General CA trolls - it's embarrassing

"I have to add that there is a bit of a "tell tale tattle" attitude coming across towards posters who make reports, even though it has been confirmed that reporting is encouraged and the mod team rely on reports. It really comes across as like being back in a school playground, where the class bully tries to stop the other kids from telling the teacher on them."

What this indicates to me is that you use the report function as a tactic, a kind of back seat modding. Where you don't care for other posters POV and so you report it. It's already established that reporting a post draws far more attention than to comments that are left in the swing of things. So maybe you need to rethink the bully analogy and also consider why you may not be liked as a poster.

Imagine reporting someone.

Do you want to go for an ice cream? 😁

In the last comment above, are you telling us that we are not allowed to read what others write on a public forum? Or remember what they wrote? Puzzled.

But amongst the gen population he didn't get anywhere near that so that would indicate that those boards users that 'bothered to vote' were more right leaning in larger quantities alright.

And would that be an indication of the leaning of most of the CA posters, or just those that 'bothered to' click on that thread?

This as my previous point.. Middle of the road boards users are switching off CA because of all of this right wing stuff.

Don't think its lack of moderation tbh. Its such an echo chamber that only certain posters who don't run with the gang get reported.

Then it should be extremely easy to quote a hate filled post then.

You're saying its not easy to quote posts?

You originally said that this thread is full of the type of posts the OP described as being common in CA.

If that's the case quote one of them for us, I don't think any posts have been deleted on this thread so your task is relatively simple. Prove what you're claiming with evidence.

Can you cite examples of these threads and provide links to back up this claim?

So you are now pulling the harassment/ victim card because you don’t like the poster’s critical words?

You are posting in a public forum, and you know full well that posts are visible to others. Bad form to be accusing people of being “creepy” just because they have seen your posts ..

I said it is quite hilarious that EVERYTHING not aligned with new ‘left’ critical thinking is ‘far right’ (eg Casey) while even more hilariously, having any right leaning opinion appears to be utterly intolerable with s o m e boards users.

Your Cathy Newmanism was a bit uncalled for but there ya go.

That's twice you've called Peter Casey far-right. A truly disgusting thing to say and is indicative of someone that is so far-left they're in danger of falling off the edge.

Lets see if you can work out why Mr Casey's vote was lower than the poll on boards shall we. I'll give you a little hint - You'd have to wonder why those polls were pulled.

Just for clarity, here's what the 'far-right' Casey said in the podcast

 Casey described Irish Travellers as "basically people camping in someone else's land" who are "not paying their fair share of taxes in society"

 Words that would've made Himmler blush eh.

"Cathy Newmanism" had to look that up.

Quite the rabbit hole. If that was a thread title I know now to stay clear.

So offensive posts are removed is what you're saying? So where's the issue?

There's a cohort here who just want a safe space with no opinions they disagree with allowed.

Like I said previously, it's just a tantrum.