Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1257325742576257825793690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭circadian


    Massive gas reserves in eastern Ukraine and around Crimea. Add in a big gas supply deal with China and you have your answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 ✭✭MudSpud


    I can't answer the question. I haven't investigated the history of Kaliningrad. A cursory examination of high school history will show that it has been part of The Kingdom of Poland, Prussia, East Prussia, The Third Reich, The USSR and now Russia. I could say that I think it should be part of Armenia since 0.8% of the population are Armenian but that would be nonsensical. 80% of the population of about a million is Russian. All other ethnicities make up around or less than 1% of the demographic. In the most recent census 13.9% didn't state their ethnicity. So with that in mind I can only assume that the majority of the people of Kaliningrad want to be part of Russia.

    Post edited by MudSpud on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh


    Putin published an essay in july of 2021 (Titled: On the historical unity of Russians and Ukrainians) where he claims Russians, Belarussians and Ukrainians are one people, and that Ukraine isn't a legitimate state, imperialism 101.

    If Putin unites Belarus, Ukraine and Russia into one Great Russia thats an extra 50 million people plus the resources of Ukraine all to the kremlin, there's your money trail. The reason its costly for Russia now is Ukrainian patriotism and bravery, Putin didn't expect that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 ✭✭MudSpud


    I've actually seen an interview with that guy Justin. Very captivating stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 ✭✭MudSpud


    Can you tell me exactly how you access RT.com because I can't access it in Ireland via a regular internet connection. Neither can my friend in another part of the country or another friend in the UK.You say you can access it, no problem and I say I can't, and you're accusing me of lying when I say that it's blocked. Maybe some others can tell us, honestly, if they can access it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,673 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    It's a cesspit of lies. As is Stormfront. Accessing them likely gets them revenue. Why do you want to access them? Both are firm backers of politicians and ideologies that would destroy your life in Ireland, given the chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    No body in Ireland uses the term high school history....



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Nope. Quite the opposite. It was the Germans who couldn't keep up with the operational losses. They were rapidly running out of spares and many units were running at half strength. Production output of British aircraft went up during the Battle of Britain and US to UK Lend Lease hadn't even started yet. The ratio of German to British aircrew losses averaged 4 to 1. In reality and short of just giving up it was damned near impossible for Britain to lose the BoB

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,498 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    Well you gave away that you aren’t in Ireland by referring to “high school”, so I won’t be wasting my time entertaining you.



  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,839 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 ✭✭MudSpud


    I take it your post was directed at me and not the other poster (runningrings..)

    If I wasn't in Ireland but wanted to pretend that I was, couldn't I just get a friend to pop down to Centra and take this pic you talk of and then send it to me and I upload it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 121 ✭✭dtothebtotheh


    I agree, Putin definitely underestimated both the Ukrainian an the Wests response to the invasion. Putin seems happy enough for Belarus to remain a puppet state and had probably planned for the same in Ukraine. He must be awfully misinformed, even if Russia did take Kyiv, Russia would have partisan warfare on their hands for decades, to me it just doesn't seem like a logical move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,458 ✭✭✭zv2


    They had plenty of planes, shortage of pilots.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Another day another balloon burst.


    2023-02-04T211310Z_431807375_RC2I4Z9UMCTN_RTRMADP_3_USA-CHINA-SPY-1024x595.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 121 ✭✭dtothebtotheh


    There's currently not much more capacity to pipe gas into China, and China is an economy I can see shrinking in the medium term. Losing the EU has been terrible for Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 121 ✭✭dtothebtotheh


    Yes, I did mention that there is no chance of NATO invading Russia, and really it doesn't matter anyway where NATO borders are, there's nuclear armed submarines all over the place, so the location of silos isn't really that important I wouldn't have thought. Russia's economy is already smaller after a year and it will only get smaller. Putin got a bit too big for his boots after Crimea and Syria.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 ✭✭MudSpud


    Can somebody answer me this? According to these figures Russia has lost over 9100 tanks. What is Ukraine knocking them out with? Whatever it is it must be pretty effective. The figures also state that Ukraine have lost 2900 tanks. So if Ukraine have thousands of tanks and they are knocking out Russian tanks to the figure of nearly 10,000, why do they need a measly 59 tanks from NATO? What are 59 tanks going to do when you are allegedly obliterating the entire Russian tank corps?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Some of the 100,000 anti tank weapons Nato countries donated to them ,and homemade drones and artillery

    Nato tanks have the ability to destroy 20/30 orc tanks before the orcs can even see the Western tanks,

    In theory now just in theory.

    60 western tanks could destroy 1,200 orc tanks ,

    I like those odds



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,069 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The factories were producing Hurricanes at such a rate, I believe the more serious problem was pilots couldn't be trained as fast as planes could be built.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Being Crimea is a pipe dream according to some ,

    Wonder whats got the Russians spooked into building mass fortifications




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,069 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I can confirm it's trivially easy. Took me less than a minute. Washing my eyeballs after took far longer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,357 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    If Germany invaded this year. And the German government brought in 1 million fanatical German people and those 1 million started to bully out the Russians living there. And the Russians started leaving due to discrimination from the German government and pressure from the 1 million German people who moved in. Now the Russians are feeling it as they can't speak or conduct business in Russian only German. Then in 4 years time from now Germany conducts a vote under armed watch from German soldiers on whether Kaliningrad should secede to Germany. Those 1 million Germans vote and we're unsure of the Russians voting but the German government announces an acceptance rate of 80% to join Germany.

    Would all this be acceptable in your view?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,011 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    9,100 is total equipment lost, of that around 1,700 are Russians tanks destroyed, abandoned or captured. Ukraine has lost about 457 tanks (visually confirmed, real figures are approx 10% to 20% more)

    It's around a 4 to 1, or 5 to 1 ratio (factoring in captured tanks) in Ukraine's favour. However Russia is a military super-power, Ukraine isn't. Ukraine has to operate from a country that is under attack, having their electricity shut down, having their infrastructure targeted, whereas mainland Russia is untouched. Even if Ukraine are destroying more equipment, they are fighting with one arm behind their back. Russia on the other hand is free to keep pushing it's numerically superior military at them. Also, at the beginning, the Ukrainians took the Russians by surprise with the ferocity and ingenuity of their defence, the Russians are now (slowly) learning and adapting, which means destroying each Russian tank is getting increasingly harder

    The international community has sent or pledged over 600 tanks to Ukraine. That's not some insignificant amount, if anything, the Ukrainians are reliant on that supply. Many are freshly renewed and maintained tanks (not old or war-torn tanks with issues. Which as you can guess, given the numbers, is vital for Ukraine. On top of that, a portion of these tanks will be modern battle tanks, which should be superior on the battlefield, as well as being a key morale boost for the Ukrainians (they are largely fighting on pure morale, as Russia has most other conditions in it's favour)

    Every drone, every shell, every tank that Ukraine gets is vital, because they fighting one of the largest militaries in the world. As much as people support them, there is nothing comfortable about their situation, it's still very difficult and serious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭circadian


    They were already reducing supply and raising prices to the EU after signing the Chinese agreement. Obviously China thought it would continue to grow and use gas supplies to replace coal and may well have been under the impression that the Russians were capable of building the required supply lines.

    I'd imagine the Chinese are now making other plans because it's clear the Russians have no ability to engineer anything of any significance and the whole deal was (excuse the pun) a pipe dream.

    Much in the same way the Russians thought they'd just waltz into Ukraine and take over while ignoring the fact that since 2014 the Ukrainian military has been preparing for this exact scenario.

    China, despite their own issues at home can afford to wait this out. They are, however, playing a similarly stupid game in increasing tensions with the west which would see them eventually sanctioned into oblivion over time. They certainly don't have the control over their citizens that they think they do if the zero COVID riots are anything to go by. Sabre rattling towards the west and Taiwan might make them think they look tough but I really wonder how much of an appetite the general population has for a war and the sanctions that come with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Seanmadradubh


    To understand the logic you have to understand the imperialistic mindset.

    Putin genuinly believes what he wrote in that essay, Ukrainians don't have the right, nor ability, to govern themselves without Russian control, exactly the same view the British had towards us in times past, also the very concept of there being a Ukrainian nationality/identity doesn't exist in his brain, so why would anyone fight for something that doesn't exist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 ✭✭MudSpud


    Well technically they do without knowing it. As Gaeilge Mean Scoil is Primary School, Ard Scoil is Secondary School and Oll Scoil is Tertiary or Third Level. Ard is Irish for "High". Ard Scoil is High School.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Nice try but no ,even Gaeilgeoir don't use the term,

    Funny my family have all attended Gaelscoils



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,114 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Its always the little slips of language that gives the game away. Similarly yesterday a rant about Zelensky, letting the superiority complex out of the bag.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement