Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1260026012603260526063690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,986 ✭✭✭ambro25




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭vixdname


    Yes they do, and they had outside lavatories installed only recently ! Major ribbon cutting ceremony arranged by the committee ! As much TK red lemonade, Taytos and hang sangwiches as any man could handle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,062 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Why would they transit a sub by surface at all ?

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,022 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Not anymore its seems. They are no longer flavor of the month...to curry favor's with Putin they heavily criticized the regular Russian army, and the Army don't take too kindly to criticism, actually its a very bad idea to criticize them, especially when their boss is a very good friend or Putin. So now Prigoshin is paying the price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,241 ✭✭✭Economics101


    That was not Airforce One. AF1 is used as the designation only when carrying POTUS. Biden is still in Washington. I think the aircraft in question has a role in wartime communications which may involve POTUS.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,074 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Because it's diesel powered.

    The image looks a bit strange, there's an inline white wake, as you would expect and as the escorts have, but there is also a secondary grey wake coming back from what looks like amidships at an acute angle, which could be smoke blown by an off track wind.

    If that's smoke - sheesh. Is it trying to compete with the Kuznetsov aicraft carrier?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh


    This seems to be it.

    Hold the line, grind down the enemy, meanwhile build up your forces for a serious offensive. The Stalingrad model.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh


    Interesting piece in The Atlantic. Military History Doesn't say what Ukraine's critics think.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/02/russia-ukraine-war-wwii-comparison/673053/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    It's one of the most uncomfortable truths of the whole invasion that I hate being reminded about, as it depresses the hell out of me, but it cannot be ignored or forgotten.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    No threat to them ,they are regularly seen in various seas from the med or the English channel transiting on the surface,and in this case their would be no reason to go submerged for a relatively short journey,and then having to resurface to launch missles,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,458 ✭✭✭zv2


    How stupid is this? Wagner advertising stacks of dead bodies-

    wagner.jpg


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Have you seen wagner groups recruiting ads for canon fodder

    Says it all,really



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,074 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    General Milley: War will end at negotiation table, neither Russia nor Ukraine will achieve their goals

    https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/02/16/7389675/

    It's abundantly clear that a lot of people don't like anything negative being said about the US, but I'm going to say it anyway - to my eyes, it's looking more and more like the US don't want Ukraine to win outright and want them to give Putin what he wants, to keep Putin in power. Better the devil you know...?

    They are possibly worried that a defeat will cause Putin to lose control and be unseated - or an attempt made to unseat him - involving a near all-out civl war between the Army, Wagner, Patriot, Kadyrovs Tik-Tokers and the FSO. Orcistan descending into a fight between warlords, all trying to grab power and likely a share of the nukes, isn't a nice scenario.

    All the stuff that could be immediately useful to Ukraine and game changing has been put on the long finger or refused: No planes, no drones, a token handful of tanks 9 months or more away, GLSDBs 9 months away, ATACMS never as there aren't enough of them (yeah, right), despite them being due for retirement and replacement with PrSM soon. A significant proportion of Leopard 2s have morphed into slowly refurbished Leopard 1's.

    Even the give up Bakhmut spiel fits because it lets the Orcs keep on rolling, taking more and more of Donetsk and setting things up for the conditions Putin wants for his plan B negotiated peace win.

    General Miley's saying Ukraine can't win and should negotiate - where have we heard that before? But General Patreus seems to think otherwise "“And my bet is on the Ukrainians in this regard.” In any case, Russia will not win the war."

    Ben Hodges, a former commander of the U.S. Army Europe, told Deutsche Welle that the West should supply Ukraine with fighter jets as the planes could contribute to Ukraine’s victory within a year.

    “The sooner we deliver them the capability to achieve a decisive outcome, the sooner that (the war) could be over,” Hodges said in an interview with Deutsche Welle.

    According to Hodges, Ukraine could still win without Western fighter jets, but Russia’s defeat would take three to five years, given the current level of Western support.

    While the consistent story out of Washington is that Ukraine doesn't need planes and should instead focus on attrition warfare of more than half a century ago.

    Looks like I am not the only one thinking along these lines, I just found this;

    Does the Biden administration want Ukraine to win, or just not to lose?

    FEAR OF TOTAL VICTORY? As Russian troops mass in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine in preparation for what could be the pivotal battle of the war, Republican lawmakers are questioning whether the Biden administration is truly backing Ukraine’s goal to reclaim territory lost to Russia eight years ago or is hoping for a stalemate that would force Ukraine to make concessions to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    “We will continue to take every step we possibly can to help the Ukrainians succeed on the battlefield and to improve their position at the negotiating table and to make the Russians pay also through increasing costs of sanctions for what they are doing to the people of Ukraine,” said national security adviser Jake Sullivan on CNN yesterday.

    That drew an immediate rebuke from Wyoming Republican Rep. Liz Cheney, who was on the same program. “I wasn't satisfied with what I heard. I think that it's crucially important that the United States be clear that we are absolutely committed to Zelensky's victory,” Cheney told host Jake Tapper. “We should not be talking about, as Jake Sullivan did just now, improving Zelensky's position at the negotiating table.”

    There should be no question that this is about getting to a negotiation or pressuring Zelensky to negotiate. This is about defeating Russian forces in Ukraine,” Cheney said.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/does-the-biden-administration-want-ukraine-to-win-or-just-not-to-lose-gop-lawmakers-want-to-know

    When I'm agreeing with what Liz Cheney is saying and being critical of Biden, something's wrong. Letting the Orcs get away with ourageous agressions against other countries is what created the conditions for this horrible war. Biden has lost it, he seems incapable of learning from the lessons of history. There is no point in making decisions that let Putin win and stay in power because he's not staying in power much longer anyway, given his age and health, you are just postponing the inevitable and given the internal political scheeming and manoeuvering going on in orcistan, you might not even achieve that anyway.

    The cost of that postponement, if it succeeds, will be borne by the thousands of kidnapped Ukrainian children who will never return under the Putin wins scenario and the brave Ukrainians who are going to die in large numbers, because they will keep pushing for victory, as in Bakhmut, not giving up because it fits with the US mealy-mouthed aims of prioritising stability in Orcistan.

    Post edited by cnocbui on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,458 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Its a weird headline (which is a common theme in journalism in general unfortunately).

    He is saying Russian objectives are completely doomed, while Ukraine will face an uphill struggle. He is not equating the two positions at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,074 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Who's - their own or Ukrainians?

    If it's the latter, I see your pile and raise you.. (caution, video shows a lot of body bags in storage)

    https://youtu.be/Xnay0SwK6BA

    "These guys' contract is over! The Russians are going home!" - dead occupiers somewhere near Bakhmut.

    How many good Russians are there? They died for Putin's palaces, for propaganda and, of course, for stolen fur coats



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 ✭✭MudSpud




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭junkyarddog


    This guy give excellent updates,definitely worth a watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,421 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    He also mentions unless the Russian army collapses, that's certainly not out of the question. When Ukraine start their counteroffensive, I can't see the cannon fodder standing there fighting and defending.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,074 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    No. I'm an 'actions speak louder than words' kind of person. Miley's quote is just one of the many signs. and emerged after I first raised my concerns about US intent two days ago in this post: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120243686/#Comment_120243686

    What I am saying is being thought by Liz Cheney, it turns out, so it's not just me - in the article I quoted.

    “We will continue to take every step we possibly can to help the Ukrainians succeed on the battlefield and to improve their position at the negotiating table..." national security adviser Jake Sullivan

    And was this me saying this, or someone else?:

    "Republican lawmakers are questioning whether the Biden administration is truly backing Ukraine’s goal to reclaim territory lost to Russia eight years ago or is hoping for a stalemate that would force Ukraine to make concessions to Russian President Vladimir Putin."

