Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1572573575577578915

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    Perhaps, I was more thinking of economic policy, SF are hard left economically compared to the British Labour Party in 2023 , never mind during the Blair years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭Guildenstern


    You only think SF are radical if you've only experience of Irish governments which really haven't been that much different, from each other. In an international context, SF really aren't radical. FG and FF fanboys have to throw that argument around and I suspect we'll get more of this over the next year. I'm not an SF fanboy either, but 37%, a lot are putting confidence in them. I'd be keen to see what they can do.

    Post edited by Guildenstern on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Most REIT's pay no corporation tax and they also don't have to pay any tax on gains when the sell their property/investment. All of this was introduced in 2013, when the Irish property was on its knee. Times have changed and it is about time, they paid their fair share! Assuming asking them to pay their fair share makes the whole thing not lucrative enough for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Quell surprise

    This the same union that threw new recruits under the bus after the last crash.

    We need an inflation rate for homeowners and non homeowners



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 613 ✭✭✭BoxcarWilliam99


    Some would prefer to see teachers salaries linked to home prices.

    Only on the way up though



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Probably said enough at this stage - but wage inflation really is here to stay. With recent announcements on Corporate Tax, the government will have money coming out their eyeballs this year to a level possible never ever seen by any country in recent history. Election getting closer. It really wouldn’t surprise me if we see another round of bumper (double digit) public sector pay rises later this year.

    Large swathes of private sector just received 5-10% in March. Next year likely to be elevated again.

    Ultimately this is why we chose to buy 18 months ago. It’s very difficult to envisage material house price reductions with the backdrop of massively elevated wage inflation and loosening lending restrictions even with mortgage rates going up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    They have to get possession of them first. That surely will not be easy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 613 ✭✭✭BoxcarWilliam99


    Many got no pay increases. Same people who might like to buy a house.

    The problem with public sector pay increases is everyone gets one. Whether they deserve it or not. In the private sector one company might give rises while the next 2 don't.

    Some Private sector rises cannot be a reason to give the entire public sector a pay increase.

    Public pay is already way out of kilter.its a farce.

    You (the government) are just encouraging inflation when European Central Bank is raising rates at pace to try bring inflation down and at a time of economic uncertainty. It would be highly idiotic direction to take



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    That would be the ever changing regulations. Thats the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    I know people who work in private sector, who got no pay increases in March.... Who work in the real estate sector.

    So don't presume everyone is getting pay increases.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Affordable rental @ 27% of income at the qualifying limits




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I don’t disagree with you. But what we want to happen doesn’t make it so.

    This government with more money it knows what to do with, struggling for popularity will not endure public sector strikes on the way up to an election under the guise of

    ’you need to reduce your living standards so we don’t fuel inflation’.

    That would be a hard message in long term interests, and why would the government do that, save money in a rainy day fund for SF to blow on random crap when instead they can give the pay rises to try to stay in power. It’s inevitable, and people should be aware of it when thinking about the future of the property market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I never said everybody is. I said lots of people are. All of the public sector and vast sectors of the private sector.

    Unfortunately if you’re not getting pay rises, you’re just falling behind - but the property market will move with the masses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 613 ✭✭✭BoxcarWilliam99


    You could very well be right and truthfully I am coming from a position of bias as I got no such raise in March either.

    It would really say something if government pulled such a stroke. If they want to spend an ocean of cash put it into housing and infrastructure . Something that benefits everyone and future generations. Don't just give it away to public servants who are only a section of the total population.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭DataDude


    100% agree.

    But what’s the choice -

    Money to ‘the people’ (public servants) right now to avoid painful strikes and talk of teachers unable to beat their homes. Secure some votes.

    or

    Be fiscally prudent. Use the surplus to either build a reserve fund, deliver housing and other infrastructure that Sinn Fein get to claim credit for when it finally delivers many years from now?

    I’m obviously only guessing but I think the government will take the easy way out. It’s a natural consequence of elections every 5 years. Sure they couldn’t even follow through on the pension age increase because it upset the wealthiest cohort of people in the history of Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    I did get the pay increase you mentioned in March but others didn't get it.

    So a mix bag.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 391 ✭✭ingo1984


    Not a prayer the government are rolling out double digit public sector pay increases in a time of high inflation. Totally negates any effort of trying to control inflation. If you don't like your current salary, move job. Simple as that. People do it everyday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Eligible tenants must have a net household income of below €53,000 a year.

    and

    Applicants must not be in receipt of any social housing supports, including rent supplement or HAP



    I'm a bit confused 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,584 ✭✭✭newmember2


    If you qualify for HAP you qualify for social housing according to your income not exceeding the threshold. Cost-rental are for those whose income exceed the HAP/social housing threshold but is still less than 53k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭Guildenstern


    Isn't the cost rentals an attempt to meet the needs of the squeezed middle? No doubt like all the few other cost rental schemes so far, they'll be heavily oversubscribed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,925 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I would call it more a half-arsed attempt to buy their votes but otherwise yes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,272 ✭✭✭amacca


    Your first sentence is inaccurate there, do a little more research.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    The 2011 Social Housing Assessment regulations, as amended, grouped LAs together according to the estimated average cost of sourcing accommodation in the private rental sector. The nine authorities with the highest average rents were placed in a group with a baseline income eligibility threshold of €35,000 per annum (Band 1). A second bracket consisting of seven authorities with more moderate average rents were assigned a baseline income threshold €5,000 per year lower than the Band 1 cut-off point (Band 2). Finally, the 15 authorities with the lowest average prices were grouped into a third band. The baseline income eligibility threshold for this band was set at €25,000 per annum (Band 3). A local authority may set the income threshold lower than the maximum amount applied to the band to which they are assigned; however, to date, no local authority has exercised this option. It should be noted that beyond assignment to one of these grouping, there is no relationship between the cost of accommodation in a LA and the income threshold eligibility for social housing. See later in Section 3 for discussion. 

