Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1290829092911291329143690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭pcardin


    I dont know Gatling, I have used AK 47 in my military service decades ago and recently was trained on H&K G36 and M16. I felt both would make nicer holes in orcs than AK47. G36 only problem I felt was it is overheating faster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It's actually not ,so far three of the coalition wanting F16s two Poland and Holland have said no we're not going to send ours ,the UK have none , nobody else is Stepping out and saying here our aircraft,lip service and training is the only thing that they can do,and it's not new earlier in the year several posters got very excited that the UK Said they're going to send aircraft,now we're back to oh yeah we're going to train some pilots on aircraft that neither country Operate and send them back to Ukraine without any aircraft,

    Realistically Ukraine could be looking at a 5 year+ Wait for F16s , even now they would make little or no difference to the war , essentially an cold war relic which would be prone to anti aircraft systems and even at that how effectively could they operate them with minimum training,it's not a missle system that doesn't require much human input or something like a javelin which could be learned in half a day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    To be fair, the "shots in the arms" occurred during the next administration after the ball was dropped post election due to an overly narcissistic leader (and that it was a European company that had the first vaccine approval that wasn't even part of "warp speed"). A lot of the delays in Europe came down to the overly bureaucratic approval process vs. the UK and US.

    In either case, this is the "cheapest" war the US has ever had to fund to completely castrate another superpower, even the biggest idiots in the GQP see that (though they might publicly say otherwise just to be contrarian, their votes say something else).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭WheelieKing


    I don't get it, i've been reading and hearing for months now that Russia is running out of missiles but the attacks seem relentless on a nightly basis now. Thankfully the majority of missiles are being shot down but it seems odd they've be using up whatever little stock they have knowing this. Are they really that stupid or was the lack of missiles line just spin. Do western intelligence agencies really know Russia's stockpiles or is it just bad guess work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭charlie_says




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,509 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Possible that some of these missiles are decoys mixed in with actual missiles to help them get passed the AA

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Sounds like a "good" excuse for a purge, one wonders if the war went well in Ukraine would this have ever seen the light of day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Anything h&k is better built and more refined, better ergonomics , accurate,

    The ak is still a killing machine even in the hands of anyone regardless of what training or lack of any training at all they received,

    I've only got to shoot a g36 k at range lovely clean design and ergonomics , straight shooting, never got a do full auto dumps though to feel any kind of excessive heating issues,

    I know there was some compliants about over heating during an extended fire fight in Afghanistan,some said it was the gun itself others blamed the trunion design others claim the issues were caused by poor quality German ammunition,now the Germans have pulled it got the lastest h&k 416A5 ,a better modern M16

    Oddly enough the most reliabe weapon tested in the US weapon testing over the last 20 years was the h&k XM8 which the US dropped despite being the better weapon than others designs including various AR 15 platforms during the OICW trials



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,255 ✭✭✭amandstu


    They must be desperate to hit those patriot systems if they are the only ones that can take down their hypersonic missiles.

    If they took out even one it would be a victory ,even if only Pyrrhic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It would be a propaganda coup for the Russians it would be the same of western aircraft arrived in Ukraine,the first one lost or several lost would be a huge propaganda coup for the Russians,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    when Russia blow up anything of significance to Ukrainian after losing 10x the amount themselves on the same day




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Both the quality of the missiles and quantity have been dropping continually, Ukraine's ability to intercept and shoot them down has been increasing all the time as well.

    russia has a lot of dumb missiles they can keep on using but their impact on the battlefield is very low (hence targeting non-military targets so often).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    We all note the desperation while you watch russia crapulate itself and watch it's best equipment fail comprehensively against NATO equipment.

    What this also means (and the russian plebs haven't realised it yet) is that NATO will now have a comprehensive strategy for dealing with russian ICBM and other nuclear armed devices that they couldn't really test before Ukraine. Undoubtedly that's what has allowed NATO to supply Ukraine with the level of equipment it has and will keep on upping the ante while russia renders it's military machine completely irrelevant, that it was the corruption which Ukraine was moving away from (and precipitated the war as they lost influence) that has rendered their military so inert vs the west is poetic (this was already seen with the panic they showed when any missiles go off target near NATO allies).

    China will also be taking note.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    I knew it !!!

    9/11 was just a ruse to deploy Microsoft Sharepoint and BI across multiple industries by the 2020's



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @astrofool What this also means (and the russian plebs haven't realised it yet) is that NATO will now have a comprehensive strategy for dealing with russian ICBM and other nuclear armed devices that they couldn't really test before Ukraine.

    Where are you getting that idea from,as it stands there's no system currently operational that can effectively counter ICBMs,the only new tech the Ukrainans got wa the various drones and loitering munitions,

    Everything else has been used for decades and across multiple conflicts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Someone who has better knowledge than you disagrees.



    I'll repeat, it's not a question of, but a question of when Ukraine get F-16 fighter jets.

    It's self-evident because what a country says today, will not be what a country says tomorrow. Germany's rhetoric when it came to their Tanks should be proof of that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Tanks and F16s are totally different,

    For instance there's only 3000 leopard tanks in Europe, Ukraine and getting 100 or so tanks from,

    The Germans said that for them to send their tanks others had to agree to send theres , currently nobody is saying we will send out F16s it other's send there's,

    That like placing a bet each way so come away with something,

    No European countries have committed to sending F16s or F18s or typhoons or Gripens , even the Americans have said they wouldn't make a difference while at the same time telling us jets barely make the top 10 list of what the Ukrainans are actually asking for,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,454 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    essentially an cold war relic

    Ah come off it ffs, it's not like Ukraine would be given 1st gen F16's.

    There are things called upgrades. Maybe you consider the Patriots, Leopards, Abrams, Challengers, M270's & Bradley's as cold war relics?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It's the patriot is a Cold war relic why aren't F16s which are heading to 5 decade old and alot older than patriots

    I don't make the rules



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,454 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    b79dbf9ff3d24a25c034a37b40049564--only-fools-and-horses-horse-quotes.jpg

    They are called upgrades. Maybe you believe the like of the new electric Mustangs are relics?

    Pretty much all the equipment I listed were developed/deployed during the cold war, are still in production to date and all have been upgraded so much, they pretty much just physically resemble their first gen models, but their capabilities are cutting edge. They are far from relics.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    You much have missed the various posts claiming the patriot was a cold war relics hence why I said /asked about F16s being Relic's being they have been flying close to 50 years in some cases .

    I believe the patriots , Abrams,IFVs are modern war fighting equipment, ballistic missiles date to the 1930s/1940s nobody's calling them Relic's from antiquity



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    The evidence is right there... ChatGPT has the same amount of letters as Clippy2.... it's so obvious, if you only did some research



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    I'm not making assumptions,you took one article about one weapons test and are using that as an assumption all ICBMs can now intercepted while the general consensus is there is currently no system currently operational to stop ICBMS



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,818 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    from 2020 and this is what the US chose to make public, if you have an effective defence you would just stay quiet about it...

    If you have a completely ineffective defence you'd probably try and stay quiet about it also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    No one is currently stating they are going to send F-16s to Ukraine.... yet.

    But it will happen at some stage. They are setting the stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    I would imagine there is a far better capability in place than what is publicised... you can piece a lot of anecdotal evidence together to get a pretty good case of it. But yes, on paper, there is nothing capable of intercepting ICBM's without some sort of luck involved.

    I imagine the US want to keep it this way, not to fool Russia, but China.

    Similar to what they know about Russian tactics, after an ICBM has travelled through the detection systems, land and sea based Aegis, the new ground protection system etc... there is 3-5 mins to make a call on using an atmospheric nuclear airburst to catch an ICBM at Apogee and before MIRV's are deployed... This is why Hypersonics are considered more dangerous, reduced reaction time, no ballistic trajectory, when systems are able to track/intercept, it's at lower altitude, and closer range, where interception and detonation can still have quite an effect. Hence the development of more advanced OTH detection systems, both ground and satellite based.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    On this... we're still waiting on further tests of the Satan 2, which haven't emerged.

    There was also supposed testing in the Barents sea missile range 2 weeks back, which nothing has been publicised about. Usually the Russian's are parading this info 5 mins after it happens..

    Both of which are quite telling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,781 ✭✭✭Apiarist


    More prison cells are waiting for Russian rocket designers?



  • Posts: 1,656 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Reliably intercepting ICBMs - nullifying every MIRV - is beyond the capabilities of current missile defense systems.

    The assumption is that interception capabilities will get better in the near future. Largely because USA pulled out of the ABM treaty 20 years ago and having been pouring money into ABM capabilities ever since.

    That assumption is what is driving the development of hypersonic missiles and glide vehicles - real ones, not fake ones like Kinzhal. Everyone is working on them - Russia, China, India. Even North Korea is working on them. So by the time missile defense systems can defend current threats, there will be next-gen threats which go beyond those systems.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,471 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Again, actions, if russian threats were credible, NATO making the amount of offensive equipment available to Ukraine would not be happening.

    That was the worry at the start of the war/special operation, it's not a credible one anymore.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement