Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

GAA Infastructure

1343537394092

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭PeggyShippen


    I think PUC actually would be up to standards if it got its media stuff sorted out and the temporary terrace. It would be at around 30 something thousand.

    Guys the Aviva..'shed end/ havelock square end ' is awfull on TV when they show the away fans. People blurt out laughing at it. The rest of it is grand but the capacity is 20,000 less than Twickenham...40 ,000 less than Wembley. Croke Park needs and awful lot of work..all the seats need to be redone and made bigger.( I'm an average sized person and barely fit in).

    Support 🇮🇱 Israel



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,538 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    PuC really wouldnt. The havelock square end isnt that bad when in the ground and the size isnt going to be an issue. 50000 Is more than enough for the number of games the aviva will get and at what stage of the competition those games will be in.

    PUC wouldnt be up to standard.

    Croke Park seats wouldnt need to be redone or made much bigger. theyre not that bad and it wont happen anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,924 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Might just get it over the 30k required capacity wise



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,924 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    So what is the actual standard that PUC can be brought up to and what exactly will this entail and at what cost? Also what media facillities need sorting out exactly? What are the specific requirements that need to be met?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,433 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    It might, but there'll be no shortage of 30,000 capacity grounds across Britain that will offer far superior facilities and convenient locations fighting to host the smaller games.

    Its not just the Stadiums, it's the airports, hotels, restaurants (to wine and dine the sponsors) ancillary activities, fanzone facilities and all that stuff.

    And that alone is why the bid will be two 50,000+ venues in Dublin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,618 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    You are massively overestimating airports and restaurants in towns that would have 30k stadia in the UK outside London.

    Cork would absolutely wipe the floor with English towns twice it's size if not 3 times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭zetecescort


    the real question is who pays for any upgrades needed to Croke Park? GAA onto a winner again if its the FAI and/or the government



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,171 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    This is not going to PUC full stop.

    It didn't even pass the technical test for the 2023 RWC bid in 2016 when it was brand new and the RWC bar is lower than UEFA.

    This is CP and the Aviva and the perennial Casement Park fantasy in the north.

    Nothing else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,250 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Interesting quotes from peter Mckenna in the media today. He says only very minor upgrades needed for CP such as LED lighting and segergeation for fans. Bucket seats to reduce capcity to 76k



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,958 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    I cant find whats required for 2028, but for 2024 theres a UEFA document laying out all thats needed . In that energy saving LED lights are only prefered but maybe thats been upgraded since officiall or inofficially, especially considering all the chatter about climate change and energy recently.

    Theres a fair bit of detail on fan segregration but Uefa wants a barrier free stadium so youre only looking at a few nets here and there in the right places.

    The one which will be interesting to see the solution for is the requirement for lots of area both inside the secure compound and directly outside for sponsors/ press AND parking.

    https://www.uefa.com/multimediafiles/download/officialdocument/uefaorg/regulations/02/46/30/61/2463061_download.pdf

    All in all, when you read the spec document you can see how the likes of inaccessable green field stadiums like Istanbul, with feck all thought for how the normal fan will get to the stadium, win bids - because so much of it is geared to catering for broadcasting, media, sponsors and VIPs and not the 60,000 odd ordinary fans there on the day.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,250 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,531 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    The GAA of govt shouldnt be putting a penny into croker for a soccer tournament whilst Navan, Nebridge, aughrim, walsh Park or Dr hyde park are in a state. Its a disgrace. Im really unhappy about this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,171 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Don't know exactly, but when the technical assessment for the 2023 RWC came out Ireland were third behind South Africa and France and PUC was mentioned as needing upgrades even though it was brand new.

    The thing about this is it's far more than seats for fans and seats for journalists.

    It's about things like "media villages" where media base themselves before and after, it about corporate facilities before, during and after the game.

    It's about the security of energy supply to the above and the quality of internet access to the above.

    Those live TV feeds take a fair whack of bandwidth.

    It's about the training and warmup areas for teams, it's about medical facilities for teams etc.

    As another poster alluded to in places like Turkey you can have a greenfield site and build all that there.

    As I said the two Dublin stadiums and Dublin city is the only place that can support what is required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,533 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The bigger and better and more expensive GAA facilities become, the more they will have to look to other sports and events to support them. That's a given.

    The 'a rising tide lifts all boats' principle should apply and if some investment is needed to host this and ultimately profit overall from it, then as a GAA member I see nothing intrinsically wrong with it. How the profit is spent is another matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,618 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    But the work put in would be paid for using the rent of Croke Park. No work no rent so it doesn't change a single thing for Newbridge or wherever.

    And the government are rightly in this for the tourism so Navan has nothing to do with this. GAA all over the country is already getting government money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,250 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I see the magic Casement park has being put forward to day for the euros



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,171 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Yep

    But I think it's actually over it's planning problems at this stage so it's closer to being built than it every has been, but still not very close.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,838 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    Absolute BS being spewed on Monday Night Live. The Limerick ex player talking nonsense about where and why their success has come in in the hurling. The same applies to Dublin in the football.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,618 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭zetecescort




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,924 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Oh for crying out loud, when is this nonsense going to stop?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,250 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The new PUC cost 99 million.This is going to be a serious upgrade. Its good to have a senior minister in your area



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭PeggyShippen


    72million...rising to 120 million no doubt. Then the standard will still be below international soccer and rugby requirements. Dont forget the Gaelic Grounds is pushing on and it's more central than Fitzgerald stadium. That's another 130million... and on we go

    Support 🇮🇱 Israel



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,171 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Years ago in Connacht at least there was a push to make a single ground the main ground in the province, and develop that ground accordingly.

    Hyde Park was the choice of the Connacht Council, but it was objected to and twarted by Mayo and Galway.

    It needs to get back to that way of thinking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    But what’s the argument? That we should let many GAA grounds fall into disrepair? Killarney was a shithole when I last visited it 10 years ago. We just do nothing for another 30 years until it’s practically falling down or we just put in a couple of hundred thousand so that it looks a little better but is still a kip?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,618 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    72m is what they are asking for it might not be what they get.

    Hopefully they are told to cop on. Its a very remote single code stadium it doesn't need to be a high end one. Give em a bit of money for minor upgrades but it doesn't need more than that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    That approach will leave a relic in a few decades if it’s not already a relic. What’s the long term plan here? Do you think it will just be passable to have it in the same state in 50 years? Do you not see that it’s eventually going to need a significant upgrade so why waste 300k on polishing a turd, just plan to do it proper.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,618 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I think it would be great if it was significantly upgraded but there are 32 counties to worry about and Killarney is nowhere near the most pressing issue stadium wise. Throw money at this and stadia that are currently relics will fall down now never mind 50 years.

    If Kerry CB are so worried why did they recently spend money pointlessly increasing capacity with a new terrace instead of building a new one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    There is no way €72m will be spent in Killarney, they'd be doing very well if they got 10% of that from the government. That meeting was just a PR stunt for Foley, she has no influence and doubt she'll be at cabinet after the reshuffle.

    They don't get enough big games and I can't see a stadium there attracting many concerts, there are already facilities for acts of a certain size in the town. Conferences might do well but again lots of competition, a museum and tourist attraction could help cover operating costs but would be a drop in the ocean towards construction costs.

    A full rebuild isn't realistic. They should look at replacing the existing long side terrace with what becomes the new main stand with conference facilities and museum, then tart up the other stand a bit. Capacity would obviously drop but that would be a good thing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,531 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Yeh agreed. Parish Pump stuff at it's best. Munster don't need any investment really. Pairc ui Caoimh should be the croke park of the province. Let thurles, Killarney and Limerick go to shite like we have done with every ground in Leinster apart from Corker.



Advertisement