Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish rail fleet and infrastructure plans

1151618202142

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    possibly for additional flexibility? 90 is a lot of units on top of the 95 already ordered. They don't need many extra to run a (say) hourly service to Wicklow and I can't see them going to Cork in the short term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Economics101


    There will be a need for BEMUs for quite some time pending the extension of electrification to Drogheda (and also to an extent to GCD, etc). They are somewhat of a stopgap, but given the really slow pace of projects such as electrification in Ireland, quite a long stopgap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,360 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    But if the intention was to replace life-expired existing DARTs, they wouldn't be stopgaps as their need for DART services will go on for decades. If they were DART replacements, they almost certainly would be EMUs.

    My point is just that it doesn't make sense that these additional BEMUs are to replace existing DART carriages, as RUI suggested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,958 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    Is there not one small issue with the Phoenix park tunnel that id'd be difficult or impossible to install overhead lines and use normal electric trains, so if you have an electric train with a bit of battery power for non electrified stretches, then they could run through that tunnel ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,008 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    The rest of Ireland's intercity network will likely also be 25kv AC, the DART will be the outlier. The 25kv AC is the better technology and can cover longer distances with fewer substations at lower cost.

    With quad tracking, the DART from Heuston to Hazelhatch won't be a problem, 2 sets of parallel voltage. Sligo and Ross are lines probably won't be electrified in our lifetime so DART to Maynooth and Greystones won't be a problem in terms of voltage.

    The problem is the Belfast service from Drogheda southwards sharing track with DART. the thing is voltage isn't the only problem, there's no capacity for Belfast trains to share with DART. The only long term solution is a new line from Drogheda to Dublin, separate voltages and eliminate painfully slow trains behind stopping DART



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Dart+ SW suggests they are planning to electrify through the tunnel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,008 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    The new Alfred St entrance, the arrival of luas and a new bridge could sort that. Heuston is a lot more remote from Dublin City Centre and relies heavily on luas and bus connections for commuter journeys



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,008 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Some DART services can be extended to Wicklow, Sallins etc with relative ease. The commuter brand may eventually leave Dublin entirely. I think Cork should definitely develop a new brand and ditch 'commuter'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,360 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    But extending DART to Wicklow, Sallins etc wouldn't involve replacing existing DART carriages as DART doesn't go to those places at present.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,272 ✭✭✭Barna77


    Maybe they should also invest in fixing the endless "point failures". Just maybe.


    (Waiting for a delayed train, again. Sigh)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    For official Ireland, it often seems as if the word "planning" means: Let's look at what they are doing in England/Britain/the UK and apply a cut-cost version here.

    After 50 years membership of the EU and its predecessors, they still think the Britain has the best of everything, and have absolutely no idea of how things are done on the Continent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Is there any hard evidence that this is a real issue? Especially with double-track tunnels there is usually no problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Having 2 tracks to Hazlehatch at 1500v DC and 2 with 25Kv AC would be crazy. If the slow lines were the centre two, how do you switch across the Up Main25 Kv line to get access to the Park Tunnel. The only feasible solution is 1500v DC for all trains to Hazlehatch and 25Kv AC thereafter. For this, all long-distance electric trains will have to be dual voltage. But this is absolutely standard. Again, go look at routine European practice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Economics101


    You are spot on, except for one thing. UK electrification has been so badly done with cost over-runs that would do credit to the HSE, we should never look to them for positive lessons. Electrification in Ireland should bot be a series of projects for various routes, but a 25-year programme with plenty of flexibility on the exact timing (because of unforseeablle economics conditions).

    There are some small and relatively poor countries which have done this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,008 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    DART+SW shows 2 tracks with overhead power and 2 tracks without. Agree re dual voltage intercity trains, it's the most sensible option for interoperability. But it might be a little bit too logical if you catch my drift

    There is a grá in Irish Rail for using commuter trains on Inter city routes and inter city trains on commuter routes. This is seen as sacrosanct and unchangeable. So a logical result is not to be expected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Decuc500


    If these new orders are meant to replace the existing old Darts that are constantly breaking down, they can't come soon enough.

    There are so many half size Darts now in rush hour, due to them being split in two to cover for broken down Darts, it's farcical.

    The 10 minute timetable has a lot to answer for. It means all units have to be running throughout the day.

    Long, empty trains running every 10 minutes during the day and tiny, packed trains in rush hour. Makes no sense.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,333 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    People need their rail lines to provide high frequency as passenger convenience is the most important factor, it's the job of the operator to figure out how to make that happen operationally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,824 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I’m on 8105 at the moment. Before getting on, I took a glance at the date code on the side which usually indicates when it was last painted. June 2002. Probably no surprise that corrosion is a problem now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭DoctorPan


    Nah both Smyth, Meade and Mulldoon have made presenations to Engineers Ireland on the subject of the new DART fleet and the expansion plans and the current plans are to be the limits of the 1500DC with 25kAC voltage to be the future expansion with the eventual backfill of the DART network over time. All new units will be bi-voltage units.


    As for the removal of the electricification of the Fast lines it makes no sense, especially with the phased swapping of the lines directions and usage that was proposed at the start or has that just been descoped and dropped?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Good to hear just a bit of strategic thinking on the 1500V to 25Kv interface. Not electrifying the fast lines to Hazlehatch is a bit short-sighted, but to make it worthwhile you would need a couple of extra turnouts (at minimum) to enable turnback from the fast lines at Hazlehatch. Irish Rail tend to be very minimalist with track layout, which limits operational flexibility and capacity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,034 ✭✭✭thomasj


    According to Irish Rail, today’s 18 battery-electric multiple units (BEMUs) order will benefit Maynooth/M3 Parkway and Kildare line services, delivering more capacity for commuters in advance of electrification.

    Quote from that article



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,008 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    No depot in Maynooth at the moment so that might be operationally difficult



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Is the Maynooth Depot building overed by the Rail Order in terms of planning permission? Just wondering about the objections, delays etc which are liable to bugger up the whole project.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    The tunnel was undercut a few years ago to facilitate higher containers. All that would need to happen is to redirect Dublin Port-Westport traffic via Mullingar and Athlone and wire up the Tunnel, reducing max clearance back to where it used to be.

    I mean, it’s not like any dopey decisions to strip out a useful rail route were taken in the last decade, right? 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭densification


    The 20-25mph speed limits between Heuston P10 and Glasnevin Junction are going to stay, even with DART+. Between Garda HQ and the Luas over pass, it's fairly straight, but trains will only go 40kmh towards Glasnevin and 32kmh towards the PPT.

    The cycnic in me thinks this is Irish Rail strengthening the Case for Dart Underground by making the alternative painfully slow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Economics101




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,777 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Its in the RO.

    A temporary charging/toilet tank offload bodge job out on the sidings beyond Maynooth via normal planning could probably be done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 394 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    If I haven't messed up anything, the DART has 19 diagrams in service on Mon-Fri, although at most 18 trains are in service during the daytime (the 19th train, which can be done by one of the 8pm finishers, is a balancer between Fairview and Bray). Twelve diagrams start in Fairview, seven in Bray.

    Funnily enough, in the 2020 Working Timetable (the last one before Pelletstown anyway) the train consists - labelled really for timing purposes anyway rather than for actual deployment - were labelled such that more 8500s would be required than physically exist.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,824 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    The 2700s and 8200s were used for anti-terrorism training recently.

    https://fb.watch/hhZ9YZLdQC/



Advertisement