Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Deposit return scheme (recycling)

Options
1128129131133134182

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Anaki r2d2


    Slightly off topic, but since Dublin airport has been mentioned a few times on this thread. I think the three way bins in Dublin airport all fall into the same bin bag. Paper waste and recycling. I am 90% sure I seen a fella empty the bin and it was one large bag for all, not three. Not flying for a while but curious if this is true.

    DRS machine broken again at my shop



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    it would be far much easier to bring our recycling rate up to 90% if they accepted damaged cans. Out of every lets say 20 cans i find discarded on the street, if i'm lucky 3 of them are undamged. And if i'm even more lucky they all have the return logo's on them, rather than 2 being non-return and the occasional one or to being a free returnable deposit. They really want too much control over the whole thing and want to give the orders and call the shops but arr'nt really willing to bend on anything or give anything in return. Recycling is a voluntary activity and they're lucky people even recycle in the first place, now it just seems they're attempting to exploit that for their own political target recycling goal reasons, and bully others into partaking also. Why punish people who already recycle anyway? it has actually put-off alot of people who already recycle. i know some who have been doing it for years do it no longer as this lark was the last straw for them. Some points on here by others reflect this sentiment too. it's basically a case of "ireland govt got caught with their pants down by the EU and now have been told to get in line, got the wind put up them, and trying to force these stats/target goal numbers out of the public by crapping on their own people once again" .

    As for what you've wrote: i agree somewhat, harming the enviroment is always the wrong way to protest. Infact i've even made countless posts here saying that its better to protest by harming their pockets aka returning the containers so its less money they get to keep from deposits, which sounds weird on paper and better in theory. But i feel the part your missing about these people "harming eviorment to protest" is the fact that they're not actually protesting against the enviroment or anything enviorment related at all, but rather against the system itself that put all this scheme in place, and against the country overall. Some do it for politically motivated reasons, and some just do it out of backlash from being impedied on and having this scheme forced on them as nothing more than an inconvenience and an extra tax. People are sick of prices always going up, sick of being ripped off and cheated, and sick of having to pay for other peoples green initiatives. Green things and charity should not cost us money, the people who stand for those things should be putting their hand into their own pocket, not footing it to the public.

    You're incorrect about the scheme coming into place, many seperated rubbish. We all did our part, or alot of us anyway. The bin men did not do their part, they did not do the seperating or actually recycle anything, thats why we had no numbers to show the EU, the whole scheme is because of ireland not actually ever recycling the plastic waste etc. They just sell our recycling waste and ship it off to other countries for a quick profit. Now EU really put the wind up them, and thus the birth of this DRS scheme. Its not for the enviorment but rather for stats/numbers to show the EU.

    For those many years people recycled put their recycleables into the green recycling bins, we were lied to as none of it ever actually got recycled. Thats the important thing to remember. its like an adult version of santa claus. This scheme let many peek behind the curtain and see all the smoke and mirrors. The greens even sent a letter in the door about 2 years back about this, and their solution disgusted me on the letter which was "here's the problem, here's whats happening, and here's how we intend to fix it, we'll just tax it and make money off of it, also vote for us by the way" lark.

    Recycling is voluntary, and they're lucky we're even doing it (or have been doing it) in the first place. Now they're just taking it for granted. Also last question in this long essay post: what are the enviromental benefits of this scheme? and do they outweigh the unbenefits?/disbenifits? (for my lack of knowledge on a proper word for it).

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    Thats very unfortunate and kind of sad, but also hilarious at the same time. However i do propose a solution. Keep the containers and give them to a very special boat man (funded by return) once a week, and he/she can return those cans to the mainland. i would like to be that boatman even for just one day. or maybe perhaps the boat could have 2 RVM's on board, or a manual quick visual inspection and then he can crush the cans after verfying. idk just some random thoughts. How is waste normally collected from islands? and is recycling even collected?

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,714 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    The shop owner came up with a similar solution, that he could re-pay deposit to customer, then bag items, then Re-turn would fund the transport & refund shop owner. People get groceries direct from mainland shops too, pay deposit etc.

    and where waste goes - for years recyclables are baled and sent to mainland



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    That's just being a conventional manual return point surely?

