Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1104310441046104810491796

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,257 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Can you please in some of your many criticisms say why something ia awful. Maybe back that up with comparisons/evidence compared to previous good tournaments??

    Of course winning the 6 nations is less than winning the world cup. Not 1 person here has said anything like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    It's not a trial. I don't need CSI. It's my opinion.

    Alternatively if anyone thinks Wales/Italy or England are good teams have at it. My eyes are the evidence.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,257 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    It isnt a trial but back up your point a bit. You have been saying for quite a while oh it was s***. Yet never really said why or how it was poor.

    How can anyone take you seriously if you go oh theyre ****. And then say nothing about why you think they are and just say because they are **** if anyone questions you!



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,833 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    pretty much everyone in the world bar ireland and portugal (and possibly fiji) right now are crap.

    SA havent played since November so we're not sure where they are at, apart from being RWC champions.

    NZ are in transition and TRC will be an interesting competition to see where they are at. The didnt win the last RWC so as far as their fans are concerned, they unachieved. Australia are, hopefully, at the bottom of their bucket and Schmidt can improve them, but they are dog sh!t currently.

    France and england are severely underperforming. wales are crap but in transition and probably doing better than expected. Italy were dog sh!t in the RWC and a bit better in the 6N so unfair to lump them in with France and England as underperforming.


    so thats it really.

    One tier 1 nation is performing at the top of their game. Is that irelands fault? does that devalue a grand slam?

    hey, maybe england will turn ireland over in twickenham and you all can be happy again. doubt it though.

    Post edited by sydthebeat on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Fans don't have to ensure the financial viability of the game going forward so their opinions count for nowt when it comes to the way a Union does things.

    NZ have won 20 out of 28 TriNations/RC. Ireland have won 5 out of the 24 6nations



    6nations and AI are key components of the financial viability of rugby here and while winning the world cup would have been great. It should take away from the next game or tournament.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Well most team's that win their pool at a RWC don't have to play a team of NZL standard in a QF. You might have a point if Ireland got their asses handed to them but they lost a close game, idk how anyone can watch that match and come to the conclusion that they are bottlers...do you think if Ireland had a normal quarter final, i.e like Wales & England had in 2019 or 2023, this year that Ireland would have lost with that level of performance? 2011 & 2015 were definetly bottle jobs, 2019 the entire year was a bottle job never mind the tournament but that isn't the case in 2023.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,811 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    congratulations on missing the point completely



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    You know what this debate needs? Some good old pseudo contrarian, "all I'm saying is" energy.

    I'm happy to help.

    Ireland did not "bottle it" or "choke" in the world cup. However I'm increasingly convinced that the counter narrative is going too far the other way. That is, in the context of gleeful mockery by the "HAHA WORLD CUP BOTTLERS" Delegation (HWCBD), defenders of the Irish side have mostly settled on a narrative of "thems the breaks", "we lost a close game", "NZ are a great team", "if Kelleher scores that try", "it is what it is".

    We lost to a very good team, but it was still an upset. And I think that aspect is being lost in the above counter narrative. Argentina are currently ranked #1 in men's Soccer. If they had lost to Belgium (#4) in a soccer World Cup quarter final, the world would have considered that an upset. Argentina would be hugely disappointed and would need to find out why a team inferior to them (albeit marginally) beat them in a hugely important game. And nobody would consider this a hysterical over reaction.

    But such reflection seems less accepted for Irish rugby. And I get it, the HWCBD are insufferable. You are reluctant to give them an inch. But as time rolls on, and as we dismantle opposition in this years Six Nations, it does hold our RWC exit in context. And I think outright acceptance of the latter is itself guilty of undervaluing ourselves in the present moment. And ultimately guilty too of allowing a very irritating cohort to indirectly control a narrative.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Argentina lost to Saudi Arabia on that World Cup. Belgium would hardly be an upset by comparison.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    The handicap for the Ireland v NZL game was only 3-4 points if I'm not mistaken, based on you're definition its an upset but by most people's definition it's not, that sort of handicap is nothing and is suggesting the game is too close to call.

    The context is in 21 matches Ireland have won 20 and the one loss was a one score defeat in a game that could have gone either way. One game simply isnt enough information to go on to make any sort of conclusion unless it's just trying to fufill a narrative, which many on here are trying (namely TRC and Dubinusa).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Cant understand it myself considering the brilliance of this Irish side and reflecting on how far Irish rugby has come since 1997

    Long post of reflection!


    As as starting point Italy were arguably a better team than Ireland in 1997.

    Troncon, Dominguez, the Cuttitta brothers, Orlandi, Checchinato, Gardner, Vaccari, Stoica were all mainstays compared to Irelands disorganised rabble.


    Then BOD arrived in '99.

    Lens (Argentina were also prob better)

    Even after the 2000 6N hammering by England it was obvious (if you scratched beneath the surface) that Ireland had The Blueprint for success (Schools-IRFU Provinces)

    Then the Famous 5 v Scot

    The Paris hat-trick

    Then the EO'S sides provided The Background for more success

    The Munster backbone

    The Leinster flair

    The Triple Crown (7th in history!!)

    Another Triple Crown

    Then Munster champions of Europe

    Triple Crown Again

    Then Munster again

    Then Leinster

    Then the Grand Slam (2nd!!)

    Then Leinster again

    Then Wales in the QF


    This was the junction in the road. 10 years on from EO'S providing the background for Kidneys Grand Salm team... would Ireland make the next step?

    The Joe Schmidt era to me has been The Springboard that Irish rugby needed. 2 more Championships and another Grand Salm.


    .......but ultimately yet more abject failures at the RWC.


    In Feb '21 I would have swapped all the Irish provincial wins in Europe for the Welsh national side 2000-2021 achievements.

    Wales: 4 GS & 2 RWC SFs v Ireland: 2 GS & 0 RWC SF's


    Farrells Grand Slam (4th) era was almost the perfect lead up to the WC.


    .......but ultimately more failure at the RWC.


    BUT this WAS different. Yes it was a QF defeat yet again but I felt that particular game was just on the day. 8 out of 10 games Ireland win that game.

    & I'll take it and embrace the current success BECAUSE Ireland will not only win another Grand Slam this year I think they will win yet another one next year.


    Plus the future looks very bright - Unprecedented U-20 success (Back-to-back Grand Slams and a WC Final)


    The Blueprint. The Background. The Springboard.....- Diving analogy - This side has Style, Degree of Difficulty made look easy with excellent Execution and excellent Synchronisation.


    Lots of work still to be done in the provinces (& new International caps) for the Perfect 10 at RWC 2027


    In the meantime I will love each and every precious Grand Slam.


    2000-2023 Honours and achievements

    1. England: 2 GS & 1 RWC Win, 2 RWC Finals & RWC SF, and 5 6N

    2. France: 4 GS & 1 RWC Final & 2 RWC SF's, and 2 6N

    3. Wales: 4 GS & 2 RWC SFs, and 2 6N

    4. Ireland: 3 GS and 2 6N



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    We absolutely screwed up the opening 20 minutes. It is a very different type of screwing up from other years, but it is what it is at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,972 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    The Telegraph is reporting that Immanuel Feyi-Waboso is set to start for England this weekend. They have a limited attacking structure, but any opportunity this guy gets in space will be a big danger for Ireland. He looks electric.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Again it's an opinion. But just to point out the fact that France are absolutely muck. Drew with the Azzurri! I fully expect Ireland to win this week. They should do comfortably.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Any leaked teams yet ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    The betting handicaps are certainly one way to assess the degree of upset. But they would also be pricing in market expectation of an upset given that it was Ireland in a QF in the RWC. Anyone's guess as to how many points that took from the spread.

    Fact is, as you say, we had won close to 20 games in a row, were #1 in the world, had beaten the team then ranked #2 in the pool stage, faced a team ranked #4 where we had recently won a tour. Removing the context of the QF, that speaks to a likelihood of victory higher than what a 3-4 point spread would predict, imo.

    But we lost. And I'd rather not capitulate to trolls, reflect on it maturely, acknowledge the disappointment, and identify the specifics of what went wrong. (Podge lists one such reason above).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I never said they were bottlers. Far from it. That loss though, has gave me a right boot up the hole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    You misread me. I'm not saying what you are implying. My hopes for this 6nations are well below usual standards, due to the loss at the world cup.

    Ireland should and will complete a grand slam. They are the best team involved... by a big margin. I'm just not as invested this time. I've been unable to get past the loss. I would say there's similar feelings in N.Z.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Lads! I admire you all for being able to move ahead. I really do! I'm just in the stages of grief. I honestly thought that we would win the world cup. I'll enjoy a grand slam. But, what could have been.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Delete



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,944 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Yes and no. JGP made two bad decisions when we were on their line that cost us scoring opportunities, but we were on their line nonetheless. Putting them under serious pressure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    image.png

    Looks strong



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Going 13-0 down to NZ is pretty much the definition of screwing up!

    Costing us scoring opportunities with bad decision making is just part and parcel of our play in the first 20 which was nervy and unlike us. It put us in a hole which we never got out of. I'm relatively sanguine about the whole thing at this point - it was a bad defeat but I can live with it. Far better than almost all our previous world cup showings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 332 ✭✭Billy_the_Kid
    Master


    No Ringrose, maybe not at 100% yet and Frawley needed to cover at FB



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Lads I think you can both be right.

    I would think its very relevant to add this:


    30secs (!) on the clock penalty to NZ. Barnes pings Porter at a ruck on the NZ 22'.

    1min 30s - Mo'unga miscues clearing kick. Barnes gives knock-on against Ringrose (it came of Retallick) Scrum NZ just outside 22'.

    2min 30s - Barnes pings Porter with NZ scrum going backwards.

    6min 20s - Barnes pings Beirne in Irish 22' for 'not rolling away'(!)

    This was after 30 phases of heroic defending.

    7min 50s - 3v0 NZ

    NOTE: Ireland have not had possession yet.


    Now I'm going to say it. If it was another ref the maj of those decisions would not have gone against Ireland that day.


    NZ actually started that game very nervously.

    8min 55s - Barnes pings Savea for not rolling away. Inside the NZ 10m

    Ireland kick for the corner.........

    I could go on but lets just agree Ireland went down swinging that day.


    They are a great side. They deserve to win another Grand Slam this year. And we are going to love every minute of it!

    Cant wait for Saturday!



  • Administrators Posts: 56,220 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Love an old school team list where everyone is just initials plus surname. All they need to add back is the middle initials.

    R. A. Henshaw

    T. V. Furlong

    Beautiful.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,833 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41



    Hugo Keenan still a Twickenham doubt as Andy Farrell set to stick with 6/2 bench split

    b8cfde21-d329-470b-a983-6d9e799904d1.jpg


    Rúaidhrí O’Connor

    March 07 2024 02:30 AM

    Andy Farrell is set to stick with a 6/2 bench split of forwards and backs for Ireland’s visit to Twickenham when he names his side this afternoon.

    The coach will give Hugo Keenan as much time as possible to recover from his knee injury, with Ciarán Frawley on standby to remain in the No 15 jersey if he doesn’t make it.

    If he does, then Frawley is likely wear the No 23 shirt and Farrell will be forced to choose between fit-again Garry Ringrose and incumbent Robbie Henshaw, whose form has been excellent alongside Bundee Aki in midfield.

    He’s set to keep his spot and the most likely scenario would see Frawley continue at full-back with Keenan being given another week to recover for the final game of the Six Nations campaign against Scotland. In that scenario, Ringrose would wear No 23.

    Such is Farrell’s faith in the bench that was first trialled against France in Marseille, with Ryan Baird’s form and Frawley’s versatility allowing them to roll six powerful forwards on during the second half.

    Read More

    It is expected that Farrell will name an unchanged pack from the one that proved too strong for Wales, with Andrew Porter, Dan Sheehan and Tadhg Furlong in the front-row and Joe McCarthy and Tadhg Beirne in the second-row. Peter O’Mahony will captain the side from the back-row, where he’ll join Josh van der Flier and Caelan Doris.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Behind the scrum, Jamison Gibson-Park and Jack Crowley will continue at half-back, with Aki and Henshaw in midfield and James Lowe and Calvin Nash either side of the full-back.

    If Frawley has that role, it’s expected that Ringrose will come on to the bench at Stuart McCloskey’s expense, while Finlay Bealham is battling Oli Jager for the reserve tighthead spot.

    Rónan Kelleher and Cian Healy are expected to be named as replacements, with James Ryan, Baird and Jack Conan covering the other forward positions, while Conor Murray will join Frawley or Ringrose in the reserves.

    England are reportedly set to hand Exeter Chiefs winger Immanuel Feyi-Waboso a first start after losing to Scotland.

    Steve Borthwick is expected to retain George Ford at out-half, while powerful lock George Martin is likely to be drafted in to partner Maro Itoje.

    Possible Ireland team to face England: C Frawley/ H Keenan; C Nash, R Henshaw, B Aki, J Lowe; J Crowley, J Gibson-Park; A Porter, D Sheehan, T Furlong; J McCarthy, T Beirne; P O’Mahony (capt), J van der Flier, C Doris. Reps: R Kelleher, C Healy, F Bealham, J Ryan, R Baird, J Conan, C Murray, G Ringrose/C Frawley.

    Read More

    Read More Articles

    thumbnail_placeholder.png


    File sent to DPP over Catriona Carey firm at centre of alleged mortgage scam

    Crime

    thumbnail_placeholder.png


    Mary McCarthy: Geri Horner doesn’t deserve to be humiliated for standing by her man amid F1’s Red Bull soap opera

    Comment

    thumbnail_placeholder.png


    ‘I was dying inside. How did this happen?’ Couple fell victim to €2,800 scam that almost ruined dream wedding in Portugal

    Irish news

    Read More Top Stories



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 332 ✭✭Billy_the_Kid
    Master


    Ha oh yeah! Very strong team..[edit] but 6-2 is such a risk to take with the versatility of our 2nd rows and back rows now

    Post edited by Billy_the_Kid on


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,369 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The key indicator of how England plan to play the game will be who they pick at Fullback.

    If they pick Steward , they plan to kick the skin off the ball and follow their WC SF game plan.

    If they pick Furbank they are going to try to actually play Rugby.

    We win either way , but the Steward option probably keeps the score close for the 1st hour or so (as it has been in most of the recent games) but if they pick Furbank and try to play I think Ireland can pull away early.

    TBH - Trying to play and actually build a long term "style" is better for England in terms of development , but they will probably go Steward as Borthwick seems to treat each game a a singular event and not part of an overall long-term strategy.



Advertisement
Advertisement