Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1782783785787788943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    For all the abuse the government take on housing I’m always so surprised how rare it is for the actual facts to be discussed. They don’t seem to be getting the positive messages out very well

    I wonder if polled how many Irish people would know we are building more houses per person than any country in Europe - significantly more than double the average. Surely this deserves some credit? As well as being the biggest in absolute terms, we are also increasing our output faster than any other country. Remarkable.

    https://www.ey.com/en_ie/news/2024/06/irish-housing-completions-forecast-to-be-strongest-among-19-european-countries-ey-euroconstruct



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Ireland is different.

    Now where have I heard that before?



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    it is remarkable, but it doesn’t fit the narrative to acknowledge it, nor the insane fact that even though our population is the highest since the Famine, we have full employment, achieved within a decade of a catastrophic economic collapse, and a few years of a global pandemic. In any other country, that would be lauded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Jmc25


    I understand the sentiment as people will indeed always find something to moan about, but this is absolutely not unique to Ireland in any way shape or form.

    And as things to moan about go, the state of Irish property market is a very, very easy target.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I didn’t say it was unique, but the successes achieved should at least be acknowledged. There is a definite sense of entitlement, and a lack of understanding of just how well we have recovered from a dire situation. If anything, we have rebounded to well, too fast, and property development has not kept pace from a near standing start. I can’t help but think there are those who resent how good the recovery has been and that there are so many high paying jobs which mean young people haven’t needed to emigrate for work. Building houses will never keep pace with job creation in an environment which has been created in this country over the last 10 years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    One of the biggest problems and this is an article in the FT today; is that inflation is potentially worse than a recession, but it is not easy to measure this for individuals. So, when people think of 2008-13 they think of a recession whereas 2021-24 have been inflationary which is utterly obliterating so much of people’s income, that it “feels” like the years of 2009-13 but just a bit different in a way that maybe cannot be accurately, verbally explained by people but they can sense it and see it in the amount of cash they have at the end of each month.

    Property acts as an inflation hedge so it makes sense that less people are being hit as hard as they would have been 2009-13 given the number of homeowners in the country but at the same time they are not immune. The big losers, suffering equivalently to how they did 2009-13 are younger people and added to this for this era are those that are renting, who probably feel like they are working to stand still due to inflation. We had massive unemployment 2009-13 and this is bad for the whole economy but it is pretty bad for the individual to be working to stand still, possibly even worse given the time and effort that working entails.

    This is not all to say that 2009-13 was better than 2021-2024 but that these last few years could be said to be on a slightly better level than 2009-13 because inflation can be and absolutely is awful for those impacted. Renting and not being able to squirrel away decent savings means many people are drifting along aimlessly in life due to inflation and home ownership is that life raft just out of reach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    Mention property taxes increasing to capture some of the huge price appreciation in the market and watch them try to play the poor man despite being paper millionaires!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,919 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    The problem is the majority of properties being built in Ireland don't make it to the general market.

    Of the houses built last year 32695, only 27% went on sale on the market. 73% of new properties were one-off houses (not on sale to public) or apartments for rent or social housing. In Dublin City Centre 94% was apartments (needed) but only 2% went for sale to the public 98% were private rent or social housing. We definitely need more apartments but to have only 27% of the record year of housing going on sale in the market is ridiculous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I agree. The government is too active in the housing market - but this is because it’s the popular position now. Sort the homeless and the housing list is the main pressure they get. The government were losing serious ground to the SF mantra of social housing for all so have moved further left in their own position with no real right wing opposition to fend off.

    The issue of the private market producing apartments to rent over purchase is just an economic/societal one. Young people in Ireland don’t want to buy apartments. They are very expensive to build. The only way they are viable is if they are build to rent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    They are very expensive to build. The only way they are viable is if they are build to rent.

    But then they are also only viable if the rents are high. So rents won't materially come down with more apartments either, if rents do start to decrease apartment supply will dry up.

