Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Coldplay - Dublin 2024 - Update Post 1 on Toutless

15455575960108

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,937 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    The Resale legislation has absolutely no correlation with the scams being run at the moment.

    Scams have always popped up for big gigs, its just that social media has led people to be far more gullible to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,555 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    Of course there is a correlation.

    Sites like Viagogo and Stubhub provided competition to Ticketmasters Platinum tickets.

    They allowed people to buy tickets with a guarantee of money back if the ticket was invalid.

    Personally I rarely used them but some people used to use them.

    What you have now is Ticketmasters 700 or 900 euro offering or some scammer on social media.

    I always tell people to wait, more tickets will be released or you can buy on Toutless or resale closer to the event, but alot of people are impatient or suffering peer pressure so panic and get stung.

    The legislation was sneakily rushed through during Covid, politicians believed Platinum tickets were actually better ticket packages, they havent a clue, they overruled their own department who said a ban on above face value resale would lead to more fraud.

    It was a pr stunt at a time the Govt needed a good news story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 115 ✭✭TheIrishPC


    Post edited by TheIrishPC on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,937 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    People are being scammed by Instagram pages less than a week after it went on sale. Even if the resale market had more sites, these people still likely wouldn't have tickets at this point and still would be falling for scams.

    There is no way that the demand for tickets would be met by the existing-ticket holders who want to sell their tickets (and let's be honest here, a majority of whom in the pre-legislation days would be selling these tickets at multiples of their face value), so these scams would still be there and still be fallen for by desperate, gullible people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 115 ✭✭TheIrishPC


    People were gullible to the scams even before the tour dates were announced. I must have seen at least 5 people share a "win tickets to see Coldplay in Croke Park" post by some random page about a week before it was announced they were coming



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,937 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Exactly my point. The lack of resale opportunities/platforms have no correlation to the scams being run (and fallen for) at the moment.

    If Stubhub, Viagogo or Seatwave still existed, they'd be selling all tickets significantly higher than face value and the scams to either 'win tickets' or 'buy a ticket at face value' would still be there and fallen for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,054 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    And if there was an official verified website where tickets could be sold at face value then people with spares could buy and sell them there, ticketmaster should be forced to provide that service.

    Currently if i have two spare tickets to any event there is no ‘legitimate’ place for me to sell them, its donedeal and thats all scammers and spam, viagogo (crazy fees mean you have to charge over face value) or among your friends and thats limited.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭Everythin coming up Milhouse


    While "old fashioned touting" (let's be clear, Ticketmaster are essentially doing the same thing) isn't as common as it used to be there are still touts out there selling through DoneDeal, Facebook, outside venues etc. The legislation scared some of them off but they haven't gone away. The increase in scammers on social media and Ticketmaster trying to make secondary market ticket sales a closed shop has definitely overshadowed them but there's still money to be made by selling in demand tickets for above face value and people are going to continue to do it. It's small-scale but to say that touts don't exist or that Ticketmaster is the only tout is disingenuous.

    Recently I've seen them outside Vicar Street, the Olympia, Trinity, all designated venues under the legislation i.e you can't sell tickets for above face value for events there but there's a big difference between having something in writing and implementing it. The total number of people prosecuted since the legislation has been brought in - zero.

    I do agree that Ticketmaster/Live Nation are the bigger issue. The legislation "solved" one problem, it killed off Viagogo, StubHub etc. but created another. Live Nation can now manage an artist (SZA to take a recent example), own the ticketing platform (Ticketmaster), own the promoter (MCD), own the venue (3Arena) and control most secondary ticket sales as well. It's easy to see how they can manipulate demand to push overpriced platinum tickets, sell the same ticket multiple times and collect various fees etc. when they have that kind of monopoly. And without straying too far into tinfoil hat territory there were "industry experts" who advised the government on that legislation who maybe had one eye on their own interests.

    I think that's were the government involvement ends, they were seen to be doing something but just gave the keys to Ticketmaster who'll continue clean up. We're already moving towards how these big shows are sold in the US, multiple levels of ticketing, not just a different view/seat, a different "experience" to justify the eye watering prices. It won't be long before we're paying €10 for a pint (that would be cheap in the US) in a plastic cup too, everything to maximize profits. The artists are also complicit, they reap the rewards as well, the Cure on their recent US tour and others have shown that you can still put the fans first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,142 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Premium Level tickets will also become available soon

    They started appearing mid-late summer last year for the Garth Brooks shows



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 807 ✭✭✭Mr321


    I'd say it'll be alot of single seats or max 2 for resale where people may have bought 4-6 and don't want that many after



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭RolandGoose


    Stubhub was as far as I remember a Ticketmaster company. They were always in on ripping there customers off. These days they don't even try to hide it!

    Ticketmaster and Live Nation are grotesquely unethical and vile with greed, they are slowly but surely killing the live music industry. It's no longer fun or escapism for punters or young teenagers getting into music especially, who are asked to shell out 300 euro plus for a ticket to their favourite act in times of inflation! Platinum ticketing has arrived into Ireland and my gig going days are limited to avoiding anything with such nonsense included!

    Screw Ticketmaster

    Screw live nation

    Screw Coldplay (blissful ignorance my arse, they know well that "their" fans are being ripped off and exploited - the 100 or so infinity tickets they like to blab on about is utter nonsense! I'd love to know how many of the 320,000 plus tickets will be allocated to infinity, any ideas?..)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭Qprmeath


    Some €390 tickets for Sunday showing just there now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    €252 early entry standing tickets showing up for Thursday night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 115 ✭✭TheIrishPC


    I checked but all gone. Of the experience packages, it's the only one I would consider buying if nothing else. Early access standing for a high demand concert would be great. Still expensive but better value for money than the other packages imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Croke Park sells most of the premium tickets as 3/5/10 year tickets. They come with admission to all GAA games, plus first refusal to purchase the same seat for any other events, including concerts.

    There’s still some renewals for tickets 2024 onwards ongoing. It’s unlikely that any premium tickets linked to multi-year holders will be released until sometime next year when Croke Park/GAA have given all of the multi-year ticket holders their chance to purchase them first



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,545 ✭✭✭magic_murph


    Ticket price is based on promotion company (Live Nation) the venue, ticket selling platform, re-selling ticket platform and the artist. I would expect the artist to have the least amount of say in the over all price as there would be a min-price to cover all costs then the artist gets their cut. Its an absolutely horrible model and would love to see artists going solo and trying to do things themselves - if enough got together and refused to work with the traditional model venues would have no choice but follow suit



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,937 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    That might be the case for smaller artists but bigger artists (or their management) 100% have the say on ticket prices, they are not going into either blind or unaware of what ticket prices will be - and if they have a problem with them, they can dictate the price range. It is likely that they're told that tickets will be sold within various price bands (and that the overall take will be X and the overall profit will by Y) but large artists are not in any way at the whim of the promoters.

    LiveNation get a lot of stick (most of it rightly so) for ticket sales but it was even on the radio even last week when talking about ticket prices (for both Coldplay and Taylor Swift) that if fans are angry about ticket prices, it's the artists they need to be angry at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭ConcertKing




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,545 ✭✭✭magic_murph


    If you have an actual point you want to articulate on please feel free.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,545 ✭✭✭magic_murph


    The big artists don't have as much say as you think as they sign contracts with the likes of Live nation to be their promotion partner - as part of that deal the artist gets a nice bonus / sign on fee and for that money they give away a % of control.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,937 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc



    "We know by now that streaming through music services like Apple Music, Tidal and Spotify doesn't bring in a lot of money for artists, and album sales aren't what they once were. But artists rarely have a "particularly big" say in where the ticket price gets set for a tour unless we’re talking about superstars, says O’Brien. "Very frequently the promoter who is putting on the show is going to set the ticket prices. The up-and-coming and mid-level artists, they may not have that kind of freedom."

    “My kind of queasiness is over dynamic pricing which is basically what has been happening for years with Ryanair. If a lot of people want to fly to London some weekend that there’s a big football match, prices go up and artists opt into it.”

    He continued, “Most of Twitter traffic that I’ve seen have been saying all promoters are price gouging. Promoters are merely following the wishes of the artists. So, if you’re angry about paying too much for Coldplay tickets, Chris Martin & co have set the dynamics there.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,405 ✭✭✭Fanirish


    That’s untrue, the likes of Taylor Swift, Coldplay, beyonce, Bruce etc of the world have the leverage and they ensure they get every penny possible from all possible avenues at a show. The promoters are happy to get the millions from these shows. They won’t risk losing an act to another promoter for sake of % of discretionary income source.

    the infamous Peter Kay car parking story is a good one.

    back in 2009 Peter Kay had written into his contract that promoters had to give him £1 for every car they were charging for car parking at the arena. the promoters all agreed to it. He was selling hundreds of thousands of tickets so promoter was hardly going to refuse him.

    the story goes after first night at one of the venues Peter gets his statement/breakdown of his income for the show. He notices that the car parking income for this massive arena is only a few quid, he asks where the other thousands are, promoter/venue tells him we only have four car parking spaces, an third party firm own the car parking lease and we only have a few complimentary spaces so that’s your cut of our spaces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭RolandGoose


    Pearl Jam tried this in the 90s at the height of their popularity. Unfortunately they didn't get the support they needed from other major artists at the time, only Neil Young it must be said. Sadly it's over 100e to see either of these live today.

    It is the consumers that drive these daft markets. People on this very thread have been shelling out 300e for a single Coldplay ticket. Some VIP packages have shifted too I'd say (at approx 900e). Live Nation take the stance if people pay it, we'll charge it. To my disbelief people are willing to shell out several hundred euro each to go to a gig. Madness!

    Just in the event I am accused of being anti Coldplay, I am not. Their first 3.5 albums were amazing. They completely lost me after this, with the exception of the odd radio friendly, bubblegum pop, catchy tune. I tried asking a few pages back what people's favorite album(s) were, it seems to me the worse Coldplay get, the more popular they become. 95% of their latest album would not be out of place at the Eurovision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 882 ✭✭✭jams100


    Will you ever stop exaggerating 😂

    Firstly stubhub isn't or was never owned by ticketmaster / live nation.

    Secondly with most concerts you can still go for a reasonable price <€50 or €60, yes, you may not have the best seat in the house, but in the likes of the 3arena even the worst seat isn't that bad.

    Thirdly, as you mentioned it's the artist that ultimately sets the price, if you and others don't like the price it won't sell out and if the big act comes to town again they'd revise their prices.

    Ultimately the price of a gig isn't all that bad, generally speaking, and to be fair we have probably been underpaying for some gigs for a long time. (Relative to going on a weekend break down the country, a football match over in England etc.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭Del Griffith


    Artists made money off albums back when Pearl Jam did that. Different story now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,786 ✭✭✭✭greenspurs


    And they havent played ireland since 2010 !!

    Not enough money in it , and insurance costs ??

    247469249_2017413731748359_7675802031635703098_n.jpg

    "Bright lights and Thunder .................... " #NoPopcorn



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭MOR316


    How come U2 can dictate their ticket prices?

    Whatever about their residency now in LV, any time they've been to Ireland between 2005 and 2018, I got tickets priced between €40 and €77.

    Doesn't make sense to me when the likes of working class, man of the people, Springsteen and Coldplay have excuses made for them in terms of ticket prices.

    For inflation purposes, you could see Queen in Slane in 1986 and Michael Jackson in Cork in 1988 for less than €50. But, we've gotten clowns charging hundreds for "listen only" tickets these days. And yes, I'm fully aware of the lack of money for artists due to streaming services, but it's zero excuse!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,643 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    There's loads of different models for contracts here, people on here every time there's a big concert try to guess what the contract type is but really we're only guessing.

    • Smaller bands are hired for a gig and then the venue can charge what they like (obvious example being wedding band or live band in a bar)
    • Middle bands that are hired as support or on a festival would be paid a set amount for that and given no influence.
    • Bigger bands have their own companies setup that manage the tour and can influence pricing as they see fit.

    Most are some combination of the above, a set fee plus a "profit share" of tickets, some even get profit shares of concessions sold at the gigs. Trying to figure out what Coldplay, U2, Taylor, Garth Brooks have in their contract is impossible from the outside



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,937 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    The only people making excuses for Springsteen, Coldplay, Taylor Swift etc. are their fans who refuse to believe that their favourite artists are actively gouging them. Add to that that Ticketmaster, MCD etc are easy fall guys.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,341 ✭✭✭FullBack Jam


    How is that zero excuse? It is extremely relevant. The artists get little or nothing from Cds, Lps etc, now. For the majority, gigging would probably be their main source of income. I have no problem in relation to gigs that were approx €60 rising to around €80 now. But it is pure greed charging €250/€300 for gigs like Coldplay, Taylor Swift etc. That's ridiculous. Coldplay will sell approx 300,000 tickets for the 4 nights in Dublin next year. Even if we took an average of €150 per ticket - that would be €45,000,000. Even if they had say €15m expenses for that whole week, it leaves €30m for the band and crew, for a couple of days work. I could be completely wrong in my figures, but even if it is anything like that, it is excessive greed.

    But then fools and their money. I have never seen the scenes in my work place the morning those tickets went on sale. People nearly crying because they were 100,000th in a virtual queue for an event that is over a year away, and tickets will become available.



Advertisement
Advertisement