    I haven't gone to actually check which they do (manual or RVM), but the Arranmore Co-op is registered as a re-turn point now rather than the shop and all the small cafes/coffee vans/etc having to do it. That island, however, has wheelie bins, bin trucks, and conventional bottle banks already; its basically just like a small village that happens to have a kilometre of sea between it and the next.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,734 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    There's a line of bottle bins near me and I do use it occasionally (rare I need to) but there's no can option.

    I did do a landfill run earlier though… 8 bags of mixed rubbish including one of grass cuttings. 15 quid took care of the lot (it's been less before but I put that down to the weight of the grass cuttings). The grass emptied onto the pile in the corner. The rest into the compactor.

    As I live alone I do these runs maybe once every 6-8 weeks. Compared to what I'd spend on bin collections or time-wasting carting bags of empty cans about, it more than pays for itself.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,253 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Whats with the plastic wrappers on the bottles nowadays?


    Barely stuck onto the bottles that when you bring them to the machine half of them have come off the bottles.


    Makes me wonder if it’s deliberate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,986 ✭✭✭thesandeman


    Trying to make us believe that all the supermarkets were going to turn into Dr Quirkeys with the all singing, all dancing machines throwing out the jackpot in 5 cent coins every time we inserted a can is the first one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    This is a very naive and short sighted standpoint.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,459 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Well it was just a thought that rather than paying to get rid of €16 worth of cans you might get rid for free.

    But I suppose if you are determined to dump the €16 the extra cost is marginal.

    Maybe when all cans are deposit paid those bottle bank bins will disappear anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,482 ✭✭✭Red Silurian




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,482 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I know this might be hard for you but try to stay on topic

    mod - warning issues for back seat moderating

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,482 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Nice alternate view of reality you have there. Presume you don't have proof for this?



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,986 ✭✭✭thesandeman


    Is answering the question you asked by providing one of the times you've lost the plot off topic?

    I gave you one of your earliest ones to make it easier for you find all the ones that follow for yourself.

    You're welcome 👍.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    The point of this scheme is to bring our recycling rate of cans and bottles up from ~60% to 90%+ nothing more, nothing less. Recycling more helps protect the environment and makes the planet livable into the future. This isn't an opinion, this is fact, backed up by science and a general understanding of how the planet work

    Anybody who thinks differently are the delusional ones. Anybody who thinks our govt have an ulterior motive on this scheme is giving our govt too much brain credit in my opinion


    This schemes main aim is to more accurately measure the delta between what is sold verus what is collected, getting up to a 90 percent figure isn't going to happen and was never going to happen, given the flaws with the scheme pointed out months ago.

    I don't really think the government themselves had a secondary motive but there is no doubt this scheme is a net negative on "The environment" and that a number of people and companies will get richer as a direct and indirect result of it, with very vague actual positive outcomes. Have you noticed the increases in prices almost across the board for popular drinks over the past few weeks? Are the manufacturers of the machines themselves not going to be significantly enriched by the scheme? The directors/staff and God knows who else.

    The statement you use there " Recycling more helps protect the environment and makes the planet livable into the future" is complete and utter garbage. You should be able to see the issue with it as far as the bigger picture goes. But again, its a nice sound bite, very fluffy and without any context - which is exactly how this scheme was planned and indeed implemented.

    Just because you say something is "fact, backed up by science" doesn't necessarily make it true.

    Example, in Germany they sell significantly more PET materials now than they did a number of years ago. Their collection rates (not necessarily recycle rates) are up on 90 percent (I think) - is this a net good thing for the protection of the environment? Or would the ideal scenario be to looking to reduce and reuse before going down the recycle route? Recycling, in itself, is not a process that comes without it's byproducts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭bog master


    Let's not forget the difference between Collection Rates and Recycling Rates.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    i can say the same…

    And proof of what? please give more detail on what you're asking me to provide proof on. i gave you many words and you gave back little in return, seems like an unfair trade off if you're not willing to put effort into typing.

    i would like to know what you're asking.

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭jj880


    Lets add them to the list of proofs requested so far:

    • demanding proof that people are stock piling containers
    • demanding proof that manual returns take up staff / customer time
    • deducing that dragging your used containers back in store is fine because customers have bad hygiene anyway
    • demanding proof that store signage is not photoshopped. Stating the store location will clear that up somehow.
    • demanding proof that recent significant price increases are not related to Re-Turn.
    • demanding proof that containers collected by this scheme are not incinerated anyway / not recycled in Ireland.
    • demanding proof that this scheme is not having a net negative effect on the environment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,488 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    A guy rang up Liveline a few weeks ago. Yes, I know, Crank-Or-Bore-Line, but bear with me. He had put a GPS tracker in one of his recycling bags, which got picked up and he tracked it from his home straight to the Poolbeg Incinerator.

    They had a representative from RePak I believe it was, who came on and instead of defending that fact, he talked about the dangers of putting an electronic device into the incinerator!

    The systems to recycle plastic are very different to recycling aluminium. Across Ireland, some recycling plants can do both, but many do one or the other. Is the ReTurn system set up sufficiently that the stuff goes to the right plant with the right equipment?

    I am tempted to do a similar experiment with the ReTurn RVMs, to be honest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Had been putting off using the machines for fear of making a tit of myself but finally did it today. Easiest thing in the world to do. Completely idiot proof.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,488 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    No system is idiot proof. Especially a system that has not been tested on idiots.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭jj880


    The problem is theres no transparency on how much of what we are led to believe is recycled is incinerated or landfilled. I know of a skip firm near to where I live who've been just burying everything on their land totally illegally. No enforcement from the Council so definitely no transparency. Its a joke.

    We're asked to believe everything just because it says so on the Re-Turn website. I find that notion fanciful at best and flat out naive at worst. As Boggles has said on many occasions "pure theatre".



  • Registered Users Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Anaki r2d2


    Hypothetical, where would you place an airtag to follow the path of the cans/bottles? Assume inside the bottle would it would get shredded.

    Interesting experirement for us idiots



  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭bog master


    https://www.irishtimes.com/environment/2023/11/28/ireland-overly-reliant-on-exporting-waste-for-recycling-epa/

    "Just under 28 per cent of plastic packaging generated in Ireland was
    recycled in 2021, with the remainder being treated by incineration (70
    per cent) and disposal (2 per cent)."



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,488 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Well I watched the machine at my local Aldi being emptied and the bottles were not crushed or shredded.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,253 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,332 ✭✭✭beachhead


    Heavier than you. Or a generalisation about all those recycling at the machines



  • Registered Users Posts: 496 ✭✭tohaltuwi


    Some bottles have thin plastic and go out of shape very easily such that they tend to get rejected. A simple hack is to blow the bottles into shape, works nicely :)



  • Registered Users Posts: 595 ✭✭✭Escapees


    I wouldn't be blowing into any of mine, as they're generally ones that have been dumped by others on the streets :)

    Here are some observations since the scheme was introduced:

    - Street littering has not decreased at all. Every day when walking home from work, I easily come across 5 to 10 cans and bottles left on the streets. One or two of these might be alcoholic drinks, but most are just water or fizzy/energy drinks put neatly down at the side of a footpath or on a window sill. Red bull cans are everywhere by the way, but oddly enough they are usually dumped on the road and generally flattened by cars and difficult therefore to re-turn. Anyway, the bottom line here is that street littering in general is still an issue in this country.

    - I've also noticed that there is a staggering amount of recyclable containers that get dumped in shopping centre bins and street bins. Just glance into any bins that you pass. This is the KEY issue I believe. If you think about it, it makes sense since drinks are probably one of the most common purchases when people are out and about. And it raises the question, why do councils not have any recycling bins for the general public to use in towns and city centres. Instead, they are all for general rubbish only. If there were RVMs in public areas, it might make a bit of a difference, but a lot of folk still aren't going to bother to go out of their way to get a coupon for just 15c. The fundamental issue really is that the councils have not and still do not encourage recycling on the streets of towns and cities.

    - On an aside, the M&S RVM type seems to be the worst designed type, with very narrow conveyor belts that struggle to grip and move the recyclables to the crusher at the back. It also requires frequent user interaction, with users even required to press a start button to begin!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭SleetAndSnow


    not against the scheme, more of a question but say you return the cans, have a 4 euro voucher, go to buy a bottle of milk while in the shop for 2 euro, I presume you can’t use half the voucher and save the other half for another time? Or would that make too much sense?



Advertisement