    My understanding, a couple earning 70k or less qualify for hap A household of two earners would qualify for hap if combined earnings less than 70k, meaning everyone applying for cost rental would qualify for hap except single income single applicants.

    Is that right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I agree with the sentiment that civil servants unhappy with their remuneration should find a new job. If they cannot find a higher wage elsewhere, then they are not overpaid. However, as someone who once worked in the public service, I can assure that that is not the way the cookie crumbles in there.

    That said, I would not be at all surprised to see double digit increases in public service pay. These are the same people who contributed to the high inflation via their various actions over the last few years, so I see no reason why they would take up fiscal responsibility now. Also, don't forget that many of the people who make these decisions are themselves civil servants. conflict of interest?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 391 ✭✭ingo1984


    Any double digit pay increases in public sector will only be offset by tax increases to fund them in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    Most people I know have had a significant pay ise at this point and the pnes who havent have been promised one coming soon. My company tried to get away with it and had to cave in thios year as people started leaving. We all ended up getting 10% pay rises and 10% more promised by the end of the year. They even threw in a €2000 Christmas bonus too as a gesture of things to come.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,360 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Yet people are telling us wages will not rise significantly. Even 3-4% pay rises o er 5 years will mean that what look like large mortgages payments will be very manageable.

    I dealth with it on another thread here. Daughter is a teacher five years qualified/working. She is presently on 49k. With increments and an annual an annual average pay rise of 2% her salary will be 65k in five years time. A 4% annually pay rise over 5 years is nearly a 22% rise in pay.

    It quite possible that those once again predicting a collapse in house prices are getting it wrong.

    I have said I taught there could be a 10% drop in prices during 2022/23 but prices would either level off to start rise again after that.

    I will repeat another fact that I constantly point out to. Most construction labour in Dublin travel in and out every day. They will not do it for nothing.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I doubt it. More likely, it will be paid for by debt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    By the end of this year ill be getting over a 20% pay rise in one year. Due mainly to them ignoring inflation last year. Im still not happy with that tbh. I think it should be more looking at what others have been getting since last year. I would would absolutely hate to be public sector tbh. The amount of teachers leaving my kids school is scary. Some of them probably never to teach again. Also I know quite a few gardai and not one of them is planning on staying a guard. Im sure there is much the same going on in other parts of the public sector im not privy to.

    Nothing is funny when you look around you at others getting higher pay rises than you are.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,612 ✭✭✭fliball123


    If the government give the PS a huge pay rise at a time when they are handing out one off payments/solutions for the rest of us in the unwashed masses there will be a general election as everyone is feeling the cost of living pressures not just our public sector. I didnt hear clammer from the teachers looking for a pay cut when their wage increases outstripped inflation in the years from 2013/14 to 2018/19 (funny that it is only an issue when inflation is higher). If the government have scope to give money back out then they need to take the foot off the neck of all income tax payers and seriously reduce the amount of tax they take off the cohort who as Leo says "get up in the morning" pandering to a sector (public sector) that is paid over 20% (all verified via the CSO) than the productive sector, a guarantied pension and a job for life is the wrong way to do business, you only have to go to your local A&E for a visit to see the sh1tshow that they the government are in control of and are p1ssing away money hand over fist I mean year after year the HSE overspend is in the hundreds of millions and its getting worse and of course any wage increases in this sector will see zero improvements or greater efficiency for it. Its time to go through our spend and cut the fat (when the IMF were in town they had the chance and made so many promises about this but they didnt have the balls to face our perma government) and if there is wiggle room the focus should be on addressing the odious burden income tax payers are forced to carry in this country. So if we have money to spend and time to make some changes I would prefer they concentrated on the following.

    Income tax reduction

    House building/ramp up of modular homes

    Increased infrastructure - Roads, Schools, Hospitals, etc

    A complete overhaul of our Public sector spend

    A complete overhaul of our Welfare spend

    This list seem fairly obvious to me but not one party out there is going to do it.


    I am waiting for the Public servants telling me all the teachers are leaving and forgetting that there are far more non public sector workers heading for the exit door and this is due to how the cards are stacked against all young people (not just teachers) ... They cant get a house to buy or rent and have to pay a serious amount of income tax to work in this country at least teachers will have a pension at the end of their career and Carlsberg holidays (probably the best in the world) same cannot be said for the rest of us. Until the income tax bands are widened and the financial demands are significantly less for someone working I can see a good chunk of our younger population heading off to other countries at least they will be able to afford the rent.



Advertisement