Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1340934103412341434153690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    There's a name I'd never thought I see mentioned on here , only talking about the legend of Fred Dibnah recently



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭rolling boh


    At this point neither Putin or Ukraine look likely to achieve their aim of Putin to take the whole country or Ukraine to push Russia back and out completely. My concern is that support for Ukraine will cool off a little for a whole lot of reasons. But I do think Putin can keep going enough to test the resolve of the various countries supporting Ukraine over the next couple of years .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,058 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The genius of the Russian strategy has been not only to sow discord, but to publicly spread the idea that they're behind it. It makes people suspect that Russia are behind everything, which deepens cynicism and political polarisation, and this in turn leads to further destabilisation. Kind of the geopolitical equivalent of a panopticon. Figuring out a way to counteract that will be critical to pushing back on Putin's ambitions for Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,024 ✭✭✭jmreire


    But also to the realization that you cannot believe a word that comes from the mouth of any Russian.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,057 ✭✭✭scottser


    Europe will not abandon Ukraine. She will be the source of our gas, oil, lithium and cobalt and aluminium in the future.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,024 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Not to mention a solid bulwark against any future Russian aggression.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,366 ✭✭✭Field east


    The funny thing is that Russia does not have to physically invade NATo countries its soldiers, armoury, etc. in order t have a very negative impact over the longtherm. It can do it by - vey remotely - sowing division, cyber attacks on various services / industry, etc. , funding groups that cause ‘ trouble, etc, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    aiming to be carbon neutral, does not mean we are moving completely away from oil and gas. it means we are aiming to be carbon neutral.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    In the same respect the universe is slowing expanding; COP28 and our collective inability to plan for what's coming has ensured we'll require fossil fuels for the medium term, long after we've past the pint of no return.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Screenshot_20231217_170145_com.android.chrome.jpg Screenshot_20231217_170206_com.android.chrome.jpg

    Now the only thing is I can say is that Russia hasn't ejected Ukrainian forces from the east bank so Ukraine does have toe hold there. Russia should of really have ejected Ukraine from there but either can't or are happy to have the Ukrainian marines pumping personell and material there and just been tied to that small area and not been used elsewhere in Ukraine. Been bled dry as such. Could be actually what they want to do for once.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It seems there's been a lot of complaints about the total lack of any Ukrainian fortifications along the front lines while the Russians constructed hundreds miles of multiple layers of defences and fortifications the Ukrainian have little or none ,it might explain the reason the Russians are able to keep grinding away at Ukrainian positions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,134 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    “Russia won’t invade another country after Ukraine”

    Maybe these posters need to google countries Russia has invaded and then come back to us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    I think it's more they might be in no position to do so for years to come. It will probably take Russia 10 to 20 years to build its army back up. Plus it still is at war with Ukraine so they will still take huge losses before this conflict ends. I think this crap of ohh Russia will march on Nato if they win in Ukraine is a load of crap, not a chance they could, I think that drum is being beaten so that Nato countries can ask for more money for their military. But let's be honest Russia has no chance against Nato alliance. It's like when top brass military in Nato countries were saying Russia was greatest threat to us give us money to improve our military, I'm sure they well knew that wasn't the case but if you have a country to project peoples fears to then it's easier to get a bigger military budget. It's like what is happening in America, you can see the pivot away from Russia and now towards China as their number 1 foe. American military is more asking for military budget for this threat now. I'm sure if these were no threats would be some other country. It's just the way it is, but no Russia has no chance against Nato and it will be years upon years before they will be able to try it against another country after Ukraine fiasco.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,058 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Well, that's what they have been doing for quite some time, using troll farms to heighten existing social and political tensions in western countries.

    There are two main ways to combat this which I can see:- one is to clamp down on freedom of speech so that people cannot so easily repeat the disinformation being spread online, but this would essentially mean becoming more authoritarian like Russia, and pushback against this would only lead to more internal conflict, which plays into Russia's hands, so its not a goer.

