Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

1119120122124125313

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,215 ✭✭✭plodder


    Fair enough. I wonder about the third place ... But, in any case, the fact that some women are okay with this, should point to a way forward. Some events should be trans inclusive, so long as biological women (who want it) have their own events too.

    “Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubt” - Carl Jung



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    “Second and third don't show up for podium presentation..”

    poor plodder that narrative lasted less than 15 minutes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,819 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Fair enough. I wonder about the third place

    I wonder how people are so easily snared by outrage bait.

    Took me 10 seconds to find that ladies comments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,215 ✭✭✭plodder


    Well it was technically correct, but the "narrative" that they were protesting is half wrong now obviously. That trans women are winning a lot of cycling races isn't wrong though, and there doesn't seem to be any races yet, exclusively for biological women, isn't wrong either.

    “Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubt” - Carl Jung



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    That’s incongruent with the race, the organizers and participants all making comments against hate and trans exclusion



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭Mebuntu


    Those women did well not turning up to the podium but they have to be much braver in such circumstances and not actually move from the starting line leaving anyone they believe should not be in the race to race by themselves. It should not take the Organisers too long to get the message that they mean business.



  • Posts: 1,656 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    'I have no idea why so many people bailed before the podiums, but they did.'

    Anyone who believes all the competitors skipped the podium for no particular reason is totally stupid. You're showing that you have no competition experience or even passing interest in sports. It's highly unusual for competitors to skip a podium ceremony.

    They skipped it in protest and then likely got threats on social media so didn't feel like getting into it. Go check their competition history and count the number of times they skipped a podium they earned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,195 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    How many young girls would like to get involved in sports if they saw they hadn't a chance of winning anything?

    Men who have gone through puberty have obviously a huge physical advantage over women, just look at 6'4" Lia Thomas against women swimers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 750 ✭✭✭mjsc1970


    Full circle. Again.



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It doesn't matter whether they didn't turn up for protest or any other reason.

    It still makes the winner of this race illegitimate and totally morally wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You're in the minority.

    Once upon a time when the general public and sporting bodies didn't know what to do, they let empathy direct their decision making. In the meantime, and over the past number of years, more evidence has come to light about how this negatively impacts women's sport. And so people and sporting organizations have made the right decision to revert back to common sense, as well as a respect for women's sport.

    There's no way things will shift back to your position. Those days are over, and more sporting bodies are concluding that trans women should not be competing with biological women in sport.

    I agree with what Sebastian Coe said:

    If you pushed me and you said if you had to make a choice between fairness or inclusion, I will always head towards fairness because that's what sports has to be based on.

    So despite your attempts to justify the unjustifiable, things are moving back toward fairness - and most people know perfectly well that this is the right thing to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,160 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Millions. You can’t have failed to notice that young girls participation in sports has only been increasing since they were encouraged to participate in sports. How many young people do you think will quit participating in sports because transgender children are encouraged and inspired and interested in participating in any sport?

    How many people do you think care about Lia Thomas or Schuyler Bailar? Most people won’t ever have heard of them, just like they won’t have heard of Ted Cruz almost doing backflips when Simone Biles exited the Olympics. That kind of perverse sneering just doesn’t register on most people’s radar, and when it does, most people see it for what it is, and it doesn’t put them off, more often it makes them more determined to compete.

    How many women do you imagine are going to have their athletic achievements questioned over allegations that they are the opposite sex? ‘Gender doping’ is the way some people refer to it. That doesn’t appear to be putting young girls off sports either. How many more bills attempting to limit transgender children’s access to school sports do you imagine politicians in the US will introduce in an attempt to get votes?

    https://www.npr.org/2021/03/18/978716732/wave-of-new-bills-say-trans-athletes-have-an-unfair-edge-what-does-the-science-s



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Even if nobody cared, it wouldn't make it right.

    It would, though.

    It would mean having a single tournament, with both men and women, with men winning every single time.

    Every, single, time.

    So you're right on two fronts: women would be able to participate, and women would have the opportunity of winning.

    But the reality you're ignoring is that women would never win - ever - against even among the less skilled male tennis players, never mind the elite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,160 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    And the reality you’re ignoring is that most people simply don’t think like you do, and don’t care about the things you purport to care about, or think anyone else should care about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,195 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    My objection to grown men deciding they are actually women and participating in women sports is that they have an unfair physical advantage.

    I get you believe that it’s ok for young children to believe they are born into the wrong sex but that’s a different argument and we’ll have to agree to differ on that



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I mentioned tennis. Are you in favour of women and men competing together in boxing too, in all tournaments?

    I'm trying to find your limit here, where you are willing to draw the line.

    Because up to now, I'm finding it very hard to believe you actually believe this stuff.

    My objection is categorical.

    Categories exist for a reason. Women's sport can and only must mean that biological women compete among each other. Otherwise the category is meaningless - you cannot call it "women's sport" anymore if biological males are eligible to join the competition. It must be renamed as something else, because it ceases to become a "women's division".

    The problem with diluting that definition is that it means some biological males take the position in a competition where a biological woman would otherwise have taken that place. So it deprives some biological women, who may have trained their entire lives, for a position they would otherwise have earned.

