Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1326632673269327132723690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,862 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,825 ✭✭✭✭Mr. CooL ICE


    Don't think I've heard about that one before now.

    I wouldn't want to be a recent resident of Crimea because it'll be raining drones soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,798 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Yes, it's another ship but unclear whether it's been sunk or damaged. There is footage of what looks like a failed attack on the 14th.


    It's also hard to tell how much air defence this ship was providing. It's a patrol vessel and not only was it never designed for Area Defence (only the Moskva had that), but it's own point defence is specifically mentioned as one of its weaknesses.

    I have read reports that said they were after-fitting/lashing on/duct-taping air defence systems to various parts of the deck. So these vessels may have been plugging a gap.

    I'm a bit confused what the Twitter author means about being a free-fly zone "under S-400 radar coverage". I thought the Ukrainians had destroyed the only land-based coastal S-400 covering the Black Sea in Crimea a few weeks ago. Maybe they mean that the S-400s further inland can still cover the Black Sea above a certain altitude. But it certainly looks like it's Novorossiysk for the Black Sea fleet for the foreseeable future and Sevastool/Crimea is no longer as valuable as it once was.

    It's a fantastic piece of strategy. Instead of focusing simply on trying to sever the land bridge and Kerch bridge to Crimea, they've removed the whole motivation for Russia wanting Crimea to begin with, if it's only going to be a duck shoot for the Ukrainians. Not that that will matter a whole lot to the grunts on the ground who are there to kill Nazis. But in the same way that they conceded the right bank of the Dnipro in 2022 because it was indefensible and costing them heavily, they might in the next 12 months choose to retreat from Kherson Oblast to Donetsk and, unthinkable as it sounds, abandon Crimea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,329 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    If there is heavy snow and we get a really hard winter in Ukraine will this make the minefields passable if there is half a metre of snow on top of them

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,690 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Ha...and yet the Russians want to go to the world with their army of Putin-bots and assorted fan-boys and somehow try to sell the idea that Russia aren't the bad guys in all of this?

    Here's a tip to any Russia fan-boy still reading here; the "Good Guys" don't usually recruit troops with the promise that they can occupy and live in the cities of a people they intend to eradicate. It's a fairly easy way to tell the good from the bad.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,692 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    They'll be harder to detect as they have heat signatures. Also, a half metre of snow is probably a light snowfall in Eastern Ukraine :) Now, if the ground freezes after that, it might make it a bit harder for the landmines to detect pressure changes and detonate. I wouldn't bank on it, you'd be playing the percentages in a game where you don't want to lose at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,798 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Although the region gets a lot of precipitation, the average snow depth never gets to anything significant. It's more frozen ground than alpine/nordic conditions. Which in my limited experience is a much more miserable type of cold.

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 878 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    my eyes!!!! make it go away!!!😵 id say he's not shy at the buffet!


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    "You are him…the one they call the "Baba Yaga"…

    yo! donnie vonshitzinpants,vlad putin,benji netanyahu..you sirs are the skidmarks on the jocks of humanity!!!



  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    I'm at a fairly fancy "all inclusive" in Turkey at the moment so that's not an unfamiliar sight for me. They're big lads who like to load up the plate.

    Oh I've got a good view of Arbrahmovic's yacht across the bay too...

    IMG_20230918_173826.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,560 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    It amazes me that it's just floating there. Surely civilian vessels like that would be relatively easy to sink?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,798 ✭✭✭✭josip




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,161 ✭✭✭wassie


    Those records are extreme. High of 40 to a low of -30.



  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,845 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    Yeah I was wondering that too. This one is at least tucked away, I don't know what security there is around it however the one that had me scratching my head was Melnichenkos weird looking one in Trieste. It's out in the middle of the bay and Ferries etc just go past it (about 100m) and it didn't look like to me as though there was much if any (I'm sure there is) security around it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,560 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    A scuba tank and an augur would take care of it fairly quickly ;)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,825 ✭✭✭✭Mr. CooL ICE


    Maybe abramovich has an army of defense dolphins. But they're probably corrupt too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Sure there's no end of heroes on here ready to have a pop 🤣



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    So what begings? Can you give a potted summary for those who might be all "Huh?" about this development?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,690 ✭✭✭Rawr


    The Nagorno Karabakh conflicts had essentially been a bit of proxy fight between the Russian-back Armenians and the Turkish-backed Azeris. Russian troops are in the area to essentially dissuade Azerbijan from rolling over the remaining ethnic Armenian areas of Karabakh. If the Russians fail in this task (which they already have been, thanks to the Lachin Corridor blockade they were supposed to prevent) this will indicate that the Russians might be unable to keep expeditionary forces running. An Azeri victory here might enbolden Georgia to take on Russian forces in thier respective areas too.