    So that's Miley and Sullivan reading from the same script, but you are acusing me of basing everything on Miley's statement. It's the US's actual actions that caused me to reach the conclusion.

    I said people don't like anything negative being said about the US - high five...



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,656 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The US are providing more lethal support to Ukraine than basically everyone else put together. If they are "keeping Ukraine weak" they are doing a phenomenally **** job of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,403 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Hopefully all these trucks were going to be used for logistics in the war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 ✭✭MudSpud


    But the flip side of that is that they are not contracted like a regular soldier who is obligated to follow orders. Couldn't they just quit and split? Same way as someone quits their job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,074 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Something I haven't seen mentioned yet: Ukraine are actively mobilising and have been for weeks now. Additionally, they are forming what I take to be another special forces unit for which they sought volunteers and received 20,000 applications at last count.

    "The Special Operations Center "A" of the SSU announces selection into a new assault unit! To become part of the team of legendary special forces is an honor for every defender of Ukraine. Our soldiers conduct unique special operations, perform tasks at the hottest points and, together with the Defense Forces, liberate our native land. You have the opportunity to defend Ukraine side by side with them, moving towards a joint Victory," the SSU notes.

    Candidates must meet the following criteria:

    - motivation, appropriate level of physical and psychological training;

    - presence of combat experience;

    - high professional qualities.

    Preference will be given to people who have served in special military units: snipers, engineers, telecommunications specialists, air detectors, artillery fire spotters, operators of multiple rocket launchers, anti-tank missile systems, drones, drivers of combat vehicles and others.

    As Ukrainian News Agency earlier reported, the Ministry of Interior Affairs began the formation of the Offensive Guard assault brigades for the strengthening of the Defense Forces and de-occupation of Ukraine.

    https://ukranews.com/en/news/915339-ssu-announces-selection-of-volunteers-in-its-assault-unit



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,750 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Neither side has the resources to finish the war completely in eithers favour. The Russians still maintain enough logistics to hold what they have and if they can exhaust Ukraines logistics through consumption and destruction of equipment and ammunition that comes with the current tempo, they can potentially secure the area from Kharkiv to Zaporizhzhia this Summer and force Ukraine to accept a frozen conflict like happened between North and South Korea. If the Russians cannot make significant gains by April then they will have to negotiate by the end of the year. Russia will also have counter strategies to the NATO armament and offensive expected in Summer 2023.

    Nor does the war in Ukraine exist in an isolated bubble. Consider the economic and political impact on the EU, a stalemate in Eastern Ukraine or an internal civil war in Russia may also be sufficient to trigger a collapse of the EU project for a multitude of other reasons that have been held down to date. For historic context Britain had an empire, even though they "won" the world war, they were broke, their empire collapsed and they became a stationary landing carrier for the United States in the North Atlantic. Militarily, compared with their resources prior to WW II, they are a minnow. Wars don't have predictable outcomes, the situation of the Korean armstice will also need to be considered.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @Pa ElGrande do you actually believe that nonsense, collapse of the eu ,

    Q conspiracy theories next



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,651 ✭✭✭✭Supercell


    Absolutely the wildest first shooter action I have ever seen, this guy has absolute balls of steel.


    Have a weather station?, why not join the Ireland Weather Network - http://irelandweather.eu/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    That's what happens when someone reads something and can't see past the quotes for what they are,

    Of course Americans will keep putting out statements about negotiating,but when they are already deep into supporting ukraine, they are hardly going to be ramping up retoric against putin,

    People are obsessing over the wrongthings



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,403 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I don't think Ukraine will give up on Crimea. At best I see them agreeing to Russia keeping their base in Sevastopol. I know it seems impossible but look where Ukraine has come from 10 years ago. Now that the gloves are off there's no more surprise attacks by Russia and while their army weakens Ukraine's gains in strength.


    Another 12 months from now things won't look pretty for Russia. That's assuming they haven't lost by then.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement