Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why wont die hard GAA fans admit football these days is muck?

1353638404150

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    We will see how attendances stack up at the end of the season. More games with some having low numbers, does not mean an overall reduction. In the Golden Age of football, the two predecessors of the Tailteann died a death because of lack of interest.

    Meanwhile back on the field there are 30 players and two sets of goalposts. The rules allow them to take up any positions they want on the field, and pass the ball in any direction by hand or by foot. No amount of harking back to how things used to be will make them play in the way that obtained 50 years ago. We are getting on for 25 years of players and coaches changing the game radically, and it will continue to evolve. It would be a disaster for the tinkerers to get their way with nonsense new rules which will just annoy the players.

    When the Shot Clock has been tried, along with the Scoring Zone, and goalkeepers made stay in their area. When handpasses have been restricted, and back passes banned. When outfield players are made to stay in certain parts of the field. When the Mark has been outlawed. What will be the next genius idea if all that does not produce the game that people want?

    Just to show that I am amenable to new ideas. Let players pick the ball directly off the ground. Increase the steps from 4 to 8. Both of those would just recognise what goes on anyway. And I would be open to an experiment with 13 a side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭shockframe


    Not a bad weekend of football that.

    Which I might have said for the 37th time on here!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    Matter of opinion. I wouldn't agree. I have to stop myself falling asleep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭shockframe


    You have you're opinion which I respect but is different to mine.

    But I know mine is valid and that's all that matters.! 😅



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    The game is too slow now, thats the main problem, players walking or standing still with the ball.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 907 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    What you are actually seeing is that there are actually no or very few “ great forewords “ and with a good tight defensive system these players can be almost invisible in a close game.
    Back in the day forwards such as Peter Canavan , Bernard Flynn and Barney Rock were capable of winning their own ball, taking a big hit and still taking a score.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,452 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The game needs a root and branch scoping.


    and you are still going on with what is largely rubbish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,035 ✭✭✭WesternZulu


    They also had far more space to do their thing making it a hell of a lot easier to score compared to the situation today



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 907 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    Yes that is very true. I Having posted my previous message I just realised that those players would have struggled to score in the modern game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,027 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    So scoring averages are higher today than they ever were in the past, there are more scores today than in the "golden years" but you think Peter Canavan would have struggled to score today?

    There is a forward mark today but you think those players would have struggled to win their own ball?

    Thats quite a take.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,118 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    You have some health issue if you struggled to stay away during the Armagh/Kerry match. That was one of the most entertaining games I have seen for a long time. Unless one is completely devoid of emotion, you couldn't but be on the edge of your seat watching it - even as a neutral. Most neutrals would be edging towards Armagh, so it was great to see them get over the line at the end.

    By any chance, are you Father Stone from Fr. Ted?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    15:18 to 17:22, into the game.

    Thats is the kind of play I hate, all hand passes going up and down the sideline and backwards, a bad wide at the end as well.

    https://www.rte.ie/player/series/the-sunday-game-live/SI0000001909?epguid=IH10003622-24-0029



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭Rosita


    Why do some people keep going on about the '60s and ' 70s? Why not discuss football in 2024 instead?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    who talks about the 60s and 70s? 🤔 the football im talking about is around 2010/2012, it was far better to watch then.

    I dont get why the likes of RTE and Newstalk are saying them 2 games over the weekend were "great games", just because they were close in terms of the scoreboard doesnt mean they were "great games".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,027 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    2011 All Ireland semi final. Dublin 0-8 : Donegal 0-6

    I'm not sure you remember 2010-2012 at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    Tell me that game isnt better to watch than any of the 2 semis this past weekend? the long kick passing is what I miss most from them days, football isnt about slow play and 99% passes being made with the fist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I was at the Galway v Donegal SF at the weekend. It was a great game. The teams varied their tactics in parts of the match. Galway in particular defended brilliantly throughout. The atmosphere was great loads of families at it. All engrossed in the match.

    There were plenty of great scores in the match as well.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    The one you are picking there is an outlier, it was probably one of the best games of football in the last 50 years, I was a at it.

    But it does not mean that today's football cannot produce great games. The problem is when teams refuse to vary their tactics (Armagh). You need defensive set up teams to at least attempt to counter, like Galway, Derry, Donegal, Louth. Even Dublin are one of the teams who have done both counter attacking football, and controlled football superbly.

    It is a question of managers and teams having the courage to try and force errors/make scores or sit back and "hope" the opposition makes a mistake. The really good sides don't "hope". They impose themselves on a game, and can vary their style.

    I would argue after 2013 Dublin's off the ball movement moved into the stratosphere, particularly after Dublin lost in 2014. The level of off the ball movement and that type of awareness as a team as a whole did not exist in 2013.

    The last great Dublin match I would argue was the 2019 AIF matches v Kerry. Especially the first game where Dublin were a man down, but were so well trained they just pushed Cluxton way up and allowed one Kerry man spare far out on the wing. Yet Dublin dominated. That was top notch stuff. Perhaps not as obvious to the casual viewer on the television. But it was well thought out and well earned.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    I think you just love tactics but to me and a lot of fans of gaelic football, that isnt what we love or want to see. I think that is just for the GAA nerds (no offence) I dont think it is entertaining to most fans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭Rosita


    If you scroll back not very far you'll see people talking about it. Surprised you missed it unless you've just joined the thread.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    3 random matches I picked from the last 20 years. I just feel them games were a lot faster and more exciting to watch. the games these days bore me to tears.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    I dont think anyone on this thread was saying the football back then was good. football has changed for the worst in the last 10 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,361 ✭✭✭mattser


    Anyone who watches that segment and doesn't believe there's a problem, is deluding themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It is just a question of getting used to change and different styles of play. A lot of GAA people are always nostalgic wether it be a fella from the 70's wanting catch and kick like the good auld days. Or the fellas from the 90's wanting man on man, knock out football.

    The fact of life is the top managers and players are now more intelligent than years ago, all teams now have sports analysts, sport scientists. Gaelic Football borrows form all different sports, Rugby League, Basketball and soccer. They watch how players move and create space. Possession is king.

    The problems start when the weaker sides/poorly managed sides do not have the nous/intelligence/bravery to use the possession and have the awareness/movement to create space. They just funnel back constantly, ball side to side slowly. The better sides have better variation within their play. Of the less fashionable sides I was most impressed with Louth to be honest.

    I have never seen a a full back wide hugging the touchline when in possession before, the idea was for Louth to stretch Dublin when in possession, then funnel back when not in possession going more compact.

    I think the game of football itself is fine, the main problem is most of the weaker sides/lazy managers resort to the simple option non stop. Slow stuff funnel back and side to side. That won't win much at all.

    There definitely has to be tweaks in the rules of GAA to stop the poor managers/weaker sides constantly playing like that, but overall the game has moved on leaps and bounds since 2013. The problem is managers/weaker sides constantly go for the easy option and do not vary their play.

    I have watched the last great Dublin team open mouthed at times, when viewed live their movement was specular, mix of kick passing, hand-passing, head up. movement at speed, loads of options for the player in possession, when they let loose. That is what teams today should strive for. They have to learn the ability to vary their play. Instead of taking the safe easy option.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    It was mostly one dimensional stuff when you really look at it. For example in Tyrone v Kerry games Kerry ran into traffic, Tyrone would hunt in packs and win it back.

    Eventually teams copped on like Kerry not run into traffic and be more patient with the ball.

    Dublin and Kerry (in particular) had to adapt even more when Donegal appeared with the more extreme defensive counter tactic.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    But it isnt football, as the hardly ever kick the ball. when great forwards arent allowed show their skill most of the game, then there is a problem. can you imagine the damage david clifford would do if he had space to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    They do kick the ball. One of those "clipboard" types counted how often they do it. And even if they never kicked the ball, that is not against the rules. One stat which shows that the game is not muck is the amount of time the ball stays in play. Unless people get enjoyment looking at a football crossing the end lines and the sidelines.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/football/2023/0928/1407954-new-study-outlines-stark-extent-of-possession-football/

    "Despite the increase in hand passing, there has not been a comparable slide in foot passing. While kicking was on the decrease from 2011 to 2018, it has started to level off at approximately 130 passes per game.

    Some of the rise in passing can be explained by an increase in game time. The ball was in play for an average of 34 minutes in the 2011 season and now stands at 45 minutes, 30 seconds, a 32% increase over 13 seasons."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    People who think a particular sport is crap or muck have so many other ways to pass their time these days. No need for anyone to ever see a football game again, if it is so painful for them to watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,452 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The fact that the highest and most respected people in the GAA do seem to think that Gaelic football needs

    a serious makeover to increase the spectacle of the game seems to mean nothing to you.

    Lets let the clipboard merchants and the backroom grifters run it into the ground till eventually only the

    hangers on and a couple of stray dogs go to games.

    Instead of fessing up and admitting that change is needed to prevent our game from turning into outdoor basketball.

    Thats how it rolls bro…..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,027 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Some people get their kicks bumping a thread to call something shite several hundred times over.



Advertisement