Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Site is a graveyard - How can boards save itself? [Threadbanned users in 1st post]

1161719212245

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    "And posters are often sided with against the actions of a moderator."

    Often? Apologies in advance, but I genuinely doubt that.

    Well, I've put my thoughts out there, as best I can. That's all I can do.

    Maybe we will see some improvement (on both sides) after this thread. Maybe not.



  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Marley Harsh Specs


    This is more for the Bugs feedback thread, but using the iPhone has become very difficult on Boards. I’m not sure how much it is a Vanilla issue or combined with more recent iOS updates. I have particular close sight issues but the spinning of the threads up and down, the disappearing of what you’ve just attempted to type, the automated changes of a sentence you’ve just typed making the semantics almost the reverse of what you intended have made using the otherwise (often) fun, useful, engaging and informative platform very tedious. It’s just another layer than can cause difficulties or misunderstandings if you don’t notice the automated changes by “spellcheck behaving badly”. I started a thread about funny typos where posters have noticed spellcheck with newer AI is broadly, not just on this platform, working against people.



  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    You "doubt" that? But do you know for definite? Or are you just basing your opinion on disgruntled posters who didn't have their warnings overturned? As we say the disgruntled usually have louder voices than the happy.

    Decisions often get overturned in DRP. That means that Cat-moderators/Admins often side with the poster.



  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Marley Harsh Specs


    I think many of us, if we think objectively, realise that we have overstepped the mark and accept the sanction.



  • Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭ Charleigh Tinkling Squadron


    The dispute process is very transparent and can be viewed by anyone here you just need to go to the forum.

    Even resolved disputes are visible to all posters and I think a lot of them here should go and have a look before making up their mind. Having an unfavourable DRP personally should not mean you decry the system which it appears plenty are doing.

    We get compared to Reddit an awful lot but to my knowledge they have no such process at all. If you’re banned that’s you. No dispute no nothing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Yah but once you get into differing opinions that are held honestly and sometimes trenchantly, then these can easily verge on what some might consider uncivility and abuse. This can arise between posters but can also be directed towards individuals and their families, or the subjects of the thread.

    Anyway zero tolerance will always of necessity be subjective?



  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Marley Harsh Specs


    try using your iPhone to find anything on Boards 😁 it’s a treasure hunt



  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    And that's where Cat-Mods and Admins can step in. Decisions get overturned. I think going 'zero tolerance on muppetry' as we like to call it will absolutely increase DRPs. Some will be upheld, some will be overturned.

    But people are calling for change. This is something that will help. We did it for a while in some areas and it worked. Trolling dropped. Serial trollers were sitebanned. Others copped themselves on.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    A bit of both.

    I'm basing it on experiences that have been shared with me by others and also from the many dispute threads I have read in the Helpdesk, and on the Dispute Resolution Archive.

    Whatever those statistics actually are, they don't include the number of posters who won't even open a dispute because they feel it's not worth it, or if they do it will put a target on their back. Posters do talk to each other by pm about these things.



  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Marley Harsh Specs


    Ideally one would nearly need a time staggered debate on controversial topics, where you join a queue to make a better-argued post, without immediate reflex reactions. I know this is not practicable on Boards.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    OK but what is 'muppetry' and who defines it?

    I reckon you should explain it in detail with good examples across the various forums.

    Then put it to a poll?



  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Marley Harsh Specs


    10-20 examples of “muppetry”would be useful to cover most scenarios but would take time for mod team to compile as it would take a bit of research as to the commonest recurrent scenarios. I think Roy Keane may have popularised the term.



  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    "Don't be a dick" is a good start. If you're being a dick then expect to be pulled up on it. Continue to be a dick and you'll be sitebanned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭rock22


    Inconsistant moderating is a real problem now.

    i am on Boards for as long as i can remember, maybe 15 years. never had a heated exchange or any post removed by a mod. Then about 6 months ago , i was attacked by another poster. I had posted on a Politics thread which i regularly read and on which I often posted. When I responded, I was thenattacked by a mod you told me he was considering giving me a warning. Not surprising , that the first poster who attacked me was also a mod but not apparently moderating. My crime, my post was too short. This in a thread where i had posted regularly and with considerable length but on this occasion my post was considered too short.

    I have no doubt that the mod was joining in the 'bullying' ( am I allowed call it that) because the first poster also happened to be an off duty moderator.

    I haven't posted on the forum since. I am not too sure what the requirements here are anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,397 ✭✭✭yagan


    All the drama seems to be in a couple of forums instigated by the same few people.

    I've always appreciated the practical community information sharing and the time mods give to keeping this service alive.

    I always avoided afterhours and most CA affairs as they just seemed full of people lashing out at everyone from behind a vail of anonymity. I don't know what the answer is to this pointless behaviour.

    Perhaps we're still in the juvenile phase of the internet with the initial fun playschool days behind us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,996 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    I think we all know a few posters - some on this very thread - who persistently fail to make a point or a post without throwing a sly - not even sly most of the time - dig at the posters on the site or the site itself. I think that's low hanging fruit that could easily be dealt with.

    Opinions are one thing, but just blatantly insulting people for the wind up is another. Posters who resort consistently to baiting people - often if its not directed at one individual most of the time - should be IMO given a lot less indulgence and rope than they currently are.

    Post edited by Arghus on


  • Posts: 344 ✭✭ Charleigh Pitiful Peanut


    You raise a good point. I’m active on another forum and they restructured so that the mods had to use a 3rd party non mod flagged account to post outside of their mod duties. It seems to have improved things.


    I think being a mod creates a stigma (which works both ways). Their views are just as important in topics outside their area of moderation but I feel their mod status either attracts unneeded attention or they like to wave their mod status around even if it’s not on that forum. In a recent interaction one of the mods most active on this thread actually posted in another forum that if they modded that forum they would have banned a poster they were in a full scale posting war with. You couldn’t find a clearer case of back seat modding yet no action because of who it was.


    I also think former mods should be banned from proclaiming that they were mods and giving their input into how they would run things if they were still a mod. They have moved on so they should leave it to the admins to figure things out. (Obviously this thread is fine as it’s useful input but some ex mods seem to use it as some kind of glory war medal non stop).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,676 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Just look at an immigration thread and when a new poster arrives and has anything negative to say.

    A handful of posters pile in with rereg and racist etc.

    Now some may be re-regs,but it's not great user experience for a new poster.

    Whether those posters are breaking a rule or whatever, it takes a bit of common sense to get rid of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,397 ✭✭✭yagan


    That's really interesting.

    I was getting very frustrated with one poster who was idiotically spamming a thread, throwing digs at everyone, usual nonsense behaviour we've been talking about. Yet when I looked at their contributions to forums where they were a mod there was none of the awful behaviour.

    There must some power tripping thing where some they think that being a mod in one forum means they can shyte endlessly elaswhere.

    I think that 3rd party non mod account could work well if it kept everyone feeling they're on an equal footing.

    Thanks for that.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And we've come full circle, back to where we started.

    🙇‍♀️



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I'm not trying to be difficult I can assure you, but how do you even define 'Don't be a dick'. You might say it's something you recognise when you see it, but doesn't everyone see things differently (hopefully)? Is there any guidance around the idea or does it come down to each moderator and how they feel at any given time as what is 'Don't be a dick'.

    For that matter am I engaging in 'being a dick' or 'muppetry' here?? Honest answer.

    My user name is carefully chosen as I'm probably a bit of a contrarian in some peoples eyes. But contrarians are useful in that they will question assumptions & group think etc. My observation is that we have quite a few sheeple here - yes people and we also have a good sprinkling of contrarians.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,832 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    100%

    there is WAY too much leeway given to muppetry here. Posters know where the line is and those that consistently are stepping over the mark are just making work for everyone.

    A huge issue with the forum is the fact that ordinary posters cannot see when a post has been moderated, without the moderator having to put an in-post not in. That equates in a lot of cases to it looking like certain posters get away with stuff, while they actually be given an infraction for it.

    it would be so much better if a clearly rule breaking post was met with a one week immediate thread ban. The poster gets a slap on the wrists, the posters arguing opposite can see that muppetry is dealt with, and any casual viewers can clearly see where the line is drawn. its literally win-win-win in my eyes.

    it will only work however if forum rules are tight, not wishy washy, and all form mods are in agreement with the actions and how to implement the actions. I assume that most fora that have multiple mods have private chat thread where they discuss posters and actions between them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭BailMeOut


    the biggest issue is that boards.ie needs a mobile app. The site is currently only useful from a PC so this will be the main reason it is losing users.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,617 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    Reinstate the THUNDERDOME.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭Green Peter




  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Marley Harsh Specs


    well I did declare my former nodding in this thread because it would be disingenuous not to admit it whilst commenting.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Marley Harsh Specs


    absolutely. I post whilst doing other things around the place, or stopping off for coffee during shopping out, it’s always on the iPhone which has scrolling issues on the site and on various “news” sites as ads load up and it all spins up and down so much you couldn’t even focus on the ads these sites are waving about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,981 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    I wouldn't agree.

    I find it easier to use in Chrome on the phone, than on the desktop. (Apart from my earlier point about keyboard size.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭BailMeOut


    you are the minority here. Boards will disappear unless they make a good app and it may already be too late to do this.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 7,522 ✭✭✭ Charleigh Tinkling Squadron


    I use an iPhone, if you search dispute resolution it shows up immediately

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement