Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

NI Dec 22 Assembly Election

1252628303163

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I believe that is absolute nonsense. Everyone I have discussed this with believes SF have sunk to a new low by trying to use a serious I’ll young boy to put pressure on the DUP.

    the DUP are tabling an amendment to a bill going through Westminster in the coming weeks that will allow the SoS to bring in the organ law. I wonder will sf turn up to support it or will they boycott it on a matter of principal. Kettle, pot and all that.

    the only pressure coming from people who will be voting dup next time, is that they must on no circumstances renter stormont no matter what tricks are employed by others



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I voted for the gfa. A bitter pill to swallow in some ways but like many I decided the guarantees around protection of the union were a reasonable pay off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I’m not sure there will be elections to devolved government for another generation. I do though think it’s better than 50:50 that the eu will back off their demand to rule us without representation.

    this article gets some of the issues https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/nireland-unionists-face-historic-choice-eu-uk-near-protocol-deal-2023-02-10/



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,907 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    the eu will back off their demand to rule us without representation

    Erm, the NIP is 100% down to your government, not the EU or any other pretend bogeyman!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 254 ✭✭lurleen lumpkin


    'I believe that is absolute nonsense. Everyone I have discussed this with believes SF have sunk to a new low by trying to use a serious I’ll young boy to put pressure on the DUP.'


    Oh my.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,907 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Yeah, it's unionism looking for yet another reason to be angry.

    I say this because I'm aware that the DUP made media profit out of Dáithí - so maybe you can tell us how are they being pressurised by anyone...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,182 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    No, you still havent explained how the court result proves you were misled about the GFA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,926 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    We can get into simantics but the Belfast agreement stated "It is hereby declared that Northern Ireland in its entirety remains part of the United Kingdom and shall not cease to be so without the consent of a majority of the people of Northern Ireland voting in a poll held for the purposes of this section in accordance with Schedule 1."

    Now you may well claim that isn’t broken but the court has now told us that nothing but the final act of partition of our nation is protected. As I read the court case, the Uk government could hand over complete authority for the day to day running of NI to France and it would not break the gfa. That is not what we were told when we voted for it.

    it doesn’t concern me. It is a useful clarification. Our security lies in our community refusing to accept eg France running the place.

    we are entering a dangerous phase in ni. Maybe it’s my turn to say stuff like Leo said ie if the Union is seriously undermined then there is a very real possibility of violence. In the scheme of things it will not be earth shattering - when you think that the entire 30 sectarian conflict here didn’t come close in lose of life to one night in Turkish earthquakes, but it will be very sad if peoples lives are seriously impacted by the intransigence of the eu. I am still optimistic that the penny will drop and the eu will realise it can’t rule a colony without representation - at least not in the democratic western world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,926 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady



    "It is hereby declared that Northern Ireland in its entirety remains part of the United Kingdom and shall not cease to be so without the consent of a majority of the people of Northern Ireland voting in a poll held for the purposes of this section in accordance with Schedule 1."


    3 of your courts including the highest one have found that there is NO constitutional change and that that clause pertains to a Border Poll.

    P.S. You are not the only community living in NI. A majority are happy with the Protocol and EU oversight of some trading laws.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,182 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Firstly 3 court rulings say your wrong. Secondly even if you were right that the constitutional position in the union has changed(it hasnt) its not the GFA that you were misled over, its Brexit and every promise thereafter from the tories. Yet as a solution to you being misled by the tories you now want direct rule from the tories....? Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

    Also that last paragraph is just something else, I dont even have words to describe how bizarre it reads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    The family have stayed well clear of this stunt. The media are even being very careful with it. Everyone sees it for what it is.

    everyone is 100% certain that stormont will not be reestablished this week - so you tell me why the shinners are dragging this terrible situation through the spotlight.

    the hypocrisy is incredible, as they will be boycotting their seats in Westminster in a few weeks when this matter WILL be sorted.

    It is disgusting, but not surprising.

    do you think they should take their seats in Westminster to support this young boy? I actually would not use this as leverage on the shinners



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,182 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Why would they need to attend if as you say its going to be sorted? Also there's no hypocrisy here as the problem is the DUP could fix this issue but are refusing too but SF attending westminster wont have any effect on fixing the issue so wheres the hypocrisy?

    TBH i think its entirely more hypocritical of the DUP to be depending on the tories and wesminster to solve this issue since as again its solely due to themselves and westminster that the NIP which they apparently have such a problem with exists in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,926 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    More of the same.

    This legislation cannot be gotten through speedily because the DUP are trying to re-establish a Unionist veto but it is everyone else's fault but the DUP's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    The hypocrisy is very clear. If it became evident that they were 5 votes short in Westminster, would sf take their seats to get it through. We all know the answer to both that question and the other question as to whether sf are using this awful situation for political points scoring.

    Nothing new here. This is their normal through the last 25 years. 1981 being one of the glaring examples



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I didn’t blame anyone. It’s you that’s doing the blaming. I am simply calling out hypocrisy and shameful opportunism.

    I note no one has responded to my question as to why sf are dragging this through the stormont mess when they know 100% that it will not help the young family one iota



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,926 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Because it isn't just about Daithi.

    Stormont is a 'mess' because your new party alone have made it one. Stormont can fix this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,182 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Yes its normal they have never taken their seats, the DUP can not say that. Also your galring refusal to acknowledge your own cognitive dissonance of the tories constantly screwing you over yet still relying on them to do the dirty work of the DUP and provide direct rule is just sad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Thy is a remarkable answer. So when will the DUP have boycotted long enough for you to afford them the ‘normal’ tag for boycotting stormont



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Francie step back, take a breath, and look at what you are saying.

    sf collapsed stormont for 3 years, the dup only have it down a year yet it’s them that have it in a mess.

    as for this pretence that it is about daithi, now changed to it’s not just about daithi. This change in sf pr message has came out today as it has been confirmed today that it will take over 3 months for stormont to enact the changes. Yesterday it was all about daithi, today it’s not. I actually regret I have lowered myself to engage in this. It will be interesting to see tomorrow which parties have realised the mask has slipped and decide to avoid the emotional blackmail



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,926 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The legislation is not just about Daithi, there are many awaiting this legislation.

    And it is not just SF who are supporting the recall motion. Everyone puts health above a fracas about trading/customs rules bar the DUP and TUV



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,182 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Never! The DUP are boycotting due to politics nothing more, SF do not attend on a point of principle due to the requirement to pledge allegiance to the crown therefore its not a boycott, its actually called abstentionism and even if it was removed I doubt they would ever attend as it would mean accepting British rule. The DUP cannot say the same as they are trying to buy something with their boycott, if the NIP was scrapped tomorrow they would likely take their seats, see the difference? Also SF are elected by their voters to specifically not attend I don't believe the DUPs 2022 manifesto mentioned anything about refusing to take their seats?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,781 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    SF boycotted Stormont for three years due to politics nothing more.

    The real truth is that the two parties - DUP and SF - belong in the same cesspit and should be left there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,926 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SF walked out of the coalition over issues the Executive could fix. Just like coalition partners from the Greens to Labour etc have walked out of governments. They agreed to go back into coalition after a year but that deal was gazumphed by the DUP party.

    The DUP are holding the Executive and the people ransom over issues the people and the Executive cannot fix and have no influence over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Still not enough and our community will turn on the DUP if the countenance accepting this deal (if true), but it is another few important steps in the road that Francie calls ‘flexibilities’. We jus need a few more flexibilities and we will have arrived.

    well done unionist community. Keep digging in for a little longer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,926 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Is the Protocol gone?

    Nope. Which is what you were told.

    P.S. I remember media claiming that deal iteration No 2055555 had 'passed the acid test', I remember Boris championing the oven ready deal and the DUP claiming it was great.

    Forgive me if I am a bit sceptical at this latest attempt to placate the ERG



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Shock news. Francie has changed his call from ‘the protocol will not be negotiated’ to ‘the protocol will not be gone’



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,926 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Quick search - As far back as April 22 202i.

     the UK have capitulated on the Protocol...it's going nowhere. 


    Belfast Disturbances - Page 53 — boards.ie - Now Ye're Talkin'



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,805 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    It’ll be alright. Sure Sinn Fein will be ending their boycott to turn up at Westminster to ensure it goes through - or maybe they weren’t just as sincere today as they pretended



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement