the entitled expectation that I could live where my parents grew up. It just wasn't possible, I had to move out further, that is the outcome for generations of people. It is only in the last decade that people have sought the impossible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,989 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …theres actually no other way of resolving this issue without significant state involvement, the market based, financialised model is clearly catastrophically failing, but dont worry, this is not going to change anytime soon, if ever…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Long considered one of south Dublin's poshest addresses, Killiney has been home to the rich and famous for well over 200 years. Back in the mid 18th century, Colonel John Mapas might not have been quite as famous as Bono is today, but he was certainly rich enough to afford the cost of building a large house on Killiney Hill.

    https://www.independent.ie/life/home-garden/homes/killiney-penthouse-with-links-to-one-of-irelands-wealthiest-musicians/39657492.html

    What are the chances of that article being re-written in 2040 with the word "Killiney" being replaced by "Blanchardstown" 🙂 …… you seem to think it is following the same trajectory. Good luck to you with that if that is your retirement plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭thereiver


    Its been like that for at least 10 years the no of houses for sale in certain areas is tiny killiney is a very posh area .sensible people work out i can borrow x amount now ok so what areas can I buy a house or apartment or do i prefer to pay rent for the next 10 years .

    Capitalism is flawed and far from perfect but it seems to be the system that is fair and logical compared with communism or Russian government which relys on corruption or bribery and we have social housing for those on lower incomes



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 421 ✭✭Dogsdodogsstuff


    I am looking at it from multiple angles. One is self, not relying on the state or others to make the world convenient for me. This is empowering as you can adapt to the world better rather then fighting against a dysfunctional system.

    The second is seeing the flaws and dysfunction and estimating the probability it will be rectified. I see in general , lifestyles improving but a disproportionate disconnect between rich and poor. That’s the way the world is, capitalism is becoming more like the feudal system , but history has a tendency to repeat itself.


    That aside, as population grows, you can’t keep building on shrinking land. Personally I don’t believe high rise cities is good for anybody’s health. Regardless transport and infrastructure is improving and the increase in work from home and job flexibility makes living in the city less and less important.

    Are you saying house prices will keep increasing proportionately and people will have to keep moving out further ? That’s what I imagine the way it works most places. Supply and demand and of course location location location.

    To be fair and clear , what are you proposing exactly ? Maybe I’m not fully understanding your point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Capitalism, is fine. The problem is, and has been, the government subsidising those who already own property via different schemes - both directly and indirectly.

    The country's finances were constrained after the crash, but when that relaxed, more focus was put on inflating house prices back up again for the benefit of those that already owned. And that continued.

    Now we have a situation where prices are not made by the meeting of supply and demand curves, but by the meeting of supply and "demand + state money".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    not relying on the state or others to make the world convenient for me.

    Would you put the current state of the housing market down then to the individuals over-relying on the state to make the world convenient for them? The eponymous scrounger wasters of the thread title on 107k a year, siting on their arses waiting for handouts?

    I think it's the opposite. The State's policies have messed up the system to the benefit of the "haves" and to the detriment of the "have nots". The difference between the former and the latter is often only age. Land tax should have been levied against speculators for years. And for as long as I've been commenting on the topic on here I've said that. The State should cut all supports and subsidies to the private market. It's activity in the market should be limited to it's own building and rental. They need to go back to building entire estates or developments of social housing. They can keep requirements for a mix on private developers if they wish but they need to restart their own pure social housing mixes. If they cannot do it directly themselves in the near term, and private developers are trying to screw them, then bring in modular housing units en-masse and/or give contracts and visas to massive foreign construction firms to get in and get the job done and get out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The difference between the former and the latter is often only age????

    What a ridiculous comment. Those older people have worked for 40 years paying off a mortgage, sacrificing holidays, sacrificing lattes in the morning to pay that mortgage. The younger people you identify with don't want to wait 40 years, don't want to sacrifice holidays etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    What kind of nonsense is this?

    The point I generally make against these type of boomer posts is a simple one.I ask the person - usually condescending against a younger demographic, going on about how their boomer position is purely down to sacrifice and hard work - is whether they (at the senior end of their boomer career with presumably their highest income) would be able to get a mortgage to buy their own home today with the standard deposit and mortgage the rest. Often the honest answer is "no". If they can't do it today at the senior end of their career, how on earth would they expect they could do it today if they were younger and at the start of their career?

    You see they don't want to admit that their massive privileged position (relative to younger people) is down to happenstance of timing of birth rather than some delusion of it being solely sacrifice or hard work or intellect.

    You may or may not be old enough to be in the "boomer" demographic yourself, but you mention buying in the 90's so I'll presume you are fairly senior in your career and I'll ask you to perform the same thought experiment. Imagine you have no house. You have a 10% deposit and are going to get a 4X mortgage yourself. Where are you buying? If you cannot buy in a location you would like to buy, it that simply because you don't want to sacrifice your holliers?

    Imagine complaining that young people don't want to wait 40 years for a house …… .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It isn't down to happenstance of timing of birth, it is down to hard work and sacrifice. I wasn't on a plane until I was 20 years old, that is not something that most of young middle Ireland can claim today.

    They want the holidays, they want the nights out, they want the nice car, but we couldn't have those and have a mortgage. We lived through the depression era of the 1980s when those that stayed struggled to keep things together while most had to leave. It wasn't then the choice of a job in the fake slave economy of Dubai, it was go to London to work on the sites.

    When I bought a house for the first time, my partner and I were both working, we were pushed to the limit. I was in the Civil Service at the time - the same point on my scale then is now €45k. My partner was on a similar income to me in the private sector then, so you can assume that she would also be on €45k (though I would think a little more, as public sector salaries haven't risen as fast as the private sector over the last 40 years). With a combined income of €90k, and a 10% deposit, (house price of €400k) we would be looking now at buying a house in a less good location, but that was what we had to do compared to our parents.

    Our first house was a small 3-bedroom. We could easily find a three-bedroom house in Dublin for €400k, there are 400 available on myhome.ie However, we would have to make the same sacrifices now that we made back then. Some of the young people of today are not prepared to make those sacrifices. Some of them are, which is why we have the highest number of first-time buyers ever in the history of the state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    It isn't solely down to "hard work" as you put it. A couple in the 1980's both with jobs in Dunne Stores were given mortgages by banks. House prices were on average 3 or 4 times the median salary throughout the 80's. House prices are now 7 or 8 times the median salary.

    It doesn't matter how many lattes you think young people have, it is a different world in the market compared to when you were buying.

    Try and buy some of the 400 3 bed houses you think that your 400k budget can buy and get back to me on it when you discover that they're selling for 450k+. A 400k budget (mine and my partners) are shopping in the 325/350k range.

    We paid the deposit on our property yesterday, a nice 2 bed in Swords that went 45k over asking price. It's not the dream home but it's a start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    This is yet more nonsense. Equating not being on a plane til you were 20 decades ago as some kind of sacrifice compared to a kid today with the option of a 19.99 Ryanair fare to wherever. Someone of your parents age probably puts the housing debacle down to young people today wanting electricity and indoor toilets and attributes the million-plus quid their ex-council house bought for a pittance to nothing but their own hard work.

    All I can say is that we've heard it all now when with the sob stories of the hardship endured by public sector workers in the 1980's and 1990's. Oh, the humanity. Let the young of today eat cake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I also lived in a rental bedsit with partner and child while saving for a deposit. A kip, but we are told on these threads that a mid-20s young person DESERVES to live in a two-bedroom apartment!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Interesting. Who is telling you that on these threads?

    The entitlement and DESERVES are mainly the boomers who want the system to keep pumping up their asset prices. They got their houses relatively handily as their previous generations handed them a fair system. Not only did they take that handout and hand-up from the previous generation, they then decided to get greedy and try to figure out who they can leech off the generations coming behind them. That is why the system is how it is now.

    The ultimate irony is that it was probably easy to get a council or other house in one's mid-20's when you were that age. You didn't get one, but it still released the pressure valve on the market which would have benefited you indirectly. When you bought your house you probably weren't trying to outbid the local authority trying to buy it with the bottomless (from their perspective) pockets of the public purse.

    Standards naturally improve over time so it is not legitimate to try to compare across generations. Your temporary bedsit would probably have been relative luxury compared to the tenements of a few decades prior.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭thereiver


    Unless you want to move to Russia or China you,ll still have to deal with capitalism. You probably won't hear people complaining too much when the house they own go,s up in value

    and eventually gen z will inherit homes from thier parents .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Again, capitalism is fine. The problem is the state subsidising and interfering in the market. The latter is what happens in reality and the reality is most definitely not the former. There is usually a certain cognitive dissonance with people who don't want to admit or recognise when something is blatantly to their advantage

    Billions of public money and subsidies flung into the private market every year.

    Most necessary goods and services are actually regulated in some form or other. Just that for housing, the interference acts to the detriment of the end consumer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭thereiver


    We had a housing crash in 2008 , many builders went out of business and left ireland as the economy slowed down.we had ghost estates with empty houses.Now we don,t have the capacity to build the no of houses to even catch up with the backlog .Materials are more expensive and we have a shortage of building workers we also have issues with infrastructure .We should be building 10 storey apartment blocks in citys to keep up with demand. This was discussed on the pat kenny show , even if we could import 10,000 builders where would they live?

    they would be spending most of their income on paying rent .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    This came into my youtube feed. Probably google cookies tracking but regardless I think it is relevant for here. I have no idea who this fella is

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-7LnxKfIeCo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    if the gov would get rid of inheritance tax it might be ok, something you will get hit for if you live in Dalkey or Finglas

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Has it been pointed out yet that this is terrible “research” from the Institute?

    The borrowing limit is not 3.5x, it is 4x. The use of 3.5x is them taking the average of mortgage draw downs and rounding up slightly. It is ridiculous to do that when the CBI rules are 4x. There are a number of reasons why the average drawdowns are at that level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,524 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    3.5x or 4x €30k is still nothing. That's what I'm currently on. Also not a FTB as I did have a house but recession, change of jobs (for mental health), and other normal factors meant I had to sell and take a hit.

    Looking for now, all I could maybe get in the entirety of Co. Limerick (not city) is an overpriced site or a basically derelict building on a tiny site. Tipp not much better.

    I've no hope of buying.

    There are 4 properties to rent in Limerick, 2 of which would take all or more of my wage. One is 800 for just a bed, and the last would take half my wage and in a crappy area. No point looking further afield because I wouldn't be able to afford to travel to/from work.

    I've given up on being able to buy/rent for the foreseeable future. I'm part of the statistics of 40+ year olds living at home. In fact, it would be great if I could officially live at home, but my mother would lose some oap benefits. Not if its someone who isn't an immediate relative though, which makes no sense. So I'm technically homeless. Thanks state!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭thereiver


    You could team up with another person to buy a 2 bed dwelling maybe an old 2bed house



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭Thespoofer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,474 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Why on earth would you be expecting your first house to be "a dream home"? Why is this even a thought that springs into your head?

    This is the latte infused though process that makes everyone a victim today.

    I'm not terribly old and grew up in what is now a nice suburb, but previously was in the sticks. My parents had to scrimp and save just to get that. We were not poor, but we holidayed in Ireland in a caravan all my life, McDonalds was something that people on TV had. If we were extra lucky we might get orange juice once a week. Our 2nd (at least) hand school clothes came from neighbours with older kids, that's just how things worked back then, our school books were covered in wallpaper, we had 1 car. You were delighted with yourself if you got an actually new pair of runners, even if they were Sizzlers.

    The idea that you go out and buy your dream home straight off the mark is just insane to me.

    I have money now, but I still live frugally, we shop in Aldi & Lidl, our kids wear Pennys clothes (or more often than not handmedowns), the wouldn't know what a pair of Nike runners were if you showed them.

    Why do I see all the people who cant get on the property ladder out having coffees and market lunches in the park on a Saturday, their kids decked out in the latest Nike gear, probably with a €100 premier league shirt on the 6 year old? If they need sports gear its Decathalon or SportsDirect.

    The average outgoings for a couple looking to buy today, based on what I anecdotally see, are incredible. They are spending more than I do, yet somehow claim that they cannot save.

    I completely agree that the market is pretty messed up at the moment, giving people money because house prices are "too" high is only going to drive house prices higher, but you still have to do your bit yourself. Throwing a fifty into the bank once a month while going on holidays twice a year is just laughable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,474 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    To eat that cake they would first have to come home from their Taylor Swift concert in their taxi, (assuming they didn't fly to London to see her of course).

    If you are saving for a house, why are spending €19.99 to fly anywhere? Either you are saving all you can or you are not.

    "ohh but I have to be able to liveee! (in Barcelona for a quick city break)"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,474 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    To be fair, you are earning not much above minimum wage, if you think someone on minimum wage should be able to buy a house for themselves, then what price do you think these properties would be, and can you explain why you think those earning far more than minimum wage wouldn't just buy them all up and rent them?

    How is €800 half of your income if you are on €30k?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,028 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I just saw this headline on the OP. Yes I realise it is difficult for people to get on the housing ladder.

    But there are two sides to every story, young people spend eat out (there is a thread on boards "has eating out become a luxury" with no hint of irony), they buy over priced coffees, spend loads on clothes, iphones etc. Then wonder why they can't save.

    A lot of people don't know how to budget, let's be honest. They live for now not thinking of the future.

    In other European countries it is common to rent and not buy homes. The Irish psyche of having to own a home is ironically still a tradition that has held up.

    Plus in the future in Ireland people will eventually move further and further away from Dublin looking for cheaper homes. Discovering the "wild west". Thankfully with the new culture of remote working (thanks to Covid) it should be less of an issue for people.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,524 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    I'm not saying I should be able to buy a house on my wage, I was just pointing out that whether it's 3.5x or 4x your wage that one can get in a mortgage, it's still not enough to even have a look at the market. But previously, renting was still affordable on near min wage. Now, it's not. When I got my first mortgage, renting was cheaper.

    The €800 was mentioned as the cost to just rent a room somewhere, not a place to myself. Followed by a separate reference to another property which would take half my income. Add in the increased costs of bills, etc, and I'm priced out of renting too. That was my point. Not that I should be able to get a mortgage, but that I've no other options either. I'm priced out of both markets.

    I'd love to earn more, but choices are limited at my age and abilities and having been made redundant 3 times in a row in 8 years didn't help. But right now, this is what I have. And what I have won't even get me a smell of either market. It wasn't always like this. That's the point. And it doesn't look good for the foreseeable. Inheritance is my only option and I'm lucky to have it, just hope my siblings don't change their minds.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Not once did I mention that I was expecting to buy the "dream home". We have bought what is affordable to us within our budget, in fact we're getting a 80% mortgage for it. I literally said "It's a start".

    We have money, and trust me I'm as frugal as the next person, shop only in Aldi, majority of my clothes are from Penny's & charity shops and very rarely go out for meals as I enjoy cooking. Haven't been out of the country or even more than a 2 night stay in Wexford for over 2 years while saving for the deposit.

    Fair play to you on making incorrect assumptions on mine and others lifestyles based on an overused stereotype.

    I'm lactose intolerant so no Lattés for me.



Advertisement