Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1107710781080108210831796

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    All reports suggest JGP is getting a central contract at the end of this season, right? So that hardly seems to be like a something that would trigger a review. (There are plenty of examples over the years of provincially-contracted guys getting selected ahead of centrally-contracted guys; this often comes up when people incorrectly claim CC players have to start / be selected).

    I'd suggest the biggest imbalance in CC's, by an order of magnitude, since their inception is far higher up the agenda.

    (An aside, but I'm interested if you have data on which players were centrally contracted over the years?)

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    What do you think a review there is going to tell them?

    Q: Why do Leinster have the most central contracts at present?

    A: Leinster have the best players at the moment. They are the bulk supplier to the Irish team.

    Follow up Q: Why do Leinster have the best players at the moment?

    A: Because Leinster have by far the most productive academy system. 8 of the 10 proposed Leinster CC recipients are Leinster Academy products (plus the Munster CC recipient too).

    This is the line of thinking I can't seem to follow - people griping about Leinster's disparity in CCs seem to think the solution is to allow them (Munster & Ulster) to sign more NIQs? How will that improve the number of CC's ultimately awarded to Munster or Ulster?

    The only solution to that problem is Munster or Ulster need to produce players worthy of CCs.

    What you, and no one else so far, have managed to do is show any kind of link between Leinster's current huge collection of CCs and Leinster's ability to continue to produce players worthy of CCs. For that to have been the case, you'd think Leinster would have had a huge overweight allocation of CCs c. 10 years ago when this current crop were coming through, but that isn't the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,714 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The existing high performance director has been in charge for ten years, the central contract system has been in place for more than 20 years. Bringing in a new director would seem to be a logical point to do a review.

    I don't think it's an admission of failure of the system at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    That's all fair, but it does suggest there may be questions worth answering.

    That it coincides with the biggest imbalance in CC's, by an order of magnitude, since their inception (tm, at this point) I'd agree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,714 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    And this imbalance coincides with the most successful period in the national team's history, and success of the national team is absolutely paramount.

    I'm not sure the IRFU is going to see it quite the same way you do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    They may also ask questions like the following.

    Q: If the imbalance of central contracts means Leinster can afford Jordie Barrett as a squad player, could that money be better spent elsewhere in the eco-system towards helping other provinces produce more players good enough to receive central contracts, without materially impacting Leinster?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Which may be the case, and they may keep the status quo which is currently compounding Leinster's natural advantage.

    Here's the thing; do you think this will impact fans (and therefore the IRFU) in the long run? I think it's definitely an issue, and one the IRFU need to (and will) consider.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    One thing I find strange, at best the 4 Irish provinces have 3 trophies to go after each season. The URC, Challange Cup and Champions Cup.

    The last team to win the Challange Cup is Leinster over 10 years ago. I don't see why some of the other provinces haven't made a push to win it when you look at the list of teams who have won that trophy.

    Yet again this season Ireland had 2 teams in that competition after dropping down and both could of won it but didn't. Now that has nothing to do with Leinster and winning any trophy would of been a huge lift for the provinces.

    The extra revenue from winning that as well would also help in terms of investment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    "Disparity doesn't bother you" That's a beut and unnecessary. Unfortunately I think I'm just going to have to disagree.

    In simple terms I would have no problem if Ulster had the majority of all of the central contracts. None at all.

    I've already given an example of why the IRFU aren't going to ask Leinster to pay a portion of their CC. I could spend another hour or two explaining the damage this would do and why they wouldn't then use this "centrally saved money to bolster the Ulster, Connacht and Munster academies, and talent identification systems" - Using Ulster as a specific example and highlighting the shambles they have made from top to bottom.

    I've championed for Baloucone, Lowry and Hume all to be given their chance with Ireland. I could spend another hour listing the absolute hames Ulster have made of the player development of Baloucone, Lowry, Doak, Hume and Stockdale.

    Stockdale! The starting winger for Ireland in Feb 2020 when he signed his 3 year Central Contract. He wasn't offed a new central contract because his form has nosedived. That's the policy and it makes complete sense.

    I would not be surprised if Stockdale, McCloskey, Baloucone, Lowry, O'Toole and few more all have that €110k portion of their contracts paid by the IRFU in that 'Tier 1 scale'.

    Just because they aren't on CC's doesn't mean Ulster aren't already subsidised. We also don't know how many of these Tier 1 contracts Leinster have.

    Its impossible to be definitive without all the details been made available. None you us know the extent of what the IRFU have pumped into Ulster.

    "Interestingly, the IRFU are undertaking a review of their contractual system, which will be completed before Humphreys takes over from Nucifora."

    For all we know the basis of this review could be:

    -Should we continue subsidising so many of these Tier 1 (€110k) and Tier 2(€90k) contracts?

    -Should we reduce the amount of them because we aren't getting enough return on investment?

    -Should we let the likes of a Stockdale leave Ulster and call him up to the national squad if he improves/injuries?

    -Should we use those actual real savings to help further assist/expand clubs, academy's, coaching within those provinces?

    -Should we use these actual real saving for more Emerging Ireland tours and games?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,714 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Yes - we can see that a decent minority of Ulster and Munster fans have stopped supporting Ireland because not "enough" of their players are being picked, and I don't expect that to change any time soon.

    I think the way the Barrett signing is being spun, despite being utterly irrelevant in the bigger scheme of things, is adding to the dissatisfaction and if Leinster go on to win the European Cup and make up the bulk of the squad for South Africa, it's just going to get worse. I think the central contracts thing is only a small piece of a much wider issue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    So if we end up with a fairer re-distribution of CCs between the provinces, would the end result be that some of Leinster's fringe players would be forced to go abroad? If so, I think that would be a good thing for Ireland. Imagine if the likes of Frawley, Byrne, Larmour were playing regularly for Eng/French teams for the past few years. They'd probably be much better players now and would give Ireland more options.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I don't think it's that simple; very consistently 3, and sometimes all 4 of our teams don't start in that competition. So it's not going to be something they directly target.

    "Yet again this season Ireland had 2 teams in that competition after dropping down"

    I think the "yet again" is overstating this, no? Is it not the norm that we typically only have 1, and only occasionally 2? It's a long time since either Leinster or Munster have been in the Challenge Cup, iirc.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    A few things here -

    a) He's not even remotely close in all likelihood to the most expensive ever imports here, especially given the duration of his contract and the fact it's on record he turned down bigger offers in Japan.

    b) He's clearly not coming as a squad player.

    For all the anguished talk this week and classifying Leinster as some sort of unstoppable force, the reality is that Leinster haven't won a trophy in the past 2 years.

    I've said it before, but I'm not one of those fans who think the good times last forever. Eventually, things change. There is a window when you have a squad good enough to win European Cups, and Leinster have arguably already left 2 or 3 behind them.

    This is the management team going out there this season and gambling in certain areas (i.e. Snyman signing) to improve Leinster's chances of delivering European Cups while the bulk of the squad is still in that window.

    Leinster have an entitlement, like all the clubs, to go and sign a couple of NIQs. When they're doing that - it makes sense to go and get the absolute best player you can afford. It's particularly necessary in a club like Leinster where this a real fear that the culture could become way too insular.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Does anyone know if all NIQ's are solely funded by the province?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And equally, fans of others clubs are entitled to ask questions when they see an imbalance of central contracts on a scale we've never seen before.

    We're clearly not going to agree, FTD, so I suggest we leave it at that.

    (Fwiw, I still am interested if you have data on CC players over the years).

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,224 ✭✭✭✭phog


    No, some NIQs have been funded by private funding



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭Rugbyf565


    Can we please stop discussing the Jordie Barrett transfer in here. It is a smart economic and strategic investment that Leinster have made. It is not unprecedented, Leinster have signed All Black Brad Thorn before on a 6 month contract. There should be no further discussion.

    Mod: No back-seat modding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭Rugbyf565


    It is embarrassing that even some mods on this site are getting so salty at Leinster’s success and jealous of competent executive management



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Unsure, but I wouldn't be surprised if they had. (Particularly if it's an emergency / injury cover signing).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,942 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'm sure there could be insurance riders in the event of injury, pretty common in the NFL for example. I think it could be a positive for players. 13 CCs vs 30-40 spots on the wider Irish squad. Could build in multipliers for repeated selections to reward continued performance



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Why would Irish player in England/France be better for Ireland?

    They would not be available for the camps that Ireland hold outside of the windows so they wouldn't be able to join. When Sexton moved he was such a big name he got to agree additional terms in his contract but the list of players you have wouldn't have that power

    You would be making Ireland weaker. Having the players in the Irish system, managing them and working with the provinces is one of the huge success stories Ireland has, both England and France are trying to implement similar.

    You are not just making Ireland weaker, you are striping squad players from Leinster which means they would be weaker, thus meaning they would have to push their internationals into more game. More injuries etc, knock on making Ireland weaker if players are out injured



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    There was also the player who just played in and won a world cup final but he was ignored. Almost like cohesion is as big a factor as talent

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Brad thorn made a lot of sense at the time because he was an excellent really experienced player who (and this is the key bit) wasnt going to knock current irish international out of provincial matchday 23s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,714 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Sorry, you're arguing that Jean Kleyn should have had a central contract?

    I'm sorry but this is mental. Absolutely mental

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    The messenge i was replying to said to just produce players that can be of significant importance to the irish team. A player that the best coach in the world trusts to come on for eben etsebeth in a world cup final and was as stated by him key to thr 7-1 split sounds exactly like that type of player to me but he coulnt even make squads. Is it possible that this is proof there are other factors at play than talent (for example the aforementioned priority of cohesion)

    Which is not to say theres somr great consipiracy its just a selection philosophy of the current coach and a successful one but it refutes the idea of talent alone being a factor



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Where do you direct those questions though?

    Since 2010 which is when Munsters decline began after Rabo/HC wins, in relation to the national team, they have produced TWO forwards of note (POM and Donnacha Ryan) and a few who were bit part players at most (Kilcoyne, Ryan, Scannell) in the that time

    Where does the question about that get directed when the solution by Munster was generally found in South Africa



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    But none of that helps when it comes to World Cup because our players don't seem to be able to adapt and recover quickly enough. I'd say our players are a bit over-protected. Also the majority of the first 15 would still be in Ireland, it's the fringe players who would leave. It might mean we don't so as well in some 6 Nations or Autumn matches but for me the target now has to be winning the next world cup.

    And it's not stripping players from Leinster, it's giving players an alternative path. Where would Tadgh Beirne be now if he hadn't left Leinster, would he have developed into the player he is today.



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Munster had development issues i dont think anyone would argue there



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




Advertisement
Advertisement