Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Jon Venables

Options
123578

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,120 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    You don’t need to have empathy to know right from wrong and to understand that decisions are will have a negative impact on your life. Just because someone doesn’t have empathy does not mean that they are dangerous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 537 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    James.

    His name is James Bulger and he was never known by the name Jamie at all. When the story broke and the tabloids were riding on the crest of emotion that followed, some unscrupulous editor decided "Jamie" sounded better for some reason and went with that against her wishes. She has always maintained that his name is James and not Jamie. I don't know how this isn't more widely known.



  • Registered Users Posts: 85,684 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I think a child's murder especially does stay with you, I know I still think of poor Santina Cawley and Robert Holohan, shocking that his killer only served 3 years

    I wonder can Jamie's parent(s) still provide a victim impact statement to the parole board even though it for another crime with their disapproval



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not possessing empathy doesn't mean you will commit awful crimes. In fact you can go about your life quite successfully on many fronts. My own capacity can be tested where I'm left scratching my head at a person's stupidity.

    In saying that I need to think about whether or not it matters. Like you say as long as the rules of life are followed then what of it. But I have thoughts to figure out.

    Venables and Thompson however had zero empathy when they murdered James. I can't make sense of their actions otherwise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,099 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    To those who say as 10 year olds they didn’t fully understand what they were doing, when I was 10 I wouldn’t have liked having paint poured into my eyes or being battered with concrete. Equally I couldn’t imagine inflicting the same on another child.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 431 ✭✭Become Death


    Ha, I didn't mean there was a pick out of the three.

    I meant I have seen people ask if they would let x babysit their child on three separate threads

    But to answer your question:

    Depending on the age and sex of the child.

    I certainly wouldn't leave a teen girl with Brand. But he would be my pick of the three for any other child demographic



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Karen Harrington had no history or previous convictions for violence. What happened to her that night that led to her murdering little Santina. It's baffling.

    I would love the opportunity to talk to them - Harrington, Venables, Thompson, Ana's killers - just to get a tiny glimpse in to their psyche. Would they chat away the same as any of us or would it be obvious something is amiss.

    Fascinating.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,070 ✭✭✭Odhinn




  • Registered Users Posts: 85,684 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    You could be the Irish Louie Theroux visiting prisons

    I'd be afraid if I'm honest



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The dream! 😁

    Would you Liz? Afraid they might hurt you?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 85,684 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I would be thinking of their crime all the time and be frightened



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Of course. That makes sense. Just being in the presence of someone who you know has done a terrible thing can be unsettling.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭Rubberchikken


    Releasing him hasn't worked but neither will 'just lock him up and throw away the key ' mentality.

    I remember hearing it on the.news the first report. When it was mentioned that two children were to blame it was truly hard to believe.

    The picture of that little boy being led by the hand by a child not much older but with evil in his heart (I really believe) is haunting.

    Ive no answer to what to do with him. I feel if he's released he'll offend again.

    I find it very difficult to try to understand people like this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Xander10


    Madeline McCann was only ever known as Madeline. Again, it was the tabloids that dubbed her Maddie, and looked to profit by running constant stories about what happen, who abducted her, false news of breakthroughs etc, for their own murky gains.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,459 ✭✭✭touts


    We'll all know their identities when they inevitably butcher some other poor women.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    "Ah sure they were kids, they just made an innocent mistake, sure it could have been any of us who did that as kids"



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,602 ✭✭✭John_Rambo




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Some choice quotes from this discussion. Remember, the "bad choice" they made was to kidnap, and then torture a toddler to death. Dwell on that for a moment... now read:

    I have an unpopular view, I am against jail sentences for children in all circumstances.


    They were 10 years old and made some bad choices.


    It’s so nice and convenient to think that these were just 2 bad eggs, right?


    He served his sentence and deserves a second chance. Get over it.


    I don't accept the concept of criminal responsibility for children


    I think if society dumps two 10 year olds into a trash can and washes their hands of them then that says a lot about what that society really is.


    "lets see what happens if we do this" is an excellent way to sum up childhood tbh. Thats how people learn and grow. Most of the time the things they do are within normal boundaries, but sometimes, as in this case, they are not.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭TokTik


    There are certain crimes that deserve a maximum enhanced punishment.

    Bulger and Kriegel are 2 of them. If society today is too soft to bring back execution, then life, meaning entire life, imprisonment should be the sentence. And it should be as solitary and sparse as possible. A bed, a toilet, a shower in their cell, 3 meals a day, an hours exercise and maybe a preselected list of books.

    Nobody that depraved and evil, 10 or 110, should be allowed back with the general public, for society’s sake and safety. They have forfeited their own human rights when they have done something that vile to another human.



  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭GSBellew


    We do not need to understand, they are evil, they are not owed rehabilitation, the death penalty I do not agree with but they should never leave a cell, same as James Bolger will never see the light of day again.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, I find it odd that in certain cases there seems to be more sympathy for the murderers than the victims.

    Murder should simply be life in prison. As in the rest of your life. You took a life in a way defined as murder, so you pay for it with yours. That is justice.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,091 ✭✭✭dam099


    Our whole society is based on the premise that children are not as developed mentally as adults, a 10 year old cannot

    • Purchase alcohol or nicotine
    • Enter a contract
    • Consent to sex
    • Vote
    • Join the military
    • etc.

    All these are for good reason, yet we have posters here saying to treat them like an adult and lock them up for the whole of their life.

    I don't believe children who commit serious crimes should get a free pass either but there has to be balance and some attempt should be made to rehabilitate and I expect mental health intervention should form part of that. I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to some sort of sentence which lets them out on licence (after appropriate rehabilitation) which would make it easier to incarcerate them if their subsequent behaviour suggests they still pose a theat.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I wonder if James understood what was happening to him in his final moments.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,865 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I have an unpopular view, I am against jail sentences for children in all circumstances.

    This isn't some daft throw away comment or some untested theory.

    Children under 15 can't be criminalised in Norway.

    It's quite controversial but not for why you would think.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No one is going to convince me to feel any sympathy for the murderers of this case.

    I could possibly understand a child killing another accidentally, like if they were play fighting and it went too far. Then yeah, I don't think a child should be charged with manslaughter.

    But some of you are appealing for clemency in the case of a toddler being kidnapped and tortured to death. I will never be on your side. It will never happen no matter what you say.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,099 ✭✭✭Patrick2010




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,103 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Yes on a life long license, so if he ever reoffends again for anything he's back in jail.

    To the people who want the names of the killers of Anna Kriegel to be made public do you think Thompson's current identity should be made public?

    And if so what would be the benefit to the public?



  • Registered Users Posts: 968 ✭✭✭Str8outtaWuhan


    There was an entire school responsible, it's wasn't just those two lads who treated her thus. Unfortunately that school had form for breeding psychopaths from what I remember when I lived in leixlip.



  • Registered Users Posts: 746 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    Boy A went to the same primary school as me. They weren't long in the secondary school, so while the secondary school should be held to account for the dreadful treatment Anna received in school, I'm not sure you can claim much role in him being a psychopath. And as someone who attended that primary school years ago, it was even worse at dealing with bullying than the secondary school was. In that school anyone being bullied was treated as if they deserved it due their innate character flaws. I know people still traumatised over their treatment there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 968 ✭✭✭Str8outtaWuhan


    Interesting, I wonder if the leixlip gang rape perpetrators went to same primary school. They definitely went to same secondary as Anna's killers



Advertisement