Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Minimum alcohol pricing is nigh

Options
1270271273275276308

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 28,719 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I agree because we have drinking problems in Ireland.

    Maybe judge them on what they have said, rather than what they haven’t said.

    Have you heard them say that they do want an alcohol ban in this country?



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,596 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I think when it comes to politics what people do NOT to say is often more revealing than what they chose TO say.

    This is not some side question. They are an organisation focused only on alcohol.

    So they are being judged on what they have said.

    Given what they have said, and in the absence of a firm statement to the contrary, I think it is reasonable to draw the conclusion as to their ultimate goal re: long term in favour of banning of alcohol.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,719 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I agree because we have drinking problems in Ireland.

    Your 'reasonable conclusion' is a strawman. They haven't said that Putin should withdraw, so can jump to a reasonable conclusion that they're Putin supporters? It's a nonsense approach.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,596 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Are they a foreign policy human rights type organisation?

    Then yes it would be reasonable to draw a conclusion from failure to make such a comment.

    So you have just proved my point.

    They dont give speeches / policy positions on Ukraine. Or Global warming. But about alcohol and its availability and accessibility. So entirely valid to draw conclusions about what they do not say about alcohol.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,832 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    These "neo prohibitionists" if they exist outside the imagination of the cheap alcohol lobby, are the most ineffective organisations in the world. Maybe if they had the €116 million advertising budget that alcohol spends in Ireland, or they could pay vast salaries like the alcohol bosses get, they would be able to have some influence. As it is there is zero prospect of prohibition happening in any country where it does not already exist.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    is anyone seriously suggesting prohibition could happen in ireland?



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,834 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Yet. Here they are getting millions in funding out of taxpayers and they've managed to bring in minimum unit pricing.


    All despite being nobody's with zero money.


    Amazing when you really pause for thought. So the pretence that they don't have a further agenda is laughable, frankly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,814 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    AAI are anti alcohol, this is a fact. I truly believe that if they had a switch put in front of them tomorrow that would allow them to ban alcohol across the country they would do it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 550 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    It won’t be a cliff edge switch though .

    You only have to look at the number of pubs that have closed in rural areas in the last five years to see the effects of this anti alcohol ideology in action .



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Hardly.

    Pub have closed in rural Ireland for numerous reasons, but anti drink ideologies are not one of them.

    People have become more health concuious.

    Off license drink has become cheaper and the range and availability have increased.

    Drink driving laws have become stricter.

    Other entertainment outlets have developed.

    As old publicans retire there is no one interested in taking on a rural pub.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,832 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    A big factor would have been Covid. In 2019 the On trade was €5.42 billion, and the Off trade was €2.22 billion. In 2021 due to Covid the figures were €3.05 billion, and €2.50 billion. I don't see any reason to doubt that the overall spending will go back to pre Covid levels.

    I wonder what the people of Ireland will do with that seven and half billion Euro, when prohibition comes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,883 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    I'd imagine it's down because there's more to do in this country now than just drink. When I was a young teen, it was mainly sport or drinking as the 2 main things to do (living in the country with little to no public transport). Now, technology has allowed people to do other things and the younger ones are starting to realise the waste of spending so much time and money on alcohol and the same conversations with the same people in the same pubs every week. Or at least, that's the impression I'm getting from my nieces and nephews. Of the 9 of them, 7 are eligble to drink. Three have zero interest, 1 is autistic so hasn't tried it yet, two more are not bothered by it and wouldn't make too much of an effort to go drinking, and the last one is the only one who is mad for a pint, but he's struggling to find others in his age range who are. Main reasons: sport and/or tech providing better return for investment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,438 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    The joy of having a few cans or a few pints after a 12 hour shift are gone. €16 for bloody SIX cans of Guinness nitro surge or €5.20 a pint in a one pub village. What the hell has happened our country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Would Guinness nitro surge fall under MUP ?

    My main drink, a 1L bottle of Bulmers, doesn't fall under MUP but has actually got cheaper in the last few months, was usually €3.99, now €3.79.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,970 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Absolutely. It doesn't add up to me that we have a lobby group like this in existence. They are busy bodies on steroids in my view.

    Their side is been driven by personal experiences I would think. Because they have a bad experience they don't want anyone else to be able to enjoy a few drinks. They are the IONA institute of this decision. Dangerous group.

    This is a bit like cigarettes. People who smoke 60 a day won't be deterred because of the price. In turn, the people who have alcohol dependencies won't be deterred about the price either.