    The second way is to meaningfully address the issues giving rise to the social and political divisions in the first place, but this means making hard decisions in the interest of the common people, not private companies who are profiting well from the status quo.

    It seems like the undoing of any system is an overload of tension generated by a consistent failure to address the problems within it. Authoritarianism seems strong, but is often brittle and suffers from a constant problem of information flow. Basically the leaders within this system are isolated and get bad information due to a reticence to speak truth to power, leading to ill-informed actions. Liberal democracy suffers from sort of the reverse problem where the leaders are afraid to speak truth to the people, which makes fertile ground for disinformation on the part of rogue actors attempting to usurp the system for themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,134 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    But by conquering Ukraine it takes them a step closer.


    It might be 10 years, but its still a step closer.

    If they take Ukraine they will have Belarus also.


    How can you not see where this is all going if they succeed??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,916 ✭✭✭eire4


    The attack on our own HSE being a good example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    I think Belarus sadly will be more saddle to Russia. Ukraine no if the west and the states supply them properly. But let's be real this thing about they might take on a NATO country won't happen. Europe and America after Russia is hopefully 100% defeated should arm countries surrounding Russia who don't want to be under the influence of Russia and train their armed forces up. It will take Russia years up years to get back to where they are military wise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,043 ✭✭✭Polar101


    None of the countries bordering Russia really think it will take 10-20 years for the next aggression to happen.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,134 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    So because they won’t take on a NATO country they should just be allowed take Ukraine??


    Sorry I’ve no idea what point you’re trying to make here?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    No sorry I mean give Ukraine everything to defeat Russia properly and kick them 100% out of Ukraine. I just think that when it's mentioned that Russia might attack a NATO country it's fantasy as I don't believe that will happen. I think countries who are not in Nato who border Russia should be supplied with weapons/training and supplied by western countries and America after Russia is kicked 100% out of Ukraine. But when I see it mentioned that Russia might attack a NATO country I think that's 100% living in fantasy land.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,057 ✭✭✭scottser


    That's why their lithium and cobalt is so valuable and we need a steady supply. Oil and gas isn't going anywhere though, not in our lifetime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Oh naturally not.

    For these pro-Russia posters (who we assume are not Russians themselves for the sake of discussion) likely just enjoy the idea of Russia and the damage they wish to do to personal libertys & human rights. As has been suggested; if only these posters actually visited Russia and experienced it for what it actually is, they would likely understand why the Ukrainians, Polish, and a whole swathe of ex-Warsaw Pact nations want nothing to do with Russians anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,460 ✭✭✭zv2


    I'm suspicious of this. The Ukrainians blasted the Russians very badly there recently.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,460 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Fog of War is going to make that front particularly difficult to examine for a while. The AFU is doing a very good job here, especially given that they've got to supply themselves via river, and can't count on any heavy armor for a good long while. Looking at the Deep State map, it seems like the Russians had begun to take this front more seriously in recent weeks with additional units in the area.

    But still...the AFU hold their bridgehead. Somehow the Russians are either failing here, or the AFU are out-classing them (again). I think this will be one of those fights we'll learn about a long while after the fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,460 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Good advice to Hungary, ask Orbán to leave the room and Hungary to leave the EU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,366 ✭✭✭Field east


    Not so fantancyland if you follow RT



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    A reverse image search shows the first picture is from May. I have no doubt that Russia are seeing barrel failures from time to time, but if that account is reusing pictures from May then it's probably not as common as they want to portray.

    Meanwhile Ukrainian soldiers are reporting that Russia is back to a 5:1 artillery advantage . It went from haha they have NK shells to oh **** they have lots of NK shells very quickly.

    During the peak period of the counter-offensive and even just a few months ago, the ratio between Russian and our artillery fire was largely 1:1 or bigger in our advantage. Now, we fire one round for every four or five rounds that Russia fires."



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement