Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clontarf to City Centre Cycle & Bus Priority Project discussion (renamed)

14546485051131

Comments

  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Even better are these 2 comments:

    The bus stop at Westwood Gym is also due to be removed, which is terrible for anyone using the gym who doesn’t drive.

    Now it’s so difficult, especially if we want to go to the airport with luggage,” she added.

    If 100m walk is a struggle then Dublin Airport and Westwood gym must be impossible go navigate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    The article is wrong, it's not "100metres". It's 300metres up a hill. Big difference there.

    It's as simple as this - international best practice for bus spacing is 400m but North Strand gets 600m which is 50% higher than guidelines.

    The average bus spacing in Dublin is currently 300m. Can you imagine how many upset residents there would be if DCC decided, without consultation or justification, to remove HALF of all bus stops in Dublin?

    Post edited by brianc89 on


  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    International best practice..

    What about her ludicrous arguments about having to walk a small bit further to take a bus to a gym, or to Dublin Airport (given that there is no direct bus from North Strand to Dublin Airport so she seems content with the idea of changing buses, walking several kilometres inside Dublin Airport, etc but the extra 100m to the bus stop is a monumental issue).

    Moaners like her love to moan.



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And if international best practice is 400m between stops why do we have an average of 300m? I'd be delighted to see the back of several bus stops along the routes I use, particularly when a bus is pulling back in at a stop having not got out of 2nd gear from the previous one, and you can still see that bus stop from the back window.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,857 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Ah, I read a lot of nonsense complaints about this project and others, but the removal of bus stops is one that I'd actually think is an actual issue. As much as I think that there's an issue with too many bus stops in some places, there should be a debate about the removal of any, and it just didn't really happen in this instance, as they only announced they were removing them permanently after they'd already started construction.

    It's just not ideal.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    So then, I take it you support removing HALF of all bus stops in Dublin? Like literally half of them.

    Cause the same logic applies to the broader network as to the residents of North Strand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    The C2CC project represents about 1% of the 230km of bus lanes which are expected to be upgraded as part of Bus Connects.

    Imagine the carnage when DCC announce randomly, after works have commenced, .... "here's the latest list of bus stops we are permanently closing without any consultation or justification to the impacted residents"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    It's an extra 300m, stop saying 100m which is false.

    You realize that gyms are not just for young fit people in their 20s and 30s? The elderly, visually impaired, deaf, wheelchair users etc etc are allowed to use gyms? Are you suggesting these sorts of people should have to get a taxi if they want to use a gym?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,515 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    That's not the argument. The argument is removing bus stops where the gap between them is 300m. That's a lot less than half



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Of course they're allowed use gyms. But if 100m of a walk (I say 100m as that is what wad mentioned in the article) or even 300m of a walk is too much of a struggle then those people have no business being in a gym where they'd be exerting far more physical effort than a 100m or 300m walk.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Need to do the maths here, to bring us in line with international best practice, which you've stated we are in excess of. So it wouldn't actually be half, you need to factor in a removal of the unnecessary bus stops we have in Dublin that average out to every 300m rather than international best practice of 400m as you say.

    Do you acknowledge we have too many bus stops if our average distance between them is ahead of international best practice?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    The answer to that should have been to reposition all stops and leave a spacing of 300-500m. Instead they just removed a stop and leave random spacing of 200-600m.

    This decision was made in August 2022 and was done without consultation. They've made a total mess of the bus locations along the C2CC route and residents are entirely justified and don't deserve to be ridiculed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    You speak of a gym as if it's all weights and hard core exercise....

    What about an elderly person with back issues or arthritis who swims to relieve pain? Do you think these people "have no business being in a gym"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    It is the argument.

    If the residents of North Strand are expected to accept a 600m bus spacing, then the rest of city should be as well. This would result in half the stops being removed.

    Perhaps all the leafy desirable post codes should maintain a 300m spacing, while we remove half the stops from the inner city and disadvantaged areas?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 778 ✭✭✭Sir Galahad


    F*uck me ! That's some statement. Please now reconsider my sister who has MS and uses the gym. She also gets the bus there. But you feel that as she struggles with a 300m walk she "has no business being in a gym". This thread has seriously turned into a "cyclists are always right" thread.



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I take back the "no business" comment, that was melodramatic of me. However the Westwood gym pool and fitness area are more than 300m from the nearest bus stop, so I can't understand the poster's argument that a 300m walk on one side of the bus journey is problematic when a greater walk exists when the gym user gets off the bus



  • Posts: 15,802 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    The long and short of this is that DCC have made a balls of the bus stop placement. It stinks of a last minute job made by someone who's never been to Fairview or North Strand.

    Some of the bus stop removals are 100% justified. Others are absolutely not. The extremely poor, or non existent, process on this has consequences for the entire city when other corridors are upgraded.

    I'd like to think we can all agree DCC have handled this very poorly?...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 778 ✭✭✭Sir Galahad


    I'm not bothered to do it myself but if you've not been a regular reader of this thread then read back and you'll see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,779 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    Well cyclists are not to blame for bus stop changes anyway.

    The situation with last-minute bus stop removal isn't ideal though as it suggests the design is being modified on the fly. Who's to say that changes are not also being made to the cycle route, or the footpaths, or the water mains, or the planting/trees, or the bus lane, that we don't or won't know about until it's too late to do anything about it?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,802 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I have followed this thread since the beginning.

    Still doesn't change the fact that the bus stops issue has nothing to do with cyclist posters



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,377 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    So like maybe some people will be inconvenienced a bit, old people going to the gym and old people walking further to bus stops etc. But overall it will improve public transport greatly in Dublin, and cycling too. It's for the greater good, even if it's not ideal for some. Dems the breaks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    If DCC had bothered to have a consultation on this - rather than announce the bus stop locations 6months AFTER construction started - then simple solutions could have been found.

    For example, core bus routes could stop at fewer stops, while less frequent or local routes could stop more regularly to ensure accessibility for all members of our community.

    But yeah, greater good, let's just disregard older and disabled people - that's a city we can be proud to live in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,377 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    yep, disregard the few who will be inconvenienced, and do it for the greater good. i am sick to death of everything being held up to appease a few.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,236 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    This isn't progress, it is a backwards step for public transport provision along certain parts of this route. They do not match up with international best practice. The Fairview Hall bus stop *probably* can get the chop due to the proximity of North Strand Fire Station stop, but the other removals seem unjustifiable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Correct me if I'm wrong here but isn't the bus stop shown in the video in the first tweet there just over 200m from the entrance to Westwood? I assume it is not being removed given the works to accommodate it are done. Is the issue the stop on the other side of the road?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,163 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    There was a stop on the side of the bridge closer to Westwood, which is being removed.

    The stop on the far side was always planned to be moved from the start, as there wasn't enough room to accomadate everything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Stop 1739 is being removed. 1738 is retained - that's the one in those videos.

    It's very close to Westwood, in fairness, and is closer to Clontarf Road Dart so I don't see a major issue with this change. However the public realm there is grim, dark and damp so hopefully they improve it substantially.

    Screenshot_2022-12-09-15-30-28-88_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg


    For arguments sake, there appears to be plenty of space at Westwood to accommodate stop 1739 instead of 1738. They could have just kept one lane of general traffic for another 50m...

    Screenshot_2022-12-09-15-34-19-23_4937eb900e197f95da98f502ddfb10e1.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I don't think a commercial gym justifies it's own stop and if complaining about them not sticking to 400m between stops elsewhere, I think arguing for two stops 176m apart is a bit much.

    A better solution might have been to move stop 1738 50m towards the rail bridge, so closer to both the DART station and Westwood, although perhaps they didn't want a stop between the two entrances.

    Where did you get that map showing the stops and which are being removed?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Here's the document outlining the new stops which was published on August 30th 2022. Prior to this, all documents showed all stops remaining as they were.

    I've no issue with the stop placement around the gym. The real issue here is the total lack of consultation or publication of any documents / data which justify their decision.

    It's an appalling, and insulting, lack of process for such a sensitive topic.




Advertisement