    The issue is the cost of delivery, that needs tackled, not pushing up demand to make it viable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    What funny is that I think the best way out of the rent for anyone is to buy a 1 bed apartment and save the difference between the mortgage and the rent. Buy one as soon as you can get the loan for it. There will be less competition than for bigger apartments and houses. They are cheaper. You can afford one faster than you can afford a bigger place. And you would be renting one or a room share anyway if you didnt buy it, so its still an improvement.

    Find a way out of the rent trap as soon as you can and then save the difference. Your mortgage will not go up at the same rate rent will. Save the difference and then trade up in a few years if you even need to. I think the last bit of value in the market is buying a 1 bed apartment if you are currently renting or sharing. I dont see that value staying too long though as they are going up fast now too.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    This was the general thinking when I was in my mid to late 20s, and rents were pretty reasonable back then.

    Buy an apartment as first rung on the property ladder, start building up equity instead of continuing to pay rent, then sell and trade up when you need to. You'd have bought an apartment thinking you might trade up three or four times over the course of next 30 years. The thinking being each rung on the ladder improved your prospects for the next rung.

    Things are very different now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    I moved into a house this year that needs some work. I can do it all myself but it will take me a year or two.

    My friends in my age group come up to visit and they are disgusted that it wasnt walk in brand new. One even asked me if i saw it before i bought it. Those same friends still moan that they will never be able to afford a house and they might as well not bother saving and blow all their money on holidays and restaurants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    Im learning as i go. Some great diy tutorials on youtube. I would rather learn how to do it than pay the new build premium. Well i cant afford the new build premium so no choice really. My only problem is time, but sure if it takes us a year or two longer to do it all, because we have to fit it around work and life, thats what we will have to do.

    Im getting quite good at painting, digging, wiring, gardening, plumbing, woodwork and flooring. Oh and demolition :) Even did a bit of block laying the other day.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Thats a sample size of n=1 or thereabouts?

    My experience is most people who don't yet own a house would bite your hand off just to get a doer upper these days, such are the prices in the market right now.

    I have never met anyone disgusted that a house was not new build



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,620 ✭✭✭combat14


    and many FTBs are older now plus are finding it much harder to save deposits with nose bleed rents



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,620 ✭✭✭combat14


    down the country it is far less e.g. 375k ruling out many of the new 430k houses - perhaps house prices are simply too high if FTBs are still struggling to buy them even with all the multiple government supports.........



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    They werent disgusted that it wasnt a new build. They were disgusted that i would buy a doer upper and move into it BEFORE it was done up. Ever met anyone like that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Yep, 100% agree but it’s easier said than done to reduce to the cost of producing something. With apartments the big variable of land costs are proportionally lower - they’re just expensive to build correctly (for reasons beyond my expertise!)

    I think the government had a scheme to give developers money directly for each apartment? This was criticised across the board for using taxpayer money to enrich the nasty developers.

    Absolutely. Once you’ve decided you’re staying in Ireland long term - buying literally anything you can, as soon as you can, over long term renting is the higher percentage play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Even with the increased density on each site, the land costs are still far too high.

    We need to tackle land speculation, and implement land rezoning taxes - windfall profits from rezoning land from ag to residential should be taxed extremely heavily to discourage land speculation.

    Smaller taxes should be levied on residential lands on their market value also, to discourage hoarding. Many towns and cities have just a few developers and businessmen who own majority of development land, and can effectively put the squeeze on anyone looking to build, forcing them to pay eye watering prices for zoned land if they want to build.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    In fairness to govt the vacant site tax does at least aim to improve this. not sure if anybody has actually had to pay it yet though. Seems like it has had an enormous lead in time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Yes, more exemptions than applications of it.

    New residential zoned land tax due to come is already seeing local level politicians lobby to add more exemptions, such as for any residential zoned land that is being used for agriculture.

    Meaning you could rent out residential zoned land to a farmer and avoid all taxes on that prime development land you own.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    TBH that rule is fair enough in as far as it is more likely to be applied on land that is genuinely being farmed. I am very pro taxing zoned land heavily to avoid speculative hoarding, but I don't think it is fair to tax genuine farmers who are using the land productively and wish to continue doing so.

    I guess if we started seeing a couple of sheep on sites in Dublin miles away from any other agriculture then it's an issue.

    As far as I know the agricultural issue is already covered by allowing farmers who wish to use the land for farming rather than development to request that it is dezoned, and thus the tax no longer applies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Dezoning is fine, but I personally know local councillors (FF) who are pushing for straight up exemptions to the tax.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Agree with all these views without exception. But I think the last figure I saw was roughly between 10-15% land cost for apartments.

    Let’s say you could optimistically knock half off that cost. For a €500k apartment you’re theoretically making it €465-475k instead. It would be fantastic but don’t think it solves the problem necessarily. A 50% reduction in land value also feels ambitious. I would venture that the value of land in Central Dublin is already low vs other capital cities (probably because of building height restrictions)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I think that is where the owner is farmingbit at present

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    When you go beyond I think its 5 floors( it's a height related limit) you can no longer use standard building practices of blocks and timber. You are now into steel and mass concrete. The higher you go the more room services take up, everything from lifts to sewers. Young lad building a bungalow at present, there will be 3k of steel going into itand it not that complicated a building. Buildings regs are crazy in this country

    On buying anything a friend separated from his other half about 5 years ago now. I told him at the time buy anything. There was option sub 80k at the time. He as he put it "was not ready to buy" 5 years later he has probably spend nearly 50k on rent. The options at 80k are double that now

    Another lad moved into the village three ish years ago himself and the partner had a bread snapper and another one on the way. I was talking to him he had a decent job but wanted to build. Again I advised him to buy anything even a house in a council estate( nothing wrong with them) but his other half would not hear of it. So three years later 35-40k gone and houses 20-30% more expensive

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If owner wants to still farm they should object to zoning or apply to dezone, but to have residential zoned land but also pay no tax on it is definition of having your cake and eating it.

    We should not facilitate that - residential zoned land should be developed, don't like it? Appeal for dezoning and you won't get benefit of price increase.

    Irish regs are very stringent for things like lift cores and the number that must be dual aspect.

    Apartment blocks on the continent have far higher ratio of apartments to lift cores, but here it's very low before you need to add another lift core which adds massively to both build price and maintenance costs.

    You don't get half as many dual aspects in European cities either as are required in Irish regs - there I think we go overboard.

    In Barcelona or Madrid you get far more pisos - flats that are family home sized, 3+, bedrooms all across one floor. Some have no lift cores, others have just one. And blocks themselves are still quite large. And even these are seldom dual aspect. We should really take a lead out of there book - Barcelona is one of the best cities for density without going proper high rise throughout



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    You and Bass clearly know significantly more about apartment building regs than the layperson. Say a group of experts conclude Irish regs are overdone for reasons x,y,z and advise the government to change them. Just imagine the optics of how that would play through public opinion? Especially given the defective apartments we built in 2000s and how strongly that sits in peoples minds.

    ‘Panel of building experts advises government to reduce building standards to increase developer profits’

    I think it’s a major problem in Ireland that housing has become so hot a topic that sensible discussion has become almost impossible.
    If I was Minister for Housing, even if I felt weakening building requirements was the right thing to do, there is not a hope I would do it because it would be weaponised against me. Any positive impact of the changes would have no real world impact until long after my 5 year term was finished.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think it’s a major problem in Ireland that housing has become so hot a topic that sensible discussion has become almost impossible.

    You've hit the nail on the head here. But this is not a recent development.

    Back around 2006/7 some commentators were trying to point out that we were building too many houses, that the situation wasn't sustainable and they were ignored in favour of the narrative of the day. Nobody could have a sensible discussion about this.

    Around 2013 the narrative of the day was that we had massive oversupply and it would take a generation to fill all the properties. It was around this time that Ronan Lyons started saying we need to build more in Dublin, particularly apartments, and again there was no appetite for sensible discussion about this.

    The problems we have now are largely as a result of long term lack of sensible discussion, leading to bad political decisions and short term thinking, and thus the solutions are to be found in political decisions. But those decisions are difficult, and as you say no government will take them, even if they think it is the right thing to do.

    That's why I remain fairly convinced sooner or later we'll overshoot the supply deficit and end up in another period of oversupply. It is certainly what our track record suggests will happen.



Advertisement
Advertisement