Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dairy Calves 2024

  • 15-11-2022 4:19pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭


    We have had a few Dairy calves threads looking at the issues regarding what are a byproduct of the dairy system. Angus Woods has an article in today's FI

    In 2024 there will be a number of changes regarding there welfare, movement and slaughter.

    Minimum slaughter age will increase to eight weeks of age. Minimum age for movement from the farm of birth will be at least 28 days as this will be legislated by the European Parliament early next year. However in the rules passed last spring there was a limit of two hours travel time for unweaned calves. This in reality will mean calves under six weeks can not be moved beyond 100 miles and technically should prohibit export before that age.

    This will change the landscape regarding what happens at dairy farm level especially. Dairy farmers will be responsible for the young calf until a minimum of 4 weeks and probably for 6-8 weeks for calves that were traditionally exported or slaughtered.

    This probably changes the economics of the way a number of dairy farms looked at calves. They were considered a cost, and the quicker the calf exited the farm the better. Every day he spend drinking milk was a cost. If he impacted the ability of a cow to produce milk this was considered a negative. It was easier to manage the herd from a labour point of view by using low beef genetic merit bulls.

    Now with the necessity to keep calves longer these defects will be one more visible poor genetic quality calves will be more noticeable in the mart. At 4+ weeks of age calves not properly reared (not given adequate clostrum etc) will be more visible.

    In AW's article he mentioned that 61% of people who reared calves give it up and ate unwilling to return. Add to this the fact that calf rearing costs are rising ( especially milk powder, straw and calf rations).

    The change in rules may change that. Taking a 4-6 week old calf to rear compared a 10-18 day old is a different proposition. Marts will probably have to bring in a minimum weight to prevent dumping by some dairy farmers of unviable calves.

    Some dairy farmers will need to put in substantially extra calf rearing facilities. Calf rearers can now take January and a lot of February off. Calf numbers will now not start to come into marts until mid February and the glut will move to late March ( this will aid rearers as calves will be within 10-14 days of going outside as well by this time of year).

    Farmers that traditionally slaughtered calves will now have to feed them for eight weeks and maybe longer if there is a backup at slaughter plant. The Department will probably be watching calf death numbers on dairy farms to prevent any incident that could put the industry at risk

    So where to from here. Will this change the economics of the way dairy farmers look at a calf.ost calves at 6-8 weeks will have some value. With poorer quality more visible by size( poorer weight gain over 30-40 days as opposed to 10-18) this may also discourage early registration.

    If there is attempts to circumvent the rules I imagine the department and government will be willing to modify the rules to prevent this.

    Slava Ukrainii



«13456727

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    It might put the sexed semen and DBI "solutions" under pressure.

    If they are as good as some in Teagasc and the media are claiming, then there shouldn't be much issue with producing solid beef calves which are either worth something to the beef farmer buying them or the dairy farmer keeping them til weanling/store/finished stage themselves.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,665 ✭✭✭White Clover


    There isn't any evidence so far to suggest that heads have been lifted out of sand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,864 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    DBI will be dead in the water before it starts. The calvung index is worth 49% of the value and this is broken into 35% for calving difficulty and 13% for gestation. Therefore bulls like KYA and his clan will move up the scale greatly on the DBI index. The weightings need to be seriously looked at with greater input from beef farmers. The index as it's will still produce high index, lightweight poor grading cattle



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,864 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    That is a belter of a post bass. Sums up the situation in a single post. Change is coming and coming fast

    I wonder has Angus used the boards threads to form the basis for some of his pieces in the FI. Spotting a trend



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,258 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    You got to hand to larry,its now looks like after years bleeding the drystock farmers dry he has now managed to creat a system where he can milk the dairy cow without lifting a finger.getting dairy farmers to rear calves is not going to result in one extra penny in drystock farmers pockets.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,088 ✭✭✭Sheep breeder


    You ask the question who come up DBI and what was their agenda. Now where do they go from here with the new rules and wake up to the big problem coming down the road with bad calves,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭Wildsurfer


    Thanks for that post Bass. Think it's time to start planning a new calf shed!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,098 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    If I rear calves to 8 weeks Id be better off to keep them and bring to slaughter myself.

    Large part of the poor return in beef imo is too low of a stocking rate and little to no grassland management. Calf type has little relevance if farmers don’t sort out those 2 key areas

    for example - the weanlings with my contract rearer are under weight, his logic is that they should have gotten 2 kg at grass instead of 1 kg

    nothing about trying to improve grassland management a bit 🤯



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Dairy farmers have to make a choice. Land is the new quota. Keeping a calf to finish would be 76 kgsN/ HA slaughtered at exactly 24 months. That nearly a dairy cow. For every beef unit you keep you will need to get rid of a dairy cow.

    Running cattle in an intensive system is demanding enough. Most beef farmers are moving away from a rely intensive system as costs are horrendous.

    If you want to have at it. On a good year you will make a few bob in a bad year you will be at nothing. If you look at most lads doing beef on boards most have moved away from intensive and winter finishing systems.

    Agree with you about grassland management. The day is gone of letting cattle have the run of the place or letting twenty yearling into a 10-12 acre field and moving them after a month to six weeks.

    But keep that figure in your head every beef unit is a cow going out the gate.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,088 ✭✭✭Sheep breeder


    Well there is the answer to the problem solved let the super dairy man rear his own calves to beef and show everyone how easy it is done 😇😇😇😇😇



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,098 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    was how we operated here previously, yes there’s no massive money in it but if ran well it’s not a loss maker on owned land and we had je blood in what was being reared too

    not meant as an attack at dairy calf to beef farmers but the game has changed and leaving stock in a paddock for even a week is not where it’s at if trying to make any sort of money from farming

    margins are not like they used to be, yes calf type has its part to play in the whole thing but so does the farmers own management

    if I acquired the land I would rear our own calves for as far as I could tbh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    As farmers who used to rear (up to 3 years ago) around three hundred mostly FR/HEx/AAx and some continental calves annually we quit due to rising input costs. When cmr prices rose to over .27c/l or 130g/l equivalent we quit feeding large numbers as it wasn't sustainable at the then beef prices.

    If cmr and meal costs were to reduce dramatically or there was some sort of subsidy to offset said costs than we would consider rearing simular numbers again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,086 ✭✭✭alps


    Would that subsidy make more sense than a suckler cow payment?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What if they brought in a payment associated to grassland management and related efficient use of fertiliser? Could be a win win.

    Fellas finishing cattle at 30 months, fair enough if they are scrubs but if they have any quality at all the cattle should be gone at 23 to 27 months with efficient practices.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    There is the €20 / head subsidy for the first 40 calves, its not a lot but at least it is something, however if there is a subsidy then the likely hood is that it will be paid back to the dairy farmer in the price given for calves.

    The issue is the cost to bring an animal from calf to beef is the same for every calf in your system, so the animal that is a better converter of feed to beef & the animal that kills out nearer 350 kgs dead weight is the more profitable animal. Any animal that will only kill 250 kgs -280 kgs is going to loose you money no matter what your system is An O= Holstein Fr @350 kgs dead @ €5 base will come into around €1,750 where as a P+ Frx @ 280 Kgs dead @ €5 base will come into something around €1,300, on the 20 calves I rear a year that nearly €9,000 with the same costs involved. I generally rear AAx / HEx calves and Holstein Frs that will kill near the 350 kgs mark. I wouldn't take anything that will kill out less then 300 kgs if I got it for nothing, but I always seem to get caught with 1 or 2. If dairy farmers have to hold their calves longer it will be easier to spot these poorer preforming cattle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Problem with that thinking is that land is the quota. Remember every beef unit takes the place of a dairy cow. As well changes are coming down the line regarding stocking and derogation. Higher producing cows are heading for 100k N/Ha and the derogation is probably going to be reduced to 220 kgsN from 250.

    There is a lot of dairy farmers renting land at 300+/HA have a go at making money out of beef at that. Smaller producers are looking at organics and ACRES which limit production. Finally you are limited by SFP. Rented land will no longer be subsidized to dairy farmers as 60k limit come into place

    A lot of dairy production methods do not transfer to beef. For instance Teagasc advice previous was grazing @ 1400kg/HA, they now accept that heavier covers are better in beef up to 2k/HA and topping after. A week between movement is grand it when it gets beyond that it's an issue. 4-5 days is ideal. And top every 2-3 rotations

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    You'd spot obvious poor calves at the mart when they're 2-4 weeks, but its hard to tell after that. Especially when there's maybe 20 inside in one small pen.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    This is the huge misconception. We cannot have 50-60% of the beef finished in a 4-5 month window especially when that window is at the highest cost production time of year mainly Dec to May.

    Present beef prices are over a euro kg below last June's peak that is 300-350 euro/head and our production is about 10% above the yearly average. If we squeeze more cattle into the high cost winter period no 100euro subsidity will pay you. Most of us small finisher's have been there and are not going f@@king back there.

    There is starting to be no such thing as efficient fertilize use in beef. Smaller finishers are getting 20&30c+/ kg less that larger producers and the unfair trading practices are not interested.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    Now that most marts are weighing calves it has made it easy to spot the poor performers. Was looking at runners the other day, there was a few FRx lads March born and they were only 135 kgs (made €210 with a struggle) after them came in a LMx bull 1 month old and he was 125 kgs and made €480.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    A P+ Friesian will makes 25c/ kg less than O=/- grading Friesian's. When you add that to the difference it another 1500 euro to the difference

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,611 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    If there isn't a route out-of the country for decent proportion of calves it won't matter what they are or where they're raised, Larry will have everyone by the balls. Whether we like it or not as dairy farmers Je isn't gonna be viable in the near future, which is a pity because as dairy cows they do the Job fine. Exporters won't want jex and calf to beef don't want em either so no choice in the matter really



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There is already a premium in many ways as efficient producers get cattle away early at a higher price and the early season breed bonus



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,258 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    There seems to be a feeling that beef lads will have the calves reared for them now and they will be able to pick the nice stuff and let the yokes behind.but the problem is those yokes are going to reppear going up the factory chute before yours and squeezing your price and the factory manager wouldnt give one dam about your tasty animals.these regs are bad news for dairy farmers but they are going to destroy beef farming



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    The majority of suckler cows are in the West of the country and IMO those farmers are not going to switch systems to rear dairy bred calves. Most are part time farmers and don't necessarily rely on the farm to pay the bills as long as they break even they will continue to breed quality cattle.

    The majority of CMR sold in Ireland is manufactured by the one Dutch company (Van Drie group) under many different guises. AFAIK there is also some made in France. Unfortunately we don't produce CMR here anymore and transport/distribution costs contribute hugely to the price per ton. Maybe one of the creameries should look at producing CMR which should be more affordable to Irish farmers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    That is all very well but Larry &Co will squeeze the price to reflect these bonuses. The AIBP/ Kepak-Glanbia is conditional on reduced movements and getting veterinary inspection ( that will cost 150-200/ farm so 5 euro/ head on a 40 head slaughter. The government slaughter premium if it comes on will be strictly U24 months. There was a Winter slaughter premium before a d processors gobbled it up.


    No there will still be a market for the lesser calf. However a poorer quality dairy cross or even those AA/HE that will only gain 4-500 gram per day or less will stand out. Neighbour dose calves AA&HE and I saw them in May there was a serious gap between the poor quality and the better quality ones.... and the poorer quality were the eldest calves there.

    Now you will be able to pick the quality calf at 5-6 weeks and pay 250-300 euro for him, however the poorer quality AA/ HE will still be grand at 6-7 weeks at 50 euro

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Price was 5.25 early summer and is 4.65 now. Factor in the additional cost of feeding silage and there is a serious premium in getting stock away early.

    The stock gone in May June would be 26 to 29 months if off dairy stock.



  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭smallbeef


    I don't think there's anyone on here whose business model is bringing dairy beef through the their 3rd winter so there is no extra silage costs between 25 and 32 months generally.

    If lads are killing dairy beef at 32 months and they are hanging at 340kg now, they were probably only going to hang at 250kg at the peak prices in May. So the extra time might be justified. These animals will always be around.

    But I agree 27 months for spring born dairy beef seems about the sweet spot between a falling price and rising weight if the animal is suitable. Problem is not all animals are suited to it and some need more time.

    U24 months may as well be U20 months as far as I'm concerned as either they'll go before the winter or they wait till early summer. IMO 100/h payment that ties you to U24 month slaughter is nowhere near enough.

    I have 4/5 HE/AA that could have gone before housing at 20 months, weighing avg 530kg and great condition. Did this little projection/calc last week to determine their fate:

    I am taking a gamble that the base price will be 5 but even if it was the same as now I'd still be 150/h better off keeping them till 27 months.

    Then I have 20ish more AA/HE that are 470-500 and not fit so no choice but to carry them to 27/28 months.

    The rest are Holsteins that are +500kgs but they will need good grass and a bit of meal to finish U30 months.

    Farmers need freedom to finish away when its right for the them and the animals they have. I'd be very slow to tie into anything that forces you when to slaughter.

    If calf export stops its a real mess, there are already too many dairy beef in the country for any real market. The only hope is that with the higher nitrates bands for cows and the extra work/costs involved if this calf age thing happens, dairy farmers will pull back a bit on the numbers. But it could be a disaster for beef for a few years until numbers reduce. I don't see how DBI or sexed semen going to help things. Quantity was always more of an issue than quality for me, drags down the price for everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You are under a huge flawed assumption that

    1. Every animal has the potential to slaughter at a certain age

    2 that no imbalance in the market will occur by pushing extra product into it.

    On a five year average I say the difference between May/June slaughter compared to November slaughter was about 35-40c/ kg. 5.25 would have not been the max got in June this year the real action. Was on cows and flat priced AA's. Early May was no where as hot as late May/June


    Yes if I was rearing my own from calves or weanlings I would seriously be trying to get as many out before late June. On a five year average the most profitable cattle have been July August cattle. This year it was May/June, last year it was the cattle slaughtered in September/October as it was higher than the May/June price a d as good as the August price. For the 2-3 years before that it was July/August cattle and winter finished cattle made no more after a ton of ration. That is why a good few on here have exited winter finishing

    Teagasc are pushing the slaughter of 18-20 month old AA/HE cattle off grass in October/ November if that continues lads slaughtering those cattle will get creamed on a bad year and there will be few good years.

    Fir those worrying about exports I am not overly concerned. There will still be exports, just cal es will be older. As well export of yearling will continue or even get stronger.

    Finally carcass weight has plummeted from a 360 kg average to 320 and will drop lower. Every 10 kg drop is taking the equivalent of 60k cattle out of the system

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    18 to 20 months from teagasc is daft

    As for dairy progeny I had heifers weigh 269 at 20 months and I had a shot of bullocks come in over 300 kg at 23 months.

    Breeding has a lot to say in it. A fellow buying a handy few cattle will do better than a fellow buying big numbers as they won’t be buying enough to have to buy the scrubs. Mainly finish home born cattle buying a small amount

    I can understand 27 months but 30 months doesn’t make sense to me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    The saying " ounce of breeding is worth a tonne of feeding" is very much applicable to the beefing cattle born from a dairy herd. If dairy farmers want a market for their calves they need to bred what the market wants.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Seems things are becoming more uncertain all the time for dairy-beef.

    Maybe contract-rearing heifers might be safer? Or a variation on it?

    When I was considering milking cows myself in 2020-21, I bought 20 FR weanling heifers. I didn't do any AI and hired an AA bull from a local man. Thankfully all 20 went in calf and I sold them as in-calf heifers in Sept 2021. They left a nice touch and probably as much per head as some of the beef animals I have in the shed now will leave.

    They were nothing fancy. The EBI average was close to €200 but the man bought them didn't seem too interested in their breeding.

    If I could get 30 x Feb/March born FR heifers next Spring, I'd probably go down that route again. Sourcing those calves might not be so straightforward thou.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,232 ✭✭✭Dozer1


    Letter in the journal this week doesn't read well in my eyes arguing against the banning of calf slaughtering. Displays a poor attitude from dairy farmer who wrote it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    I just read it there and IMO it's either a troll or a fookin vegan - either which way anyone reading it that has at least two brain cells will see it for what it is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,212 ✭✭✭Good loser


    Your attitude is amazing! I thought it was a perfectly reasonable letter and fully support the sentiments expressed in it. All options must be given consideration in the light of the carbon reduction targets.

    In the first instance it is completely immaterial to a bovine when it is killed, as that is the end for them all ultimately. There is a scheme about to be introduced by the Govt to reduce the slaughter age of cattle to less than 24 months. Where is the justification for drawing any line anywhere between 0 months and 24 or 36 or 44 or 80 months? When the end result is the same. Calf disposal is by far the easiest route to the 25% target; if they want that target achieved we must be allowed the means.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Science (if you want to call it that) will get you so far. But sentiment then takes over.

    Even leaving aside the public perception of farmers…If you follow the calf slaughter idea thru to its next step, then some lads will want to induce an abortion in the cow at 8.5 months. Wouldn’t that reduce GHGs even more?

    A bit of respect for the animal would go a long way. And before anyone says what about respect for the 24-month beef animal, just remember that’s what the anti-livestock crew say.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    I have previously stated that I personally have no issue with unwanted/financially non viable dairy bull calves been slaughtered in DAFM approved facilities however I accept that this is not how the majority of people feel. The social license that we have as farmers is no longer willing to tolerate the practice and I reckon any attempt to link it with carbon reduction/climate change will be met with derision.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,258 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    Personally i think this slaughter issue has had more discussion than it deserves as its only 30 k calves.where we in ireland should concentrat our time and energy is maintaining exports.theres 400k calves being exported and there is demand for them currently but they are definately facing headwinds.should we look at taking more control over the export procedure to ensure its done right.could air transport be an option.its highly unlikely that we are going to go away from seasonal calving but maybe taking calf wellfare and management into consideration having 90 % of your calves in 6 weeks isnt such a good option



  • Registered Users Posts: 592 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    Assuming that you are not trolling , why not stop producing a worthless calf if you are so concerned about reducing GHG s



  • Registered Users Posts: 592 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    Very well put . The farmers trying to justify calf slaughter are probably the very few who are doing it . I don’t have the figures to hand but my understanding is that most of the calves killed were coming from a very small number of herds which implies that the herds involved were large . Can you imagine a clown producing slurry from four or five hundred cows trying to justify calf slaughter on the grounds that he is doing his bit for the environment / climate change ? That would go down well on Prime Time



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,153 ✭✭✭blackdog1


    Big problems coming down the road I reckon. Normally autumn calves make 80/100 but I'm hearing at marts the prices are bad? Anyone seeing this? If your getting 40 for an autumn calf, the spring ones won't be worth 5 euro. Looks like with high rentals and high feed prices , farmers who rear calves are disappearing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,260 ✭✭✭Grueller


    Average calf rearer around here is 60+ yrs old. No young blood in the game. Its not a good Outlook.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Problem with calf slaughter is that calf exports age is going to increase to 6+ weeks by 2024. Therefore there would be a temptation to slaughter more and more. Add in that lads rearing the first cross Je and even the FRX is getting fewer and fewer. Finally you have a lot of poorer quality AA as well. Average DW for AA has dropped through the floor over the last 5years.

    Dairy farmers will have a choice produce a calf that is worth 2-300+ at 4-6 weeks or a calf that a lad will take off there hands at eight week. Is the cow making that 300 euro more in extra milk in 8 weeks

    The problem is not 30k calves being slaughtered it's 300k+ calves being slaughtered post 2024 if slaughter age was left at 10-14 days.

    Yes farmers rearing calves are getting fewer and fewer. A lot of that is down to calves going I to the mart at 10-14 days instead of 20-25 days 5+ years ago.

    Problem will be solved posted 2024. I be willing to take some of the poorer cross at 7-8 weeks if they are good and strong.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,212 ✭✭✭Good loser


    I have reared calves for 40 plus years. I like calves as much as anyone. The slaughter of calves does not bother me. Just see it as the simplest route in the Irish set up to reducing GHG emissions. If THEY want a cut of 25% let THEM accept the consequences.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    We will have no problem with GHG emissions of we slaughter 2-300k+ calves a year as we will not be sell any milk to the higher priced markets

    In NZ they are stopping once a day feeding until after 3 weeks of age. The bobby calf system is starting to come under pressure as well

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,086 ✭✭✭alps


    We don't sell milk to any higher priced market though. Bar Kerrygold butter, our products are often indistinguishable to the eventual consumer, be they used as ingredients or otherwise.

    The consumer for the vast majority of our product depend on the user of our ingredients to look after the etethical dimension tonthe product.

    It's interesting that some vocal in their defense of the use of calves for food run farm tours and don't shy from letting the visitors in on the outlet being available and used.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭QA1


    i won’t be rearing calves next year anyway reared calves the last good few years the calves I get are harder reared every year I get them of the 1 farmer every year he keeps getting biggger calves are not as well looks after they all get beastings but he has not them time to do as good a job and the calf shed get full so they have to go and another issue is AI the cows he has now are short gestation them selves and using short gestation on them they all calving before there time calves not as hardy I think anyway justice my thoughts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,823 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    150 for Hereford and Angus calves out of yard atm to farmers. No problem selling. Also 3 different dealers looking for Friesian bulls which I have none, edited to say I would never sell a calf in a mart



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭green daries


    Your so far out of touch with the new reality of what the powers that be are pushing for its nearly laughable. They would prefer us to have to keep our calves to slaughter as for grassland management..... that's only going one way........... backwards I'm afraid



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Is it the powers that be are out of touch or a small cohort of dairy farmers that have there heads stuck in the sand.

    Do you think that there will be no reaction by the public if 2-300k calves are being slaughtered.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
Advertisement