    So even when you remove the "advantage" issue, we're still left exactly back where we were to begin with.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 30,867 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    image.png

    In the UK as one reference, people are largely supportive of trans rights (as I think is correct) but overwhelmingly oppose their participation in female sports.

    Or the US.


    Of course, a majority of people can be "wrong" about things (I, for what its worth, have no issue with transmen in men's sport, though there are practical issues at play I'm sure around how to deal with the T supplements). I am simply saying your statement is clearly incorrect.



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Completely right.

    You can be in favour of trans rights and equality whilst acknowledging that women's rights to sport etc. must be respected as a separate category.

    Remember: nobody in the 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, 00s, up until about 4-years' ago, argued that biological males should compete in women's sport. I thought this was supposed to be an obvious right? But no, we only heard about it 4-5 years' ago. That alone should ring alarm bells.

    With gay rights, it was consistent all the way through - without abuse and gaslighting.

    But apparently we're told this was always the right of some biological males to enter and participate in women's sport.

    It's simply a lie.

    And people shouldn't be shy about calling it out.

    Why? Because biological women are 50+% of the population.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,160 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    I completely get your objection, I’m sure that’s not what’s happening, but I’m not going to argue semantics about it, you have your objections, fair enough.

    I do want to correct you though on what you think I believe - I don’t believe it’s ok for young children to believe they are born into the wrong sex, that’s clearly not normal and there’s definitely something wrong there. That being said, I know at the same time that my opinion doesn’t matter one iota to parents in Texas who are under investigation for trying to do their best for their children -

    https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/texas-attempt-to-tear-parents-and-trans-youth-apart-one-year-later

    I dunno if you’ve ever been on the receiving end of some idiot with their head up their own ass telling you you’re committing child abuse for not raising your children in accordance with their beliefs, or their standards, or their ideas about how your children should be raised, but y’know, I’m kinda used to the idea now - some people are just like that, and there’s a certain level of shyte I’d put up with, depending upon how far they want to push it.

    I’ve never supported people who want to exclude others from enjoying the same opportunities and benefits that they do, whether it be in sports, employment, healthcare or education, because having been on the receiving end of other people’s prejudices I know how it feels, and I wouldn’t be interested in inflicting that kind of humiliation on another human being.



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I still have no idea what your position is re: the subject of this thread.

    In fact, I give up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,160 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack




  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So an injustice committed in 1977 means everyone is wrong today?

    What a bizarre form of "argument".

    Some people just hate women's rights. Whether it's 1977 or 2023, you'll always find some biological males telling women that they must be put in their place - they're too stupid, and must shut up and accept what their biologically male superiors say, and that's what's happening today.

    The newest version of one of the oldest forms of prejudice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,160 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Ahh maybe you didn’t get what I was referring to, but I was referring to rapid ash’s efforts to portray themselves as a socially conservative sort when what they’re really about is just anything that’ll stick it to the lefties culture wars crap.

    On the question of whether or not the majority of people have the authority to determine the rights of a minority, I’m absolutely certain that’s not how these things work. I still stand by the inference of my previous claim that most people just don’t care about the whole culture wars crap, of which this whole issue about transgender people participating in sports is just one aspect of it. There’s a tiny minority of people who need other people to care In order to support their ideas, but that’s the same with any issue - vast majority of people just don’t care and aren’t interested.



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I still stand by the inference of my previous claim that most people just don’t care about the whole culture wars crap.

    Most people don't watch all sports, so you're right. So what!?

    Some things are just wrong, even if "most people just don't care" about it.

    Women who participate in sport matter, irrespective of what any biological male says - or how many say it. Some things are right. Some things are wrong. Biological males competing in women's sport is wrong - both from a categorical perspective and an advantage perspective - even if 99.9% of the population were in favour of it.

    Morality is not based on a popular vote.

    Some things are just plain wrong.

    Your attempts to obfuscate the debate, and to argue that biological males should have a say in women's sport, is the absolute summit of misogyny.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,160 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    I don’t care what you think is or isn’t an injustice, your claim was this -

    Remember: nobody in the 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, 00s, up until about 4-years' ago, argued that biological males should compete in women's sport. I thought this was supposed to be an obvious right? But no, we only heard about it 4-5 years' ago. That alone should ring alarm bells.

    YOU only heard about it about four or five years ago. I wasn’t aware you were a woman either, but you do you, I guess 🤨



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is just modern day misogyny, dressing itself up as progressive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,160 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Call it what you wish, the point is that you were mistaken, and I provided irrefutable evidence to show you were mistaken. It’s understandable though that you wouldn’t be aware of it when it was before your time in another country and all the rest of it. Has women’s tennis fallen apart in the US since the 70’s as a consequence of Renee Richards right to play in women’s tennis being upheld by the New York Supreme Court?

    Meh, depends on who you ask really, some people get kinda nostalgic for the hey-days of the 80’s when there were some great players in women’s tennis that were international household names. Nowadays it’s kinda difficult to name them if you’re not really, really into the sport -

    https://www.bettorsinsider.com/amp/story/tennis/2020/05/27/opinion-the-williams-sisters-hid-weaknesses-in-us-womens-tennis-that-rival-the-decline-of-the-us-men



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Call it what you wish, the point is that you were mistaken, and I provided irrefutable evidence to show you were mistaken.

    Don't listen to me, listen to biological women.



Advertisement