Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Sinn Fein and how do they form a government dilemma

1117118120122123392

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,566 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Support for the government was always qualified from the start, that is a fact.

    The fact also is she identified what was wrong, before it went disastrously wrong for the government.

    And @Clo-Clo has the nerve to come on here and call SF incompetent. Hilarious sour grapes and an abject failure to inform himself properly, to be perfectly honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    She was more confused that the vote itself. She sat around waiting to see what the result was going to be and then came out fighting strong. Hurlers in the ditch again from MLMD



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    She might be confused from all the flights over and back to America she is doing. She was there about a week ago, and I think is going again to States next weekend for St.Patrick's day.

    Wonder if she will march behind an "England get out of Ireland" banner over there again?

    And seeing as you talk about confusion and Mary-Lou McD., no wonder the Irish-Americans are confused about Ireland when she endorses a banner which cannot even get geography correct?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,566 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    She sat around waiting to see what the result was going to be 

    She didn't. You can ignore the evidence presented to you if you wish but you will still be wrong on that one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    That was embarrassing to the majority of Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Yes SF are incompetent. You are so desperate for attention you keep tagging people and then go off with the 100 posts

    MLMD sat on the fence and then came roaring out once the results started rolling in, typical Sinn Fein, even the link you presented said MLMD wanted a yes vote.

    By the way I didn't agree with the referendum and voted no. Im not like you who doesn't have an opinion till Sinn Fein tell you what it is.

    So off you go with the 100 mundane nonsense posts like every topic. Sorry I have no interest in them.

    Quit tagging me with your nonsense, I have no interest in it.

    As I explained many times, from the top to the bottom Sinn Fein are totally incompetent, including the shower of online army who are driving votes away. Total incompetence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,566 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You were wrong when you said that 'she didn't mention those things' = fact, she did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    if you were actually following the real world, you'd know you arent being honest.

    "March 8th, Ms McDonald sharply criticised the wording proposed by the Government, and the timing of the referendum – while urging a dual Yes vote.

    “Should this fail, the question we would put would be the wording as per the Citizens’ Assembly.”

    “We would return to the Citizens’ Assembly ... That’s what should be happening now. And if this is not successful, that’s where we would bring that,” she said."


    Thats not the same thing as simply re running the same referendum Its the opposite in fact. But no - you keep on there telling people inaccuracies. Sure no-one will notice 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,566 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Considering she led her party to be the most popular party in Ireland a short time after I doubt if that statement has any data to back it up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    ye's are easily fooled or you don't read into whats being said, or you are either just purposely being cynical. Thats how Im reading the anti shinners these days.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,566 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Or he is just like O'Dea and Chambers in FF and has a different view than the leader.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    By anti shinners, you mean the folks that want Ireland to still have an economy after the general election?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,293 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Not the first time someone has had that thought. A man to keep a close eye on, a bit like Conor Murphy, has the in with the lads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,293 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    So just like Lisbon and Nice? A different referendum?

    Or are they running it again?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,054 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    "We reached an unbalanced position"

    Odd admission for a pol

    Or just maybe he said 'on-balance position'...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    i mean the same usual crowd we find on boards who hate SF so much they ironically give them more airtime and even actual SF supporters. You know, the ones for some reason just couldnt stand the idea of SF in govn and instead resort to gossip and hearsay - plus really bad interpretations of statements - to denigrate the party as much as they can. In the process, as I say, talking about the party they hate moreso than any other party.

    SF in government are an unknown - thats the fact. If you even think of the north, then you need to educate yourself on what Stormont is in comparison to the Dail. Becuase they are an unknown, you have nothing to back you cynicism up with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I didnt mention the north. I"ve no interest in it.

    My point about the folks wanting Ireland to have an economy after the GE still stands.

    The part you keep missing is that SF dont have any mapped out or costed proposals.

    Yet you still have this blind faith in them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    Maybe you missed when I mentioned it, or when SF said it, but MLMD advised that wording should be sent back to the CA. Her actual words where “We would return to the Citizens’ Assembly wording, that's what should be happening now and if this is not successful, that's where we will bring that,” but I cant find any direct quote from her promising to re-run it. Plenty of papers pushing that idea - but has anyone got the actual quote itself?

    Lisbon and Nice were basically the same deal presented twice weren't they. Could you say the immigration problem began then, as we were promising to expand the eu and let loads of people live here? That was one of the issues SF had at the time with Nice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    I think he just goes straight to the truth and doesnt bother with the media pretend bullshit that the likes of the indo prints. They have no intention of running a referendum because they never decided they would. full stop.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,293 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Interesting that you position Sinn Fein as anti-immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,566 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They the same 'folk' who quickly rehabilitated FF and ushered them back into government? We have a FF MoF at the minute.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,569 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    They had never decided that they would re-run it - except for when Mary Lou stated that she would re-run it?

    Here's an article written by a journalist who has canvassed for Sinn Féin in the past - is that "media pretend bullshit" too?


    Was Mary Lou lying when she said that a Sinn Féin Government would re-run the referenda, using the Citizen's Assembly wordings, early in the lifetime of their Government.

    The Dublin Central TD said she as Taoiseach would look to run the referendums again should they fail and it would be "her ambition" that such a repeat of the referendums would happen early in the party's term in government if elected.


    Why post such easily proven lies time and again?

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,293 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Having seen the scale of the "no" vote, Sinn Fein are slipping into the hedge like Homer Simpson, pretending they never made the pledge to re-run it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Yes the people on boards who run multiple accounts, up to 10 by one person before they got caught.

    Or running multiple accounts at the same time so they can agree with themselves.

    Or using PM to gather others to thread's etc

    Is that the SF supporters you are talking about that seemingly give less airtime than others? 😂

    What di Mary Lou say on them again?

    This is a Sinn Fein thread, so naturally it will be a discussion on Sinn Fein, boards has thousands of thread, only a few on Sinn fein so easy to dodge them if you don't want to


    Sinn Fein are well known in government. That's a fact. We all know about Northern ireland and the excuses don't wash. The excuses are long and winding with Sinn Fein, I think we can all agree that is a fact. Incompetence is what the party is good at



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,566 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The referendums have fall out for most parties, look at FF, was there any of them actually in favour before the vote? I think SF are no different.

    They did spot that the government messaging and wording was all wrong. But I think with the weight of the No votes the decision not to run another one is wise.

    Good to see a party than can change it's mind. It's a pity the government parties weren't able to and change to the wording that the CA wanted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    well then they are an unknown quality as of yet. Costed proposals? their alternative budget every year is as realistic as they can make it, outside of being in government. Plenty more than any other party comes up with, regardless of how you term 'costed', so yes - Ive a lot more faith in them than the eejits people have been voting in for the past few decades. Look at the state of the place. Anyone who has voted FF or FG over the years should be ashamed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    i couldnt care less how has multiple accounts- im pretty sure there still are a few around who have more than one account and they wouldnt be ont he shinner side.


    Stipr out the waffle from you post and what have we? Hmmm. ... not much left when the whataboutery is taken out. Lets see ... "sinn fien are well know in government ...Northern Ireland" - well, I did say you get there eventually. A few posts ago BlueSkyDream hadnt mentioned northern ireland and SF and then you bounce along and come up with exactly what I was saying people without much an idea of different stormont and the dial are, keep coming out with. Perfect timing to prove my point!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    people were voting No because of fears of 'them foreigners' bringing over families - all down to the terrible wording the government wouldnt change. How the hell are you blaming that on SF? In saying that, nearly every shinner I know voted no because the vagueness. I dont think SF should have backed a Yes vote at all, but their hearts were in it. I know people who couldn't inherit anything from their partner as they werent married (the family had first priority) - issues like that would have been fixed with a Yes vote - but the wishy washy wording that was used, how'd anyone expect that to pass? Big failure on the governments part (again).

    Pretty desperate though to be thinking its any skin of SF's nose. Have you found me Mary Lou saying the actual words that SF will re-run the referendum again, as is with no changes? Its just gossip in here by the looks of it. I remember the politics forum had a bit of teeth as you used to have to back up you claims. Nowadays a headline off the Indo seems good enough. Very boring.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    try reading the article. what she said was SF would return the wording to the CA. That in itself is the opposite of rerunning the referendum. The government ignored the CA's suggestion of wording. what people were asked to change was wrong, and needs to be looked at and the correct wording found, as there are issues affecting carers and families that needs addressing. she did say her ambition would be to re-run it with new wording. two things there - one is 'her ambition' - which isnt a SF decision. secondly, if it was re-ran, it would be with different wording, so it certainly would not be presenting the same choice again to the public.

    Its really childish carryon to be honest. its obvious to see what the woman was saying, but again - lets bring in some drama, a bit of misrepresentation and sure enough theres enough around to believe it.



Advertisement