World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) Files

So there's no ban then? What are the trans activists all complaining about?

(Again, you're showing your complete lack of understanding of clinical trials with the nonsense about "delayed indefinitely" and "dishonesty".)

And could you explain why on earth you think Wes Streeting, who only 2 years ago was saying that "trans women are women" would now be delaying what you think are life saving treatments for "dishonest" reasons? What can possibly have changed his mind to that extent - while being "dishonest" rather than simply convinced that he was wrong before?

Are the hard right in the room with us right now?

Again that is completely untrue can you show me a long term follow up study or even a short term follow up study from Tavistock? One that monitors the outcomes of the patients who attended and were given puberty blockers at a young age? The " far right" Jesus what a ridiculous comment are all the whistleblower doctors far right is professor Donal O Shea far right? Is Hilary Cass far right?

So your argument is that Streeting was correct and honest when he said trans women are women, but for some unfathomable reason that is becoming an untenable position to hold (why??) and therefore he is now changing - for purely political reasons? But that he still secretly believes that trans women are women and that children will actually die if he does what he has said he will do?

You don't see a problem with that reading of the timeline?? Not least the horrifying deliberate decision to cause harm for his own career - as well as there being no explanation for why public opinion would be changing in that way if that approach were actually making life better for everyone.

Because the alternative reading is: some years back, when there was a lot less awareness of the whole question among the general public, Streeting and the Labour Party generally took on a clearly nonsensical view because the activists around him that it was the right thing to do, so he decided, for political reasons, that it was better to go with the flow? Only since then, more information has come out as more and more children have been pushed onto the transition pathway, and now it has become much harder to continue ignoring reality - especially since the Cass report?

If there's a flaw in that reading of events, please do tell me - but with evidence rather than your usual unevidenced assertions.

LOL

Still no evidence then?

Ah heyoor, with your facts...

I don’t know if there was any discussion on here about Jolyon Maugham’s (of The Good Law Project) claim to have data proving that the ban on puberty blockers had already caused a massive increase in suicides among young trans people, but he’s just received a massive public slapdown on that from Wes Streeting the new Labour minister for health:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-suicides-and-gender-dysphoria-at-the-tavistock-and-portman-nhs-foundation-trust/review-of-suicides-and-gender-dysphoria-at-the-tavistock-and-portman-nhs-foundation-trust-independent-report

Turns out it’s complete nonsense.

Unsurprisingly.

The specific aim is to examine evidence for a large rise in suicides claimed by campaigners.

Summary of conclusions

The data do not support the claim that there has been a large rise in suicide in young gender dysphoria patients at the Tavistock.

The way that this issue has been discussed on social media has been insensitive, distressing and dangerous, and goes against guidance on safe reporting of suicide.

The claims that have been placed in the public domain do not meet basic standards for statistical evidence.

There is a need to move away from the perception that puberty-blocking drugs are the main marker of non-judgemental acceptance in this area of health care.

The report actually refers to the GLP and their irresponsible behaviour in making up these claims.