    It's been a failure and will continue to be a failure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 802 ✭✭✭Butson


    NGOs / Advocacy groups essentially run this country now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,554 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Rubbish. One of the biggest lobby groups is the Vintners themselves. And the drinks industry carries massive weight. If AAI are making inroads then it is nothing more than a balancing out of the massive overinfluence that the drinks lobby have had for years.

    You blame the AAI, but the drinks producers, Diageo, Heinekin etc, are more than happy with this MAP. It is brand protection for them. Don;t for one minute think that if this was going to hurt them that the AAI would have been put back in their box.

    The Vintners are in favour of this. But when it was brought in, rather than look to keep their prices low and get in more customers they hiked their prices to fleece more from their customers.

    This suits the retailers. no longer having to waste time on special bargains, checking local pricing.

    You are blaming the wrong people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,596 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It's not much better if it's NGOs / Advocacy / Lobby groups essentially run this country now :(

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    I've seen no evidence pubs put prices up because of MUP.

    It was introduced January 2022 and Putin invaded in February.

    With the high inflation in bars and restaurants since then the effects of MUP has been reduced substantially.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,554 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Completely agree, but this notion that the AAI, tiny in comparison to the likes of Vintners and Drinks producers, are somehow running this country is a convenient scapegoat. Vintners were losing out to people getting the cheaper products from the likes of Lidl and Aldi. Diageo was losing out to less known brands taking more and more of their traditional markets, which over time will result in people becoming less brand loyal, which is completely against the business model.

    Vintners could see that people were moving away from the traditional drinking in the pub and this was an attempt to rebalance (to their favour) the pricing as pubs cannot compete with off licence sales as the cost of running the pubs continues to increase.

    None of them lost out from this. You and I did, the cheaper brands have. But not the big boys. They love this. What I am saying is that the anger directed at the AAI should be directed at the effective cartel that has been legalised in this country. They did the exact same with drinks promotions in pubs. It stops competition dead as why pay the same price for the unknown when you can just order the usual?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,970 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    The Vintners are more than happy to let AAI do their dirty work..

    The Vintners can come at MUP from the health angle. AAI can and do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,832 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It costs about €17,000 a year to pay for 60 cigarettes a day. Employers do not have to provide smoke breaks, so it could be difficult for someone like that to hold down a job. I think the price must deter some people. If they have a double addiction to nicotine and alcohol, they would need serious money to fund it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I would agree with this.

    The price gap between a pint in a bar in Dublin and the price of a can of the same beer in a store is huge.

    An average lager in Dublin City Centre is probably about 7 euro.

    A can of the same common lager in a store is maybe 2 euro?

    I think that anyone that goes out in town one or month or so really would not even notice MUP.

    Thats not to say I agree with it, but I think anyone that socialises in bars semi regularly still views beers in stores/off licences as cheap.

    I think thats maybe why there isnt a large outcry against MUP. It just doesnt affect a lot of people.

    But I do agree that for those on a lower income who drink responsibly, it does feel unfair.

    Unless the MUP price point impscted more people though, I dont think opposition to it will gain significant traction.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,762 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    Price deters me, someone who doesn't have a problem with alcohol. I rarely drink, and less so now that it's gone very expensive.

    Price doesn't really deter those at whom this legislation is aimed, i.e. the people that have a problem with alcohol.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭waterwelly


    Well it must do as they all can't afford it.

    Plenty of people have cut down on drink, definatey here we were'nt drinking through slabs in January just because it was here after being bought cheap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    A lot of young people spending a lot of money on Drugs- Cocaine in the main.

    No money left to go to a pub after spending 100-300 Euro each week on cocaine apparently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,559 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Those with no drink problems tend to prioritize other things and so cut back a little. Those with drink problems will prioritize drink and cut back on other items often to the detriment if their families.


    A reduction in alcohol consumption dies not equal a reduction in problem drinkers



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,648 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Which leaves you in a pretty good situation.

    On the other hand while I also enjoy a nice cider sometimes my favoured tipple is beer, mostly standard 4.3% stuff.

    It now costs a minimum of €1.70 per can.

    Before MUP I could buy it regularly on offer for €1 per can, often even less.

    I am a MUP loser 🙂



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    Nice little bargain from tesco.. I have a liking for the bavarian beers, cheers 🍻👍

    Post edited by ShamNNspace on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 34,386 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Rubbish comparison. AAI's raison d'etre is against alcohol consumption.

    Fingal County Council are certainly not competent to be making decisions about the most important piece of infrastructure on the island. They need to stick to badly designed cycle lanes and deciding on whether Mrs Murphy can have her kitchen extension.



Advertisement