Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Nobody cares about Covid anymore"

Options
1232426282943

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 627 ✭✭✭DLink


    Never let the truth get in the way of a good rant 🤣



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lots of polls are manipulated and usually it's in the questions.

    For example, do you support mandatory masks in some settings?

    People think of hospitals and nursing homes and answer yes.

    The poll is sold as people support mandates.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    It's criminal in my view the lack of investigation and review of the lockdowns. A case could be made for the first two months but thereafter, forget it in my opinion.

    What a horrible joke. It caused people to reassess stuff, it ruined my business and badly affected many young children that were learning to socialize, around 4 years old especially at the start of the outbreak. If they try it again, I think I'll be out with the looneys.

    The worst thing was you weren't allowed an opinion unless you were a doctor. It reminds me of the way the church seemed to imply that normal people could not understand morality in those enquiries etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,782 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    If people believe the Irish Media is unreliable. Why do they keep obsessively consuming it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,782 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I like they way you ignored rising COVID cases in what was said.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 627 ✭✭✭DLink


    You're definitely a professional politician or solicitor, always looking for an angle.

    Restrictions were set in law, so yes, they applied to everyone, whether they followed them or not is another matter, and not just while driving either.

    Anyway, nighty night, some of us have nothing to do tomorrow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,815 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    So we've established now that indeed you have no proof other than opinion polls.

    Hmmm, something else is clearly being established in these discussions. Countries like Ireland do not hold votes on e.g. national health rules (among many, many other things). Even Switzerland, which is a direct democracy, didn't have a vote on a their mask mandate, or their bans on public gatherings

    Polls showed (repeatedly) that a majority of Irish people supported the mask mandates. This was the same in most countries.

    There are many of these polls, if you can demonstrate how each was manipulated, great.

    To come back to an earlier point you made. You expressed the view that you only protect yourself. If you were e.g. on your way to visit your friend and his/her grandparents and you did a quick Covid test, discovered you were positive, would you still visit them?

    Or would you protect them by telling them you had Covid and it was safer if you avoided them altogether?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,782 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I'm just replying to your comment. Use a better analogy.

    This reminds of a previous thread where poster who complained they were stopped at check points a minimum twice a day and was restricted by the lockdown distance going to work. Then it was revealed he lived beside a checkpoint (a Garda Station in effect) and walked to work.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,782 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    Well you don't believe the polls, the media, the medical hierarchy, experts, Irish or international, the Gov. At this point there is nothing left.



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Of course I don't go to visit people while COVID positive or dying sick.

    But I don't want to go around healthy and wearing a mask.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,815 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Interesting opinion.

    I don't think the lockdown measures were perfect by any stretch, but that's always going to be an issue with quickfire decisions being made for national rules in response to a dynamic situation. If there were a new pandemic tomorrow, it's only natural we would glean info from lessons learnt during the previous, so I think any national review wouldn't really achieve much beyond what we already now know. I also don't think taxpayers would be happy to fund a national review into why we took pretty much the same measures as every other country in the world

    I'm sorry about your business and obviously young children missing out on socialising, on the flipside the world lost 6 million people in two years and national health systems were pushed to the brink. Perhaps the world should have prioritised the economy over people's lives and the healthcare system, not to be funny here but I genuinely can't remember anyone but fruitloops making that point when this new disease with no vaccines was sweeping the globe.



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's important in life to question everything and do your own research from many different sources.

    Are the media trustworthy? Their main job is to sensationalise stories to get clicks.

    Would the government ever lie? Surely not... That's never happened before has it?

    Medical experts.. All the focus is suddenly on the health service and you know it's been mismanaged for decades and not fit for purpose. Would you have an agenda?


    You've literally named some of the least trustworthy people I can think of.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    People still believing the majority want masks because a poll somewhere says so.. look around! Shops, transport, sports events. Barely a mask in sight. Doesn’t seem like the majority want masks back. Just like when the mandate ended, 99% of masks were binned.

    It’s like the time People wanted lockdowns, but then broke the rules they deemed fine for themselves. Posters on here even did this with the distance limits.

    (Also I did both Red C and Behaviour & Attitudes surveys for opinion polls during Covid. Polls like these generally have a bigger base of respondents who have lots of free time on their hands. The questions were heavily weighted. They would frame are you pro mask/lockdown in the guise of are you in favour or measures to reduce spread of illness, or are you more concerned about the personal burden).



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,782 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    What sources, there are none left.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,815 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Right, but you wrote this:

    I'm not a doctor or a bodyguard etc. It's not my job to protect people and I certainly don't expect anyone to protect me.


    It's up to each of us individually to look after our own health and do what's necessary to look after ourselves.

    You've just contradicted that. If you have Covid, you will protect e.g. someone's grandparents by taking the action of not turning up. Your action has nothing to do with you, it's to protect them.

    Let's say you are visiting your friend's family, you don't feel sick, but you have a tiny tickle in your throat. Could be anything, who knows, or it could be Covid. You don't have a test handy and you're almost at the house. Do you tell them?

    I'm going to answer this one for you. You do tell them. Why? because naturally you will want to protect them and not put them at added risk.

    Let's say they insist you come and you do. You put on a mask and keep your distance. You don't like wearing the mask or having to distance, but you know it's not about you. You do it to protect them. It's a minor inconvenience to you, to avoid a risk you infect your friend's family.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,782 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Is that not referring to when masks where mandatory not now when they aren't...?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The surveys were being ran until mid summer. But yeah, obsolete now. Just a comment on how the questions in these headline polls are never as simple as some would like.



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You took me 100% literally.

    Yeah I protect myself but I don't go out when I'm sick. I didn't do that before COVID either. That's just common sense.

    But I absolutely dont wish to cover my face on a daily basis to protect me or anyone else.

    As mentioned, people can get vaccinated, wear a mask or just stay home if they're not comfortable in society.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,782 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Well you used to see people with masks now you mostly don't.

    In a healthcare setting you'll still see a lot (most?) with masks. Which is a real flashback if you been away from it for a while.

    I think you can infer a little of people's opinions and objectives from people's compliance or not. Maybe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,782 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Seems like people in this thread weren't all that comfortable in society when it was masked.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,815 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Just because you personally have an opinion that something is unjust doesn't make it so.

    In our democracy (like most others), the public doesn't get to vote on public health rules or speed limits or similar laws like that. We vote in people who represent us to make these decisions (representative democracy)

    In a e.g. national health emergency, representatives (of that party) consult with the country's bodies of related experts on the best course of action

    They locked the entire county down with the stroke of a pen!!!

    Bit more context to it than that. Panels of experts, consulting other experts, consulting economic experts (to check the drawbacks), business representatives, industry representatives, etc, etc decided that due to the circumstances at the time, the country need a temporary lockdown to curb exponentially rising case numbers that were putting our entire national health system under pressure and resulting in climbing death cases. We can borrow money but we can't replace dead people. Keep in mind this was 2020, at a time when we didn't know much about the virus, how much it could mutate, etc.

    The combined judgement of all these people and experts isn't infallible. What's important to note is that many other countries arrived at the same conclusion and took similar measures. It wasn't like it was one isolated decision. It was many decisions, and many of them were similar. We weren't an outlier.

    Anyway enough explainy stuff.

    It's 2020, you're the leader of this country, cases are going through the roof, we're scrambling to prep ICU beds, we are low on ventilators, we still don't know much about the virus, people are concerned. I had two cases of Covid hit my office on the same day, hundreds of staff refused to turn up the next day. People were concerned about themselves, their families. What rules or mandates would you have passed (or not) that would not have resulted in a mob with pitchforks turning up at your door within 15 minutes..

    Take weeks to organise a national referendum to ask the public what to do?

    You've just claimed that's what needed to be done..



  • Registered Users Posts: 627 ✭✭✭DLink


    Look at that, I'm still awake...

    You better believe it buddy, masks and the rest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,815 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    As mentioned, people can get vaccinated, wear a mask or just stay home if they're not comfortable in society.

    Bizarre statement. I didn't get vaccinated against a disease to "feel comfortable in society". I didn't get my jabs as a baby to "feel comfortable in society".

    But I absolutely dont wish to cover my face on a daily basis to protect me or anyone else.

    Again, it's not all about you. It's about protecting others during a pandemic of an infectious disease. It's a mild inconvenience to temporarily wear a mask when out. However if rules aren't made about masks, even in a pandemic, we know many people wouldn't wear them (same happened with seatbelts).

    During the first year of the pandemic, when our national health systems were under threat of being swamped (and we didn't have vaccines, and didn't know how it would mutate), mask mandates were introduced almost everywhere, why? Because masks reduce the spread and are a mild inconvenience.

    In 2021, we kept mask rules because we still had immense spikes in cases, but as the vaccines kicked in these were having a less severe impact on hospital and ICU admissions.

    2022, much of pop vaccinated, a lot of herd immunity, health system functioning okay, mask mandates removed

    In 1918 during the Spanish Flu epidemic people wore masks, why? Because it reduced the spread of a deadly virus. We had to introduce mandates, why? Because certain people refused to wear masks and put themselves and others at risk (which also increased the pressure on the health system at the time). Hence mandates.



  • Registered Users Posts: 627 ✭✭✭DLink


    I skipped to the end of what you said, TL,DR.

    To answer your question, I'd probably have brought in the restrictions and broken them myself, I'm the guy in charge after all.

    The plebs shall do as I say, not as I do 😉

    But I'm not a politician, so I don't care about your hypothetical question, I'm gonna keep complaining about the restrictions, which were overkill and uncalled for, an opinion poll is not a majority.

    Now that the Twitchers & Vulnerables have had their time in the sun, they're thankfully back in their boxes and there's no going back to the restrictions and masks nonsense.

    There are more important things to worry about, even the Chinese have finally copped on to the fact that the economy is more important than fighting covid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,815 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    That's completely fine. The points and questions still stand.

    You believe the country should have had a national referendum to decide if masks should be worn during a pandemic. If you don't believe that, you are free to explain how the public should have decided this. If you can't explain, then okay, there's nothing to discuss.



  • Registered Users Posts: 627 ✭✭✭DLink


    I'd have gone the referendum route I guess, but any official method of polling the entire population would suffice, with a simple yes / no response.

    Opinion polls with leading questions don't count.

    Doesn't matter now anyway, what's done is done, but no going back.

    And just to get back on topic, I don't care about covid, I never did.

    Everyone for themselves, just don't restrict my freedoms or force me to wear a mask.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    A LOT of people were not happy with the lockdown, pub owners, etc. I certainly would not consider them 'fruitloops'. Lots of people benefited from WFH and the PUP, without those aspects there might have been considerably more pushback.

    Sadly around 60 million die per year. We live in a world where 112 is the oldest recorded persons age. AFAIK everyone dies. I'm still seeing lingering pandemic effects. The 'fruitloops' as you call them didn't protest on the streets but I'd be surprised if a lot more were not out marching with the loonies if lockdowns were reimposed.

    Also, I was recently surprised to hear that John Water's case was credible by someone in the legal side. I'd dismissed him as a crank, the older I get..

    fwiw, I did not say to prioritize the economy. The healthcare system is still suffering with the extra protocols and masking nonsense. That's how I feel about it, I feel sorry for people still wearing masks but I don't intend to be ruled by hypochondriacs again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 811 ✭✭✭lumphammer2


    There is no doubt that long lockdowns in Ireland and other countries were damaging ... counterproductive ... and did not solve the problem ... only put off the inevitable ... What made matters worse was that those in charge never listened to alternatives to long lockdowns ... and actually dismissed them ...

    I well remember the scaremongering on the radio and TV in the time leading up to the arrival of this virus in Ireland ... and the fearmongering upped again during those late February early March 2020 days after the first cases began to emerge here ... there was no other reaction only panic and eventually the government went into total kneejerk reaction on 27th March 2020 ... a day that will go down in history as one of the worst in modern Irish history along with 30th September 2008 ... another kneejerk reaction ...

    2KM and then 5KM stay in your area rules were oppressive and entirely not necessary ... the legit concerns of businesses were not listened to ... those advocating masks and antigen tests were not listen to ... those advocating closing borders were not listened to ... as all was on the table was business lockdowns and stay at home orders ...

    Now WFH and other such approaches benefited and still benefit people ... the good should be kept and long unnecessary commutes when work instead could be done from home got people thinking about their work life balance ... WFH should remain an option and a right where possible ...

    I am ok with masks and with minor restrictions should we have another novel virus pandemic again ... but do not ever want to see 2-5KM rules and long business lockdowns again ... the damage done is still felt and many businesses never opened again ...

    While I was never on the side of lockdowns and esp 2-5KM rules ... I also was never a fan of John Waters, Dolores Cahill, Gemma O'Doherty and other self styled Messiahs ... that said and done they did have a point in challenging the 27th March 2020 laws and how they were enforced of a sudden on a Friday evening at 8-9PM ... if someone with a better argument and a better level of respect instead of these far right loonies challenged Ireland's kneejerk Covid laws ... who knows how things could have gone ??? ...

    Some made the point that Ireland's lockdown was not as bad as what was in China or even Australia ... by saying people could get out and about within 2KM whereas they had to stay inside ... but that's rather like Iranians saying their laws are better than those of the Taliban and the Saudis ... saying one is less oppressive than someone worse does not justify anything oppressive ...



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,815 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    A LOT of people weren't happy with the pandemic either. The whole Irish people dying from a new disease and our national hospitals heading towards collapse. I'm genuinely sorry your business was affected but this has to be said so many times in this thread, the world doesn't revolve around you. It resolves around everyone. Not everyone in Ireland is a pub landlord or a business owner. I know it wasn't enough, but there was compensation, that's my taxes paying that, but you're alright you can have that.

    Sadly around 60 million die per year.

    Yikes. You actually went there. Okay, let's apply this to your situation, thousands of businesses fail every year for all sorts of reasons. "**** happens". "People die".

    masking nonsense

    And there it is.

    I feel sorry for people still wearing masks but I don't intend to be ruled by hypochondriacs again.

    Right, you feel sorry for doctors and nurses who wear masks every day, is there something you know that they don't, if so, please share

    Unless this is just another mealy-mouthed vapid complaint about people choosing to wear masks

    but I don't intend to be ruled by hypochondriacs again.

    Asian countries have been wearing masks since the 50's. So that's Asia out for you. Sweden? ah wait, they introduced mask mandates. I dunno, maybe some astronomically wealthy self-absorbed libertarian will buy a massive chunk of land somewhere and all the anti-maskers, anti-lockdown types and all their brethren can flock there. We can only live in hope.

    Anyway, who cares about this, 60 million people die a year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    I'm not a pub owner and I didn't give out about the economy. My business was ruined, doesn't matter.

    It's a fact, people die and there seems to have been little correlation between lockdowns and mortality. There was a surprising correlation between influenza vaccination and covid19 mortality that was never investigated.

    Instead we had pseudo science concerning masks that was refuted by reputable doctors such as Dr Osterholm but propagated by public health doctors, the doctors largely regarded as too afraid to treat patients.

    The people I see still wearing masks outside a medical setting, in general, seem like they've lost it. The people in health settings are happy with masks by and large even though they offer very little medical benefit as covid19 is an airborne pathogen.

    I think it's best you go back to the conspiracy thread where you usually lurk. You can wear your mask and your tinfoil hat just don't expect me to wind tinfoil around my head too.



Advertisement