    What is crap though, is that the Nagorno Karabakh conflict is awash with inter-ethnic violence from both sides. Local Armenian civilians stand to probably suffer horribly under Azeri control.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,032 ✭✭✭jmreire


    This, 100%. For Ukraine its a fight to the finish. And if Putin wins, Europe and the Balkans ( aside from the other Putin inspired trouble spots in the world.) may prepare for more "De-Nazification". The Hydra has to be killed, once and for all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp



    this performative hyperbole isnt very persuasive, Russia wont be invading NATO

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,467 ✭✭✭zv2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,032 ✭✭✭jmreire




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,798 ✭✭✭✭josip


    I think it's the beginning of the collapse of Russian influence in the wider region as the emperor is finally seen to have no clothes. Russian peace-keepers have backed their Armenian allies in Nagorno-Karabakh up to now. Armenia realising Russia is week and can't defend its interest was reported to be pivoting towards the US in recent weeks. I don't think Azerbaijan would have made this move before the invasion of Ukraine for fear of upsetting Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,690 ✭✭✭Rawr


    There is this. I had been watching Karabakh for this very reason. I kind of guessed that if Russia was deemed to be weak enough, Azerbijan would make their move. And so here we are.

    Already reports of strikes into Stepanakert and if that town falls it's already over. The Karabakh Armenians are starving and a not better armed than the Russians in Ukraine. They face an Azerbijan with NATO-grade gear thanks to Turkey. I can't imagine them lasting long.

    What will be worth watching are the Russian garrisons on the approaches into Stepanakert. Will they be made to surrender, or some other arrangement to get them to leave. This too will be a sign of where the Russian military are after 2 years of war in Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,979 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Absolute nonsense. Putin is losing a war against Ukraine and even if he wins the idea he will then take on the EU/NATO member Baltics (I assume that's what you meant not Balkans) is laughable Hollywood nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,032 ✭✭✭jmreire


    They are already attacking NATO just not military style, but everything short of that definitely. Computer hacking attacks, mapping undersea cables, general harassment, like the recent incident when two Russians trying to intimidate a NATO intelligence gathering plane , and one Russian plane fired 2 missiles at it. The problem is that, there are those in power with Putin openly calling for nuclear bombs to be used, ( or in Russian terminology " Limited Nuclear Devices") to turn the tide in the war. And that means that they do not give a damn about the fallout from these bombs travelling into NATO Countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,907 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    If Putin wins, and has Ukraine in his orbit, emboldened by that victory, after a pause, the same destabilisation and little green men tactics we saw in Ukraine would be used towards Baltics, Moldova Romania. Why are Poland increasing their independent military capacity?

    We have seen the only thing that deters Putin and Russia is military power and resolve.

    It may not play out way, Ukraine should keep Russia in check or even if Russia succeeds in grabbing land it will be expensive to hold.

    But it is within the realm of political possibility, not laughable Hollywood nonsense.

    We can see how Russia uses the resources of annexed Ukrainian territory, and conscripts its populace.

    Had Russia stormed to an easy victory in Ukraine, that was the plan, to turn Ukraine back into a satellite like in USSR.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,979 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Russia would be rolled over by EU/NATO in seconds and even the lunatics in charge of Russia know this.

    "Had Russia stormed to an easy victory" then ya other countries were probably the plan but the reality is they were shown to be complete amateurs once again just like in Afghanistan.

    It's nonsense.

    "Putin openly calling for nuclear bombs to be used"

    Didn't actually use them though did he. And it's because he won't go to war with EU/NATO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,907 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    You are creating a simple scenario of a straightforward open attack, with no room or doubt, Article 5 kicks in.

    The Russians wouldn't play it out that way. It would be destabilisations, an internal fifth column, little green men, border incidents and provocations, creating doubt. Maybe with an "America first" type President in the White House. A scenario designed to create wedge between NATO countries, perhaps one in which Poland comes to the assistance of one of the Baltics.

    Part of a long game to roll back US \ NATO commitments to liberated USSR \ Warsaw Pact territory.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,979 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    They won't even try "little green men" on an EU country.

    We all knew that was Russia and it won't be tolerated.They will probably keep up all the cyber and political stuff alright.

    But they will not do to any EU/NATO country what they done to Ukraine which was the suggestion.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement