Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

To Mask or not to two - Mask Megathread cont.

1267268270272273290

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,686 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I gave you the actual quote and they are now looking at strike action as well. Not the actions of people just "calling" for something. But you keep dressing it up. Good man yourself 👍



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,686 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Where did I say they were going on strike over mask mandates???? I said they are threatening strike AND looking for mask mandates. 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Sconsey


    Oh here we go with your own editorializing, you are now interpreting their comments in your own way (dare I say dressing them up?), without any actual quote of a demand. I quoted verbatim their 'call for', you interpret something else and claim it is a quote. Do you even know what dressing up means? If anything I am dressing-down your hyperbole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,049 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    So there's no link between the two.

    So this post is a deliberate attempt to mislead by your own admission then? You linked the strike reference to masks to bolster your unjustified description of it as a 'demand'.


    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,686 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    It is a direct quote from the INMO head. You're all over the shop bud.

    Here it is again as you appear to be very confused.

    Phil Ni Sheaghdha says "all congregated settings, so public transport, any centres where people are congregating where illnesses can spread" should have a mandatory mask-wearing situation.

    A union has no business "calling for" citizens to me masked up. None. But you keep it up. It's actually quite entertaining.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,187 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    A union has every right to call for any measure they consider to be in the interest of their members.

    You have the right to disagree and put the opposite case.

    At the end of the day it is up to the Government to weigh up the pros and cons and decide one way or the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Some German regions have removed the mask mandate for January and more will follow.

    There are numerous studies done prior to 2020 on the ineffectiveness of masks against airborne viruses.

    Here are two recent studies questioning mask effectiveness during Covid with hindsight, as opposed to studies done through the pandemic as waves came and went, and as other measures were used in conjunction with mask wearing. The discussion part in the first one is interesting.

    There is no clear evidence of ecological reduction of infection due to mask wearing alone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Sconsey


    Direct quote of the executive summary complete conclusion....(I'm not picking and choosing a single line that might suit my purposes).

    Conclusion

    • A preliminary conclusion is that medical masks may help in preventing respiratory virus infection. However, the currently available experimental results are too preliminary to support an informed policy.
    • More well-designed and robust research on the effectiveness of masks in preventing COVID-19 infection is needed.

    So even the study you are quoting says masks may help reduce spread, while many many more reports say they do reduce the risk of spread. With all that evidence is it such a crime to ask people to wear them in certain situations?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,981 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Because China has sxxx vaccines and didn't place emphasis s on vaccination of vulnerable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,049 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The studies prior to 2020 did not consider their use as barriers by the general population, they were e.g. studies into cloth masks as direct protection for HCW. That's not why mask mandates were rolled out.

    Having seen a sample of Spira's twitter comments about 'mask fanatics' and having to have a religious belief in masks, let's say I'd be strongly sceptical of any claims he makes and of Cureus's peer review process.

    A large study from Bangladesh had a reduction of about 10% in the number of people who became infected, when compared to the control group that received no interventions.

    A study in Johnson County, Iowa, reported that when an uninfected person and infected person both wore a face mask, the secondary attack rate—the rate at which the infected person passes on the infection to the initially uninfected person—was halved from from 25.6% to 12.5%.

    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking-science-sars-cov2.html

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,260 ✭✭✭jackboy


    such results would indicate masks would be very useful if there are low levels of virus in the population. However, if the population has been overrun with positive cases these results would not give confidence that masks would help. Even if masks reduced the risk of infection by 90% and you were being exposed 10 or 20 times a day, you will quickly get infected, mask or no mask.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    A re-analysis of the Bangladesh study here;

    Authors note that behavioural changes as a result of mask wearing have an impact on transmission reduction.

    So does mask wearing altering behaviour reduce transmission? Perhaps, while the population are mostly in fear of becoming infected. But mask wearing alone? Still no evidence for it.

    I suppose there’s dirt on the authors or their peer reviewing process to be uncovered but I’ll leave that to anyone else who wishes to do that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,049 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Are you getting exposed that often though? On a bus how many infected people are there within X of you...

    At an individual level, it is not something to be relied upon, but at a macro level if that translates into a 10% reduction in cases, then it has an impact.

    I would also be curious as to whether it would reduce viral load you were exposed to so even if infected, it would be potentially less severe.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,260 ✭✭✭jackboy


    I Would say it doesn’t reduce cases by 10%. It could slightly delay when you get infected. A bus or a Luas now will be overrun with sick people and most workplaces.

    The viral load thing, yes I agree that makes sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,049 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    If you're getting a packed bus everyday your luck will run out eventually ... but if we're talking about say occasional users, in vulnerable demographics, it could have an impact.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,049 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    People are going to know they are wearing masks, hard to RCT that. I supposed they would have needed to have 2 intervention groups, one with masks and distancing and one with distancing.

    It should also be pointed out this study showed a 10% reduction when mask wearing got up to near 50%. On the 'barrier' principal the authors suggested the reduction could be greater with higher use. Against that, it would have been versus Delta variants I think and not Omicron.

    And this isn't the only study showing an effect though.

    Plus there are also the lab studies into the effects of masks on droplets, so we have a plausible mechanism of action versus respiratory viruses such as covid.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,981 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Why have a union with an interest in the situation got " no business " calling for citizens to be asked to do something which would be in their interests??

    NBRU have asked for masking at different times also , as have teachers unions and other unions representing staff who are public facing .

    They are just representing their workers, why have you got a problem with that ?

    That is the function of a union .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    I've a problem with anyone going against the science

    The workers have idiots representing them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,049 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    How are they 'going against the science'?

    The CMO recommends mask wearing in those places.

    It's the difference between a recommendation and a mandate.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    It's been apparent that restrictions are causing a wave of respiratory illnesses now because of lack of exposure

    It's just kicking the can down the road the taoiseach said as much today



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Funny how for 2 years people told us repeatedly to listen to the experts and the authorities.

    Now some people don't want to listen because it no longer suits them.


    But the authorities have been very clear that there are no plans for a mask mandate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,049 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    So which is it, masks are too effective or not effective enough at blocking respiratory viruses?

    And why do we vaccinate vulnerable groups against flu if we 'need' it to circulate?

    Kicking the can down the road makes sense if we've had a large section of the population exposed in this season already and the hospitals are at max dealing with that load.

    The calls for masks at present are in specific settings - public transport and medical settings. Essential services where there's random intergenerational mixing, especially with those of vulnerable groups.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    If masks were going to solve the problems I'm sure we'd see them mandated but barely a dickybird



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    "If masks were going to solve the problems I'm sure we'd see them mandated but barely a dickybird"

    So are you done rehashing the same lines every week or so that I pointed out yesterday(below)?

    "Every time a union of any sort says something rinse and repeat the above post and guess what nothings happened.

    Sure you were posting in mid December about Varadkar bringing back masks and telling people to expect a recommendation for a mandate....."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,321 ✭✭✭xhomelezz


    Some statement there ..

    About what science and about what idiots are you talking about?

    Genuinely interested to hear all of it

    Hit the switch to keep the lights on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,187 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Do you really think the INMO don't know the shortcomings of the HSE?

    The responsibility for the state of the health service lies with the HSE, Dept of Health and the Government.

    Trying to blame the INMO is going down a blind alley.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,260 ✭✭✭jackboy


    True enough. The HSE and the government know in a few weeks the trolley numbers will naturally drift down, it will no longer be a news item and the vast majority of people will no longer care. It’s classic government policy to ride out scandals until people no longer care. This is the reason they will not implement a mask mandate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,187 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Another Minister for Health Mary Harney famously said "The public's memory can often be a very short term one".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    It’s true what you say, but INMO should be striking (pun unintended) while the iron is hot and highlighting and calling for changes that would result in permanent improvement in conditions in healthcare, rather than calling for a mandate for masks which would be an ineffective bandaid, one that that could turn out to be a perpetually ineffective bandaid.

    There are many other ways seasonal infectious illnesses could be better managed. It has been said in this thread before - public sentiment towards masking is obviously lukewarm, as evidenced in the low percentages of voluntary masking, despite authorities advice.

    Even some small inroads made for permanent long term improvements would be a win for INMO during this current crisis.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,981 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    This is also the reason why the health service will keep lurching from one crisis to another .

    INMO are just highlighting the fact that the government appear to have washed their hands of trying to make a real difference, just pawning it off till the next emergency situation with the Healthservice.

    Suggesting a mask mandate is certainly an attention grabber .



Advertisement
Advertisement