Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Bank of Ireland shares

Options
14445464749

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,659 ✭✭✭torrevieja


    Any recommendations i have about a 1000 euro value in these shares i just want to sell them now havent bought shares in ages just found this old cert, i bought these a few years ago, so its old fashioned paper certs, seems if i open an account now with a stockbroker there arent many around and im charged 98 euro for the cert been lodged with them also a yearly fee of €200 i dont intend to keep the account open that long maybe a few weeks, and i have to have €500 in the account.

    Id appreciate any advice on the best way to sell these shares with minimal expense thanks



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,672 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    On RTE Radio Drive Time Tuesday 22 August the journalist accused Paschal of saying that it would be unpatriotic for Irish savers to place their savings abroad. Which is exactly opposite to what Paschal actually said. And Neasa Hourican from the Greens described Pascal's alleged remarks as being "extraordinary".

    There is a bit of hysteria going on at present about deposit rates, but there is no excuse for journalists and politicians to make up lies like this. Hourican also said that Irish savers can get 0.75% and 1%, which leads me to think she is misinformed about the actual rates available as well.

    https://www.rte.ie/radio/radio1/clips/22289357/



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,441 ✭✭✭Hibernicis


    Computershare is BOI’s Registrar. It might be worth contacting them and asking if they are aware of any program for disposing of small numbers of shares - I've come across such programs in the past which are intended to reduce the number of "trivial holdings" and eliminate the associated costs.




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,839 ✭✭✭daheff


    you don't think you can get 1% from Irish banks? BOI & PTSB will pay it on a regular saver account. pretty sure AIB will too.


    whats misinformed about that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,672 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I don't see it on the Ask About Money Best Buys. Not in the Instant Access accounts. 0.5% is available with 30 days notice. For clarity I mean the sort of "overnight" money where you can withdraw up to €3,000 a day with no notice from the NTMA "Post Office Savings Book". But the penalty for such instant access is a 0.05% interest rate, subject to DIRT.

    https://www.askaboutmoney.com/threads/savings-best-buys.90481/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭Timing belt




  • Registered Users Posts: 20,672 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The Minister was asking customers to move €140 billion earning nothing in current account type products into interest bearing products. BOI want their customers to do that with their share of that €140 billion. It would be more straightforward if they would just pay say 2% instead of 0.1% on that money. They have the use of the money anyway, the same as the money in other accounts.

    "For Demand Deposits, interest rates will be increased to 0.10%, from 0%.

    "I would encourage customers to switch their money from their current account to a savings or deposit account where they will benefit from interest payments," Ms Russell said."



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,108 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    AIB third quarter results indicate NII of 3.75bn and a NIM of 3%.


    Projected 2023 data

    Total income = 4.6 bn

    Total costs = 1.8 bn

    They seem to be hugely profitable this year.



  • Registered Users Posts: 108 ✭✭Greengrass53


    What dividend is expected this month. The froth seems to have dissolved on this share recently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,108 ✭✭✭✭Geuze



    Dividend = 60 cent

    Strong increase in payouts.


    But they signalled that 2024 net interest income will be less than 2023, so the share price fell this morning.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,108 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Dividend tripled to 60 cent in 2023.






  • Registered Users Posts: 741 ✭✭✭garbanzo


    Down 10% today….

    🙁



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭bankboucy


    If you dont see through the noise here - your crazy - they reported almost outrageous loan loss provisions on CRE......I cant help but think that it was done to ensure PBT dipped below €2bn....the PR around such a number would have been crazy......and no banker ever lost his job taking too many provisions and writing them back later!

    But also listen to the call and take a step back here - 60c per share dividend for 2023 to be paid in the next few months (likely May) and resumption of interim dividends this year also (lets guess ~30c per share in August)......so 90c of dividends per share on stock price of what €8 euro........so ~11%+ dividend yield in the six months......but then throw in the buybacks........€475mmm+++......another 5%+ distribution

    After that you've got a 15% RoTe business in a dupoly baking market - trading for what 0.8 TBV today.......so really something like mid-teens return on capital via share price paid cause you arent even paying book here.

    I get the skepticism when a bank reports higher provisions/lower NII than expected..... but the reality is that BOI is just a killer deal at these levels



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,108 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    If that is all true, how come the share price fell?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,395 ✭✭✭Dinarius


    It's up now.

    But, the 12 month trend has been downwards. There is support at €8.00 and then at €6.00. But, no technical indicators are saying buy. That said, the share buyback may underpin the price. We shall see.


    D.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,672 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    If it is all true, fraud investigators should be called in. A bank falsifying figures to avoid bad PR.



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭bankboucy



    Share price movements in the short term explain nothing about the underlying value of the business long term...I never try to explain short term moves who the hell knows.........folks in the stock expecting a €2bn PBT perhaps bailed....algos saw commercial real estate in the press release and programmatically bailed

    Look at the math though - 60c dividend......indication of a 2024 interim dividend likely after buyback deployed....so I think 30c DPS on interim is likely....so a holder of record today buys a duopoly bank in a totally consolidated market that's indicating RoTE guide of ~15% 'through the cycle'...buying it today at a 20% discount to that tangible equity....for something like a late teens ~18% return on early March share price paid....with that company based on 8.16 share price likely to send you out in the next 9 months about 0.90c per share in dividends....for a 2024 dividend yield of about 11%.....while also shrinking the shares outstanding via €520m buyback or another 6% capital return to the shareholder.......so 17% total annual return.

    Finally their NII guide (in conjunction with the CRE loan loss) is a deeply conservative one...this is a mgmt happy to sandbag.....I'm not sure the ECB is going to be as aggressive in their cuts as BOI has modelled.....I'm not sure CRE is going to turn out as bad as provisioned for (15% loss).

    Put simply BOI is likely to return capital to shareholders in the next 9 months equal to about 17% of its market cap today via a mix of buybacks and dividends (mainly dividends)......great.......one year is one year....the question is around the sustainability of those returns........well someone explain to me two things that bust the thesis (1) explain to me another institution with a lower funding cost than BOI (outside AIB) from which to make loans (mortgage, car, personal) in the Irish market (2) explain to me a situation that might arise in the near future that would see that funding cost duopoly be eroded and/or the loan book degrade in an excepted fashion.

    I just dont see it - BOI - settles out IMO at a valuation of about ~1.3 TBV with an ordinary dividend yield of about 3-4%.....and an opportunistic average buyback that shrinks s/o by about 4% per year.

    The only bad thing I'll say about BOI which must be ackowlendled - growth is limited, UK exposure is a gift and curse while Ireland beta is almost 100%.

    Post edited by bankboucy on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Only putting this out there but do you think you have a unique insight and information to the wider market in general? If not; how come the rest of the market does not pile in on what's a very good return for a short term investment? That is the point you should take a step back and start to wonder why and do a second and third round of reviews or if you are a long term (5+ years) it does not really matter what's the short term increase (and yes to me 9 months is short term). Not saying that the market is rational and perfect but chances of you spotting something the wider market with more and better information has not are very slim so why does the market then not agree by increasing the stock price accordingly?



  • Registered Users Posts: 333 ✭✭Hawkeye123


    Equities are up on anticipation of a cut in interest rates. Investors bought the rumour with the intention of selling the fact. But what happened to the fact? It hasn't happened and the ECB are dragging their feet. They can't really sell the rumour again without delivering on the previously suggested rate cuts. If investors don't get dividends to equal the rather pathetic interest offered by banks, they may lose patience and sell their equities. Inflation is still too high.



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭bankboucy



    Stock prices aren't there to instruct you - they are there for you to exploit.....I come up with the valuations and if

    I bought Bank of Ireland for I think €1.80 share maybe less than three years ago......that was the market price then - was the market right then?....did I have information other people didn't? Nope - this year BOI will send me half the money I paid for it back in 2021 in the form of dividends......if it does that again in 2025 it will have sent me back my total purchase price.

    I have simple framework - I buy businesses with sustainable competitive advantages that earn descent to high returns on equity.....BOI isnt sexy, it isnt AI.......boring businesses, in times like these, are unpopular from a marginal stock perspective.....but what do I care!?!......BIRG is sending me a ~50% annual dividend on my original purchase price...while earning what looks like to me a sustainable 17% return on equity (15% underlying RoTE selling for 0.8 tbv) on its current stock price.

    Now we can have a conversation about BIRG the stock.....and why it isnt higher.....European banks trade like a blob and the consolidation story in the Irish market hasnt quite filtered out fully......my favourite explanation however is the simplest one I think........the natural stock holders of a low growth domestic champion bank are Irish domestic dividend income investors, pension funds, widows and orphans......BIRG has been on a decade long journey to get back to being investable for its natural and ultimate shareholder base...........NPL's are cleaned up, CET1 build, basel III capital build etc.......this year will have an interim dividend for the first time since 2008....BIRG shareholder base will reconstitute itself around the new regular dividend payer its becoming......as I've said.....the fair price for BIRG is ~1.3 TBV.....and I'll be handsomely paid to wait for something approaching that before I'll pick up my ball to go play somewhere else.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,672 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I see that AIB have published a profit figure of €2 billion. After tax. I haven't heard or seen any crazy PR about that. I think the idea that BOI manipulated their numbers to go below €2 billion to avoid crazy PR is a bit crazy.

    "IRISH BANK AIB has announced that it intends to distribute €1.7 billion to shareholders after reporting a post-tax profit of over €2 billion.  As interest rates rose, AIB’s net interest income rose from just over €2 billion in 2022 to €3.8 billion last year – a jump of 83% – due to the “changed interest rate environment and higher average customer loan volumes”.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,036 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Ya, this reads like a paper I'd expect from a student in investing 101 and it would get you an F for applying the concepts to a penny stocks and a failure to demonstrate any understanding the broader banking sector, although when applied to penny stocks it rarely works out in any case. Had you compared AIB or BIRG to something like Liechtensteinische Landesbank (LLB) rather than a second bank with similar handicaps the difference would be obvious, but that would require real skills and knowledge of the banking sector.

    You are confusing luck with actual skills and knowledge.



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭bankboucy


    Straight out the gates I'm going to take your dig with a grain of salt - cause your lack of knowledge is kind of obvious - BIRG stock price is €8.xx.....BIRG met the technical definition of a penny stock post the GFC...the reverse share split in 2017 collapsed the s/o and firmly removed them from any definition of a penny stock.....but the real hint is in the name 'penny'... stocks that trade, ya know, in pennys/cents...not euros or dollars. I also broadly define penny stocks another way to mean stocks with nano mkt caps in the single millions/ 10's of millions. Not companies with billions of dollars of mkt cap....which BIRG mainly was even when its underlying shares - due to dilution - were trading for 'pennys'...those pennys multiplied by shares outstanding added up to an enterprise worth at its worst hundreds of millions or biilions. Again you've failed your 'penny' stock moniker even back then..

    So yeah BIRG meets none of the hurdles that could justify your two references to it as a penny stock......I'm going to guess from your handle that perhaps your possibly a 2007 vintage BIRG shareholder and have PTSD - which I completely understand.

    Secondly my investing record now stretches for a decade - I run a concentrated portfolio of 8 to 10 names. My CAGR over that period is ~18% p/a. The portfolio looks nothing like SPY or QQQ. It does not include 'hot' retail names. The portfolio record is not dominated by say taking a 80% allocation to tesla/btc in 2014 and holding it. It has idosyntatic ideas which I source myself.

    Untangling luck and skill in investing takes time.......investing is full of people who were lucky 'one time in a row' or two times in a row....(unlucky too so they give up)...being lucky over a 10yr period over numerous situations & positions and outperforming the indexes would suggest (but not irrefutably prove) I have some skill.

    On your Landesbank comment and lack of understanding of the banking sector - I'll simply say this.....that I consider Banks to be about the most dangerous type of stocks in the world (outside meme stocks)......you in effect own the bank on margin....less so since the GFC when CET1's of 5% were common....but in effect BIRG has a loan book that is 8 times the size of its shareholder equity......so given the loan portfolio is held with a thin sliver of shareholders equity........investing mistakes in banks are effectively punishable by quick and speedy falls in equity prices of 80-100%. Just ask the NYCB holders..you can lose 90% of your money investing in a bank that held predominantly NYC apartment buildings....for that reason I dont get 'mentally' on airplanes to look at them elsewhere. I invest in banks where I know and live/workin the environment I'm based in. That shrinks my bank investing universe to really the UK, Ireland and the USA where I have some hope of a view on the value or otherwise of what's likely held inside a banks loan book (principally real estate but then consumer loans) and the macro/regulatory environment too.

    I dont take credit/margin/leverage risk (remember these things are levered 8 to 1) and then layer on top of that currency risk like you seem to be willing to do with LLB but really what your layering on is language/cultural/insight risk. You seem like a guy then that I see investing the whole time - you think by studying a thousand things you can know a thousand things. My strength is I know what I dont know and what in some sense I can't ever know. Studying a bank in Liechtenstein would be an example where I wouldn't take 10 seconds out of my day to look at it no matter how cheaply it screens on a RoE, P/E, P/TBV basis. There are simply things you can never know and certainly not know enough to have the fortitude to hold if/when they fall in an extreme fear based drawdown.

    I have two rules for investing in banks outside of the above 'home' country/cultural understanding rule . The first rule is that I care principally about the funding cost of a bank (deposits) before I even think about the asset side of the bank. Money is a commodity. In commodity businesses, broadly, the low cost producer wins. The person with the lowest funding costs (deposits) is the best positioned and most likely to make the most sensible loans. The man with high funding costs requires both higher loan rates which in effect doom them to 'reach' for riskier loans. This sums up the Irish market - a challenger to the AIB/BOI dupoly would need to charge higher underlying rates or take on riskier credits or BOTH!. I despise banking markets like much of Europe where competition for deposits and so unprofitable/risky loan making abound. Secondly I like my banks boring and conservative but MOST important and this goes directly to the Landesbank reference I have to UNDERSTAND the regulatory and competitive environment in which they operate. If you like following ideas in different languages I wish you good luck with that. I wouldn't cross the street for an extra 5% of bank RoE if it involved five seconds using google translate to understand a sentence of something I need to understand such that I can come up with a view to its intrinsic value.

    I look forward to coming back when BIRG trades up to something approaching its fair value which IMO is ~1.3x TBV.....I have no idea when the marginal buyer of BIRG stock will pay that.....but based on the results, the nature of the Irish banking market becoming outrageously consolidated and the fact we aren't likely not going back to ZIRP and BIRG is returning to life as regular sustainably through the cycle dividend payer......my bet is its relatively soon (but nothing is certain).... IMO BIRG provides an adequate return via dividend distributions while I wait for capital appreciation in the stock and decide to sell, pay my cap gains and look for an opportunity with a higher expected return.

    For now BIRG meets my estimated 3yr fwd TSR hurdle of ~15% or greater which warrants continue holding in the portfolio. In fact I've pegged the TSR somewhere north of 22% p/a 'if' the market trades the shares closer to 1.3TBV and they buyback 6% of s/o in the next three years....much of the return will come via dividends with high visibility IMO. The icing on the cake will be further sp appreciation.

    Post edited by bankboucy on


  • Registered Users Posts: 19 Green Penguin


    Great analysis.

    Key point for me is around the demand side, up to now only buyers have been a shrinking pool of long term value investors. With distributions finally restarting I think BOI will be back on the radar for Income focused funds which may well underpin an uptick over the medium term.



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭bankboucy


    Yep the underlying RoE strength is there, the sustainable moat is there, NPL's are 'fixed', interest rate hedges are in place, loan loss provisions are adequately even conservatively provisioned. If/when we get a recession - I think the underlying strength of the banks here will surprise and will certainly change the perception and invite in the natural holder of the stock.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If a recession increases NPL in any sort of shape or form then SP takes a hit. Yes banks are holding capital but if that gets run down so to will the share price because it will be expensive to replace.

    its also worth remembering that Irish banks were mainly unhedged coming into the increase rate cycle due to over a decade of ultra low rates…which means it’s a one off.

    If it’s not a one off and they benefit from same strategy then they are not adequately hedged and hold a ton of risk.



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭bankboucy


    Sure a recession comes along and you get depressed earnings due to higher losses on the loan book - but the reality is the loan books in the domestic banks are underwritten to extremely prudent standards with low LTV's. The mortgage book IMO is about as rock solid as one could expect in a world where the unexpected can happen. Everybody is always fighting the last war - i think a recession would nearly be a postive catalyst for BIRG such that this enhanced resiliency could be demonstrated.

    My point about the fwd strength of the banks balance sheets and earnings power through a downturn is again something which would bring the natural shareholder back to the table....these aren't your grandfathers 2008 banks type thing......in some respects a confirmed recession, if the banks perform admirably during it, will be a catalyst to their re-rating from a multiple perspective as the natural holders begin to think of them again as safe, reliable through the cycle dividend payers.

    On the hedging aspect I think your right - unexpected and violent upside on rates and they had a windfall......but BIRG has been conservative in taking some of that windfall and buying hedges to downside on rates so they aren't totally exposed on the way down now either.......but in some respects hedging or no hedging....I dont own BIRG such they do an excellent job forecasting interest rates and so running an effective macro hedging program....this is not the game of owning these banks....the key to sustainable RoE through the cycle is the change in their competitive position in the Irish market (married to my macro view on a non-return to ZIRP).....their deposit franchise/funding costs are unmatched.....so its a question of how much competition exists on the asset side such that AIB/BIRG can price product, mainly mortgages, in a way that generates NIM's of sufficient spread to get to 15% RoE targets. Whats clear in my mind even during this rate cycle is the funding cost piece....the deposit beta of BIRG's liabilities has been exceptional.....and so their ability along with AIB to set marginal pricing in the Irish market for mortgages (absent real competition) is exceptionally strong.

    It staying as perfect as it is today for AIB/BIRG is dependent on a non-return to ZIRP.....such that non-bank lenders dependent on the capital markets have significantly higher funding costs than the duopoly players and so are forced to play in niches or at higher pricing.

    From here IMO the thesis gets blown by a wave of new bank entrants to Ireland via actual regulatory entry or some version of capital markets union dream. Likewise the rise of neo-banks getting into the mortgage space in a big way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If there is a recession the NPL book naturally increases which eats away at capital and limits ability to pay dividends. It’s not just the mortgage book that impacts this but all other credit whether it be unsecured loans, business loans or loans to funds. The fact that the average LTV of the mortgage book is 50% or lower doesn’t make any difference if people are behind on payments as capital is still being used up.

    The idea that a bank will continue to be able to pay large dividends in such a situation and that share price doesn’t fall as a result all depends on the portion of the assets that are late with repayments and how much additional capital is required in such an event. The fact that there is collateral underpinning the lending has little impact and only comes into play in the case of final default.

    As for the hedging the bank didn’t need to take out long term hedges to protect against downside risk as rates were so low. Now that rates are higher they will be locking in these rates for a 5 year period on a monthly rolling position so we won’t be seeing instant returns like we just did as it would take a couple of years to feed through…likewise downside risk of lower returns from rates going lower would also take a few years to feed through. So what should be seen is slow and steady and not unexpected bumber profits like the last year.



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭bankboucy


    50% ltv mortgages have significantly higher repay rate in times of distress

    120% ltv mortgages as we found out in gfc are the problem and drive npls through the roof



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭bankboucy


    BIRG dividend payout ratio is pegged at 40% of steady state PBT…dividend coverage at that level allows for quite high NI falls/npl increases where the dividend can be paid and where the bank still has organic capital generation to repair cet1’s.

    Obviously raising capital at importune times is death for a bank shareholder- the scenario that would see BIRG do that are quite unlikely imo but not zero.



Advertisement