Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1343434353437343934403690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Considering it was announced it was going to happen it's not rumour, just people having the notion it was going to happen in 6 weeks last year was completely unrealistic



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    More issues in America sectary of defence Loyd Austin goes into for elected surgery and ended up in intensive care for 5 days and nobody not even Biden was informed he was incapacitated .


    Post edited by Gatling on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    6 weeks. JFC, people were guessing 6 months, not 6 weeks. That was also the training timeframe.

    The 6 months delay is with Danish F16's, there's no mention of the Dutch ones being delayed. So the Danish delay could be down to the F35 delivery to replace their F16's being delayed and not to do with training.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling



    No the Danish government announced that they wouldn't be sending unless all of the training of flight crew's, ground crews, maintainers and other infrastructure was in place first, nothing to do with F35s .

    I should have taken that bet that was proposed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,513 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    I would think that when the f16s are in play in a large number they will target something meaningful and spectacular and say to the rest of the world hey look what we can do with them now give us more of them as we can use them properly and do proper damage to Russia.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,011 ✭✭✭macraignil


    "Russia's military is stronger now than at the start of 2022 , a working alliance swapping tech and know how is now in place between Russia, China, Iran, and NK."

    Any evidence you'd like to share to prove China is actually supplying military tech to putin? Just seen information about Iran and North Korean supplies but not seen anything solid about the supply from China.

    Also just wondering how is his military now stronger after loosing the equipment recorded to have already been lost in Ukraine?

    r4p8r5l2iyac1.jpeg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    They could but I don't think they will unless they plan something spectacular for inside the Russian border but at the current flight operations they have already have the ability to take out Russian Radars using haarm missiles from their own aircraft, they could go after airfields in Crimea but that brings the risk of losing valuable aircraft,but I also get the feelings that individual countries will put restriction on what can be targeted, hopefully it won't be the case but I get the feeling that there will be restrictions put on them



  • Site Banned Posts: 899 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    Very interesting declassified memo I stumbled on just now. If you think russian ambitions on conquering Europe were a recent putin thing read this. The absolute cheek of yeltsin casually suggesting to Clinton that russia just be allowed to take Europe with no US interference

    Post edited by I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,891 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Any restrictions placed on Ukraine should only be complete common sense ones like ones that constitute a suicide mission or the Zaphorizhia PP and the most basic commons sense dictates that Ukraine would not do either, anyway. Otherwise, the jets are there to hurt Russia's war effort as much as possible, and there's no reason not to use them in that way.

    We're long past the incremental defence argument of only giving Ukraine enough or letting them do enough not make Russia go nuclear. Russia will be using nukes under no circumstances regarding Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Totally agree with you there but as we know from the previous years of this invasion other countries don't see things like that ,it will be interesting to see what weapons they receive with them ,I suspect it will primarily be Air2air weapons



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,891 ✭✭✭✭briany


    What countries don't see it that way and what are they afraid would happen if, say, Ukrainian F-16s were blow up the Kerch bridge beyond repair or something like that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,891 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Well, I was talking about the reticence to support Ukraine fully early on in the war for fear of escalating things into a wider conflict. I would say that fear has passed, so short of other countries sending their militaries into Ukraine or doing big attacks on Russia (bigger than the drone attacks and airstrikes which have already happened), Russia aren't going to do anything really beyond what we've already seen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Looks like a Ukrainian mig 29 was shot down yesterday or earlier today with the pilot been killed ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Fastpud


    Not with standing the Ukrainian gains in the Black Sea my optimism of 2022 has evaporated over 2023 and now my long term view is quite depressing.

    Ukraine’s bravery thwarted Russia’s plan to decapitate Ukraine in the first few days but it feels like the west has missed a chance to end the war quickly by not fully backing Ukraine to win. The west’s slow drip drip has given Russia the time to get its war industry up and running despite sanctions.

    The west might have a much bigger economic capability but it hasn’t mobilised its industry to match, much less over match Russia’s. Given enough time Russia will find ways around the sanctions. Add in its high capacity to absorb losses and suffering this could run on for years and years.

    Ukraine has played a blinder so far but unless the west fully commits Putin will drag this out. A stalemate in Ukraine in the current positions is a win for Putin. Eu and NATO membership will be off the table, Ukraine’s economy severely damaged, all reconstruction on hold, millions of UKR citizens lost to other countries. This war will also allow him to continue lock down Russian society strengthening his grip on power.

    If it quietens into low intensity stalemate, he will move on Georgia, Moldovia or even Belarus. (Don’t see him ever going directly against a NATO country but there are other countries he could target)

    To Putin a stalemate is a win for him and a western loss. This will embolden him and other dictators around the world. (Iran NK, China are clear candidates but there are others)

    I think this is a pivotal point for the free world and depressingly at the moment we are sleep walking into a new world order that won’t be anything like as peaceful or comfortable as it is now.

    I hope I’m proved wrong and the west gets its finger out and turns military manufacturing up to 11 to over whelms Russia’s capabilities but I fear the longer this drags on the greater the risk of our resolve fading.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,566 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    How easily people forget events of just 2 years ago. Pre invasion, the US was convinced Ukraine wasnt going to last very long. The US was also clear that they wouldnt intervene. The best they would do is give a limited supply of weapons to Ukraine of a limited nature.

    After the battle of Kyiv, the tenancity of Ukraines resistance won over hearts and minds of the people of the US and EU and their governments were convinced to supply greater amounts of aid and more powerful equipment. Russia, meanwhile, showed itself to be utterly unable to fight a modern war and reverted all the way back to WW1 plus drones as a tactic.

    The war has dragged on longer than the US was expecting. They are now in the midst of a political spending crisis and the argument that Ukraine spending can be cut in favour of other projects is gaining traction. Hence their reluctance to supply more aid.

    It is also in Ukraines interest as much as it is the US to not escalate to a point of nuclear war or mass mobilisation with Russia. So her suggestion that there is a fear of collapse ignores this very real fear of escalation.

    How all that has happened is now being retconned into a false narrative to criticise the US and EU is straight out of the Russian propaganda booklet. It suits Ukriane for this narrative to go around, if it results in more aid, but thats by the by!

    The theory that Ukraine are being used as a tool to deplete the Russian army as you say, has no evidence to support it, vs the reality that other countries are providing aid and support, but that aid and support isnt unlimited and it is currently a political hot topic!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Lol .

    Which ones like the military expert you claim isn't a respected military expert because he calls it as it is ....

    Maybe a new hobby or account



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,397 ✭✭✭Ardent


    There is no win for Putin re Ukraine. It's a question of how big the loss is. The US recognises this and so the urgency to support Ukraine has diminished, which is really frustrating.

    We all want to Putin and Russia sent home with their tails between their legs. Just have to wait longer than we would like IMO, the resolve of the Ukrainians is incredible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,223 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Are people hopeful Avdiivka holds indefinitely after over 3 months of Bakhmut like attacks but very little gains? Will be a tough pill to swallow if Russia have to accept they won't take it and have to move their focus elsewhere.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Anyone old enough to enjoy them, they perhaps like me saw that "panorama" video and thought: is that a Command and Conquer mission briefing?

    "Comrade commander, the west are buckling. We must destroy 4 power centers before our attack can start"

    <Mission Loading>



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,518 ✭✭✭scottser


    Poverty rates across all metrics are increasing in all countries in the EU. Gerashchenko should be a little less flippant about it; the shift to populist and far-right leaders isn't a coincidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,223 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    This shift isn't uniquely tied to poverty either. Huge levels of immigration from outside the EU was always going to lead to a rise in the right. Especially when policy makers have been doubling down despite public opinion wanting otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    The same Russians funding Far right and far left groups you mean? Like they done in 80s to spread hopelessness and drive a wedge in social and political fabric of their self declared “enemies”

    Our weekly welfare amount is already larger than Russian average monthly wage

    You want to see poverty I recommend a trip to Russia where their concept of welfare is to ship off men to die in a mud hole for the glorious benefit of oligarchs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,518 ✭✭✭scottser


    Agreed, we're pretty well insulated here. I had the UK, France, Spain and Italy more in mind, particularly the UK given the Tories exceptional performance in driving inequality over the past 15 years. And it's not just Russia that funds far-right idealogues and authoritarian candidates - the USA and China are quite adept at it too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    And that’s what that video highlights 40 years later the exact same rhetoric and tactics are being used by Russia in their war against us

    Russia can’t win a conventional war against the “west” but it sure as hell is busy stirring **** up over here creating and exploiting various social and political issues in the hope the West collapses before Russia does, yet again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,518 ✭✭✭scottser


    Causes of poverty are always complex and often contradictory. Immigration can be a red herring though, I think. Taking the UK as an example, most of their immigrants are either Irish, Polish, Indian or Pakistani - countries with strong historical ties to the UK:

    Migrants in the UK: An Overview - Migration Observatory - The Migration Observatory (ox.ac.uk)

    Illegal immigrants to the UK are still a tiny minority but are used by the Tories to push quite an insidious agenda.

    Most common migrants to Germany are Romanian and Turkish, both EU countries. France takes in the most from outside the EU; mainly from Africa and Russia. The vast majority of immigrants to France are working, whereas 75% of their prison population are French nationals.

    We all know that economic inflation is the main driver of poverty. I keep reading differing accounts of how the sanctions are affecting Russia, which was probably the point of the original tweet from Belarus above. It seems like they want to portray the west as broke to deflect from how dire things are over there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 219 ✭✭Carlito Brigantes Tale


    If the west wanted a quick win it would be long over by now. Our cowardly approach is fueled by the "but but but what about da bomb" shouts from Putin propagandists. How the west has handled this test will be a black mark on our history for years to come.

    If Trump gets in in November anything is possible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,439 ✭✭✭zg3409


    I am not sure the real experts were of the opinion that Ukraine was not going to last long. They had specialist advisors on the ground giving advice, pre war training, intel, satellite imaging, telling them exactly the Russian battle plans and time and how best to draw them in and stop supply lines etc.

    In terms of latest weapon tech no country really wants to hand their latest weapons to the enemy, which is what happens in a war, they don't want the Russians knowing the range of missiles, how to counter them, how to copy them, how to identify them and knock them out.

    In terms of how long the war is going there is an opinion it's going perfectly for USA, little to no USA troops on the ground, economically crippling Russia for decades, Russia unable to withdraw, Ukraine nowhere near defeat. Similar proxy wars have been funded by USA for generations with low risk and high reward. Even leaked USA documents from a year ago expected no real change in front lines in 2023. Potentially 2024 was a probing year and Ukraine are waiting for enough equipment and a clear advantage before all out push. They may know they don't have that.

    That's not to say things don't go to plan and that there is not political messing going on and that it takes months or years to get planes and pilots and tactics ready.

    I suspect the real war strategists know exactly what's going on and the USA war machine is months ahead of action on the ground and can predict progress 3/6/9 months out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I'd be thinking that your average citizen watching this was muttering bleakly while they put on an extra coat after looking in an empty fridge.

    Such hubris can be seen here too with government interviews on immigration concerns - blithely insisting the state is omnipotent, but ignoring the angry mutterings of the local populations affected.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement