Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1313231333135313731383690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 604 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    Screenshot_2023-07-21-17-29-15-119_com.android.chrome-edit.jpg

    Darth on point as usual



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,521 ✭✭✭zv2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 604 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    Absolutely crazy stuff going on in Russia today



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,318 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    There's been quite a few times over the last 125 years or so you could have said that :)

    They do seem to have a high baseline of 'crazy' when it comes to politics.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Further confirming, really, what Putin and his ilk believe: the USSR should not have been dissolved and those former "republics" should know their place and show defence to their colonial betters. And this, as if it needs reminding at all, why nearly every country in Eastern Europe have treated this war as an existential crisis, not a neighbourhood kerfuffle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,267 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Sure does now.

    "Those whom the gods would destroy.... " and all that.

    Didn't Marx also predict they would collapse under the weight of their own contradictions?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,133 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Girkin to be held in prison until September 18th.

    I'll say one thing for him, and all those like him like Surovikin, Prigozhin, etc who've been exiled/jailed/arrested. At least they're standing up for their convictions. They obviously have horribly wrong convictions, but they are still standing up for them.

    The vast, vast majority of ordinary Russians still continue to sit at home sucking their thumbs. Nearly 18 months of war, no reaction, barely a whimper. It's quite pathetic really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Yep, apathetic is the word. I'm surprised the Russian Mammys aren't up in arms. Notwithstanding that women can be cheerleaders at times for war, the hard reality of missing sons & neighbours missing sons, body bags coming back - must be wreaking a toll on them. Putin might yet well fear the Russian Mammys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭Ramasun


    I thought Churchill, in yet another British messing with lines on maps episode, suggested the shift of borders West using match sticks to Stalin at Yalta.

    Either way it's a strange subject to bring up by Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 698 ✭✭✭TedBundysDriver


    I watched a interview with Putin today and he seemed to be hanging onto the table for dear life.

    With some of these comments today and the exercises in the black sea i do wonder if he's completely losing his mind.

    Amnesty International’s new investigation shows that Israel imposes a system of oppression and domination against Palestinians across all areas under its control: in Israel and the OPT, and against Palestinian refugees, in order to benefit Jewish Israelis. This amounts to apartheid as prohibited in international law.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭ Willow Fat Neckerchief


    I think you're forgetting the rather important fact that Japan didn't have nukes to retaliate with.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,847 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    He is a pathetic old rat ****, his actions and words suggest a man who has lost touch with reality, hopefully not long until he is liquidated, though I would like to see him caged and humiliated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,167 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    He’s itching to get Poland and NATO directly involved so he can unleash the bomb.

    Only way this ends is if he dies of natural causes.


    Bleak.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,133 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Why is this still only being discussed?

    Vast swathes of the occupied south of Ukraine are almost entirely out of range for Ukraine. As of this moment, Russia has 10x the capability to bomb Odesa than Ukraine has to bomb airfields and ports in Crimea. Planes, drones, helicopters, missiles have continued to destroy Ukrainian infrastructure for months now. Ukraine can only respond with a fraction of what is thrown at it.

    The ability to hit the Russian fleet at Sevastopol and the air bases in Crimea would hugely reduce the ability of the Russians to launch drones and missiles in the first place. The obvious solution is to remove the threat at source. The current threat occupies Ukrainian territory - it's fair game.

    The whole thing is a joke. The west spent 6 months arguing amongst itself about sending Leopards to Ukraine. Now they are there, no one gives a ****. We're arguing a year about sending ATACMS. I think it will come, eventually. But unfortunately long after it should have. Just like with Leopard, the supposed fear of escalation with the Russians. It will prove to be inconsequential.

    What's the delay?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Couldn't he just unleash 'the bomb' anyway.... same outcome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 287 ✭✭dennis72


    Sending ATACMS is a just response to the Odessa grain facility attach.

    Worry here is longer range gives more time to intercept US only has 4k, not making anymore replacing them with PRSM in 2025



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭AngeloArgue


    What's the delay?

    Worries about weapon tech being lost and backward engineered to find countermeasures. This information being shared with China. We've already seen a storm shadow missile being captured nearly wholly intact.

    Depletion of own stocks. Especially in light of other warzones potentially flaring up into armed conflict: Korea, Taiwan, Syria, Israel, Yemen, etc..

    The denigration of potential weapon sales to other parties. There may be a concern that if weapon systems are talked up big and are not as impressive in practice, this might hurt sales and also induce doubts as to the effectiveness of your own militaries abilities.

    Some in the Pentagon/government may be of the belief that the war is unwinnable and that sending them expensive weapons systems is engaging in a "sunken cost fallacy", when Americas most cost effective strategy would be crippling Russia militarily and economically through a prolonged attritional war using cheaper conventional weaponry



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,167 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,167 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Then it’s Russias fault for starting WW3 and then end of Putin, Russia and his daughters hiding in Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I don't think those who survive WW3 (with nukes) would really care who started it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,133 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Worries about weapon tech being lost and backward engineered to find countermeasures.

    This isn't modern technology.

    Depletion of own stocks.

    Give Ukraine 100 out of 4,000. Let them hit the Kerch bridge, and opportunistically attack naval targets and air bases in Crimea. Give them another 100 if the first batch doesn't do the job after 3 months. Then another 100 after 3 months. etc.

    The denigration of potential weapon sales to other parties.

    Ukraine will use them all. The very few unexploded duds will have limited use.

    sending them expensive weapons systems is engaging in a "sunken cost fallacy"

    We are not in sunk cost territory. I think Ukraine has the ability to reclaim the pre-2022 border if they get the help they need.

    The brake is on this effort though. Yes, I said it. America is the only country that has the capability for Ukraine to reclaim the 2022 border and as of right now they are holding it back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,642 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I think publicly these counties act like they're terrified of Russia but behind closed doors they're not. Especially America. They conveniently use this narrative as an excuse why they're afraid to support publicly.

    But in reality I suspect they drip feed the weapons for two reasons. The main one it prolongs the war. They sacrifice Ukraine to inflict maximum damage on Russia. Cripple them as a threat for decades to come. Maybe even cause a break up of the union although unlikely.

    The second is the slower they deliver weapons the longer they have to ramp up production again and train Ukrainians on the equipment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭Ramasun


    It's a good time to invest in military related industries, their order books will be full for the next few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,556 ✭✭✭swiwi_




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I don't think he's insane: I think he misread the stranglehold he had on European economies and decided it was Now Or Never to get Ukraine absorbed back into the USSR he missed so dearly.

    A dice was rolled that the West would look the other way as a Kremlin stooge was installed in Kyiv, the EU kept passive with Nord Stream and that France/Germany would shush Poland et al once they got anxious.

    We can either put that down to bad intelligence, or good intelligence ignored by a man who wrote a literal treatise on why Ukraine and others should be part of "Historical Russia". The problem now is, you got a stubborn, bullish man who knows weakness will be punished with sudden defenestration: but he's now stuck in a war that in theory could be won eventually - but a pyrrhic victory for sure, one that'd destroy the Russian economy and deplete its military strength to critical levels (with no path to recover it, such is the severity of the sanctions).

    All that said, I don't know what circumstances could transpire that Russia would be happy to accept - retreat is not in their nature, and a death sentence for Putin.

    Post edited by pixelburp on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh


    "It is vitally important to convince Putin that his regime will not be able to outlast Ukraine and all of its supporters"

    The importance of this can't be overstated. Every time someone calls for negotiations, or says it's time for Ukraine to start thinking about trading land for peace, no matter their intentions or their saying they fully support Ukraine, what they are really doing is helping to prolong the war and giving succour to Putin and Russia.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,646 ✭✭✭rogber


    Like you say, America has the weapons Ukraine needs to progress much faster in the war. It won't give them. The question is why. Hard to escape the conclusion that the US is not against the war dragging on as it stops Russia making trouble elsewhere and keeps weakening the country. What can Ukraine do? Not much, as without American help it's in serious trouble anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,068 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    America are the ones keeping Ukraine in the game.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Let's be doubly blunt here. There's also a part of the "peace at any cost" crowd not factored in enough, and only highlighted to me of late elsewhere on Boards: outright racism. Within the seed of anti West contrarianism there's also a subset of what reads like blatant racism that dismisses Ukrainian concerns, hand waving away swathes of Ukraine cos "they all look and sound russian anyway"; lamenting the involvement of "white Europeans" in the conflict presumably seen as a kerfuffle between a bunch of Russian Slavs.

    It's also noteworthy how in all the "peace at any cost" narratives espoused by people, Ukrainian self determination never, ever figures in the spitball. It's about giving Russia what it wants, giving Putin what he lays claim to - Ukraine just non existent in terms of the end result. They don't count, they're not allowed any agency; again, a by product of dismissively viewing Ukrainians as cosplaying Russians. An affectation of concern for the ordinary people caught on all this -bnut not enough concern to give them any ability to dictate their own destiny.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,058 ✭✭✭Polar101


    The people who ignore Ukrainian self determination also believe NATO expanded to Russia's borders, while the fact is instead that everyone who joined since the '90s did so willingly and independently.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement