Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1245124522454245624573690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,066 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    I think it could go on well into 24, but at a largely static phase. Dug in and artillery fire across the line.


    If the Russian line collapsed I wouldn't be surprised.


    I think Putin is correct in that Russian people are much tougher than the West, no comparison really but that's not much use when you are fighting a war you don't believe in, short of clothes, ammunition, food etc because it has all been stolen and the officer sending you in to a wall of fire is pissed.


    Long way to go yet to eventual Russian defeat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,687 ✭✭✭riddles


    Russia have already been defeated - they are battling over small towns in the east of the Ukraine. The end of winter is on the horizon and alternative gas supply chains developed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,450 ✭✭✭zv2


    Russian soldiers shot down a bomb that was dropped from a helicopter of Ukrainian forces.


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭vixdname


    Your presumption is correct, of course we should act, as much weaponry as is needed to get this finished with as soon as possible and send the orcs back over the border with their tails between their legs is needed

    Post edited by vixdname on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭vixdname


    It all depends on how putin deciphers their nuclear doctrine.

    If and granted its a big "If", Putin, in his head, actually sees the likes of Crimea as being an actual integral part of russia, he could see any attack by Ukraine as a direct attack on mainland russia, which, according to russian nuclear doctrine, is a legitimate excuse for using its nuclear deterrent.

    Of course, the odds of him being that dumb as to ensure his own, his regime and his countries destruction are slim, but this world has thrown up plenty of unforeseen surprises throughout history.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Looks more like an accidental explosion rather than a single shot,

    Not a hope a single shot or a sniper hit the ied as it was dropped from a drone or helicopter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,779 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Perchance a Swiss discussion board would be more to one's liking?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,450 ✭✭✭zv2


    Could have been a fluke. I once saw two bullets fused together - they collided in mid air! (I think it was from WW1)

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Hmm.. if he does formally declare war it won't just be aimed at his domestic audience. As you say it will have little or no effect on Ukraine.

    But he'll be targeting Europe and 'the west' with the message. If it happens, expect to see a raft of commentary that 'the west' needs to be cautious now as regards supplies to Ukraine for fear of escalating etc. We'll see the usual posters here throwing their hands up in the air and warning of nuclear armageddon etc

    So it will be just as much a response to the growing calls to send tanks and more advanced military equipment to Ukraine, to try and frighten the horses. Will it work? Probably already incorporated in decision making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Tomorrow is also the 80th anniversary of Stalingrad. It could be another bullsh1t speech this time comparing Bakhmut to Stalingrad.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,716 ✭✭✭storker


    The losses will register even more sharply if the Russians are lumping new soldiers from the same districts together in the same units like the "Pals" Battalions of the Somme. One bad day at the front and an entire community is shattered. If that starts to happen in urban areas even Putin might not be able to keep a lid on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,450 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,254 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Russia has used up something like 60% of its missiles already. It's now using ballistic missiles as a bombing tactic as it's cannot use either its air force or its smaller missiles for tactical bombing. Russia cannot replace any missile it fires. At some stage it will have to start to consider what will happen as it's stock is depleted

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭vixdname


    Hes going to put his weapon in his hand and bate them with it man !

    When those Orcs see Pcardin pelting across over the frontline with his weapon swinging in his hand, theyll know for sure theyre in for it....make no mistake !!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    The point I was making that Russia potentially using ballistic missiles is incorrect as they have fired over 200 at Ukraine so far. It's not a new tactic.

    As for missiles, even Ukraine acknowledge that Russia is still producing scores of each type of missiles each month. So I don't know where you're getting that Russia cannot replace any missile it fires. They can, but if they fire more than they produce, they eat into their stockpile. Hence why the mass attacks are getting further spaced out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020



    do you actually think Russia/Putin gives one fcuk about the Geneva convention……😡😡



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,445 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    To be fair......

    A lad running towards you while wa.nking would definitely give you a moments pause.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,015 ✭✭✭jmreire


    More like the boy who cried wolf at this stage with Vladimir and his Nuclear Weapons...what new threat can he pose? And if he has not learned by now ( or should have) threatening the West has usually had the opposite effect of the one he intends. Putin threatens the west with a new technology super unstoppable weapon, and the west thinks " Hmmnn, maybe its time to call his bluff....and show him what happens if he ever decides to use his new super weapon?" Previously when he was mouthing off about nuclear strikes, not only did Xi Jinping tell him to calm down the nuclear rhetoric, but Biden also warned him in no uncertain terms what would happen if he ever did carry out even a so called nuclear strike, and it would be with conventional weapons, but when it finished, Putin would not have a military worthy of the name.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭pcardin


    I came back from 2 weeks military refresh training as I fall in the military age category and will be enlisted if my country is attakced. And yes, with the weapon in my hands. For sure, I might not last long, but before I die I will try to cut down as many fascist orcs as possible. As for 'my weapon'...perhaps stop watching porn so much. Ah, and of course, lets stick here 'your ma'joke too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,015 ✭✭✭jmreire


    No they are not naturally "tougher" than in the west or any other Country. Outside of the citys in the rural areas, they live a pretty basic life, as they have for years, but they live that life because they have to. Its not free choice in this day and age, its enforced on them by Putin and his regime. Here in Ireland within living memory, the Irish lived a hard life too. When cottages were build in Rural areas, they had a half or full acre of land to grow their own food, which they did, and raised a pig or two, and of course chickens. Those days are now gone, but not in rural Russia, they still grow their own potatoes and vegetables, and raise pigs for their own consumption. Same thing with Putins war,,they are forced into it. No choice, and toughness does not come into it. Putin is completely indifferent to the fate of his fellow citizens.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,015 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, I read that too, Putins speech. Wonder if Putin attended their funerals though? When / if the next round of mobilizations start, I'd be keeping a close eye on Samara to see what is the reaction there, where most of the dead were from. During the first "limited" mobilization, in Dagestan I think it was, the relatives fought with the military and police to prevent their menfolk being taken away. They were taken none the less, but at least it shows that not every Republic is in favor of Putins war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,799 ✭✭✭threeball


    The only thing that will cause a Russian collapse is when they run out of artillery. The men will keep coming as they are cheap and don't matter but when the artillery stops its game over. It all depends how much they have left in reserve. That's what will determine the end of this war. Putin would happily throw 100 million mobiks at this this just to get a win armed with nothing more than a wooden bat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭AngeloArgue


    NATO countries should give Ukraine a few nuclear missiles that are launchable from trucks instead of tanks. Nukes stopped the slaughter in Japan in 1945.

    They don't have to use them. They don't want to use them. But the potential for their use should bear down on Russia. They themselves have been threatening the west with them over the past year many times, it's time it was reciprocated. Russia just need to withdraw from Ukraine and should be allowed to do so peacefully. If they don't, leave it up to Ukraine to decide how they want to use them.

    Let's not be naïve. Ukraine and the Baltic states will need the nuclear deterrent to prevent a reoccurrence of this madness. So give it to them now, sooner rather than later. It won't be NATO attacking them, so they won't be able to strike the west back, Ukraine is not in NATO, Ukraine on it's own will be able to invoke MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction). Russia will skulk away with it's tail between it's legs if it's cities are put under the same threat of destruction as Ukraine's are under



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    Ukraine should receive from different countries three batteries of Patriot air defense systems, which will help protect the sky from Russian missiles - President Zelenskyi in the evening address


    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,015 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, but the thing is, as it stands, only Russia is threatening to go Nuclear, no one else is. And that makes Russia a pariah world-wide, even amongst its so called allies, China, North Korea and Iran. Its very important that the west and Ukraine continue to hold the moral high ground, especially when the west have more than enough conventional weapons to completely destroy Russia's armed forces. The big problem / issue now is to get all the weapons that Ukraine needs to not only defend against the Ruzzians, but to push them back into Russia, where they were pre Crimea invasion. And ideally further back into Russia so that there's a 100 klm minimum buffer zone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭AngeloArgue


    The only reason Russian tanks aren't rolling into Poland, Finland, and the Baltic states is because they are under the NATO nuclear umbrella



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,900 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    No, but I do, and I expect Ukraine to as well. And as a soldier if my future actions are to be commented upon by this board, I would rather it was based on accurate knowledge so I will correct any errors I see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    How would they get footage from the secure network. I mean if they are able to get video they are intercepting the communications network and can tell where the drones are for a start. I mean even the Ukrainians are not doing that. Their kit is probably microwave or complete spectrum jam so the drone looses contact and resorts to auto land.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,015 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, since Feb 2022, this has been clear. Putin has been very carefully tiptoeing around NATO Countrys.....he knows very well what the outcome would be if he did attack them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Exactly he is not afraid of NATO as it's defensive thats been proven. The are however Very afraid of the Response that would be short sharp and very destructive. Kind of reminds me of mega lo mania game where you had cave men fighting guys with lasers.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement