Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings - updated 11/5/24*

19939949969989991031

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,562 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Brilliant contribution.

    Plenty of options to try, Automatic rejection of claim and a plane ticket home. Work with the UK government to prevent the abuse of the CTA. Much cheaper than building a wall.

    But to be honest, given your stance on all of this I am surprised you are not out demanding we start running a free ferry service from the UK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Patrick2010




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,562 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Why are there no threads on the sky being blue? If a thread on overpopulation is that important to you. You are more than welcome to start one.

    The thread is about refugee policy,not general migration. Read the mod updates on the 1st post if you need further clarification.

    If you wish to discuss Ireland's emigration patterns/problems, again, open a thread. Kindly stop conflating legal migration with asylum seeking/illegal economic migration.

    Virtually no one (yes, there are a few loopers) blames migrants for Ireland's problems. Before you bring it up, yes we know migrants did not cause the housing crisis. If you are bringing multiples more people into the country than you are building houses this just makes it magnitudes worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,259 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    That's it? That's your great mass-deportation plan you've been so secretive about all this time?

    Buying people a plane ticket home! I wasn't expecting much tbh but I thought you'd have come up with something better than this quite unoriginal take on voluntary deportations.

    As for working with the UK government, I'm sure it's top of their priority list.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,941 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Yes but again, what you're talking about here is a targeted concern about high immigration — not overpopulation. Regardless of annual numbers, the overall numbers show that there probably wouldn't be a hugely material difference in our population if immigrants and emigrants were swapped around.

    What that tells you is that it's not a problem of overpopulation that we have. What we have is a problem of there being a historic and ongoing lack of impetus to modernise and improve our infrastructure and resources to deal with the inevitable population increase deriving from our emergence as a modern dynamic economy — not to mention an almost abject failure to make practical provision for the fact that we have rapidly changed from a very rural / agricultural society into an increasingly urbanised one.

    Notwithstanding the fact that the influx of Ukrainian refugees was an unprecedented event (and one which — while we can argue all day as to what was the right way to approach it — we probably could not have completely avoided) — I'm not sure I buy the argument that it's realistic to expect we would not be experiencing the housing, services and cost of living issues of today if asylum seekers disappeared or we dramatically reduced migration (without that reduction causing problems of its own).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,761 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Video recorded by IPAs in Dundrum



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,142 ✭✭✭prunudo


    The whole system is a shambles. They're pawns in a money making scheme, the government don't care for anyone but themselves, neither born and bred citizens or those they claim we have international obligations towards.

    Although, the women is obviously being coached by a ngo or do gooder, it is still isn't a good situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 416 ✭✭cal naughton


    Wow the sense of entitlement is off the charts in that video! I get a sense that things are going to boil over in these facilities soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,118 ✭✭✭Gen.Zhukov


    The Prime Time investigates crew will be all over this one - It will dominate the airwaves for weeks

    There is the small chance however, that they'll just stick with the reporting of Gaza and ignore this domestic issue for some unknown reason

    Will we have a - "extra.ie-A source of misinformation" - thread started because they did a hurty article about the Govt/FG?

    extra.ie is quite obviously a hotbed of white supremacist neo-nazi sentiment - Who knew



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,534 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Would you implement a hard border with NI?

    It's either a common travel area or it's not. It will be abused if it's open.

    For the record I do think we will need border controls with the UK soon. But I don't see people calling for it...why not? That said, border controls with NI will not prevent crossings. It would be a sieve.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,761 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    I agree with you but also there's no excuse for how that gentleman speaks to them at the end, an absolute pig

    We think he's the manager of the place, a horrible horrible individual



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,411 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    I have a feeling that this Resort hotel will be getting a very negative review on Booking.com !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,142 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Thats because the ngo's are in their ears, filling them with every trick in the book.



  • Posts: 8,532 [Deleted User]


    I would have zero issues having a border with NI at this stage. If that's where the majority of these people are coming from then it makes perfect sense. If it's done properly then it won't be too much of an inconvenience.

    Either we go for a United Ireland where we can control the ports up there or we put a border in. One or the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 630 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,562 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Another ground breaking contribution.

    What are you even talking about at this point 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,562 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    No - we both know that would be impractical.

    As for the discussion, the government is unwilling at least publicly to admit we have a problem with the numbers coming into the country and/or the way they are doing it.

    Cant fix an issue if they refuse to admit there is one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,941 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Well, as is common on here, you seem to have leapt to comment on what you think I'm saying — rather than what I actually am saying.

    I was making the point, aimed at a particular poster who specifically referred to overpopulation as an issue in the context of this thread, which you have kindly reminded us is a thread about refugees. I made the point that it seems odd to me to evoke overpopulation as an issue in the context of refugees and that it also seems to me that the gripe is really simply one of people thinking there are too many of them or they aren't being handled well. That's a legitimate concern in its own right that doesn't need to be dressed up as a concern as to overpopulation and — in my own opinion — is indicative of the trend on here to be alarmist and constantly tie everything to some doomsday scenario (be it overpopulation, the fall of Irish society and western civilisation generally, the obliteration of Irish culture, the "replacement" of Irish people).

    You don't seem to be disputing that point. You're just making points to me that aren't actually reflective of what I'm saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,259 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Apologies if I'm mixing you up with another poster.

    But wasn't deportations your big thing? Weren't you the poster who said that ultimately we'll simply have to be able to deport large amounts of people?

    Maybe you've changed your mind, fair enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,534 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Yeah fine but what are you recommending in relation to the CTA? We can all give out and moan but have you practical suggestions?

    You said "Work with the UK government to prevent the abuse of the CTA."...so let's brainstorm...

    I waltzed thru Stansted last week without having to show my passport to anyone except the Ryanair guy at the gate who was only matching the passport name to the boarding pass. He couldn't care less.

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,411 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    So you presented the correct matching and valid documentation to the boarding agent so he did his job but"he couldn't care less"

    So if you presented no passport at the boarding gate I am sure the agent there would care a lot more and you'd be denied boarding… or he would lose his job and his company fined.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,534 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    You're missing the point entirely. I am talking about the lack of passport controls. He only cared that I had a passport and the names matched. A driving license would also have worked. He didn't care if I had a proper visa for Eire or anything like that. He didn't ask the purpose of my visit. He did not scan the passport to check for issues. Not his job. There is no passport control until you get to Ireland and that's where people claim asylum. I understand there can be random checks from immigration officers but I have never witnessed it. Easy ditch the passport between the Ryanair gate guy and Irish "passport control" too as we all know. Actually the Irish passport control was 2 lads in Shannon at midnight waving everyone through quickly with a glance at passport.

    So expert, would you abolish the CTA? Would you implement a border controls/check from NI?

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 630 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    I Would prefer a hard border with the North



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,626 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    There are two reasons why they are making their way from Northern Ireland.

    1: Obviously the UK social welfare system is not attractive enough. And Ireland's is better.

    2: They were refused asylum in the UK and took off to pursue their remaining option. The Republic of Ireland.

    It's not rocket science to fix both of these.

    Limit their social welfare to a few Euros a week.

    Stop giving the NGOs tent money. May as well be pissing taxpayers money up against a wall.

    Request access to the UK asylum database.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,941 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Not much point giving it thought. There is no realistic sustainable future of this country where there is a hard border with the North. There isn't any way that the governments either side of the border have the appetite for miring themselves once more in the torturous issue of how you effectively police the border (to hard border standards). The most we will see are the odd checks and targeted interceptions.

    What's more, the British have the stronger hand in this. There is no incentive for them to administer a hard border (and to co-fund that administration) as the easy movement of migrants from North to South is likely to be the more attractive flow path than South to North. There doesn't appear to be much incentive for the Northern executive and British state to plug that gap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,902 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    maybe you thought twintytwo was in the cohort with the mental illness? Wasn’t that you who said that?

    No idea why deporting illegal migrants should be seen as a taboo subject that we can’t talk about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,269 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I've a solution for her and anyone else not happy with the conditions….

    Feel free to get yourself to the airport, get on a plane, and go try a country that might be more to your liking. If they got themselves to Ireland from wherever, that should be an easy enough task.

    No one is forcing her or anyone to stay. It's not a prison camp.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,411 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    CTA is there for a reason and is used daily in the thousands by the legal documented citizens of the UK&Ireland, so abolishing it would serve no purpose and would not stop the daily flow of illegal migrants paying €150 to get driven over the border from Belfast to the IPAS office on Mount St.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,259 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I said something related but it certainly wasn't my intention to claim anybody was part of a cohort with mental illness.

    I don't believe discussing deportations is taboo I just recall @twinytwo as having made strong claims on the subject previously, but as I said, maybe it was a different poster.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,534 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    So no concrete suggestions then? Continue as we are and have a good moan?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement