Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1718719721723724943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,669 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    The Irish House Price Report Q4 2023 was released today by Daft.ie

    " Housing prices are stabilising not because supply has increased to meet demand, but instead because demand has fallen to meet it. Supply of newly built homes for purchase has certainly increased but the second-hand market, which is the larger share of the market, has been working in the other direction ‐ buffeted by changed economic conditions. "



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I think everyone expected this. Interest rates and the price ceiling have cooled increases, but prices can't fall as there's a huge cohort waiting for houses.


    I predicted ithis time last year that prices would rise by 5-10% in 2023. Daft says it was 3.4%

    My 2024 prediction is not more than a 5% drop in prices nationally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I think wage increases of 2023 will feed into the market more so in 2024 than they did in 23.

    Same with increased borrowing limits and various government schemes designed to drive prices higher

    Buyers need time to adjust to such changes, save deposit etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Why assume it's incompetence? The state has done everything to fuel price rises and rent increases whilst doing absolutely nothing arrest either. The only "solution" ever offered is more funny money. No one can be that incompetent. This is either sheer indifference or outright malice. I can't comment on the latter as it's opening a rabbit hole, but regarding the former, this is what happens when we have decades of "zero consequences" for acting the maggot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    You can see the dysfunction in the Donegal market. A 20% increase in the price of a 4 bed detached year on year isn't normal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Interesting that, contrary to popular conjecture on here, the upper end of the market is powering forward the most with 5 bed detached houses seeing 10-20% yearly growth in the majority of locations.

    1 bed apartments have fallen 10%+ in almost all locations. 2 bed terraces flat and 3 bed semis low to mid single digit growth.

    Assuming activity of funds and people on tighter budgets, both of whom would be very sensitive to interest rates, mean drops at lower end while cash buyers dominate the higher end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Thats absolutely fair. My take on it being incompetence does assume FF/FG want to fix the housing crisis, but that may well be a charitable assumption given the evidence of the last decade.

    Its just all so very short sighted of them even if its that though - a stablisation of property values, slight lowering of rents, and high property ownership rates would result in pretty much a permanent FF/FG government. Its been known for decades at this stage that once most people own property they start voting for more right-wing parties to defend the status quo. Thatcher wildly successful strategy to expand home ownership in the 1980s proved this very well.

    But in Ireland we instead have continuous upward trends in rent and property values, a steadily declining property ownership rate, and a massive cohort of under 40s locked out of the housing market getting more and more desperate. Its going to lead to the voting out of FF&FG and the voting in of far more radical parties.

    SF polling at double the combined total (!) of FF&FG in the 25-34 age demographic (as is currently the case), and at 30% and climbing in all ranges of the ABC1 demographic, is almost entirely down to the housing crisis. ABC1 voters aren't exactly natural SF supporters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I think FG are acutely aware that their best path toward more votes is to get more homeowners. Hence shared equity/HTB etc.

    Right now the primary issue in Ireland preventing home ownership is a lack of houses. Not the price of them. Every single new build across the country is snapped up. Second hand supply is at record lows. The market is dominated by FTBs. There’s just not enough houses to go around.

    Whats the best way to get more of something supplied? Higher prices. Once someone buys, whether it cost them 500k or 700k they are more likely to be FG voters.

    Strong confidence from the building/financing sector to try to stimulate more supply is the clear intention. Higher prices is merely the mechanism to deliver that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The fact that they've governed over a continual drop in our home ownership rate since they came into office in 2011 would suggest they're either not acutely aware of it, or are utterly incompetent in their efforts to stem the decline, though. Neither is good.

    Driving up prices to increase supply has been the stated FG plan since as far back as 2013, and to date it has proven consistently ineffective. As well as it having the rather unfortunate side effect of pricing increasingly large numbers of people out of the market.

    Theres not much point in having a housing market where only a minority of earners, or else foreign investors, can afford to buy. And thats what we're heading towards with a median price of €440k now in Dublin, against a median household income of approx €55k.

    FG (and FF) need the majority of the population to be able to become homeowners to protect their support base long term. Which is very much no longer the case. The current ESRI projections are for only 35% of those currently aged 35-44 to be homeowners in their life time (and worse for younger cohorts) - which is going to have an absolutely disastrous effects on our home ownership rate.

    And the thing is this won't just effect people who've been unable to buy - if circa 65% of the population are renters in 30 years time the taxes on landlords, and homeowners, are going to be something else. The tyranny of the majority can get extreme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You have a very simplistic way of looking at things. In the same 2011 to niw period we have gone from being bust with a 14% unemployment rate ( and substantial number emigrating) at the same time.

    Last year we created 100k new jobs, the expectation is we will create the same number or more in 2024. We are at full employment so people immigrating into the country are necessary to fill these jobs.

    Housing is the most significant bottleneck but it hard to solve in an economy with full employment. Construction labour and labour costs are now starting to be the biggest factor in housing costs especially in Dublin.

    60-80% of those working in construction in Dublin migrate in and out of Dublin. They demand a premium above working in therebown locality. Just as an example 12-18 months ago blocklayers in Dublin were charging about 2 euro per block, outside Dublin it was about 1.3-1.5/ block.

    At present locally 10 miles from Limerick city rhe rate seems to be heading to slightly above 2/block, there was a significant push before Christmas by some blocklayers to push it to 2.5/ block.

    Where dose that leave Dublin rates.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭snl rory


    I have a suspicion that the much quoted 'never more first time buyers' are mostly migrant tech workers. Is there any data on this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Plot house prices on a graph beside numbers of new home completions over the last 25 years and see if you credibly state higher prices doesn’t equate to higher output. It’s nonsensical.

    You also posted data yourself recently showing how the home ownership rate had its biggest declines from the period of 2006-2016. Prices were extremely cheap for most of that period? Could it have been because everyone stopped building?

    Also, on the Tyranny piece.

    Here are the bottom 8 European countries for lowest home ownership rates. All worse than Ireland. Most significantly so.

    1. Switzerland
    2. Germany
    3. Austria
    4. Turkey
    5. Denmark
    6. France
    7. Sweden
    8. Finland

    Most seem to be surviving ok.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    In most of those countries you listed there are stronger tenant protections. If Irish landlords copies their systems by the reaction to tenant rights on here they'd have a collective aneurysm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The housing data speaks for itself. You can discuss bricklayer rates as much if you like, but the issue in a thread about the Irish Property Market is the home ownership rate dropping consistently over the year last 13 years of FG government, and being projected to drop much much further. Thats a very big sign of bad governance.

    Plot house prices against numbers of new home completitions over the last 25 years and you'll still find the number of housing completions in 2023 are still far below whats required. To the tune of 10,000-20,000 housing units a year by the ESRI and Housing Commission's most recent estimations that I posted on the last page.

    The idea that continually driving the price of houses up will result in a situation where theres a stable property market, accessible to the majority of the population, is whats nonsensensical. And thats not just my opinion - we have the evidence of 2011-2024 to show what happens when this approach is tried - abject failure, in the form of the Irish housing market in 2024.

    I didn't say the country wouldn't survive, it absolutely will. But in an Irish democracy where our political parties are almost all inherently populist, landlords and home owners will get absolutely hosed by taxation and regulation if we reach a situation where only 35% of households are home owners.

    To use comparable EU countries from your very own list - Germany has a home ownership rate of 47%, and has property taxes of up to 1% of gross value a year, Denmark has a home ownership rate of 59% with property taxes ranging up to 1.4% per year, France has a home ownership rate of 63% and property taxes of up to 1.5% per year. The idea that an Irish state with 35% home ownership rate won't have taxes significantly higher than these is very, very naive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    As I said you look at it simplistically. If blocklayers can up rates by nearly 50% in 18-24 months it tell you we have a significant shortage of them a d of construction trades in general

    Instead of reaming on about data tell us what you think the solution is.

    It's easy to be a whinger and complain about everything show us the solution. If the government are to be blamed for anything its that they got the economy to recover too fast

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Saying they are below where they need to be is very different to saying they don’t increase with prices. I agree they still need to increase (which they will continue to do I suspect).

    Plot prices against completions per capita and I assure you’ll find the same conclusion. Higher prices and more output are almost perfectly correlated. So logically if you wanted to close the gap to the ESRI projections, you would need to push prices higher, not lower.

    You mentioned ‘the Tyranny of the majority can get extreme’ which is very different to some increases to property taxes to more normal international levels (which I personally believe we absolutely 100% should do right now).

    Bizarrely the party that all the non-homeowners seem to vote for, want to abolish property taxes altogether. Go figure

    Agreed, the Irish rental system is broken across the board and needs a radical overhaul. Good tenants have too few protections and bad ones have far far too much. It’s a shambles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The solution is for the state to stop wasting billions of tax payer euros on ineffective demand side measures like HAP and leasing large numbers of high end apartments for social housing, and instead re-engage in large scale building of housing (both social and affordable) to supplement the private sector. As was practised for most of our post-independence existence, and is currently successfully in action in numerous other polities around the world.

    The problem is that neither of our otherwise generally fairly reasonable/centrist main political parties have shown any willingness to engage in this (based on the evidence from 2011-2024) under their current generation of policymakers.

    Which is a huge problem for everyone. For the Irish economy and country in general, but also on an individual level both for those locked out of the housing market, and long term for homeowners as they become a smaller and smaller slice of the electoral pie. And also for said political parties, as even their core demographic of ABC1 voters drifts to more extremist options like SF purely as a result of the housing market.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    How the hell does home ownership rates go from 66% to 35%……get real people are continuing to buy.

    you also need to take into account

    1) the increase in population which a large portion is due to immigration (where the majority rent) and how this impacts home ownership rate

    2) that the home ownership rates increased massively when the councils sold off there housing stock in the 90/00’s

    yes everyone knows we need to build more housing there is nothing new or revolutionary in you pointing that out. The issue is how do we go about this with the constraints that currently exist. You talk about young people voting SF but they haven’t been able to explain to date how they will increase the overall number of houses being built all they have stated is that they will redirect resources to building social housing which will mean a smaller stock of new private houses for FTB’s to buy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭J_1980


    Based on Dublin open days for new build launches (was at Cherrywood and woodbrook) it’s at least 50% foreigners.

    these people seem to have a lot more flexibility with regards to property type too. Happy to buy new build estates in less desirable areas (many Indians buying in clongriffin) or apartments (all the privately sold big blocks in SD along the luas seems to be 80% foreign owner occupiers) if that’s the only thing fitting the budget. Irish buyer seem to be waiting till houses in Blackrock drop in price. Typical SF voting idiot strategy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭J_1980



    home ownership rate is ticking up again.

    landlords are net sellers and houses are not magically disappearing, so I believe these statistics.

    Just because some left wing losers and their mates can’t buy their semi-D in blackrock doesn’t mean everyone else is renting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Who is holding off in the hope of buying a semi-D in BlackRock?

    That's the biggest strawman yet.

    Home ownership will not decline that much, but it will decline. The real thing to be worried about is the shrinking rental supply coupled with an increase in population. The rental market is going to get so much worse in the next decade. The government will try price controls to appease voters, we all know the effect of price fixing attempts. Then we see homelessness rocket.

    Unless rental investments are made attractive the supply is going to dwindle away to nothing. Even REITs and foreign funds no longer see it as attractive to invest in rental schemes here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    Just one point, who's the author of the statistics? If your going to believe a graph it helps if you know where the data comes from.

    You've just came on here with a uncited graph and told people their problems don't exist because of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,046 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    I suspect there is a lot of truth to this also, I'm working in a large tech firm and the Indian guys will often look to buy immediately once allowed.

    from the roughly 25 colleagues / ex-colleagues I know the areas of choice are

    D13 (Clongriffin and Baldoyle)

    D18(Clay farm, Glencairn Gate developments)

    Kildare (kill mostly) - Even heard from one of the guys "this will be like Sandyford in 10 years"

    with some others thrown in, as another poster said there's a preference for new build and decent transport links.

    It makes sense many of these guys are on good salaries and have seen their rents continuing to rise, its also not completely uncommon for two or three families to band together and split the cost of a new build.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭snl rory


    This is what I suspect also, Therefore the government exciting statistic isn't all its cracked up to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Thats...wildly factually incorrect. Home ownership rates have been dropping since 1991, they didn't increase in the 1990s/2000s.

    "People are continuing to buy" is always going to be true, a certain number of people will always be buying a house. The issue is the per capita rate of buying is dropping consistently every year, and so is our home ownership rate. The data doesn't lie. The 35% future home ownership rate estimation is from the ESRI, not me. I'd imagine they know far more about this than either of us.

    Any immigrant background of renters won't matter when it comes to the ballot box. They'll vote for measures in favour of renters, and to the cost of home owners/landlords, just as readily as native born Irish renters.

    SF, and the other opposition parties, have all stated they'll expand state building of housing massively - which is more than either FF or FG have achieved since 2011. They've laid out how in detail in their policy documents, have you read them?

    Its not just the majority of young people, its now 30%+ of ABC1s - the highest earning people in the country - across all age ranges. Those people are going to vote for SF almost purely because of the current housing market disaster, 30%+ of the highest earning people in the country are not natural Republican Socialists. Thats how badly FG and FG have handled the property market over the last decade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    The best bogeyman of the Irish property market I've ever heard - the mythical hordes of extreme lefties (who are also SF hardliners (?) ) monitoring the Blackrock semi-D market 😂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    Not to get too personal but, I could have done what a lot of my friends (strangely the ones who now have their own houses and apartments) did back then and went straight into the workforce and started saving for a house deposit. But instead I went on for my masters (total waste of time). I worked for a couple of years saved for a deposit and was about to buy then with my then gf, but then we decided top go traveling for a year, which turned into 3 years (i wouldnt say that was a mistake but it cost a lot of money both in spends and earnings forgone). When I got home I ended up eventually in a good job, but i had the travel bug and probably went somewhere at least every month.

    I added up all the money I "wasted" (my own definition of wasted) and I could easily afford a nice big house now if i hadnt spent it all on experiences and cars. I spent some serious amount of money of coffee over the years added up too (if people want a shock tot coffee money up). Im a bit late learning that spending money instead saving it and getting your major financial needs out of the way young are very important as there was only one time in history that the market came to people instead of running away from them.

    Its kind of like not funding your pension until your 50s and wondering why its not going to be enough when you retire. Time is everything and time at the beginning matters most. Thats one thing ive learned from my job in finance. I learned it too late though. But at least ive learned it and am taking on the responsibility to fix my situation, which hopefully will be sorted in the next few months.

    Or I could keep going as I was and just moan about it and blame others and see if that helps. But my proof to myself is looking at who has and has not bough their houses among my friends. ITs so obvious to me looking at that.



Advertisement
Advertisement